What it measures
Publicly discoverable support infrastructure, not research quality, prestige, or faculty performance.
The Manusights Research Publishing Support Observatory maps how clearly U.S. R1 universities help researchers move from finding evidence to publishing trustworthy work.
Publicly discoverable support infrastructure, not research quality, prestige, or faculty performance.
Start with the six dimension profiles and their official evidence. The composite is a secondary methodology check, not the product.
The evidence floor is complete, but independent second review and the institutional correction window have not happened yet.
Institution profile browser
Reviewed institutions show their strongest public support dimensions and the official evidence behind every assessment. The remaining R1 institutions stay visible as awaiting review rather than receiving an inferred profile.
Showing 12 of 50 matching profiles
ASU presents research and publishing support as one connected journey, with especially clear routes to consultations, publication strategy, and public-access compliance.
Standout signal: One coherent researcher-support entry point spanning project planning through dissemination.
Boston University provides a solid research-help foundation with clear repository and open-publishing infrastructure.
Standout signal: OpenBU gives researchers a visible institutional route to preserve and share scholarship.
Brown exposes a connected research-support journey with particularly strong publishing, rights, data, and consultation services.
Standout signal: A central hub routes researchers from evidence discovery through publication and preservation.
Carnegie Mellon is strongest in data-intensive and digital research support, backed by actionable consultation services.
Standout signal: Research-data support spans planning, active work, sharing, preservation, and compliance.
Case Western offers credible data and librarian support, with the public research-publishing journey spread across units.
Standout signal: The research-data hub gives researchers a practical cross-campus route for stewardship and compliance.
Columbia combines strong data stewardship with substantial open-scholarship and publishing infrastructure.
Standout signal: The Libraries support more than 30 open-access scholarly journals with publishing infrastructure and consultation.
Cornell makes an unusually broad set of research-support services discoverable, including evidence synthesis and AI literacy in addition to publishing and copyright help.
Standout signal: Evidence synthesis and AI critical literacy are visible alongside conventional publishing support.
Duke provides a mature distributed support system spanning discovery, data stewardship, publishing rights, and preservation.
Standout signal: Research-data and scholarly-communication services are both established and consultation-led.
Emory combines robust data services with strong scholarly-communication support and direct expert access.
Standout signal: Publishing rights and data stewardship are both supported by identifiable specialist services.
Georgetown offers dependable research and data support, with publishing help spread across multiple institutional units.
Standout signal: Library and research-office routes together cover both discovery and data-compliance needs.
Georgia Tech provides an especially actionable research and data-support pathway, with room to strengthen manuscript-stage visibility.
Standout signal: Clear consultation and instruction routes connect researchers quickly to data and subject expertise.
Harvard exposes a deep support network across research discovery, data, repositories, scholarly communication, and consultations, though the experience spans several university units.
Standout signal: A broad, well-connected infrastructure for data stewardship and sharing research outputs.
The evidence model
A missing public signal is not proof that a university offers no support. It means a researcher could not reliably discover that support through the reviewed official pages. Institutions can submit corrections before the full edition is released.
How profiles are verified
Official pages, explicit observations, correction history.
A weighted composite remains in the downloadable data so the method is reproducible, but profiles are not ordered or presented as a league table.
A researcher can find a coherent support hub, subject expertise, and a clear route to help.
The institution offers practical help with searching, evidence synthesis, citations, and research discovery.
Researchers can find guidance for writing, reporting, publication strategy, and preparing work for submission.
Public support covers publishing options, open access, rights, repositories, and author-cost questions.
Researchers can access data-management, reproducibility, research-integrity, and responsible-AI guidance.
Help is actionable through consultations, workshops, templates, accessible pages, and current maintenance.
Reuse and citation
Original Manusights assessments are released under CC BY 4.0. The R1 sampling frame is based on the Carnegie Classifications 2025 Research Activity Designations, whose source terms continue to apply to Carnegie-derived fields.
Manusights. (2026). Research Publishing Support Observatory: methodology calibration release. https://manusights.com/resources/research-publishing-support-index
Release discipline
Commercial relationships, product use, and sponsorship do not affect inclusion, evidence selection, scoring, correction handling, or recognition bands.
Version 2026.08-calibration-3 · Reviewed 2026-08-28
Manusights open research
Use the asset that matches the question you are trying to answer. Each layer publishes its scope, evidence status, review date, and limitations.
Where do the official rules live?
Trace the journal, publisher, society, and policy pages an author must reconcile before submission.
Indexable, downloadable, versioned, and open for reuse under CC BY 4.0.
Trace the source pathsWhat changes from journal to journal?
Compare the package-changing requirement, official evidence, and verification status for each journal in the pilot.
Indexable, downloadable, and intentionally scoped as a pilot rather than a complete directory.
Compare the requirementsCan researchers find support at their institution?
Audit the public support infrastructure that helps researchers move from literature search through publication.
Not indexed until independent review and the institutional correction window are complete.
Current datasetFor courses and practical guides, continue to the free Manusights Academy.