This packet lets a second reviewer independently check the official sources and all six first-pass assessments. It evaluates public discoverability, not institutional prestige, research quality, or the private quality of services.
Reviewer declaration
Reviewer name and affiliation: __________________________________
Relevant expertise: ____________________________________________
Conflict with this institution: □ None □ Described below
Conflict note: _________________________________________________
Independence confirmed: □ Yes □ No
Public attribution consent: □ Yes □ No
First-pass summary
Yale offers one of the clearest public maps of the entire research lifecycle, connecting evidence discovery, methods and data support, responsible AI, and practical publishing decisions.
A single support page combines journal selection with data, statistics, AI, copyright, and open-access guidance.
Add more manuscript-stage templates and reporting-guideline support to the central publishing pathway.
Dimension review
Confirm only when the note is supported by the cited institution-owned pages. A missing public signal means it was not discoverable in the reviewed evidence, not that the service does not exist.
A researcher can find a coherent support hub, subject expertise, and a clear route to help.
One central page organizes human help, research tools, data services, publishing resources, workshops, and subject expertise.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
The institution offers practical help with searching, evidence synthesis, citations, and research discovery.
Search help, subject specialists, research guides, citation tools, datasets, and quantitative and mixed-methods consultations are directly visible.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can find guidance for writing, reporting, publication strategy, and preparing work for submission.
Citation support, scholarly publishing infrastructure, author rights, and explicit journal-selection guidance address major preparation decisions.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Public support covers publishing options, open access, rights, repositories, and author-cost questions.
Copyright, author rights, open-access options, a publishing platform, and journal-selection guidance are connected from the main hub.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Researchers can access data-management, reproducibility, research-integrity, and responsible-AI guidance.
Data planning, code documentation, visualization, Dataverse preservation, statistics support, and responsible AI guidance cover a broad integrity pathway.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Help is actionable through consultations, workshops, templates, accessible pages, and current maintenance.
Consultation requests, named specialist routes, workshops, and public guides make the support easy to act on.
□ Confirmed □ Corrected □ Insufficient evidence
Reviewer note: __________________________________________
Official evidence review
The official hub links research consultations, subject experts, data and statistical support, workshops, AI guidance, citation tools, copyright, author rights, open access, and journal selection.
Supports: Findability, Evidence, Manuscript, Publishing, Integrity and data, Access
Source resolves and is institution-owned: □ Yes □ No
Independent outcome
Outcome: □ Confirmed □ Corrected
Required note: ________________________________________________________________
Official evidence supporting any correction: _______________________________________
Reviewed on (YYYY-MM-DD): __________________