Skip to main content

JCI Insight AI Policy: ChatGPT and Generative AI Disclosure Rules for JCI Insight Authors

JCI Insight (American Society for Clinical Investigation) requires AI disclosure under the journal's guidelines. AI cannot be an author. This guide covers where to disclose, what to disclose, and what the journal does and does not say about non-compliance for JCI Insight submissions.

Editorial processThe Manusights editorial team researches and maintains these guides using source review, field-specific analysis, and our documented editorial process.How we work

Readiness scan

AI policy covered? See what reviewers are likely to push back on.

The AI policy governs disclosure, not how the science is judged. Run the Free Readiness Scan with your target journal to see desk-rejection risk, likely reviewer concerns, and journal fit.

Check my readinessPrivate API processing. Your manuscript is not used to train models.See example reports

Quick answer: The JCI Insight AI policy is set out in the journal's own author guidelines (the journal is self-published by the American Society for Clinical Investigation).

Generative AI used for written or visual content must be explicitly described in an AI disclosures paragraph in the Manuscript information section, with the task performed, the tool name and version, and the dates of use, plus a statement that the authors take full responsibility for the output.

AI cannot be listed as an author of any JCI Insight paper. Using AI to generate or modify data images is strictly prohibited, and peer reviewers are not permitted to use AI to write reviews. The journal's published guidelines do not list a specific consequence for leaving out a required AI disclosure, so disclose every use.

Run the JCI Insight submission readiness check which includes an automated AI-disclosure audit, or work through this guide manually. Need broader context? See the JCI Insight journal overview.

The Manusights JCI Insight readiness scan. This guide tells you what JCI Insight (American Society for Clinical Investigation)'s editors look for when verifying AI disclosure at desk-screen. The scan tells you whether your manuscript has the disclosure language required by the current journal policy before you submit.
We have reviewed manuscripts targeting JCI Insight (American Society for Clinical Investigation) and peer venues; the named patterns below are patterns we check against the publisher's public AI policy and common editorial-screening risks. 60-day money-back guarantee. Your manuscript is not used for model training, and access is limited to the review workflow.

Editorial detail (for desk-screen calibration). Verify the current Editor-in-Chief and handling-editor list on the journal's editorial-team page before quoting any name in a submission cover letter. Submission portal: Insight journal page. Manuscript constraints: an abstract of no more than 200 words for Research and Resource and Technical Advance articles (250 words, structured, for Clinical Research and Public Health), and a recommended length of 9,000 words with a 12,000-word maximum counting all text including the title page, references, figure legends and tables.

We reviewed the journal's AI policy against current JCI Insight author guidelines (accessed 2026-10-09); evidence basis includes both publicly documented the publisher policy and our internal anonymized submission corpus. The applicable limits at JCI Insight are an abstract of no more than 200 words (250 words for Clinical Research and Public Health) and a recommended length of 9,000 words with a 12,000-word maximum.

The recommended manuscript length at this journal is 9,000 words and the maximum is 12,000 words, counting all text including the title page, references, figure legends and tables (verify article-type-specific caps in the latest author guidelines). The named editorial-culture quirk: JCI Insight reviewers expect both mechanistic depth and translational implications; mechanism-only or clinical-only papers extend revision.

What does JCI Insight (American Society for Clinical Investigation)'s AI policy require?

JCI Insight authors should check four policy areas under the journal's current AI guidelines before submission:

Rule 1: Disclose every AI tool used in manuscript preparation

Authors must describe generative AI used for written or visual content, and must disclose AI use in research design as well as data extraction, analysis, and synthesis, in a paragraph titled AI disclosures in the Manuscript information section, specifying the task performed, the name and version of the AI tool, and the date or range of dates of use. A statement that the authors evaluated and take full responsibility for the output is also required. Examples that REQUIRE disclosure at JCI Insight:

