All Comparison Guides

Comparison Guide

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition vs Scientific Reports

Angewandte Chemie is selective and prestigious. Scientific Reports is inclusive.

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition and Scientific Reports serve chemists at different tiers. Angewandte Chemie is one of Europe's most prestigious chemistry journals (IF 16.9, 8% acceptance), arguably competitive with JACS. Scientific Reports accepts any methodologically sound chemistry work (IF 3.9, 57% acceptance). For chemists, this is prestige selectivity versus accessible publication.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MetricAngewandte ChemieScientific Reports
Impact Factor (2024)16.93.9
Rank in ChemistryTop 5%Bottom 50%
Acceptance Rate~8%~57%
Geographic FocusEuropean/globalGlobal
Citations (5yr avg)~25–40~3–5
Career ImpactStrong in Europe; competitive globallyRoutine

Angewandte Chemie: European Prestige, Global Competition

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition is top-tier journal published by Wiley and German Chemical Society (GDCh). Sits alongside JACS as one of two most prestigious chemistry journals globally. Philosophy: innovation in chemical science. Wants novelty like JACS. Bar: would this advance chemical science interesting to global chemistry community? Historically stronger in organic/inorganic chemistry; JACS stronger in biological/materials. But prestige levels essentially equivalent. For European chemists or collaborations, Angewandte Chemie carries particular cultural weight. Globally, competes directly with JACS.

JACS vs Angewandte Chemie

Both selective, both reward novelty, similar impact factors. Different geographic/cultural centers. JACS = American Chemical Society. Angewandte = German Chemical Society. Actual editorial standards difference is minimal. Paper clearing JACS desk review likely clears Angewandte, vice versa. Decision often personal: which editor community? Which reaches your audience? North American chemists favor JACS. European favor Angewandte. Globally, both work equally.

Scientific Reports as Fallback

If work doesn't clear novelty bar at Angewandte, Scientific Reports is backup. Accepts solid specialty chemistry without prestige barrier. Citation impact difference dramatic: Angewandte 25–40 citations, Scientific Reports 3–5. For career-critical papers, matters.

Decision Framework: Where to Submit

If: Novel synthetic methodology with broad chemistry relevance

Angewandte Chemie OR JACS

Both equally competitive. Try one; if desk rejected, try other.

If: New catalytic system or materials property

Angewandte Chemie

Strong track record in materials/catalysis. Comparable to JACS.

If: Solid chemistry but not fundamentally novel

Scientific Reports

Angewandte desk rejects incremental work.

If: International collaboration with European partners

Angewandte Chemie

Geographic/cultural fit.

If: Specialty chemistry with narrow audience

Scientific Reports

Angewandte requires broader relevance.

The Bottom Line

Angewandte Chemie and JACS are prestige peers, both reward novelty. Angewandte has European roots, slightly stronger organic chemistry; JACS broader. Novel chemistry = aim for Angewandte or JACS. Solid specialty chemistry = Scientific Reports. Citation impact difference (25–40 vs 3–5) makes prestige journals career-critical in competitive fields.

Choosing the right journal is half the battle

A desk rejection costs months. Get expert feedback on which journal fits your paper , and how to position it for acceptance , before you submit.