This packet lets a second reviewer independently check the official sources and all six first-pass assessments. It evaluates public discoverability, not institutional prestige, research quality, or the private quality of services.
Reviewer declaration
Reviewer name and affiliation: __________________________________
Relevant expertise: ____________________________________________
Conflict with this institution: □ None □ Described below
Conflict note: _________________________________________________
Independence confirmed: □ Yes □ No
Public attribution consent: □ Yes □ No
First-pass summary
Rochester organizes research support around the scholarly lifecycle and gives publishing strategy unusually practical visibility.
Academic SEO, publishing platforms, citations, rights, and open scholarship appear in one author-facing service.
Extend the strong publishing pathway with reporting-guideline and manuscript-submission readiness tools.
Dimension review
Confirm only when the note is supported by the cited institution-owned pages. A missing public signal means it was not discoverable in the reviewed evidence, not that the service does not exist.
A researcher can find a coherent support hub, subject expertise, and a clear route to help.
The research hub organizes planning, data, scholarly publishing, and specialist help around recognizable researcher tasks.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
The institution offers practical help with searching, evidence synthesis, citations, and research discovery.
Consultations, citation management, and data discovery support evidence work across disciplines.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can find guidance for writing, reporting, publication strategy, and preparing work for submission.
The scholarly-publishing pathway includes platforms, citations, academic SEO, rights, and consultation.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Public support covers publishing options, open access, rights, repositories, and author-cost questions.
Author rights, open scholarship, repositories, public-access compliance, and publishing platforms are explicit.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can access data-management, reproducibility, research-integrity, and responsible-AI guidance.
Data-management services support planning, storage, sharing, publishing, citation, and funder requirements.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Help is actionable through consultations, workshops, templates, accessible pages, and current maintenance.
Consultation routes are visible across research, data, and publishing services.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Official evidence review
The hub organizes planning, data, primary sources, scholarly publishing, and research consultations.
Supports: Findability, Evidence, Manuscript, Integrity and data, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
The service covers author rights, open scholarship, citation management, publishing platforms, academic SEO, and consultations.
Supports: Manuscript, Publishing, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
Independent outcome
Outcome: □ Confirmed □ Corrected
Required note: ________________________________________________________________
Official evidence supporting any correction: _______________________________________
Reviewed on (YYYY-MM-DD): __________________