Materials (MDPI) APC and Open Access: Full Cost Breakdown and Smarter Alternatives
Materials (MDPI) charges CHF 2,600 (~$2,800) for open access. Gold OA only, no subscription track. Discounts, waivers, and comparison with competing journals.
Senior Researcher, Oncology & Cell Biology
Author context
Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for oncology and cell biology, with deep experience evaluating submissions to Nature Medicine, JCO, Cancer Cell, and Cell-family journals.
Next step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.
Quick answer: Materials, published by MDPI, charges CHF 2,600 (approximately $2,800 USD) for open access. It's a gold OA journal with no subscription track, so every published article requires the APC. MDPI offers several discount pathways, but you should understand how Materials compares to hybrid alternatives where publishing can cost nothing.
What Materials charges
Component | Details |
|---|---|
APC | CHF 2,600 (~$2,800 USD) |
License | CC BY 4.0 (default) |
Submission fee | $0 |
Color figures | $0 |
Page charges | $0 |
Subscription track | Not available (gold OA only) |
Materials is one of MDPI's broadest journals, covering everything from metals and ceramics to polymers, composites, biomaterials, and nanomaterials. It publishes over 8,000 articles per year, making it one of the highest-volume materials science journals in existence.
MDPI bills in Swiss francs. The USD figure fluctuates with exchange rates, but CHF 2,600 has typically converted to $2,700-$2,900 in recent years.
Gold OA only: no free publishing option
This is the first thing to understand about Materials. Unlike hybrid journals from Elsevier, Springer Nature, or Wiley, there's no subscription track. You can't publish for free and let readers access your work through library subscriptions. Every accepted paper costs CHF 2,600.
This changes the economics compared to journals like Materials Letters (Elsevier) or Journal of Materials Science (Springer Nature), where the subscription track is free and OA is optional. If you don't have APC funding, a hybrid journal's subscription track may be the better financial choice.
MDPI discounts and waivers
MDPI's discount structure is more layered than traditional publishers:
Discount type | Typical value | How to access |
|---|---|---|
Institutional membership | 10% off (~CHF 260 saved) | Check with your library |
Review voucher | CHF 300-500 per review | Review for MDPI journals |
Editorial board | Varies (often 20-50% off) | Join the board |
Low-income country | Full waiver | Automatic at submission |
Lower-middle-income | Partial waiver | Automatic at submission |
Guest editor waiver | Full waiver | Edit a special issue |
Hardship waiver | Case by case | Request after acceptance |
Reviewer vouchers are particularly relevant for active researchers. If you review two papers for MDPI journals, you can accumulate enough credit to cover a significant chunk of the Materials APC. MDPI sends voucher codes automatically after you complete a review.
Institutional memberships provide a flat 10% discount. More universities have signed up for MDPI memberships in recent years, though coverage is still far less extensive than Elsevier or Springer R&P agreements.
Institutional agreement landscape
This is where Materials (MDPI) falls short compared to Elsevier or Springer titles:
Agreement type | Applies to Materials? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
Elsevier Read & Publish | No | Different publisher |
Springer Nature Compact | No | Different publisher |
Wiley agreements | No | Different publisher |
MDPI institutional membership | Yes, 10% discount | Growing network but limited |
Direct university deals | Rare | Some institutions have specific MDPI arrangements |
The practical impact is significant. If your institution has a Springer Compact agreement, you can publish OA for free in Scientific Reports or Journal of Materials Science. If it has an Elsevier R&P deal, Materials Letters and Materials Science and Engineering are covered. At Materials (MDPI), you're paying out of your own grant in most cases.
How Materials compares on cost
Journal | APC (USD) | Model | IF (2024) | Publisher | Institutional Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Materials (MDPI) | ~$2,800 | Gold OA | ~3 | MDPI | Limited (MDPI memberships) |
Scientific Reports | ~$2,490 | Gold OA | ~4 | Springer Nature | Springer Compact (broad) |
Materials Letters | ~$3,500 | Hybrid | ~3 | Elsevier | Elsevier R&P (broad) |
J Materials Science | ~$3,400 | Hybrid | ~4 | Springer Nature | Springer Compact (broad) |
Materials Science & Engineering A/B/C | ~$3,500-$4,000 | Hybrid | ~5-6 | Elsevier | Elsevier R&P (broad) |
This comparison tells an interesting story.
Scientific Reports from Springer Nature is the most direct competitor in terms of publishing model. Both are large-volume, gold OA journals with moderate IFs. Scientific Reports charges ~$2,490, which is cheaper than Materials. It also benefits from Springer Nature Compact agreements, meaning many institutions cover the APC. If your institution has a Springer deal, Scientific Reports can be free. Materials rarely is.
Materials Letters from Elsevier charges a higher listed APC (~$3,500), but it's hybrid. The subscription track is free. If your institution has an Elsevier agreement, OA is also free. Materials Letters has a similar IF (~3) and is well-regarded for short communications in materials science.
