This packet lets a second reviewer independently check the official sources and all six first-pass assessments. It evaluates public discoverability, not institutional prestige, research quality, or the private quality of services.
Reviewer declaration
Reviewer name and affiliation: __________________________________
Relevant expertise: ____________________________________________
Conflict with this institution: □ None □ Described below
Conflict note: _________________________________________________
Independence confirmed: □ Yes □ No
Public attribution consent: □ Yes □ No
First-pass summary
Pittsburgh presents one of the clearest service catalogs in the sample, with evidence synthesis and data integrity as first-class offerings.
Evidence synthesis, author services, publishing, data, and impact are all named and directly accessible.
Add reusable journal-submission and reporting-guideline tools to the already coherent service catalog.
Dimension review
Confirm only when the note is supported by the cited institution-owned pages. A missing public signal means it was not discoverable in the reviewed evidence, not that the service does not exist.
A researcher can find a coherent support hub, subject expertise, and a clear route to help.
The services catalog makes evidence synthesis, data, publishing, impact, and consultations highly discoverable.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
The institution offers practical help with searching, evidence synthesis, citations, and research discovery.
Evidence synthesis is a named cross-disciplinary service alongside research consultations and citation tools.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can find guidance for writing, reporting, publication strategy, and preparing work for submission.
Author, publishing, impact, and digital-project services support scholarly preparation and dissemination.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Public support covers publishing options, open access, rights, repositories, and author-cost questions.
Open-access publishing, repositories, author services, and digital publishing are explicit offerings.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can access data-management, reproducibility, research-integrity, and responsible-AI guidance.
Data planning, privacy, ethics, version control, reproducibility, sharing, and preservation receive detailed support.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Help is actionable through consultations, workshops, templates, accessible pages, and current maintenance.
Consultations, workshops, and service snapshots give researchers clear next steps.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Official evidence review
The catalog lists evidence synthesis, author services, open-access publishing, research data, impact, and consultations.
Supports: Findability, Evidence, Manuscript, Publishing, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
The service covers data plans, privacy, ethics, reproducibility, version control, sharing, preservation, and training.
Supports: Integrity and data, Manuscript, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
Independent outcome
Outcome: □ Confirmed □ Corrected
Required note: ________________________________________________________________
Official evidence supporting any correction: _______________________________________
Reviewed on (YYYY-MM-DD): __________________