Chemical Reviews Formatting Requirements: Complete Author Guide
Chemical Reviews formatting guide. Word limits, figure specs, reference format, LaTeX vs Word, and journal-specific formatting quirks you need to know.
Senior Researcher, Oncology & Cell Biology
Author context
Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for oncology and cell biology, with deep experience evaluating submissions to Nature Medicine, JCO, Cancer Cell, and Cell-family journals.
Next step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.
Quick answer: Chemical Reviews is invitation-only. There are no unsolicited submissions. Published reviews have no strict word limit and commonly run 50 to 100+ printed pages with hundreds of references. The journal uses ACS reference style with superscript numbered citations, requires a TOC/Abstract graphic, and accepts both Word and LaTeX (via the achemso package). If you've been invited to write for Chemical Reviews, the formatting standards are high and the production process is thorough.
Word and page limits by article type
Chemical Reviews is unique among major chemistry journals: it publishes only one article type, the invited review. There are no research articles, communications, or perspectives.
Article Type | Word/Page Limit | Abstract | TOC Graphic | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Invited Review | No strict limit (50-100+ pages typical) | 150 words max | Required | No formal cap (300-800 typical) |
Thematic Issue Review | Same as above | 150 words max | Required | No formal cap |
The absence of a word limit is genuine, but it doesn't mean you can write without constraint. When you receive an invitation, the handling editor will discuss the expected scope and approximate length. A review covering a narrow subtopic might be 40-50 pages. A review of an entire field can exceed 100 pages. Some landmark Chemical Reviews articles have reached 150+ pages.
The page count includes everything: body text, figures, tables, and references. For a 75-page review with 500 references, roughly 15-20 pages will be the reference list alone. Plan your text and figures for the remaining 55-60 pages.
One practical reality about Chemical Reviews length: these papers take 6-18 months to write. The editorial timeline accounts for this. Your invitation letter will include a submission deadline, typically 12-18 months from the invitation date. If you need an extension, contact the editor early.
Thematic Issue reviews are identical in format to regular reviews. The only difference is that they're grouped with other reviews on a related topic and published together in a themed issue. The formatting requirements don't change.
Abstract requirements
Chemical Reviews uses a concise abstract that's dwarfed by the paper it summarizes.
- Word limit: 150 words maximum
- Structure: Unstructured (single paragraph)
- Citations: Not allowed in the abstract
- Content focus: Scope of the review, key themes covered, and main conclusions or trends identified
Writing a 150-word abstract for a 100-page review is an exercise in extreme compression. Don't try to summarize every section. Instead, state the field being reviewed, note the time period or scope, and highlight the most important conclusions or emerging trends.
TOC/Abstract graphic: This is a mandatory visual element that appears alongside the abstract on the ACS Publications website and in the journal's table of contents.
Specifications:
- Dimensions: approximately 3.25 inches wide by 1.75 inches tall
- Resolution: 300 dpi minimum
- Format: TIFF, EPS, or high-resolution JPEG
- Should visually represent the scope or theme of the review
- No text-heavy images; keep labels minimal
The TOC graphic for a Chemical Reviews article serves a different purpose than for a research article. It needs to represent the breadth of the review topic, not a single experimental result. The best Chemical Reviews TOC graphics are conceptual diagrams or visual maps of the field.
Figure and table specifications
Chemical Reviews articles are figure-rich. It's common for a review to contain 30-80 figures plus numerous tables and schemes (chemical reaction diagrams).
Figure specifications:
Parameter | Requirement |
|---|---|
Resolution (line art/schemes) | 600 dpi minimum |
Resolution (halftone/photo) | 300 dpi minimum |
Resolution (combination) | 600 dpi minimum |
File formats | TIFF, EPS, high-resolution PDF |
Color mode | RGB |
Single column width | 3.33 inches (8.46 cm) |
Double column width | 7.0 inches (17.78 cm) |
Font in figures | Arial or Helvetica, 6-8 pt minimum |
Color charges | Free (online and print) |
Schemes: Chemical Reviews makes heavy use of chemical schemes (reaction diagrams, synthetic routes, mechanism illustrations). These are numbered separately from figures (Scheme 1, Scheme 2, etc.) and have their own captions. Schemes should be drawn using standard chemistry drawing software (ChemDraw, MarvinSketch, or similar) and exported at publication quality.