Journal of Materials Science from Springer Nature charges ~$3,400 for OA, but again, the subscription track is free. Its IF (~4) is slightly higher than Materials. Springer Compact deals cover many institutions.
Materials Science and Engineering (the A, B, and C variants from Elsevier) charge $3,500-$4,000 for OA but offer free subscription-track publishing. IFs are higher (~5-6 for MSE:A).
The pattern is clear: Materials (MDPI) isn't the cheapest option when you account for hybrid journals' free subscription tracks and institutional R&P agreements. Its listed APC is lower than most Elsevier or Springer alternatives, but the effective cost is often higher because you always pay.
What makes Materials distinctive
Despite the cost disadvantage, Materials attracts a huge volume of submissions. Here's why:
Speed. MDPI's review process is fast. Materials typically returns a first decision in 15-20 days. Total time from submission to online publication often runs 5-8 weeks. That's dramatically faster than Elsevier or Springer journals, where 3-6 months is normal.
Broad scope. Materials accepts work across all materials science subfields. If your paper sits at the intersection of multiple materials disciplines, or if it doesn't fit neatly into a specialized journal's scope, Materials provides a home.
High acceptance rate. Estimated at 40-50%, Materials accepts a larger proportion of submissions than selective journals. For work that's methodologically sound but incremental, this matters.
Special issues. A large proportion of Materials content comes through guest-edited special issues. These themed collections can attract a focused readership for your specific subfield.
Immediate OA. Every article is immediately free to read. No embargoes, no access barriers. For fields where practitioners (engineers, industry researchers) need access but don't have institutional subscriptions, this has real value.
Funder mandate compliance
Funder/Policy | Compliant? | Route |
|---|---|---|
Plan S (cOAlition S) | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY (default) |
NIH Public Access | Yes | Immediate gold OA |
UKRI | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY |
ERC | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY |
Horizon Europe | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY |
NSF | Yes | Immediate gold OA |
Like all gold OA journals, Materials automatically satisfies every major funder mandate. The CC BY license is the default, and there's no embargo. This is one clear advantage over hybrid journals, where you need to actively choose OA and select the right license to ensure compliance.
Hidden costs and practical details
- Swiss franc invoicing. MDPI bills in CHF. Foreign transaction fees may apply depending on your institution's payment setup.
- VAT. European authors may face additional VAT charges (7.7% Swiss rate or local rate).
- English editing service. MDPI offers optional paid English editing. It's not required, but reviewers may suggest it. This is a separate cost.
- No page limits in practice, though MDPI encourages concise writing. Supplementary files are hosted for free.
- MDPI templates required. Word and LaTeX templates are free but MDPI-specific.
- Preprint posting. MDPI encourages preprint posting on Preprints.org (MDPI's own preprint server) before or during review. This doesn't cost anything extra.
The reputation factor
Materials, like other large MDPI journals, faces skepticism in some academic circles. The journal's high volume, rapid turnaround, and extensive special issue program have led some researchers to question editorial rigor.
The facts: Materials is indexed in Web of Science and Scopus, has a legitimate IF (~3), and conducts peer review. But the quality of individual papers is more variable than at selective journals. In hiring and promotion contexts, Materials publications generally count but may receive less weight than publications in traditional society journals or high-IF Elsevier/Springer titles.
If your institution or tenure committee evaluates journals closely, factor this into your decision.
The practical decision
- Speed matters most? Materials offers the fastest path to publication in mainstream materials science. Budget CHF 2,600 from your grant.
- Institution has Springer or Elsevier agreements? Consider Scientific Reports (Springer, gold OA, may be covered), Materials Letters (Elsevier, subscription track is free), or J Materials Science (Springer, subscription track is free).
- No APC funding at all? A hybrid journal's subscription track costs $0. Materials Letters, J Materials Science, or MSE:A/B/C let you publish for free.
- Plan S compliance with minimal hassle? Materials' gold OA model handles compliance automatically. No license selection mistakes, no embargo workarounds.
Before submitting, make sure your experimental characterization, data presentation, and novelty statement meet the journal's expectations. Even high-acceptance-rate journals reject poorly prepared manuscripts. Run a free readiness scan to identify the issues that trigger desk rejection.
For more on understanding impact factors and journal selection, see our detailed guide.
Reference library
Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide
This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.
Dataset / reference guide
Peer Review Timelines by Journal
Reference-grade journal timeline data that authors, labs, and writing centers can cite when discussing realistic review timing.
Dataset / benchmark
Biomedical Journal Acceptance Rates
A field-organized acceptance-rate guide that works as a neutral benchmark when authors are deciding how selective to target.
Reference table
Journal Submission Specs
A high-utility submission table covering word limits, figure caps, reference limits, and formatting expectations.
Before you upload
Want the full journal picture?
Scope, selectivity, what editors want, common rejection reasons, and submission context, all in one place.
These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.
Where to go next
Supporting reads
Conversion step
Want the full journal picture?
These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.