Journal of Colloid and Interface Science Formatting Requirements: Complete Author Guide
JCIS formatting guide. Word limits, figure specs, reference format, LaTeX vs Word, and journal-specific formatting quirks you need to know.
Senior Researcher, Oncology & Cell Biology
Author context
Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for oncology and cell biology, with deep experience evaluating submissions to Nature Medicine, JCO, Cancer Cell, and Cell-family journals.
Next step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.
The Journal of Colloid and Interface Science (JCIS) is a long-established Elsevier journal covering colloidal and interfacial phenomena, including nanoparticles, emulsions, surfactants, polymers at interfaces, thin films, and related materials science. With an impact factor consistently above 9, it's one of the strongest journals in its field. JCIS follows Elsevier's standard submission framework but adds journal-specific requirements around highlights, graphical abstracts, and structured content that you need to know before submitting. This guide covers the complete formatting specifications.
Quick Answer: JCIS Formatting Essentials
JCIS Regular Articles are limited to 8,000 words (excluding references). The journal requires 3-5 highlights and strongly encourages a graphical abstract. References follow Elsevier's numbered style with square brackets. Both LaTeX (elsarticle) and Word are accepted. Submission goes through Elsevier Editorial Manager.
Word Limits by Article Type
JCIS enforces word limits more strictly than many Elsevier journals. The 8,000-word cap for Regular Articles includes virtually everything except references.
Article Type | Word Limit | Abstract | Highlights |
|---|---|---|---|
Regular Article | 8,000 | 200 words max | 3-5 required |
Rapid Communication | 4,000 | 150 words max | 3-5 required |
Review Article | 15,000 | 300 words max | 3-5 required |
Letter to the Editor | 1,500 | None | None |
The 8,000-word count includes the abstract, body text, figure legends, table content, and acknowledgments. Only the reference list is excluded. This is tighter than it sounds. If you have 8 figures with detailed legends (100 words each) and a 200-word abstract, you've already used 1,000 words before you start writing body text.
Rapid Communications are intended for work of exceptional urgency or novelty. They go through the same peer review process but with a faster editorial decision target. The 4,000-word limit makes them roughly half the length of a Regular Article.
Abstract Requirements
JCIS uses unstructured abstracts for Regular Articles, capped at 200 words. There are no section headings within the abstract.
The abstract should include:
- The problem or question being addressed (1 sentence)
- The approach or methodology (1-2 sentences)
- Main results with quantitative data (2-3 sentences)
- Significance and implications (1 sentence)
Elsevier's editorial system checks the word count automatically and will flag abstracts that exceed 200 words. Be precise.
Avoid referencing figures, tables, or citations in the abstract. Don't use abbreviations that aren't universally recognized. Elsevier's guidelines specify that the abstract should be "a concise and factual representation of the paper" that can stand alone from the article.
Highlights: Required, Not Optional
JCIS requires 3-5 highlights for every submission. Each highlight is a single bullet-point statement limited to 85 characters including spaces. These appear prominently on the article's ScienceDirect page and in search results.
Rules for highlights:
- Minimum 3, maximum 5 statements
- Each statement: 85 characters max including spaces
- Must describe specific findings, not general statements
- No abbreviations, acronyms, or references
- Written in complete sentences or clear noun phrases
Good highlights:
- "Au-Pd nanoalloys achieved 98% dye removal in 15 min under visible light"
- "Surfactant concentration below CMC produced stable Pickering emulsions"
- "Contact angle measurements confirmed superhydrophobic surface modification"
Bad highlights:
- "Novel nanoparticles were synthesized" (too vague)
- "We present results on colloidal stability" (no specific finding)
The 85-character limit is the hardest part. Most authors need several rounds of editing to get highlights under the cap. Write your highlights after the paper is complete, when you can identify the most impactful findings.
Graphical Abstract
JCIS strongly encourages a graphical abstract but doesn't make it strictly mandatory. That said, submitting one significantly increases your article's visibility on ScienceDirect and social media.
