Chemical Society Reviews APC and Open Access: RSC Pricing, Review Proposals, and How It Compares to Chemical Reviews
Chemical Society Reviews charges £3,100 for open access. RSC hybrid model, review proposals welcome, and how it compares to Chemical Reviews (ACS).
Readiness scan
APC budgeted? See what Chemical Society Reviews reviewers are likely to push back on.
The fee is one decision. Getting through review is the harder one. Run the Free Readiness Scan with Chemical Society Reviews as your target to see desk-rejection risk, likely reviewer concerns, and journal fit.
Quick answer: Chemical Society Reviews (Chem Soc Rev) charges an APC of £3,100 (plus any applicable tax) for gold open access.
It's a hybrid journal from the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC). RSC welcomes proposals for reviews, which changes how authors think about the APC: the APC is only payable if the article is accepted.
With an impact factor around 39, Chem Soc Rev is the second most-cited review journal in chemistry, behind only Chemical Reviews.
Official sources define the current rule. Manusights judgment is not an acceptance forecast. In our editorial work, we use the matrix below to require a source, a manuscript-level check, and an explicit stop condition before recommending an action.
September 2026 evidence update: For Chemical Society Reviews open access, the decision should separate invitation and article-type fit from the current open-access route.
Evidence basis: We rechecked the current primary guidance and companion authority on October 9, 2026. Publisher instructions control volatile rules; Manusights labels estimates and interpretations rather than presenting them as publisher facts.
Decision check | Evidence required | Guardrail |
|---|---|---|
Route | Publisher confirms the article type and option | Do not infer a universal fee |
Cost | Current publisher price and taxes are recorded | Do not reuse an old amount |
Eligibility | Institution and funder terms are checked | Do not treat a waiver as automatic |
What Chemical Society Reviews charges
Component | Details |
|---|---|
Gold OA APC | £3,100 (plus any applicable tax) |
CC BY license | Included at no extra cost |
CC BY-NC license | Included at no extra cost |
Subscription-track | $0 |
Submission fee | $0 |
Page/color charges | $0 |
RSC quotes its APC in pounds sterling, so check the exchange rate on the day you pay. For the fee at Chemical Reviews, see the ACS pricing page.
RSC says there are no fees to submit to or publish in the journal, that colour images may be used free of charge both online and in print, and that its APC is all-inclusive. That matters because RSC recommends a maximum length of 45 pages for Reviews, while Tutorial Reviews are typically up to 15 journal pages.
If the cost looks workable, the harder question is whether your paper will clear desk review. A Chemical Society Reviews desk-rejection risk check takes about two to three minutes before you commit to these fees.
The invitation model
RSC does not describe Chem Soc Rev as invitation-only. Here is what its own pages say:
How proposals work: The journal page says RSC welcomes and encourages proposals for reviews from members of the research community. The author guidelines say authors interested in writing an article should submit a completed proposal form to the online submission system, which gives the board the opportunity to provide feedback before the article is written.
Can you submit without an invitation? RSC publishes a review proposal form and a tutorial proposal form on the journal page, and asks authors interested in a Viewpoint to contact the editorial office. RSC does not publish an acceptance rate for proposals.
Article types:
- Tutorial Reviews: concise, accessible overviews that RSC says appeal to advanced undergraduates, the general research chemist new to the field, and the expert
- Reviews: in-depth, authoritative accounts of important topics in the chemical sciences
- Viewpoints: short, opinion-based articles
The APC for proposal-based authors: The APC is only payable if you choose gold open access and the article is accepted. The subscription route has no APC. If your funder requires OA, check whether your institution has an open access agreement with RSC using the Journal Finder.
RSC Read & Publish agreements
The Royal Society of Chemistry has open access agreements with institutions and consortia. Agreements differ depending on the terms set out between the parties, and the full list of eligible journals is stated in each institution's contract.
RSC's open access community page mentions agreements with Jisc in the UK, Couperin in France and CzechELib in the Czech Republic, and North American institutions. To see whether yours covers Chem Soc Rev, use the RSC Journal Finder. When you submit, you must be listed as the corresponding author in the submission system and use your official institutional email address so RSC can identify the agreement.
Waivers and discounts
RSC member discount: RSC says corresponding authors who are members of the Royal Society of Chemistry are eligible for a 15% discount on APCs, and to claim it you include your membership number in the online application form when asked. The member discount does not apply to the reduced rate countries (India, Indonesia and the Philippines).
Research4Life waivers: RSC says corresponding authors based in Research4Life Group A or Group B countries are eligible for a full APC waiver in its gold open access journals.