  • For JCI Insight-targeted manuscripts addressing translational research: using ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or similar to draft, polish, or edit manuscript text passing through JCI Insight editorial review
  • For JCI Insight submissions: using AI to generate boilerplate text for limitations or ethics statements in the manuscript
  • For JCI Insight (American Society for Clinical Investigation) submissions: using AI to translate manuscript text into English from another language, as in the journal's own example disclosure of translating Methods text from French to English
  • For JCI Insight literature reviews: using AI to conduct a literature review, for citation discovery, or to summarize prior work; the journal's own example disclosures include an AI literature-review tool
  • For JCI Insight analytical pipelines: AI-assisted code generation or analysis requires disclosure in the AI disclosures paragraph; the journal's examples include AI used to write code for processing scRNA-seq data and to perform statistical analysis

Examples that do NOT require AI disclosure:

  • At JCI Insight, using grammar/spell checkers (Word) for line-level edits, when used without generative AI features for new manuscript content
  • For JCI Insight submissions, using reference managers (Zotero, EndNote) for citation formatting against the publisher's style guide
  • For JCI Insight (American Society for Clinical Investigation) statistical analysis, using established statistical software (R, Stata, SPSS) where the algorithm is the established tool documented in JCI Insight's methodological norm, not a generative AI

Rule 2: AI cannot be an author

No generative AI tool can be listed as an author of a JCI Insight paper, in any submission category. Authors remain responsible for verifying the accuracy of AI-generated content. The same rule appears in the generative AI guidelines of the JCI, which the ASCI also publishes.

Rule 3: AI-generated figures are prohibited for original research data

JCI Insight states that use of AI technology to generate or modify data images is strictly prohibited. Other AI use in figures and graphics, such as AI-assisted layout suggestions for a graphical abstract, must be disclosed in the AI disclosures paragraph with the task, tool, version and dates of use. The journal's image-integrity rules also apply: no specific feature within an image may be enhanced, obscured, moved, removed, or introduced, and nonlinear adjustments must be disclosed in the figure legend.

Rule 4: Reviewers may not use AI to write reviews

JCI Insight states that peer reviewers are not permitted to use AI technologies to write reviews, and its publication-ethics page says reviewers are strictly prohibited from using generative AI to assist with the content of reviews. The rule binds reviewers rather than authors, so it adds no disclosure step to a submission.

How does JCI Insight (American Society for Clinical Investigation)'s AI policy compare to peer journals?

Rule
JCI Insight stance
the publisher default
Policy basis
AI authorship
Prohibited
Prohibited
Authorship/accountability
Disclosure location
Manuscript information section (AI disclosures paragraph)
Same (the ASCI also publishes the JCI)
Authorship/accountability
AI-generated figures
Generating or modifying data images prohibited
Same
Image-integrity guidance
Reviewer AI use
Reviewers may not use AI to write reviews
Same
Peer-review confidentiality guidance
Enforcement process
Not described in the journal's guidelines
Same
Submission-stage policy check

Source: JCI Insight author guidelines and publication ethics page (accessed 2026-10-09).

What does AI disclosure look like in a JCI Insight Manuscript information section?

Acceptable disclosure language for JCI Insight submissions:

"For our translational research-focused manuscript at JCI Insight, we used ChatGPT-4o (OpenAI, used in October 2024) to polish English-language phrasing in the Introduction and Discussion sections. We did not use generative AI for data analysis, figure generation, or substantive manuscript content. All authors reviewed and edited the AI-assisted text and take responsibility for the final manuscript."

Or, for AI-assisted code:

"For this JCI Insight submission addressing translational research, initial Python code for the Bayesian regression analysis was drafted with Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Anthropic, used in December 2024). All code was reviewed, modified, and validated by the authors before use; the final version is available at [repository URL]. Statistical inference was performed using the established R package brms."

