Angewandte Chemie SJR and Scopus Metrics: What the Numbers Actually Tell Authors
Angewandte Chemie's Scopus profile confirms it still belongs in the top chemistry tier. The numbers reflect speed, breadth, and unusually durable citation pull.
Associate Professor, Clinical Medicine & Public Health
Author context
Specializes in clinical and epidemiological research publishing, with direct experience preparing manuscripts for NEJM, JAMA, BMJ, and The Lancet.
Next step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.
Quick answer: Angewandte Chemie still looks like a flagship broad-chemistry journal under Scopus-style metrics. Current Scopus-linked browser data reports a 2024 SJR of 5.550, a CiteScore of 27.6, and stable Q1 standing. That confirms real chemistry authority, but the submission call still depends on whether the manuscript is broad enough for the journal's fast, flagship format.
The core metric picture
Metric | 2024 value | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|
SJR | 5.550 | Prestige-weighted chemistry influence is very strong |
CiteScore | 27.6 | Four-year citation performance remains elite |
SNIP | 2.465 | Field-normalized impact is also strong |
Quartile | Q1 | The journal stays in the top Scopus tier |
JCR context | Impact factor 16.9 | Web of Science tells the same flagship story |
The important read is that Angewandte Chemie is not coasting on brand. The journal is still heavily cited by other strong chemistry venues.
What the metrics actually help with
They help clarify where the journal sits:
- in the same broad upper chemistry tier as JACS
- faster in editorial rhythm than some flagship rivals
- strongest when the chemistry is concise, broadly important, and immediately legible
That is useful when your paper sits between JACS, Angewandte, and a more specialized chemistry journal.
What the metrics do not answer
They do not tell you:
- whether the chemistry is broad enough outside one subfield
- whether the mechanism is convincing enough
- whether the communication-style framing is helping or hiding weakness
- whether the paper is better suited to a strong specialty title
Those are still the questions that decide fit.
Why the profile matters for authors
At this SJR level, the journal does not need to publish narrow chemistry just because it is technically good. The paper usually needs some combination of:
- broad chemical consequence
- concise but convincing mechanistic support
- results other chemists can adopt quickly
- a clear reason the story matters beyond one audience pocket
That is why the metric is useful. It tells you that the journal's speed does not imply softness. It implies the opposite: a fast screen with enough prestige to reject aggressively.
What should drive the submission decision instead
The better question is whether the paper is truly an Angewandte paper.
That is why the better next reads are:
- Angewandte Chemie acceptance rate
- Angewandte Chemie review time
- How to avoid desk rejection at Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- JACS SJR and Scopus metrics
If the paper is elegant but still too local, the metrics do not solve that. They only explain why the editorial screen stays sharp.
Practical verdict
Angewandte Chemie has a genuine flagship Scopus profile. That confirms broad chemistry influence, not just reputation.
But the useful author takeaway is still about fit. If the paper is concise, broadly important, and mature enough to survive a demanding short-format read, the upside is real. If the chemistry still needs a lot of context to sound important, the metric is already warning you that the target may be too high. A free Manusights scan is the fastest way to test that before submission.
- Angewandte Chemie acceptance rate, Manusights.
Sources
- 1. Angewandte Chemie International Edition journal browser entry, Vrije Universiteit journal publishing guide.
- 2. Angewandte Chemie author guidelines, Wiley.
Reference library
Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide
This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.
Dataset / reference guide
Peer Review Timelines by Journal
Reference-grade journal timeline data that authors, labs, and writing centers can cite when discussing realistic review timing.
Dataset / benchmark
Biomedical Journal Acceptance Rates
A field-organized acceptance-rate guide that works as a neutral benchmark when authors are deciding how selective to target.
Reference table
Journal Submission Specs
A high-utility submission table covering word limits, figure caps, reference limits, and formatting expectations.
Before you upload
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Move from this article into the next decision-support step. The scan works best once the journal and submission plan are clearer.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.
Where to go next
Conversion step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.