Graphical abstract specifications:
- Dimensions: 530 x 300 pixels minimum (landscape orientation)
- Resolution: 300 DPI minimum
- File format: TIFF, EPS, JPEG, or PDF
- Single image summarizing the main finding
- Minimal text allowed (labels only)
- Must be legible at thumbnail size
- No copyright-protected content from other sources
The most effective graphical abstracts in JCIS combine a material characterization image (TEM, SEM, or confocal) with a schematic showing the mechanism or application. Don't try to capture every experiment. Show the starting material on the left, the process in the middle, and the outcome on the right.
Figure and Table Specifications
JCIS doesn't impose a fixed figure limit, but most published Regular Articles contain 5-10 figures. Quality expectations are high.
Figure requirements:
- Minimum resolution: 300 DPI for photographs, 600 DPI for line art
- Accepted formats: TIFF, EPS, JPEG, PNG, or PDF
- Column widths: 90 mm (single column) or 190 mm (full width)
- Font in figures: Arial or Helvetica, minimum 6-point after sizing
- Panel labels: lowercase letters (a, b, c) or (A, B, C), consistent throughout
- Scale bars required on all microscopy images (TEM, SEM, AFM, confocal)
- Axis labels must include units in parentheses
- Color figures are free in the online version; print color costs extra
Table formatting:
- Tables created using Word table function or LaTeX tabular
- Every column must have a header
- Units go in column headers, not repeated in cells
- Use horizontal lines only (top, below headers, bottom)
- Footnotes referenced with superscript lowercase letters
- Tables numbered consecutively and referenced in text
Supplementary Material:
Elsevier calls it "Supplementary Material" or "Appendix" depending on the content type. It's submitted as separate files through Editorial Manager. Common supplementary content in JCIS includes additional characterization data (XRD, FTIR, TGA), detailed synthesis protocols, and extended datasets.
Reference Format: Elsevier Numbered Style
JCIS uses Elsevier's standard numbered reference style with square bracket citations in the text.
Key formatting rules:
- References numbered in order of first appearance
- Cited in text using square brackets: [1], [2-4], [1,5,7]
- All authors listed up to 6; for 7+, list first 6 followed by "et al."
- Journal names abbreviated using standard abbreviations
- Volume in bold, followed by issue number in parentheses, page range
- Year in parentheses after the journal name
Example journal article:
[1] Y. Zhang, T. Liu, W. Chen, S.R. Patel, Self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymers at the oil-water interface: a molecular dynamics study, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 642 (2026) 234-243.
Example book reference:
[2] D.F. Evans, H. Wennerstrom, The Colloidal Domain: Where Physics, Chemistry, Biology, and Technology Meet, second ed., Wiley-VCH, New York, 2025.
Note the Elsevier style details: author initials come after the surname, there's no "and" before the last author, and the year appears in parentheses after the abbreviated journal name. If you're using a reference manager, select the "Journal of Colloid and Interface Science" output style specifically, as generic Elsevier styles may differ in minor details.
LaTeX vs. Word
JCIS accepts both formats through Elsevier Editorial Manager.
LaTeX submissions:
- Use the elsarticle document class, maintained by Elsevier
- The elsarticle-num.bst bibliography style handles JCIS reference formatting
- Submit the compiled PDF plus all source files (.tex, .bib, figures)
- Elsevier's LaTeX template includes options for single-column review format and two-column final format
- Use the review option (\documentclass[review]{elsarticle}) for submission
Word submissions:
- No specific template required, but Elsevier provides one
- Times New Roman or Arial, 12-point, double-spaced
- Number all pages
- Include line numbers (Insert > Line Numbers in Word)
- Figures can be embedded in the text or submitted separately
For JCIS, both formats are equally common. The colloid and interface science community has a mix of chemistry-trained researchers (who tend to use Word) and physics-trained researchers (who often prefer LaTeX). Choose whichever you're comfortable with.
JCIS-Specific Formatting Quirks
1. The CRediT author statement is mandatory. JCIS requires a CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) author statement listing each author's contribution using the standardized taxonomy. This goes in the manuscript and also in the submission form. Roles include Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data Curation, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review and Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration, and Funding acquisition.
