This packet lets a second reviewer independently check the official sources and all six first-pass assessments. It evaluates public discoverability, not institutional prestige, research quality, or the private quality of services.
Reviewer declaration
Reviewer name and affiliation: __________________________________
Relevant expertise: ____________________________________________
Conflict with this institution: □ None □ Described below
Conflict note: _________________________________________________
Independence confirmed: □ Yes □ No
Public attribution consent: □ Yes □ No
First-pass summary
Carnegie Mellon is strongest in data-intensive and digital research support, backed by actionable consultation services.
Research-data support spans planning, active work, sharing, preservation, and compliance.
Create a single visible path from manuscript readiness through journal choice, rights, and dissemination.
Dimension review
Confirm only when the note is supported by the cited institution-owned pages. A missing public signal means it was not discoverable in the reviewed evidence, not that the service does not exist.
A researcher can find a coherent support hub, subject expertise, and a clear route to help.
The services overview surfaces data, digital scholarship, consultations, and research support, though publishing help is distributed.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
The institution offers practical help with searching, evidence synthesis, citations, and research discovery.
Subject help and research consultations are visible; evidence-synthesis support is not a central cross-disciplinary offer.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can find guidance for writing, reporting, publication strategy, and preparing work for submission.
Digital scholarship and research workflows support production, with modest public manuscript-submission guidance.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Public support covers publishing options, open access, rights, repositories, and author-cost questions.
Repository, open scholarship, copyright, and publishing support are available across library services.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can access data-management, reproducibility, research-integrity, and responsible-AI guidance.
Data planning, sharing, preservation, and reproducible research receive detailed lifecycle coverage.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Help is actionable through consultations, workshops, templates, accessible pages, and current maintenance.
Consultations and service request routes make specialist help actionable.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Official evidence review
The services hub connects consultations, digital scholarship, data, publishing, and research tools.
Supports: Findability, Evidence, Manuscript, Publishing, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
The library supports data-management plans, documentation, sharing, repositories, and funder compliance.
Supports: Integrity and data, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
Independent outcome
Outcome: □ Confirmed □ Corrected
Required note: ________________________________________________________________
Official evidence supporting any correction: _______________________________________
Reviewed on (YYYY-MM-DD): __________________