What does NOT pass JCI Insight's desk-screen:

  • For JCI Insight addressing translational research: "AI tools were used in manuscript preparation." Too vague for the publisher editorial review of JCI Insight submissions; the JCI Insight editorial team needs the specific tool name, version, and specific use case
  • "We acknowledge AI assistance in the Acknowledgments." (The journal asks for an AI disclosures paragraph in the Manuscript information section, not the Acknowledgments.)
  • "ChatGPT helped write this paper." (Insufficient detail on use case)
  • No disclosure when AI was used (a required disclosure is missing)

Desk-screen risks we see before submission

For JCI Insight-targeted manuscripts, the patterns below are common AI-policy risk areas to check against the publisher's current guidance before submission. Of the manuscripts we screened in 2025 targeting JCI Insight and peer venues, the patterns below are the ones we check against the journal's published AI guidelines.

AI disclosure missing despite obvious AI-assisted phrasing. Substantive AI-assisted drafting without a required disclosure can trigger an editorial query. Check whether your manuscript reads as AI-assisted

AI disclosure placed in the wrong manuscript location. JCI Insight asks for the disclosure in a paragraph titled AI disclosures in the Manuscript information section, so a disclosure placed in Methods or the Acknowledgments is in the wrong location. A misplaced disclosure can create an avoidable submission query. Check whether your AI disclosure is in the right section

Generic disclosure language without tool name and version. JCI Insight requires the task performed, the name and version of the AI tool, and the date or range of dates of use. "AI tools were used" without specifics does not meet that requirement. Check whether your AI disclosure has the required specificity

What is the JCI Insight AI-policy compliance timeline?

Stage
Duration
What happens
Author drafts AI disclosure
30-60 minutes
Identify all AI use, gather tool versions, write Methods paragraph
Co-author review of disclosure
1-2 days
All authors confirm the disclosure is complete and accurate
Editorial desk-screen check
Journal average of 2.0 days to first decision when not sent for review
The journal's guidelines do not describe a separate AI-disclosure check
Editorial query (if disclosure incomplete)
No journal-published figure
An editor may query an incomplete disclosure; the journal does not publish how queries are handled
Reviewer AI use
Throughout peer review
Reviewers are not permitted to use AI technologies to write reviews

Source: JCI Insight journal metrics page (accessed 2026-10-09) and Manusights internal review of JCI Insight-targeted submissions, 2025 cohort.

Submit If

  • For JCI Insight (American Society for Clinical Investigation) submissions on translational research: the manuscript documents substantive generative-AI use with the tool name, version or access date, specific use case, and disclosure location required by the current journal policy
  • For JCI Insight: no AI tool is listed as an author; all listed authors meet authorship criteria and take responsibility for the final manuscript
  • For JCI Insight (American Society for Clinical Investigation): figures and schematics representing original research data come from the actual research, with any AI-assisted image or figure workflow checked against the current journal image policy
  • For JCI Insight submissions: the disclosure makes clear that human authors reviewed the AI-assisted material and take responsibility for the final manuscript

Readiness check

Run the scan while the topic is in front of you.

See score, top issues, and journal-fit signals before you submit.

Get free manuscript previewPrivate API processing. Your manuscript is not used to train models.See example reports

Think Twice If

  • The manuscript contains substantive AI-assisted drafting but no disclosure; this can trigger an editorial query if the journal requires disclosure for that use case.
  • The AI disclosure is placed in a section the current journal policy does not recognize.
  • The disclosure language is generic without naming the tool, version or access date, and use case; journals may query or return manuscripts with this gap.
  • Any figure, schematic, or image workflow used generative AI without being checked against the current journal image policy.

Manusights submission-corpus signal for JCI Insight (American Society for Clinical Investigation).

Of the manuscripts our team screened before submission to JCI Insight and peer venues in 2025, the AI-policy compliance gap most consistent across the cohort is generic disclosure language without tool-version specificity. In our analysis of anonymized JCI Insight-targeted submissions, manuscripts with complete AI disclosure (tool name, version, specific use case, all-author confirmation) clear desk-screen at the same rate as manuscripts without AI use; manuscripts with incomplete or missing disclosure trigger editorial queries that add 1-2 weeks to the timeline.

JCI Insight (American Society for Clinical Investigation) follows the publisher's public AI policy, but authors should verify the current journal page before submission because AI-use rules, disclosure locations, and image guidance continue to change.

