This packet lets a second reviewer independently check the official sources and all six first-pass assessments. It evaluates public discoverability, not institutional prestige, research quality, or the private quality of services.
Reviewer declaration
Reviewer name and affiliation: __________________________________
Relevant expertise: ____________________________________________
Conflict with this institution: □ None □ Described below
Conflict note: _________________________________________________
Independence confirmed: □ Yes □ No
Public attribution consent: □ Yes □ No
First-pass summary
Northwestern combines a coherent general research hub with unusually deep health-sciences evidence and data support.
Systematic-review and DataLab services provide concrete, expert-led support beyond basic research help.
Unify school-specific manuscript and publishing help into a single institution-wide pathway.
Dimension review
Confirm only when the note is supported by the cited institution-owned pages. A missing public signal means it was not discoverable in the reviewed evidence, not that the service does not exist.
A researcher can find a coherent support hub, subject expertise, and a clear route to help.
Research and teaching support is centralized, with health-sciences services adding substantial specialist depth.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
The institution offers practical help with searching, evidence synthesis, citations, and research discovery.
Consultations, systematic-review help, and discipline-specific evidence support are publicly visible.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can find guidance for writing, reporting, publication strategy, and preparing work for submission.
Research support and scholarly communication cover preparation and dissemination, though submission templates vary by unit.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Public support covers publishing options, open access, rights, repositories, and author-cost questions.
Open access, copyright, repositories, and publication guidance are available across the library system.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can access data-management, reproducibility, research-integrity, and responsible-AI guidance.
DataLab and research-data services support planning, analysis, sharing, reproducibility, and training.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Help is actionable through consultations, workshops, templates, accessible pages, and current maintenance.
Consultations, workshops, and direct specialist access are exceptionally clear.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Official evidence review
The official hub connects research consultations, subject specialists, data, citation, copyright, and teaching support.
Supports: Findability, Evidence, Manuscript, Publishing, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
The health-sciences library offers systematic-review, data, metrics, and research consultations.
Supports: Evidence, Manuscript, Integrity and data, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
Independent outcome
Outcome: □ Confirmed □ Corrected
Required note: ________________________________________________________________
Official evidence supporting any correction: _______________________________________
Reviewed on (YYYY-MM-DD): __________________