Comparison Guide
Angewandte Chemie - International Edition vs Scientific Reports
Angewandte Chemie is selective and prestigious. Scientific Reports is inclusive.
Angewandte Chemie - International Edition and Scientific Reports serve chemists at different tiers. Angewandte Chemie is one of Europe's most prestigious chemistry journals (IF 16.9, 8% acceptance), arguably competitive with JACS. Scientific Reports accepts any methodologically sound chemistry work (IF 3.9, 57% acceptance). For chemists, this is prestige selectivity versus accessible publication.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Metric | Angewandte Chemie | Scientific Reports |
|---|---|---|
| Impact Factor (2024) | 16.9 | 3.9 |
| Rank in Chemistry | Top 5% | Bottom 50% |
| Acceptance Rate | ~8% | ~57% |
| Geographic Focus | European/global | Global |
| Citations (5yr avg) | ~25–40 | ~3–5 |
| Career Impact | Strong in Europe; competitive globally | Routine |
Angewandte Chemie: European Prestige, Global Competition
Angewandte Chemie - International Edition is top-tier journal published by Wiley and German Chemical Society (GDCh). Sits alongside JACS as one of two most prestigious chemistry journals globally. Philosophy: innovation in chemical science. Wants novelty like JACS. Bar: would this advance chemical science interesting to global chemistry community? Historically stronger in organic/inorganic chemistry; JACS stronger in biological/materials. But prestige levels essentially equivalent. For European chemists or collaborations, Angewandte Chemie carries particular cultural weight. Globally, competes directly with JACS.
JACS vs Angewandte Chemie
Both selective, both reward novelty, similar impact factors. Different geographic/cultural centers. JACS = American Chemical Society. Angewandte = German Chemical Society. Actual editorial standards difference is minimal. Paper clearing JACS desk review likely clears Angewandte, vice versa. Decision often personal: which editor community? Which reaches your audience? North American chemists favor JACS. European favor Angewandte. Globally, both work equally.
Scientific Reports as Fallback
If work doesn't clear novelty bar at Angewandte, Scientific Reports is backup. Accepts solid specialty chemistry without prestige barrier. Citation impact difference dramatic: Angewandte 25–40 citations, Scientific Reports 3–5. For career-critical papers, matters.
Decision Framework: Where to Submit
If: Novel synthetic methodology with broad chemistry relevance
Angewandte Chemie OR JACS
Both equally competitive. Try one; if desk rejected, try other.
If: New catalytic system or materials property
Angewandte Chemie
Strong track record in materials/catalysis. Comparable to JACS.
If: Solid chemistry but not fundamentally novel
Scientific Reports
Angewandte desk rejects incremental work.
If: International collaboration with European partners
Angewandte Chemie
Geographic/cultural fit.
If: Specialty chemistry with narrow audience
Scientific Reports
Angewandte requires broader relevance.
The Bottom Line
Angewandte Chemie and JACS are prestige peers, both reward novelty. Angewandte has European roots, slightly stronger organic chemistry; JACS broader. Novel chemistry = aim for Angewandte or JACS. Solid specialty chemistry = Scientific Reports. Citation impact difference (25–40 vs 3–5) makes prestige journals career-critical in competitive fields.
Not Sure Where to Submit?
Get pre-submission feedback from reviewers who know what each journal's editors look for , and which one fits your paper best.
Check your manuscriptHuman review from $1,000Individual Journal Guides
More Comparison Guides
- Nature vs Science
- NEJM vs Lancet vs JAMA vs BMJ
- Cell Press Journals: How to Choose
- Nature Family: Choosing the Right Journal
- Immunity vs Nature Immunology
- Applied Physics Letters vs Journal of Applied Physics
- Journal of the American Chemical Society vs Nature
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition vs Nature
- Nature Communications vs Scientific Reports
- Nature Communications vs PLOS ONE
- Nature Communications vs SCIENCE
- Nature Communications vs PNAS
- JACS vs Nature Communications
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition vs Nature Communications
- Nature Communications vs Physical Review Letters
- Nature Communications vs Science
- Nature Communications vs PNAS
- Journal of the American Chemical Society vs Nature Communications
- Angewandte Chemie vs Nature Communications
- Nature Communications vs Physical Review Letters
- PLOS ONE vs Scientific Reports
- Science vs Scientific Reports
- PNAS vs Scientific Reports
- Journal of the American Chemical Society vs Scientific Reports
Choosing the right journal is half the battle
A desk rejection costs months. Get expert feedback on which journal fits your paper , and how to position it for acceptance , before you submit.