What can JCI Insight authors do to stay ahead of AI policy changes?

The publisher's AI policy framework continues to evolve as 2026 brings new ICMJE recommendations, COPE guidance refinements, and journal-specific clarifications. JCI Insight authors targeting translational research submissions should track three signals throughout 2026:

Policy updates from the journal. The journal's author pages carry the current AI guidelines, and its revised-submission instructions include worked example disclosures, so recheck both before each submission and each revision. JCI Insight authors who pre-register their disclosure language at submission time tend to face fewer revisions during the 2026 transition period than authors who write boilerplate disclosures.

Field-specific clarifications for translational research. Different research domains see different AI use patterns. The journal's guidelines do not distinguish "substantive" from "ancillary" AI use; they ask for explicit description of generative AI used for written or visual content. Authors who err on the side of more disclosure rather than less avoid the publication-ethics gray zone.

Reviewer rules. JCI Insight does not permit peer reviewers to use AI technologies to write reviews, and its publication-ethics page says reviewers are strictly prohibited from using generative AI to assist with the content of reviews.

  • Manusights internal preview corpus (150+ JCI Insight-targeted manuscripts, 2025 cohort)

Competitor pricing and feature claims on this page reflect publicly listed information as of 2026-05-14. Pricing and features may change; verify against each vendor's current product page before decision-making.

Frequently asked questions

Yes, with required disclosure. JCI Insight (American Society for Clinical Investigation) requires generative AI used for written or visual content to be explicitly described in an AI disclosures paragraph in the Manuscript information section, including AI used in research design, data extraction, analysis, synthesis, writing and figure preparation. Generative AI may not be listed as an author, AI may not be used to generate or modify data images, and authors are responsible for verifying the accuracy of AI-generated content.

Disclose it in a paragraph titled AI disclosures in the Manuscript information section. Specify the task performed, the name and version of the AI tool, and the date or range of dates of use, and include a statement that the authors evaluated and take full responsibility for the output. If AI was not used, the journal asks for a statement that no AI tools were used in the original research for or writing of the article.

No, not for data images. JCI Insight (American Society for Clinical Investigation) states that use of AI technology to generate or modify data images is strictly prohibited. Other AI use in figures and graphics, such as AI-assisted layout suggestions for a graphical abstract, must be disclosed with the task, tool, version and dates of use. The journal's image-integrity rules also say that no specific feature within an image may be enhanced, obscured, moved, removed, or introduced.

The journal's published AI guidelines make disclosure mandatory and do not list a specific consequence for leaving it out. Treat an undisclosed use as a risk to the manuscript under the journal's publication-ethics and scientific-integrity policies, and disclose every use up front.

JCI Insight is self-published by the American Society for Clinical Investigation, and its policy covers AI authorship, mandatory disclosure of the task, tool, version and dates of use, a ban on AI-generated or AI-modified data images, and a ban on peer reviewers using AI to write reviews. Check the journal's current author pages for the exact disclosure wording before submission.

References

Sources

  1. JCI Insight publication ethics and generative AI guidelines (accessed 2026-10-09)
  2. JCI Insight author guidelines (accessed 2026-10-09)
  3. ICMJE recommendations on AI use (accessed 2026-05-08)
  4. COPE guidance on AI in research publication (accessed 2026-05-08)

Free guide

AI cannot be an author. None of the 49 policies we checked allows it.

Not a co-author, not an acknowledged contributor with a byline, not "with assistance from". What they do require is a disclosure, and the wording matters. The guide has the statement filled in, with what each publisher asks for beside it.

The guide, plus the weekly brief on getting published. One email on Mondays and a product note at most once a month, unsubscribe in one click.

Before you upload

Choose the next useful decision step first.

Move from this article into the next decision-support step. The scan works best once the journal and submission plan are clearer.

Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.

Private API processing. Your manuscript is not used to train models.

Put the guidance to work

Choose the practical next step for your research.

Start with the question in front of you, or use the guided learning path when you want a clearer view of the full publishing process.

Internal navigation

Where to go next