This packet lets a second reviewer independently check the official sources and all six first-pass assessments. It evaluates public discoverability, not institutional prestige, research quality, or the private quality of services.
Reviewer declaration
Reviewer name and affiliation: __________________________________
Relevant expertise: ____________________________________________
Conflict with this institution: □ None □ Described below
Conflict note: _________________________________________________
Independence confirmed: □ Yes □ No
Public attribution consent: □ Yes □ No
First-pass summary
Columbia combines strong data stewardship with substantial open-scholarship and publishing infrastructure.
The Libraries support more than 30 open-access scholarly journals with publishing infrastructure and consultation.
Present the distributed services as one researcher-facing publication journey with clearer manuscript-stage guidance.
Dimension review
Confirm only when the note is supported by the cited institution-owned pages. A missing public signal means it was not discoverable in the reviewed evidence, not that the service does not exist.
A researcher can find a coherent support hub, subject expertise, and a clear route to help.
Research data and open-scholarship services are visible, though the full support journey is spread across several hubs.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
The institution offers practical help with searching, evidence synthesis, citations, and research discovery.
Specialists support data discovery, analysis, and research consultations; systematic-review support is less central in the reviewed pages.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can find guidance for writing, reporting, publication strategy, and preparing work for submission.
Publishing platforms and project-workflow training support scholarly production, with limited public submission-checklist detail.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Public support covers publishing options, open access, rights, repositories, and author-cost questions.
Open-access publishing infrastructure, journal partnerships, and dissemination support are unusually concrete.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can access data-management, reproducibility, research-integrity, and responsible-AI guidance.
Data planning, secure infrastructure, publishing, citation, and preservation are covered across the research lifecycle.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Help is actionable through consultations, workshops, templates, accessible pages, and current maintenance.
Consultations and tailored instruction offer clear routes to expert help.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Official evidence review
The Libraries offer consultations and training for collecting, managing, publishing, sharing, and preserving research data.
Supports: Findability, Evidence, Integrity and data, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
Columbia provides technical publishing support and hosts open-access journal and research-communication partnerships.
Supports: Manuscript, Publishing, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
Independent outcome
Outcome: □ Confirmed □ Corrected
Required note: ________________________________________________________________
Official evidence supporting any correction: _______________________________________
Reviewed on (YYYY-MM-DD): __________________