Compare the instructions that change a submission package.
Choose two journals from the maintained pilot. Each card preserves the official source, date checked, and evidence status, so you can see a concrete difference without mistaking it for a recommendation or a complete checklist.
This is a practical comparison aid, not a journal fit or acceptance assessment. Verify the current publisher instructions before you submit.
Focused comparison
Put two submission paths side by side.
Use this only to identify the package-changing difference in the pilot records. It does not rate journals, estimate acceptance, or replace the live author instructions.
vs
PhysicsOfficial page verified
Physical Review X
American Physical Society
Featured package difference
Prepare the PRX nontechnical Popular Summary and provide the research-data availability details required by Physical Review journals.
Summary for non-specialistsData statement
Checked against the PRX information-for-authors page.
A side-by-side view is a starting point, not the final rule.
01
Follow the source
Open the live publisher page for each selected journal. It remains the administrative authority, even where the pilot record is marked verified.
02
Keep the context
The observable difference is deliberately narrow: one package-changing requirement per journal, not a complete set of author instructions.
03
Reuse with attribution
Share the generated link, briefing note, or embeddable visual with version and evidence boundaries intact. Original Manusights classifications are reusable under CC BY 4.0.