Step 1
Prove the group is editable by the next author
Zotero separates a group library from each member's personal library. Group type, library-reading, library-editing and file-editing settings answer different questions. A visible record is not proof that another member can change it.
- Name control and permissions
- Record the group owner, an administrator or successor route, group visibility and who can edit records or files. Check the group's actual settings, not a member's assumptions. Do not make a private research library public to solve an access problem.
- Ask a second author to act
- Have the next author open the intended group library, find a named record, correct a harmless test field, and confirm whether an attachment is actually available. If editing or file access fails, fix the permission or document the approved alternative before drafting at scale.
Check the source
- Zotero: Groups · Group Types; Members Settings; Library Settings; Interact With Groups Through the Zotero Client
Step 2
Repair records without collapsing distinct works
Zotero's duplicate detector identifies candidates within a library. Its merge action retains information used by collections and citation plugins; deleting a candidate is not equivalent.
- Inspect before merging
- Check title, authors, DOI, publication type and version. A preprint and a journal article, or a study report and its correction, may be related but distinct records.
- Separate metadata from support
- Correct bibliographic fields against the source. Separately read whether the source supports the manuscript's actual claim, population and degree of certainty. A resolving DOI does not perform that check.
Check the source
- Zotero: Duplicate Detection · Merging duplicates
Step 3
Run a full citation-to-claim test
Fictional case: three authors prepare a biomedical narrative review. The second author can initially read but not edit their private Zotero group. After the group administrator fixes that permission, the author corrects a test record and refreshes the editable Word draft. A separate claim still needs repair.
- Check the document mechanism
- Change the test item's year in the shared record, then use Zotero Refresh in the editable Word master. Confirm the citation and bibliography update. Zotero warns that Unlink Citations removes active fields irreversibly, so retain the linked master and make any final plain-text copy separately.
- Check what the source supports
- The fictional draft claims a survival benefit, but its cited laboratory paper measures only a biomarker response. Narrow the sentence or find direct evidence for the clinical claim. Record the checked version and responsible author; a refreshed bibliography cannot make the claim true.
Check the source
- Zotero: Using the Word Plugin · Zotero Plugin Tab; Refresh; Unlink Citations
Step 4
Separate an export, a backup and the submitted master
Zotero says export and re-import are not an exact backup: they can reset dates and break links to word-processor citations. Sync stores the latest server state, not a restorable history. Treat each handoff object according to its real purpose.
- Keep a recovery route
- Use an approved, versioned backup of the complete Zotero data directory or an institutional backup service. Confirm whether attachment files exist locally before promising they are included. Test recovery only on a safe copy, never the sole working library.
- Freeze a traceable submission set
- Save a dated reference export as a snapshot beside the submitted manuscript and source-check notes. Keep the linked editable master and record its location and owner. Ask the next author to repeat the open-edit-refresh test; do not call the snapshot a backup.
Check the source
- Zotero: The Data Directory · Backing Up Your Zotero Data; attachment downloads; export warning
- Zotero: Using the Word Plugin · Zotero Plugin Tab; Refresh; Unlink Citations