Case-by-case requests: RSC says that if you do not fall into Group A or Group B and have no funding to pay the APC, you may apply for a discount or waiver on acceptance. These requests are assessed case by case.
Funder mandate compliance
Funder/Policy | Compliant? | Route |
|---|---|---|
Plan S (cOAlition S) | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY |
UKRI | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY, covered by Jisc deal |
ERC | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY |
Wellcome Trust | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY |
NIH Public Access | Yes | Gold OA or green OA after 12-month embargo |
NSF | Yes | Gold OA or embargo deposit |
DFG | Yes | Gold OA, often covered by DEAL |
For UK and European researchers, Plan S compliance through Chem Soc Rev is straightforward. The RSC agreements cover the APC, and CC BY licensing is available. US researchers can use the subscription track and self-archive the accepted manuscript after 12 months to satisfy NIH or NSF requirements.
How Chemical Society Reviews compares
Journal | APC (USD) | Model | IF (2024) | Publisher | Content Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chemical Society Reviews | £3,100 (plus any applicable tax) | Hybrid | ~39 | RSC | Reviews, Tutorial Reviews, Viewpoints |
Chemical Reviews (ACS) | ~$5,000-$6,000 | Hybrid | ~64.2 | ACS | Invited reviews |
Nature Reviews Chemistry | ~$12,850 | Hybrid | ~50.3 | Springer Nature | Invited reviews |
Accounts of Chemical Research | ~$4,000-$5,000 | Hybrid | ~18 | ACS | Short accounts |
Chem (Cell Press) | $9,350 | Hybrid | ~19.1 | Elsevier | Research + reviews |
The comparison that matters most is Chem Soc Rev vs. Chemical Reviews:
JIF: Chemical Reviews (~64.2) beats Chem Soc Rev (~48.3). Both are extremely high for chemistry, but Chemical Reviews holds the edge.
APC: Chem Soc Rev charges £3,100 (plus any applicable tax) and Chemical Reviews quotes its fee in US dollars on the ACS pricing page, so compare the two on the day you pay.
Article length: Chemical Reviews publishes longer, more encyclopedic reviews (often 50-100+ pages). RSC recommends a maximum of 45 pages for Chem Soc Rev Reviews and says Tutorial Reviews are typically up to 15 journal pages.
Turnaround time: RSC reports a median of 11 days to first decision for all decisions and 27 days for peer-reviewed submissions at Chem Soc Rev (decisions made in 2025, full manuscripts submitted after a synopsis was approved).
Institutional coverage: ACS and RSC both have extensive R&P networks. If your institution covers one but not the other, that may be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: If both journals are options, compare the current APC, timing and article-length guidance on each publisher's own page. Chem Soc Rev is still considered top-tier by any reasonable standard.
Hidden costs and considerations
- Review writing is time-intensive. A Chem Soc Rev review typically takes 3-6 months of dedicated work. The APC is minor compared to the time investment.
- Figure preparation matters. Chem Soc Rev reviews are known for high-quality graphical summaries and scheme figures. Expect to invest time (or money for a professional illustrator) in figure preparation.
- No paid fast-track described. RSC's author guidelines for Chem Soc Rev do not describe a paid expedited review route.
- Self-archiving: RSC allows authors to post the accepted manuscript on institutional repositories after a 12-month embargo.
- Supplementary materials are free. No additional charge for supporting information files.
Readiness check
Run the scan while the topic is in front of you.
See score, top issues, and journal-fit signals before you submit.
Three journal-specific facts most authors don't know
- Tutorial Reviews are a separate article type. They're shorter, aimed at newcomers to a field, and are particularly good for early-career researchers who want to establish expertise. If a full Review feels like too large a first step, consider proposing a Tutorial Review.
- RSC publishes its own timing for Chem Soc Rev. The journal page reports a median of 11 days to first decision for all decisions and 27 days for peer-reviewed submissions, and RSC does not publish an acceptance-to-online time for the journal.
- The journal's scope is broader than "chemistry." Chem Soc Rev regularly publishes reviews that bridge chemistry with materials science, biology, and environmental science. Don't self-select out if your work is interdisciplinary.
The practical decision
For chemistry researchers considering a review publication:
- Proposal approved by Chem Soc Rev? Check whether your institution has an RSC open access agreement. If yes, choose gold OA for free. If not, the subscription track costs nothing.
- Considering both Chem Soc Rev and Chemical Reviews? Chemical Reviews has a higher IF. Compare the fees and timing on each publisher's own page, and weigh prestige against practicality.
