This packet lets a second reviewer independently check the official sources and all six first-pass assessments. It evaluates public discoverability, not institutional prestige, research quality, or the private quality of services.
Reviewer declaration
Reviewer name and affiliation: __________________________________
Relevant expertise: ____________________________________________
Conflict with this institution: □ None □ Described below
Conflict note: _________________________________________________
Independence confirmed: □ Yes □ No
Public attribution consent: □ Yes □ No
First-pass summary
Case Western offers credible data and librarian support, with the public research-publishing journey spread across units.
The research-data hub gives researchers a practical cross-campus route for stewardship and compliance.
Unify evidence synthesis, manuscript preparation, journal strategy, and publishing rights on one public path.
Dimension review
Confirm only when the note is supported by the cited institution-owned pages. A missing public signal means it was not discoverable in the reviewed evidence, not that the service does not exist.
A researcher can find a coherent support hub, subject expertise, and a clear route to help.
Faculty research help and data support are discoverable, but the cross-campus publishing journey is not fully unified.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
The institution offers practical help with searching, evidence synthesis, citations, and research discovery.
Librarian consultations and research tools support evidence discovery, with synthesis services less explicit.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can find guidance for writing, reporting, publication strategy, and preparing work for submission.
Research and writing support are available, while manuscript submission guidance is distributed.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Public support covers publishing options, open access, rights, repositories, and author-cost questions.
Copyright, open access, and repository support are present but not presented as one end-to-end workflow.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can access data-management, reproducibility, research-integrity, and responsible-AI guidance.
A university research-data hub provides clear planning, storage, sharing, and compliance guidance.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Help is actionable through consultations, workshops, templates, accessible pages, and current maintenance.
Consultation routes exist, though reusable researcher-facing templates could be more visible.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Official evidence review
The official hub connects data planning, storage, security, sharing, preservation, and institutional services.
Supports: Findability, Integrity and data, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
Faculty can access research consultations, instruction, citation support, and scholarly communication help.
Supports: Evidence, Manuscript, Publishing, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
Independent outcome
Outcome: □ Confirmed □ Corrected
Required note: ________________________________________________________________
Official evidence supporting any correction: _______________________________________
Reviewed on (YYYY-MM-DD): __________________