Tables: Chemical Reviews tables can be substantial. Many reviews include comparison tables spanning multiple pages. Tables must have:
- Headers for every column
- A title above the table
- Footnotes below using superscript lowercase letters
- Consistent formatting throughout
Biographies and photographs: Chemical Reviews includes brief author biographies (100-150 words per author) and headshot photographs at the end of the article. Each biography is a short paragraph covering the author's background, research interests, and current position. Photographs should be high-resolution portraits (300 dpi minimum, 3-4 cm wide).
This biography requirement is distinctive to Chemical Reviews and catches first-time authors off guard. Prepare these early, especially if you have multiple co-authors who need to provide photos and text.
Reference format
Chemical Reviews uses the standard ACS reference style. Given the length of these reviews, reference lists are massive.
In-text citations: Superscript numbers, e.g., "as reported by Smith et al.^{1}" The numbers are sequential by order of first appearance.
Reference list format:
(1) Author, A. B.; Author, C. D. Title of Article. J. Abbrev. Name Year, Volume, Pages.Key formatting details:
- Author names: Last name, then initials (Smith, A. B.)
- Semicolons between authors
- Journal titles abbreviated per CAS (Chemical Abstracts Service) conventions
- Year in bold, followed by volume in italics
- Page range with an en dash
- DOIs included at the end
- For books: Author, A. B. Title of Book; Publisher: City, Year; pp Pages.
Reference count: Chemical Reviews articles routinely cite 300-800 references. Some exceed 1,000. There's no cap, but every reference should be relevant and discussed in context. A reference list that's just a dump of every paper in the field won't serve readers well.
Managing hundreds of references manually is impractical. Use a citation manager (EndNote, Zotero, or Mendeley) with the ACS style file. The achemso BibTeX style handles ACS formatting automatically for LaTeX users.
Citation of your own work: Chemical Reviews expects balance. Self-citation is acceptable where relevant, but reviewers and editors will flag reviews that disproportionately cite the author's own publications while omitting other groups' work.
Supplementary material guidelines
Chemical Reviews articles can include Supporting Information (SI) hosted on the ACS Publications website.
What goes in Supporting Information:
- Extended tables that would disrupt the flow of the review
- High-resolution versions of figures
- Complete datasets used to generate comparison tables
- Additional literature references for specific subtopics
- Supplementary schemes or reaction examples
Format requirements:
- Submit as a single PDF file
- Include a table of contents for the SI
- Number items sequentially (Figure S1, Table S1)
- Must be cited in the main text
- No strict size limit, but keep files manageable
Given the already extensive length of Chemical Reviews articles, the need for Supporting Information is less common than in research journals. However, when a review includes comprehensive comparison tables or datasets, the SI is the appropriate place for the complete data while the main text contains summarized or selected entries.
ACS requires a Supporting Information paragraph in the main manuscript that describes what's included in the SI file. This appears before the Author Information section.
LaTeX vs Word: what Chemical Reviews actually prefers
Chemical Reviews accepts both Word and LaTeX. Given the length of these reviews, each format has practical implications.
For LaTeX users:
- Use the
achemsopackage, which is ACS's official LaTeX support \documentclass[journal=chreay]{achemso}selects the Chemical Reviews format (the journal code ischreay)- BibTeX with the
achemso.bststyle file handles reference formatting - LaTeX handles cross-referencing, figure numbering, and large bibliographies better than Word for documents this long
For Word users:
- Use the ACS Word template available from the ACS Author Guidelines
- For a 100-page document, Word can become unstable. Save frequently and consider splitting the document during writing
- Use the ACS reference style in your citation manager
For Chemical Reviews specifically, LaTeX has a practical advantage: these are long documents. A 100-page review with 500 references, 50 figures, and hundreds of cross-references will stress Word's formatting engine. LaTeX handles documents of this size without performance issues.
If you're collaborating with multiple co-authors on different sections (common for Chemical Reviews), Overleaf provides a good collaborative LaTeX environment. Multiple authors can work on the same document simultaneously, which is helpful for a 12-month writing project.
The invitation and editorial process
Since Chemical Reviews is invitation-only, the submission process differs from standard journals.
How invitations work:
- The editorial team identifies a topic that needs a review
- They invite one or more experts to write the review
- The invited author(s) agree and discuss scope, length, and timeline
- The submission deadline is set (typically 12-18 months)
- The manuscript goes through peer review (2-3 reviewers) even though it's invited
- Revisions are common, sometimes multiple rounds
Can you propose a review? You can contact the editors with a proposal, but unsolicited proposals are rarely accepted unless the topic is clearly underserved and the proposing author has strong credentials in the area.
