Journal Guide
Publishing in Frontiers in Pharmacology: Fit, Timeline & Submission Guide
A section-driven Frontiers journal where pharmacology fit matters more than broad biomedical relevance
Should you submit here?
Submit if the manuscript should make the intended Frontiers in Pharmacology section obvious from the title, abstract, keywords, and cover note. Be careful if frontiers in Pharmacology is section-driven; a vague section fit makes editor and reviewer routing harder.
Best fit if
The manuscript should make the intended Frontiers in Pharmacology section obvious from the title, abstract, keywords, and cover note
Not ideal if
Frontiers in Pharmacology is section-driven; a vague section fit makes editor and reviewer routing harder
Also compare
5.4
Impact Factor
Not officially published
Acceptance Rate
Varies by specialty section and review path
Time to First Decision
Readiness Scan
See whether your manuscript clears Front. Pharmacol.’s editorial screen.
Free 1 to 2 minute scan. Get a fit score, top issues, and the specific Front. Pharmacol. desk-reject patterns flagged before you submit.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Your manuscript is never used to train any model.
What Front. Pharmacol. Publishes
Frontiers in Pharmacology is a Frontiers open-access journal for pharmacology research submitted through specialty sections. The practical fit question is whether the manuscript has a clear drug, target, mechanism, safety, clinical pharmacology, pharmacogenomics, outcomes, or policy claim that belongs in a specific section.
- Drug action, response, safety, and therapeutic mechanisms
- Clinical pharmacology, pharmacogenomics, and patient-relevant drug-response work
- Pharmacology reviews, perspectives, clinical trials, case reports, and policy-oriented article types
- Section-specific pharmacology manuscripts where the editor and reviewer audience can be named before upload
Editor Insight
“Frontiers in Pharmacology works best when the manuscript is not just biomedical research with a drug mentioned, but a pharmacology paper whose section audience, article type, and evidence boundary are clear before upload.”
What Front. Pharmacol. Editors Look For
A clear specialty-section fit
The manuscript should make the intended Frontiers in Pharmacology section obvious from the title, abstract, keywords, and cover note.
A pharmacology-centered claim
Drug action, target logic, exposure, response, safety, or clinical pharmacology interpretation should carry the paper, not appear as a late framing layer.
A complete submission package
Author contributions, ethics, consent, data availability, conflicts, funding, figures, and supplementary materials should be ready before the portal session.
Why Papers Get Rejected
These patterns appear repeatedly in manuscripts that don't make it past Front. Pharmacol.'s editorial review:
Submitting to the journal before choosing the section
Frontiers in Pharmacology is section-driven; a vague section fit makes editor and reviewer routing harder.
Using pharmacology as decoration
A disease-biology or chemistry paper with a drug mentioned late may not satisfy pharmacology reviewers.
Choosing the wrong article type
Frontiers article types carry different word, figure, and evidence expectations.
Does your manuscript avoid these patterns?
The Free Readiness Scan reads your full manuscript against Front. Pharmacol.'s criteria and flags the specific issues most likely to cause rejection.
Insider Tips from Front. Pharmacol. Authors
Name the pharmacological object early
The first page should show the drug, target, pathway, exposure, response, or safety question that makes the paper pharmacology.
Treat the submission checklist as scientific packaging
Weak ethics, data, contribution, or conflict statements can make a manuscript look underprepared before peer review.
The Front. Pharmacol. Submission Process
Choose journal, article type, and specialty section
Before uploadStart from the Frontiers in Pharmacology journal page and submission system, then match the manuscript to the right section and article type.
Complete author and declaration fields
During portal submissionPrepare author information, contribution statements, ethics and consent language, data availability, funding, and conflicts.
Editorial and peer review
Varies by section and reviewer availabilityExternal editors and reviewers evaluate section fit, evidence strength, and article-type match.
Front. Pharmacol. by the Numbers
| Impact Factor(Frontiers current journal page displays a 5.4 Impact Factor.) | 5.4 |
| CiteScore(Frontiers current journal page displays a 9.5 CiteScore.) | 9.5 |
| Publishing model(Frontiers says APCs apply to accepted articles.) | Gold open access |
| Submission model(Authors submit to a journal section and article type through Frontiers.) | Specialty-section based |
Before you submit
Front. Pharmacol. accepts a small fraction of submissions. Make your attempt count.
Start with the Free Readiness Scan. Unlock the Full Review from $39, with local pricing shown before checkout. If you need deeper submission planning, choose the Submission-Ready Dossier. The full report is calibrated to Front. Pharmacol..
Article Types
Original Research
Standard research format; verify current structure and limits on the article-types page.
Clinical Trial
12,000 wordsInterventional health studies; the current Frontiers page lists a 12,000-word maximum.
Mini Review
3,000 wordsFocused review format; the current Frontiers page lists a 3,000-word maximum and no more than 2 figures or tables.
Landmark Front. Pharmacol. Papers
Papers that defined fields and changed science:
- Section-specific pharmacology research and reviews
- Clinical pharmacology and drug-response studies
- Drug-safety, pharmacogenomics, and therapeutic-mechanism papers
Preparing a Front. Pharmacol. Submission?
Get pre-submission feedback from reviewers who've published in Front. Pharmacol. and know exactly what editors look for.
Run Free Readiness ScanNeed expert depth? See Expert Review Options
Primary Fields
Browse by Field
Related Journal Guides
All journal guidesReady to submit to Front. Pharmacol.?
A desk rejection costs months. Get expert feedback before you submit, from scientists who know exactly what Front. Pharmacol. editors look for.
Avoid Desk Rejection
Get expert pre-submission review before you submit to Front. Pharmacol.. 3-7 day turnaround.
Manuscript Rejected?
Expert revision help to strengthen your manuscript and resubmit with confidence.
Reviewer Response Help
Get expert guidance crafting your response to Front. Pharmacol. reviewers.
Need field-expert depth? See Expert Review Options