This packet lets a second reviewer independently check the official sources and all six first-pass assessments. It evaluates public discoverability, not institutional prestige, research quality, or the private quality of services.
Reviewer declaration
Reviewer name and affiliation: __________________________________
Relevant expertise: ____________________________________________
Conflict with this institution: □ None □ Described below
Conflict note: _________________________________________________
Independence confirmed: □ Yes □ No
Public attribution consent: □ Yes □ No
First-pass summary
Emory combines robust data services with strong scholarly-communication support and direct expert access.
Publishing rights and data stewardship are both supported by identifiable specialist services.
Present manuscript readiness and journal-selection help more explicitly in the cross-disciplinary pathway.
Dimension review
Confirm only when the note is supported by the cited institution-owned pages. A missing public signal means it was not discoverable in the reviewed evidence, not that the service does not exist.
A researcher can find a coherent support hub, subject expertise, and a clear route to help.
Research data and scholarly communication services are easy to locate, though the broader journey spans several pages.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
The institution offers practical help with searching, evidence synthesis, citations, and research discovery.
Research consultations and evidence-oriented support are available, with strong health-sciences depth.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can find guidance for writing, reporting, publication strategy, and preparing work for submission.
Publishing and research support help authors prepare outputs, while general submission-stage templates are less visible.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Public support covers publishing options, open access, rights, repositories, and author-cost questions.
Scholarly communications covers open access, copyright, author rights, and publication choices.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can access data-management, reproducibility, research-integrity, and responsible-AI guidance.
Data support includes planning, organization, sharing, repositories, and responsible stewardship.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Help is actionable through consultations, workshops, templates, accessible pages, and current maintenance.
Consultations, training, and specialist contacts offer practical access.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Official evidence review
The official service supports data discovery, management, analysis, sharing, preservation, and consultation.
Supports: Findability, Evidence, Integrity and data, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
The program advises on copyright, author rights, open access, publishing options, and research impact.
Supports: Manuscript, Publishing, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
Independent outcome
Outcome: □ Confirmed □ Corrected
Required note: ________________________________________________________________
Official evidence supporting any correction: _______________________________________
Reviewed on (YYYY-MM-DD): __________________