Case Studies
Tested against real peer review.
Nature Communications publishes transparent peer review files alongside accepted papers. We ran our AI diagnostic on the preprints, then compared our findings against what the actual reviewers said. No cherry-picking. Full results.
21/32
Reviewer concerns matched
+10
Issues reviewers missed
<20 min
Average analysis time
$49
Per diagnostic
Cancer Biology
5/5
major issues matched
AI Diagnostic vs. Four Expert Reviewers
A 55-page neuroblastoma paper reviewed by four Nature Communications reviewers. We matched every major concern and found one they missed.
Immunology
11/17
reviewer concerns matched
AI Diagnostic vs. Three Reviewers, Two Revision Rounds
An immunology paper that spent 29 months in review. We identified the majority of issues up front, in 16 minutes.
Immunology
5/10
reviewer concerns matched
AI Diagnostic vs. eLife Open Review
A skin resident memory T cell paper with publicly available eLife reviewer assessments. Independent validation against open peer review.
Methodology
Each analysis was run on the original preprint, blind to reviewer comments. Nature Communications transparent peer review files were obtained from the published articles. Concerns were matched by substantive issue, regardless of phrasing. All citations in our reports are verified against CrossRef and PubMed.
Try it on your manuscript
The same diagnostic used in these case studies is available now. Upload your manuscript, pick your target journal, and get your report in about 30 minutes.
Run Free Readiness Scan