This packet lets a second reviewer independently check the official sources and all six first-pass assessments. It evaluates public discoverability, not institutional prestige, research quality, or the private quality of services.
Reviewer declaration
Reviewer name and affiliation: __________________________________
Relevant expertise: ____________________________________________
Conflict with this institution: □ None □ Described below
Conflict note: _________________________________________________
Independence confirmed: □ Yes □ No
Public attribution consent: □ Yes □ No
First-pass summary
UC Irvine offers strong digital and data support, with the overall manuscript-to-publication journey spread across services.
Data-management plan support connects institutional infrastructure to funder requirements.
Create a visible cross-campus path for manuscript readiness, journal choice, rights, and dissemination.
Dimension review
Confirm only when the note is supported by the cited institution-owned pages. A missing public signal means it was not discoverable in the reviewed evidence, not that the service does not exist.
A researcher can find a coherent support hub, subject expertise, and a clear route to help.
Digital scholarship and data-management services are visible, while broader author support is distributed.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
The institution offers practical help with searching, evidence synthesis, citations, and research discovery.
Research and digital-scholarship consultations support discovery and methods; synthesis support is less prominent.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can find guidance for writing, reporting, publication strategy, and preparing work for submission.
Digital projects and scholarly outputs receive support, with limited centralized manuscript-submission guidance.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Public support covers publishing options, open access, rights, repositories, and author-cost questions.
Repository, open access, copyright, and scholarly-communication services are available.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can access data-management, reproducibility, research-integrity, and responsible-AI guidance.
Data-management support covers plans, storage, security, sharing, preservation, and funder compliance.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Help is actionable through consultations, workshops, templates, accessible pages, and current maintenance.
Consultations and project support provide practical routes to expertise.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Official evidence review
The library supports digital research, project planning, publishing, repositories, and scholarly communication.
Supports: Findability, Evidence, Manuscript, Publishing, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
The university provides help with data-management plans, storage, sharing, security, preservation, and compliance.
Supports: Integrity and data, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
Independent outcome
Outcome: □ Confirmed □ Corrected
Required note: ________________________________________________________________
Official evidence supporting any correction: _______________________________________
Reviewed on (YYYY-MM-DD): __________________