This packet lets a second reviewer independently check the official sources and all six first-pass assessments. It evaluates public discoverability, not institutional prestige, research quality, or the private quality of services.
Reviewer declaration
Reviewer name and affiliation: __________________________________
Relevant expertise: ____________________________________________
Conflict with this institution: □ None □ Described below
Conflict note: _________________________________________________
Independence confirmed: □ Yes □ No
Public attribution consent: □ Yes □ No
First-pass summary
Harvard exposes a deep support network across research discovery, data, repositories, scholarly communication, and consultations, though the experience spans several university units.
A broad, well-connected infrastructure for data stewardship and sharing research outputs.
Unify school-specific manuscript review and final-submission help into a clearer university-wide path.
Dimension review
Confirm only when the note is supported by the cited institution-owned pages. A missing public signal means it was not discoverable in the reviewed evidence, not that the service does not exist.
A researcher can find a coherent support hub, subject expertise, and a clear route to help.
A dedicated research-and-publishing hub organizes experts, tools, datasets, repositories, and partner services.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
The institution offers practical help with searching, evidence synthesis, citations, and research discovery.
Research consultations, subject experts, dataset discovery, citation tools, and professional-school review services are easy to find.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can find guidance for writing, reporting, publication strategy, and preparing work for submission.
Publishing and review support is visible, although final-submission guidance is distributed across units.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Public support covers publishing options, open access, rights, repositories, and author-cost questions.
Repositories, scholarly communication, copyright help, ORCID, and sharing infrastructure are prominent.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can access data-management, reproducibility, research-integrity, and responsible-AI guidance.
Data plans, data consultations, Dataverse, and OSF cover much of the reproducible research lifecycle.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Help is actionable through consultations, workshops, templates, accessible pages, and current maintenance.
Personal consultations and specialist routes are clear; some services remain school-specific.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Official evidence review
The official hub links consultations, subject specialists, data help, publishing review services, repositories, citation tools, ORCID, OSF, and copyright resources.
Supports: Findability, Evidence, Manuscript, Publishing, Integrity and data, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
Independent outcome
Outcome: □ Confirmed □ Corrected
Required note: ________________________________________________________________
Official evidence supporting any correction: _______________________________________
Reviewed on (YYYY-MM-DD): __________________