Required submission components:
- Complete manuscript in ACS format (Word or LaTeX)
- All figure and scheme files at publication quality
- TOC/Abstract graphic
- Author biographies and photographs
- Supporting Information (if applicable)
- Cover letter confirming the invitation
Copyright: ACS requires a copyright transfer or Open Access selection at acceptance. For Chemical Reviews, most articles are published under ACS's subscription model, but Open Access is available for an APC.
Journal-specific formatting quirks
These are the details that Chemical Reviews authors learn through experience:
Author biographies are required. Every author must provide a 100-150 word biography and a headshot photograph. This is published at the end of the article. Prepare these early, because collecting bios from all co-authors takes time.
Schemes are separate from figures. Chemical Reviews uses three types of display items: Figures, Schemes, and Tables. Each has its own numbering sequence. Schemes are for chemical structures, reactions, and mechanisms. Figures are for graphs, images, and diagrams. Don't number a reaction scheme as "Figure 5."
Heading levels matter. Chemical Reviews uses a specific heading hierarchy: sections, subsections, sub-subsections, and paragraphs. Numbering is handled by ACS production, but you need to use the correct heading levels in your markup. For a 100-page review, outline your section structure carefully before writing.
Extensive copyediting. ACS provides thorough copyediting for Chemical Reviews. You'll receive detailed proofs with many editorial suggestions. The copyediting process for a long review can take several weeks. Budget time for proof review.
Dual publication check. ACS checks for text overlap with other published reviews. If you've written reviews on similar topics for other journals, make sure your Chemical Reviews article doesn't reuse text verbatim. Paraphrasing your own prior reviews is acceptable; copying is not.
Acknowledgments and funding. ACS requires explicit acknowledgment of all funding sources. Use the ACS format: "This work was supported by [funder] under Grant [number]."
Abbreviations list. For a review article with dozens of specialized abbreviations, consider including an Abbreviations section. This isn't mandatory, but it helps readers in a field where different groups use different abbreviations for the same concepts.
Frequently missed formatting requirements
Even experienced review authors miss these:
- Author biographies and photos. These are required, not optional. First-time Chemical Reviews authors often forget about them entirely until the production stage.
- Scheme vs Figure numbering. Chemical reaction schemes must be numbered as "Scheme 1," not "Figure X." This is a consistent ACS convention.
- TOC graphic dimensions. The 3.25 x 1.75 inch specification is enforced. Images that don't match will be returned.
- Copyright permissions. If you reproduce figures from other published papers, you need written permission from the copyright holder. For a review with 50+ reproduced figures, securing permissions takes weeks. Start early.
- Reference formatting for large lists. With 500+ references, even small inconsistencies add up. Use a citation manager with the ACS style file. Don't format references manually.
Submission checklist
Before submitting to Chemical Reviews, verify:
- Manuscript uses ACS format (achemso in LaTeX or ACS Word template)
- Abstract is 150 words or fewer, unstructured, no citations
- TOC/Abstract graphic prepared at correct dimensions (3.25 x 1.75 inches, 300 dpi)
- All figures, schemes, and tables numbered in separate sequences
- References in ACS style, verified with citation manager
- Author biographies (100-150 words each) and headshot photographs included
- Copyright permissions secured for all reproduced figures
- Supporting Information (if any) is a self-contained PDF
- Cover letter references the original invitation
- Acknowledgments include all funding sources
Writing for Chemical Reviews is a major commitment, and the formatting requirements reflect the production quality ACS invests in these articles. If you're working on a review and want to check the structural integrity of your manuscript before submission, run a free readiness scan to catch issues that could slow down the editorial process.
For the most current Chemical Reviews formatting guidelines, visit the ACS Author Guidelines for Chemical Reviews. ACS templates and reference style files are available through that page.
If you're interested in how Chemical Reviews compares to other review journals, our guides on Chemical Reviews impact factor and understanding ACS journal APCs provide additional context.
Reference library
Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide
This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.
Dataset / reference guide
Peer Review Timelines by Journal
Reference-grade journal timeline data that authors, labs, and writing centers can cite when discussing realistic review timing.
Dataset / benchmark
Biomedical Journal Acceptance Rates
A field-organized acceptance-rate guide that works as a neutral benchmark when authors are deciding how selective to target.
Reference table
Journal Submission Specs
A high-utility submission table covering word limits, figure caps, reference limits, and formatting expectations.
Before you upload
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Move from this article into the next decision-support step. The scan works best once the journal and submission plan are clearer.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.
Where to go next
Conversion step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.