This packet lets a second reviewer independently check the official sources and all six first-pass assessments. It evaluates public discoverability, not institutional prestige, research quality, or the private quality of services.
Reviewer declaration
Reviewer name and affiliation: __________________________________
Relevant expertise: ____________________________________________
Conflict with this institution: □ None □ Described below
Conflict note: _________________________________________________
Independence confirmed: □ Yes □ No
Public attribution consent: □ Yes □ No
First-pass summary
Michigan State provides particularly transparent data and open-publishing support, backed by liaison and reference services.
The public open-access agreements and decision support make author costs and eligibility unusually concrete.
Add a central manuscript-preparation path that connects existing discovery, data, and publishing services.
Dimension review
Confirm only when the note is supported by the cited institution-owned pages. A missing public signal means it was not discoverable in the reviewed evidence, not that the service does not exist.
A researcher can find a coherent support hub, subject expertise, and a clear route to help.
Reference, data, and scholarly-communication services are discoverable, but the journey is distributed.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
The institution offers practical help with searching, evidence synthesis, citations, and research discovery.
Liaison librarians, research help, and citation tools are visible; structured evidence synthesis is less prominent.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can find guidance for writing, reporting, publication strategy, and preparing work for submission.
Research workflow and publishing guidance exist, with limited central manuscript-submission support.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Public support covers publishing options, open access, rights, repositories, and author-cost questions.
Open-access agreements, author rights, peer review, costs, and repositories are covered in detail.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can access data-management, reproducibility, research-integrity, and responsible-AI guidance.
Data-management guidance spans planning, collection, publishing, reuse, and long-term storage.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Help is actionable through consultations, workshops, templates, accessible pages, and current maintenance.
Consultations, training, chat, and liaison contacts provide multiple access routes.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Official evidence review
The official service covers data planning, collection, analysis, publishing, reuse, preservation, and consultation.
Supports: Findability, Integrity and data, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
The library describes support for author rights, peer review, access, publishing costs, copyright, and compliance.
Supports: Evidence, Manuscript, Publishing
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
Independent outcome
Outcome: □ Confirmed □ Corrected
Required note: ________________________________________________________________
Official evidence supporting any correction: _______________________________________
Reviewed on (YYYY-MM-DD): __________________