This packet lets a second reviewer independently check the official sources and all six first-pass assessments. It evaluates public discoverability, not institutional prestige, research quality, or the private quality of services.
Reviewer declaration
Reviewer name and affiliation: __________________________________
Relevant expertise: ____________________________________________
Conflict with this institution: □ None □ Described below
Conflict note: _________________________________________________
Independence confirmed: □ Yes □ No
Public attribution consent: □ Yes □ No
First-pass summary
USC provides accessible subject and faculty research help, while its advanced publishing and data journey is less centralized.
Subject librarians offer a clear human entry point for research and discipline-specific support.
Build one visible advanced-research hub spanning synthesis, manuscript readiness, data, rights, and publishing.
Dimension review
Confirm only when the note is supported by the cited institution-owned pages. A missing public signal means it was not discoverable in the reviewed evidence, not that the service does not exist.
A researcher can find a coherent support hub, subject expertise, and a clear route to help.
Faculty research help and subject librarians are easy to find, while advanced publishing and data support are less unified publicly.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
The institution offers practical help with searching, evidence synthesis, citations, and research discovery.
Reference librarians, guides, and subject specialists support discovery and research strategy.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can find guidance for writing, reporting, publication strategy, and preparing work for submission.
Publishing-impact guidance is available, with limited central manuscript-preparation support.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Public support covers publishing options, open access, rights, repositories, and author-cost questions.
Open access, scholarly communication, copyright, and repositories are available but distributed.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can access data-management, reproducibility, research-integrity, and responsible-AI guidance.
Data-management and responsible-research support are present in specialist resources rather than one central lifecycle hub.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Help is actionable through consultations, workshops, templates, accessible pages, and current maintenance.
Ask-a-librarian and subject-specialist routes are clear, but advanced service navigation takes more effort.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Official evidence review
The official page connects faculty to research consultations, subject librarians, guides, journal and impact resources, and instructional support.
Supports: Findability, Evidence, Manuscript, Publishing, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
The library provides access to publishing, copyright, open-access, data-management, and repository guidance.
Supports: Publishing, Integrity and data
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
Independent outcome
Outcome: □ Confirmed □ Corrected
Required note: ________________________________________________________________
Official evidence supporting any correction: _______________________________________
Reviewed on (YYYY-MM-DD): __________________