2. Declaration of competing interest is required even if there are none. The submission system requires a competing interest statement. "The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper" is the standard wording for no conflicts.
3. Data availability statement. JCIS now requires a data availability statement. Options range from "Data will be made available on request" to depositing data in a public repository. This is a relatively new requirement and is enforced during production.
4. Structured keywords. JCIS asks for 4-6 keywords that appear below the abstract. These should include specific terms (not generic words like "nanoparticles" or "colloid"). Include the material system, technique, and phenomenon: "gold nanorod self-assembly," "dynamic light scattering," "Pickering emulsion."
5. The journal distinguishes between Results/Discussion formats. You can present Results and Discussion as separate sections or combined. Both are accepted, but JCIS papers in applied areas tend to combine them while fundamental studies keep them separate. The choice is yours.
Manuscript Structure
A standard JCIS Regular Article follows this structure:
- Title (concise, specific, no abbreviations)
- Author names and affiliations
- Highlights (3-5 bullet points, 85 characters each)
- Graphical abstract (recommended)
- Abstract (200 words max, unstructured)
- Keywords (4-6 terms)
- Introduction
- Experimental (or Materials and Methods)
- Results and Discussion (combined or separate)
- Conclusions
- CRediT Author Statement
- Declaration of Competing Interest
- Data Availability
- Acknowledgments
- References
- Figure legends (if figures not embedded)
- Figures and Tables
The Introduction should establish the context, identify the specific gap, and state what this study does to address it. JCIS editors look for clear justification of novelty. The Conclusions section should be a brief paragraph (not a list) summarizing findings and their implications. Don't introduce new data or speculation.
Elsevier Editorial Manager: Submission Workflow
JCIS uses Elsevier's Editorial Manager system. The upload process requires:
- Article type selection
- Manuscript file upload (Word or LaTeX with source)
- Individual figure file uploads (even if embedded in manuscript)
- Graphical abstract file (separate upload)
- Supplementary material files
- Highlights entry (typed directly into the form, not in the manuscript file)
- Cover letter
- Suggested and opposed reviewers (typically 3-5 suggested)
- CRediT author contributions
- Data availability statement selection
The highlights are entered directly into Editorial Manager's web form during submission, separate from the manuscript file. However, it's good practice to also include them in the manuscript itself for reviewer convenience.
Common Formatting Mistakes
These errors cause the most delays at JCIS:
- Highlights exceeding 85 characters (the system enforces this strictly)
- Missing CRediT author statement
- Abstract over 200 words
- Figures below 300 DPI, especially when downsized from the original
- References in a non-Elsevier style (common when reformatting from ACS or Nature journals)
- Missing data availability statement
- Keywords that are too generic
Internal Links and Resources
For authors comparing Elsevier journals with other publishers, see our Nature formatting requirements page. If you're working in a related materials science area, our guide on Chemical Engineering Journal formatting requirements covers another high-impact Elsevier venue with similar but not identical requirements.
For the official author instructions, visit the JCIS Guide for Authors.
Get Your Formatting Right Before You Submit
JCIS's Elsevier formatting system is well-structured, but the journal-specific requirements around highlights, graphical abstracts, CRediT statements, and the all-inclusive word count are easy to overlook. Missing any of them means your submission gets returned for corrections, adding days or weeks to your timeline.
If you want to verify your manuscript meets JCIS's specific requirements before submission, try Manusights' free AI manuscript scan. It checks formatting, structure, and reference style against journal-specific standards so you can fix problems before editors see them.
Reference library
Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide
This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.
Dataset / reference guide
Peer Review Timelines by Journal
Reference-grade journal timeline data that authors, labs, and writing centers can cite when discussing realistic review timing.
Dataset / benchmark
Biomedical Journal Acceptance Rates
A field-organized acceptance-rate guide that works as a neutral benchmark when authors are deciding how selective to target.
Reference table
Journal Submission Specs
A high-utility submission table covering word limits, figure caps, reference limits, and formatting expectations.
Before you upload
Want the full journal picture?
Scope, selectivity, what editors want, common rejection reasons, and submission context, all in one place.
These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.
Where to go next
Conversion step
Want the full journal picture?
These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.