Skip to main content
Official-source directoryPilot v1.5

Find the journal rule that changes your submission.

Search 21 journals across 15 publishers. Each record names one package-changing instruction, links its official source, and shows when that source was checked.

Reviewed Aug 31, 2026. This pilot is not a complete directory or a submission-compliance check. Recheck the live publisher instructions before acting. Compare two journals when the distinction matters.

21 journals / one highlighted difference each

Search the pilot

Search by journal, publisher, field, or requirement. The requirement text summarizes the cited publisher page; the type labels are Manusights classifications added for comparison.

Showing 6 of 21 matching journals for a faster first read
Download pilot CSV
PhysicsVerified

Physical Review X

American Physical Society

Summary for non-specialistsData statement

Prepare the PRX nontechnical Popular Summary and provide the research-data availability details required by Physical Review journals.

Checked against the PRX information-for-authors page.

Source reviewed
Ecology & climateVerified

Global Change Biology

Wiley

Data statement

Include a data availability statement; the journal says it will cover Dryad archiving charges for published papers when authors use Dryad.

Checked against the journal author-guidelines page.

Source reviewed
Energy researchVerified

Nature Energy

Springer Nature

Submission routeArticle structure

Primary research manuscripts cannot use a presubmission enquiry; choose the correct content type and follow its separate formatting instructions.

Checked against the journal submission-guidelines collection.

Source reviewed
ComputingVerified

ACM Computing Surveys

Association for Computing Machinery

Article structure

Submit a survey or tutorial: a long survey must organize recent results in a novel way that integrates and adds understanding, while a tutorial introduces the field for an inexpert audience.

Verified in a live rendered check of the official ACM Computing Surveys Author Guidelines, including the paper-type definitions and manuscript-preparation instructions.

Source reviewed
MultidisciplinaryVerified

Heliyon

Elsevier

Scope routing

Choose the correct disciplinary section and confirm that the work fits Heliyon's scientific scope; arts humanities and law are routed elsewhere.

Checked against the official journal page and its disciplinary routing.

Source reviewed
Materials scienceVerified

Mechanics of Materials

Elsevier

HighlightsData statement

Submit 3–5 highlights of no more than 85 characters each and a required data availability statement under Elsevier's Option C instructions.

Checked against the journal Guide for Authors.

Source reviewed

Use this directory to spot the submission-specific difference. The publisher page remains the final source of truth.

Download and cite

Use the evidence without losing its limits

The downloadable records preserve the official source, review date, verification status, and canonical guide owner. Cite the pilot as a dataset and keep its coverage caveat attached.

Manusights. (2026). Journal Requirements Observatory (Version 1.5) [Data set]. https://manusights.com/research/journal-requirements-observatory

CC BY 4.0 applies to the Manusights comparison and classifications. The Manusights classifications and comparative dataset are reusable with attribution. Publisher instructions, trademarks, and linked source content remain owned by their respective publishers.

Manusights open research

One publishing system, three evidence layers

Use the asset that matches the question you are trying to answer. Each layer publishes its scope, evidence status, review date, and limitations.

  1. Layer 1Maintained public study

    Where do the official rules live?

    Journal Submission Source Map

    Trace the journal, publisher, society, and policy pages an author must reconcile before submission.

    Coverage
    30 journals · 90 official sources
    Version and review date
    v1.8 · reviewed 2026-08-28

    Indexable, downloadable, versioned, and open for reuse under CC BY 4.0.

    Trace the source paths
  2. Layer 2You are here

    What changes from journal to journal?

    Journal Requirements Observatory

    Compare the package-changing requirement, official evidence, and verification status for each journal in the pilot.

    Coverage
    21 journals · 15 publishers
    Version and review date
    v1.5 · reviewed 2026-08-31

    Indexable, downloadable, and intentionally scoped as a pilot rather than a complete directory.

    Current dataset
  3. Layer 3Calibration release

    Can researchers find support at their institution?

    Research Publishing Support Observatory

    Audit the public support infrastructure that helps researchers move from literature search through publication.

    Coverage
    187 institutions · 50 first-pass audits
    Version and review date
    2026.09-public-calibration-1 · reviewed 2026-09-15

    Not indexed until independent review and the institutional correction window are complete. Downloadable and bounded to 50 nonrepresentative evidence profiles within the complete R1 universe.

    Inspect the calibration study

Make this evidence useful

Choose what you need next.

Use the study in a LibGuide or workshop, find the practical help for your own paper, or learn the underlying publishing workflow.

All open research

Evidence contract

Built to be checked, corrected, and cited

The value is not the row count. It is the visible chain from an author’s decision to the publisher evidence behind it. We publish the uncertainty when a source cannot be fully accessed: 21 of 21 official pages were fully accessible at review.

01

Start with the official page

We record the journal or publisher page that governs the requirement, not a third-party summary.

02

Find the package-changing detail

We isolate the instruction that changes what an author prepares, selects, declares, or submits.

03

Keep provenance visible

Every record carries its source, review date, evidence status, and canonical Manusights guide.

What this can answer

Three decisions the dataset supports

Before drafting files

What extra artifact does this journal expect?

Surface a popular summary, highlights file, data statement, or journal-specific structure before the upload begins.

Before choosing a route

Is there a journal-specific submission constraint?

Catch content-type, disciplinary-section, or presubmission restrictions that a generic checklist misses.

Before final review

Which source should settle a contradiction?

Go directly to the current publisher page instead of relying on an undated blog or a sibling journal’s rules.

Continue the workflow

Check the manuscript, not only the upload package.

Once the administrative requirements are clear, use the Free Readiness Scan to find evidence, fit, and presentation risks that can still stop the paper before peer review.

Check my readiness

Verify before you act

Compare the patterns, then open the official source behind the rule.

Requirements comparisons show useful differences, but the current journal or publisher instruction governs the real submission. Use the Source Map to trace that source.