- Want to write a review? Submit RSC's completed review or tutorial proposal form to the online submission system, as the author guidelines ask. Include a clear scope, your qualifications, and why the topic is timely.
- Funder requires immediate OA? The APC is £3,100 (plus any applicable tax) for a hybrid journal. Check whether your institution has an RSC open access agreement through the Journal Finder.
- Cost is the priority? The subscription route carries no APC, and RSC says there are no fees to submit to or publish in the journal.
Whether you're writing a review for Chem Soc Rev or preparing original research for JACS or another ACS journal, strong manuscript preparation matters. Reviewers check for clarity, structure, and thoroughness. Chemical Society Reviews submission readiness check to identify structural issues before you submit.
Should you submit if the APC is covered?
Submit if Chemical Society Reviews is already a strong journal-fit choice and the APC route solves a real access, funder, or institutional requirement. APC coverage should make a good submission easier to publish, not make a weak-fit submission look better.
Think twice if the only reason to choose Chemical Society Reviews is that the fee is covered. The common mistake is treating APC coverage as a proxy for editorial fit. Editors still screen the manuscript for scope, evidence strength, and audience value before the payment question matters.
Is open access at Chemical Society Reviews worth the APC?
Worth paying if:
- Your funder mandates open access (check Plan S / cOAlition S requirements)
- An institutional Read & Publish agreement covers the fee
- Open access visibility meaningfully benefits your research area
- The APC fits within your grant budget
Consider alternatives if:
- The APC is a personal out-of-pocket expense
- A subscription option or green OA (preprint + embargo) satisfies your funder
- Another OA journal with a lower APC would provide similar visibility
For a manuscript-specific signal before you submit, run a Chemical Society Reviews submission readiness check.
Or see example reports before you finalize.
Frequently asked questions
Chemical Society Reviews is a hybrid journal. Authors who choose gold open access are charged an APC of £3,100 (plus any applicable tax) according to the Royal Society of Chemistry, and the choice of CC BY or CC BY-NC licence is included at no extra cost. Institutional open access agreements may cover the APC. The subscription route carries no APC, and there are no fees to submit to or publish in the journal.
RSC does not describe the journal as invitation-only. The journal page says proposals for reviews from the research community are welcomed and encouraged, and the author guidelines say a completed proposal form must be submitted to the online submission system. RSC provides a review proposal form and a tutorial proposal form, and asks authors interested in a Viewpoint to contact the editorial office.
Chemical Society Reviews (RSC, IF ~39, APC £3,100 plus any applicable tax) and Chemical Reviews (ACS, IF ~56, APC ~$5,000-$6,000) are the two leading chemistry review journals. Compare the two fees on each publisher's own page, because they are quoted in different currencies. Chemical Reviews has a higher IF and publishes longer, more encyclopedic reviews.
Yes. The Royal Society of Chemistry has open access agreements with institutions and consortia, and its open access community page mentions agreements such as Jisc in the UK, Couperin in France and CzechELib in the Czech Republic. Agreements differ by institution, so use the RSC Journal Finder to check whether yours covers Chem Soc Rev.
Chemical Society Reviews has a 2025 Journal Impact Factor of approximately 39 in the 2026 JCR release, making it the second-highest IF chemistry review journal after Chemical Reviews (~64.2). The high IF reflects the citation density of long-form review articles in chemistry.
Sources
- Chemical Society Reviews - Author Guidelines
- Chemical Society Reviews - Journal Homepage
- Clarivate Journal Citation Reports (2026 release for the 2025 Journal Impact Factor)
Free guide
The list price is rarely the price you pay.
Waivers, funder agreements and institutional deals move it, and the deadline for most of them is submission, after which there is no appeal. Every figure in the guide was read off the publisher or funder page that sets it, on the date shown, and each one is linked at the end.
Before you upload
Want the full picture on Chemical Society Reviews?
Scope, selectivity, what editors want, common rejection reasons, and submission context, all in one place.
These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.
Private API processing. Your manuscript is not used to train models.
Put the guidance to work
Build a journal decision from more than one signal.
Use comparison data as a starting point, then confirm the live source that governs the actual submission decision.
Where to go next
Start here
Same journal, next question
- Chemical Society Reviews Submission Guide: Proposal, Scope, and Files
- Is Chemical Society Reviews a Good Journal? A Practical Fit Verdict
- Chemical Society Reviews Impact Factor 2026: Ranking, Quartile & What It Means
- Chemical Society Reviews Acceptance Rate: What Authors Can Use
- Chemical Society Reviews Review Time: What Authors Can Actually Expect
- How to Avoid Desk Rejection at Chemical Society Reviews