This packet lets a second reviewer independently check the official sources and all six first-pass assessments. It evaluates public discoverability, not institutional prestige, research quality, or the private quality of services.
Reviewer declaration
Reviewer name and affiliation: __________________________________
Relevant expertise: ____________________________________________
Conflict with this institution: □ None □ Described below
Conflict note: _________________________________________________
Independence confirmed: □ Yes □ No
Public attribution consent: □ Yes □ No
First-pass summary
Minnesota combines unusually detailed research-data services with substantive library publishing infrastructure.
Researchers can receive expert review of a data-management plan within three business days and deposit in a curated repository.
Add an equally concrete manuscript-readiness and journal-submission service-level pathway.
Dimension review
Confirm only when the note is supported by the cited institution-owned pages. A missing public signal means it was not discoverable in the reviewed evidence, not that the service does not exist.
A researcher can find a coherent support hub, subject expertise, and a clear route to help.
Research-data and publishing services are clearly organized and cross-linked within the Libraries.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
The institution offers practical help with searching, evidence synthesis, citations, and research discovery.
Data discovery, subject support, citations, and consultations aid evidence work; synthesis depth varies by field.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can find guidance for writing, reporting, publication strategy, and preparing work for submission.
Publishing consultations and research support help scholarly production, though general submission checklists are less prominent.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Public support covers publishing options, open access, rights, repositories, and author-cost questions.
Publishing Services supports consultations and university-hosted journals, books, and dynamic scholarship.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can access data-management, reproducibility, research-integrity, and responsible-AI guidance.
Research-data services provide training, consultations, plan review, curation, repository deposit, ethics, and FAIR support.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Help is actionable through consultations, workshops, templates, accessible pages, and current maintenance.
Researchers can request training, consultations, and three-business-day data-plan feedback.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Official evidence review
The service provides education, consultations, plan feedback, data discovery, curation, sharing, and a trusted repository.
Supports: Findability, Evidence, Integrity and data, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
The Libraries provide publishing consultations and publish journals, books, serials, and educational works.
Supports: Manuscript, Publishing, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
Independent outcome
Outcome: □ Confirmed □ Corrected
Required note: ________________________________________________________________
Official evidence supporting any correction: _______________________________________
Reviewed on (YYYY-MM-DD): __________________