This packet lets a second reviewer independently check the official sources and all six first-pass assessments. It evaluates public discoverability, not institutional prestige, research quality, or the private quality of services.
Reviewer declaration
Reviewer name and affiliation: __________________________________
Relevant expertise: ____________________________________________
Conflict with this institution: □ None □ Described below
Conflict note: _________________________________________________
Independence confirmed: □ Yes □ No
Public attribution consent: □ Yes □ No
First-pass summary
Wisconsin combines deep health-sciences evidence and data services with established open-scholarship support.
Dataset review and curation support go beyond planning to improve data intended for reuse and discovery.
Unify general and specialist services around one manuscript-to-publication journey.
Dimension review
Confirm only when the note is supported by the cited institution-owned pages. A missing public signal means it was not discoverable in the reviewed evidence, not that the service does not exist.
A researcher can find a coherent support hub, subject expertise, and a clear route to help.
Research and data support are visible across general and health-sciences libraries, though the full journey is distributed.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
The institution offers practical help with searching, evidence synthesis, citations, and research discovery.
Literature searching, systematic-review, and research-impact support provide strong evidence depth in specialist units.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can find guidance for writing, reporting, publication strategy, and preparing work for submission.
Publishing and research support aid authors, with submission guidance varying by discipline.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Public support covers publishing options, open access, rights, repositories, and author-cost questions.
Open access, scholarly communication, author agreements, and publishing support are established.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can access data-management, reproducibility, research-integrity, and responsible-AI guidance.
Data planning, dataset review, metadata, repositories, ethics, licensing, and publisher compliance are detailed services.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Help is actionable through consultations, workshops, templates, accessible pages, and current maintenance.
Consultations, plan feedback, and specialist contacts make advanced help actionable.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Official evidence review
The service offers data-management planning, dataset review, metadata, repository selection, and funder or publisher compliance guidance.
Supports: Findability, Evidence, Integrity and data, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
The Libraries support open access, author rights, copyright, publishing choices, and scholarly communication.
Supports: Manuscript, Publishing, Integrity and data
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
Independent outcome
Outcome: □ Confirmed □ Corrected
Required note: ________________________________________________________________
Official evidence supporting any correction: _______________________________________
Reviewed on (YYYY-MM-DD): __________________