This packet lets a second reviewer independently check the official sources and all six first-pass assessments. It evaluates public discoverability, not institutional prestige, research quality, or the private quality of services.
Reviewer declaration
Reviewer name and affiliation: __________________________________
Relevant expertise: ____________________________________________
Conflict with this institution: □ None □ Described below
Conflict note: _________________________________________________
Independence confirmed: □ Yes □ No
Public attribution consent: □ Yes □ No
First-pass summary
Penn presents one of the most complete public support pathways in the calibration set, including multidisciplinary evidence synthesis, publishing strategy, copyright, data, and direct manuscript contribution.
The advanced evidence-synthesis service can contribute searches, methods text, and manuscript review as part of the research team.
Bring responsible-AI and reproducibility guidance into the same central publishing workflow.
Dimension review
Confirm only when the note is supported by the cited institution-owned pages. A missing public signal means it was not discoverable in the reviewed evidence, not that the service does not exist.
A researcher can find a coherent support hub, subject expertise, and a clear route to help.
The research-and-scholarship hub connects subject experts, consultations, research guides, data, copyright, and publishing support.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
The institution offers practical help with searching, evidence synthesis, citations, and research discovery.
A multidisciplinary evidence-synthesis team offers consultations, search-strategy support, advanced searching, citation management, and methodological contribution.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can find guidance for writing, reporting, publication strategy, and preparing work for submission.
Publishing support covers venue selection, goals, preprints, citations, plagiarism, author profiles, contracts, workshops, and manuscript review within advanced synthesis collaborations.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Public support covers publishing options, open access, rights, repositories, and author-cost questions.
Open access, copyright advice, Creative Commons, publisher contracts, digital publishing, repositories, and venue evaluation are public and actionable.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can access data-management, reproducibility, research-integrity, and responsible-AI guidance.
Research-data management, evidence-synthesis methods, source evaluation, research design, and funder-policy workshops cover major integrity needs.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Help is actionable through consultations, workshops, templates, accessible pages, and current maintenance.
Subject librarians, matched consultations, live chat, workshops, online guides, and specialist services provide several routes to help.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Official evidence review
The official hub connects subject librarians, research guides, citations, scholarly communication, copyright, data management, publishing support, appointments, and chat.
Supports: Findability, Evidence, Manuscript, Publishing, Integrity and data, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
The service covers journal selection, publishing goals, open access, copyright, citation practice, licenses, preprints, contracts, author profiles, plagiarism, workshops, and consultations.
Supports: Manuscript, Publishing, Integrity and data, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
A cross-disciplinary team supports systematic and scoping reviews from search design through citation management, methods writing, manuscript review, and advanced collaboration.
Supports: Evidence, Manuscript, Integrity and data, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
Independent outcome
Outcome: □ Confirmed □ Corrected
Required note: ________________________________________________________________
Official evidence supporting any correction: _______________________________________
Reviewed on (YYYY-MM-DD): __________________