Skip to main content

Free teaching resource

Compare the requirement that changes the submission.

A printable 25-minute workshop for librarians, writing centers, graduate seminars, and research offices. Learners compare two candidate journals around one real decision and leave with a source-backed next action.

PDF · No login · CC BY 4.0 · Version 1.5 · Reviewed 2026-08-31

Two designed files

Everything needed to run the activity.

The web page is the overview. The downloadable PDFs are the teaching materials learners and facilitators can actually use.

PDF · 5 pages

Facilitator guide

Preparation, timed lesson plan, answer guidance, discussion prompts, attribution, and scope boundaries.

Download facilitator guide
PDF · 2 pages

Learner worksheet

A spacious evidence record for comparing the source, requirement, package consequence, interpretation, and next verification.

Download learner worksheet

25-minute lesson

Move from lookup to publishing judgment.

Use an active manuscript when possible. The exercise compares a decision, not the overall quality of either journal.

  1. 0-4 min1

    Frame one real decision

    Choose an article type, disclosure, required file, or other instruction that could change the submission package.

  2. 4-9 min2

    Choose two candidate journals

    Use two plausible journals for the same manuscript and state what the team needs to decide.

  3. 9-17 min3

    Trace the official evidence

    Open each linked source and record what the instruction visibly requires, who owns it, and when it was checked.

  4. 17-22 min4

    Separate evidence from inference

    Distinguish the publisher instruction from the team interpretation and keep any unresolved question visible.

  5. 22-25 min5

    Leave a reproducible record

    Name the package consequence and the verification that must happen again before upload.

The evidence standard

The comparison must leave a trace.

The deliverable is not a journal verdict. It is a compact record a coauthor can inspect and repeat without relying on memory.

REQUIREMENT COMPARISON RECORD
Decision
What could change the package or route?
Evidence
What does each official source visibly require?
Interpretation
What will the research team do differently?
Uncertainty
What remains conditional or manuscript-specific?
Next check
What must be verified again before upload?

Adopt and reuse

Use it without a permission exchange.

Add the activity to a LibGuide, seminar, workshop, or researcher-support page. Keep the canonical link and version with the material.

Comparing Journal Submission Requirements (25 minutes). Learners use the Manusights Journal Requirements Observatory to compare two candidate journals around one submission-package decision. They trace each requirement to a current official source, distinguish a package-changing instruction from general guidance, and record the verification that must happen before a manuscript is submitted.
The live official journal or publisher page always controls the submission decision. The Observatory is a maintained pilot, not a complete directory, journal ranking, compliance certification, or acceptance prediction.
Built from the maintained Observatory.Version 1.5 · 21 journals · reviewed 2026-08-31
Open studyMethodologyDownload study CSV

Keep going

What do you need help with next?

Find another practical resource or follow a guided publishing path when you want deeper support across the process.