NEJM Formatting Requirements: Complete Author Guide
NEJM formatting guide. Word limits, figure specs, reference format, LaTeX vs Word, and journal-specific formatting quirks you need to know.
Senior Researcher, Oncology & Cell Biology
Author context
Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for oncology and cell biology, with deep experience evaluating submissions to Nature Medicine, JCO, Cancer Cell, and Cell-family journals.
Next step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.
Quick answer: NEJM Original Articles are limited to 2,700 words of body text, a structured abstract of 250 words, a maximum of 4 figures or tables, and 40 references. CONSORT compliance is mandatory for clinical trials. All authors must submit ICMJE disclosure forms. A statistical analysis plan is required for clinical trials, and NEJM often requests independent statistical review. These limits are among the strictest in medical publishing.
Word and page limits by article type
NEJM publishes a focused set of article types, each with firm length constraints.
Article Type | Body Word Limit | Reference Cap | Display Items | Abstract |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Original Article | 2,700 words | 40 | 4 (figures + tables) | 250 words, structured |
Special Article | 2,700 words | 40 | 4 | 250 words, structured |
Review Article | 4,000 words | 80 | 6 | 150 words, unstructured |
Brief Report | 1,500 words | 15 | 2 | None |
Case Report (Case Records) | Varies (invited) | Varies | Varies | N/A |
Sounding Board | 2,000 words | 15 | 2 | None |
Perspective | 1,200 words | 5 | 1 | None |
Correspondence | 175 words | 3 | 1 | None |
At 2,700 words, NEJM's Original Article is tighter than The Lancet (3,000 words) and substantially tighter than Cell (7,000 words). Combined with only 4 display items, this means every paragraph and every figure must carry real weight.
The Brief Report format at 1,500 words is useful for focused findings that don't require a full Original Article. It has no abstract, which means the opening paragraph functions as both introduction and summary.
Correspondence at 175 words is extraordinarily short. That's about 7-8 sentences. NEJM Correspondence is used for comments on recently published articles, and the tight limit forces authors to make exactly one point.
Review Articles are typically commissioned by the editors. Unsolicited review proposals can be submitted but are rarely accepted. If you're planning a review, contact the editorial office first.
Abstract requirements
NEJM's structured abstract is a model of clinical reporting clarity.
- Word limit: 250 words maximum
- Structure: Four required headings:
- Background: The clinical question and rationale (2-3 sentences)
- Methods: Study design, setting, patients, intervention, and primary outcome
- Results: Main findings with effect sizes, confidence intervals, p values
- Conclusions: Clinical meaning of the findings (not a restatement of results)
- Trial registration: For clinical trials, the ClinicalTrials.gov number must appear at the end of the abstract
- Funded by: A separate line after the abstract stating the funding source
- Citations: Not permitted in the abstract
- Keywords: Not required. NEJM assigns MeSH indexing internally.
NEJM editors pay particular attention to the Conclusions section of the abstract. It shouldn't be a restatement of the Results. It should provide a clinical interpretation: what should doctors do differently based on these findings? If your Conclusions section reads like a compressed version of your Results, it needs rewriting.
The "Funded by" line is mandatory and appears after the Conclusions but before the main text begins. It's separate from the 250-word count.
Figure and table specifications
NEJM's 4-item cap on display items is the tightest among the journals covered in this guide.
Parameter | Requirement |
|---|---|
Maximum display items (Original Article) | 4 (figures + tables combined) |
Maximum display items (Review) | 6 |
Resolution (minimum) | 300 dpi |
Resolution (line art) | 1,200 dpi |
File formats | TIFF, EPS, JPEG, PDF |
Maximum figure width | Single column: 8.3 cm; double column: 17.4 cm |
Font in figures | Arial, Helvetica, 8-10 pt |
Color | Accepted at no charge; must work in grayscale |
With only 4 display items, strategic figure planning matters more at NEJM than at almost any other journal. A clinical trial with a CONSORT flow diagram (often required) and a Kaplan-Meier curve has already used 2 of 4 slots.
Table formatting: NEJM has specific table style requirements:
- No vertical rules
- Horizontal rules only at top, below headers, and at bottom
- Every column must have a header
- Baseline characteristics tables (Table 1 in most clinical trials) should show treatment groups side by side
- P values should generally not appear in baseline characteristics tables (unless relevant to the study question)
NEJM figure style: NEJM's art department redraws all accepted figures to match the journal's house style. You submit your best version, but the published figures will look different. They'll use NEJM's color palette, font choices, and layout conventions. This means you don't need to match NEJM's exact style at submission, but your figures must contain all the necessary data and labeling for the art department to work from.
Interactive figures: NEJM increasingly publishes interactive figures for its online version (e.g., interactive forest plots, dynamic Kaplan-Meier curves). If your data supports interactivity, discuss this with the editorial office at the revision stage.
Reference format
NEJM uses Vancouver-style numbered references, similar to The Lancet.
In-text citations: Superscript numbers (e.g., "as previously reported^1,2"). Numbered in order of first appearance.
Reference list format:
1. Author AB, Author CD, Author EF, et al. Title of article. Journal Abbrev Year;Volume:Pages.Key formatting details:
- List up to 20 authors before using "et al." (NEJM is more generous than The Lancet's 6-author limit)
- No periods after author initials
- Journal names abbreviated per MEDLINE/NLM standards
- No issue numbers for most journals
- Year followed by semicolon, volume, colon, pages
- DOI included for online-ahead-of-print or online-only articles
- Personal communications: cited in parentheses in the text with written permission, not in the reference list
- Unpublished data: cited in the text as "(unpublished data)" with no reference list entry
The reference cap for Original Articles is 40, which is more generous than The Lancet's 30 but still requires careful curation. Every reference should directly support a specific claim in the text.
NEJM-specific detail: references to retracted articles must be labeled. If you cite a paper that was later retracted, add "[Retracted]" after the title. NEJM editors check for this during production.
Supplementary material guidelines
NEJM calls its supplementary content the "Supplementary Appendix."
Supplementary Appendix contents:
- Extended Methods (detailed protocol, statistical analysis plan)
- Supplementary tables (labeled Table S1, S2, etc.)
- Supplementary figures (labeled Figure S1, S2, etc.)
- Additional results (subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses)
- Trial protocol (required for all clinical trials)
- Statistical analysis plan (required for clinical trials)
- ICMJE disclosure forms (submitted separately but considered part of the supplement)
Formatting:
- Compiled as a single PDF
- Internal pagination starting at page 1
- Must include a table of contents if longer than 10 pages
- Goes through full peer review
Protocol and SAP publication: For clinical trials, NEJM publishes the full trial protocol and statistical analysis plan as part of the Supplementary Appendix. These documents are available to readers and are considered part of the published record. The protocol must be the final version approved by the IRB/ethics committee, and the SAP must be the version that was finalized before database lock.
Data sharing: NEJM requires a data sharing statement. For clinical trials, NEJM supports data sharing through the NEJM Data Sharing platform or established repositories. The statement specifies what data will be available, to whom, and under what conditions.
NEJM's Supplementary Appendix often runs 20-60 pages for major clinical trials. There's no formal page limit, but everything in the appendix should be directly relevant to the main paper.
LaTeX vs Word
NEJM is a Word-dominant journal. LaTeX is accepted but rarely used.
Initial submission: A single PDF combining all manuscript components is preferred.
Revision/acceptance:
- Word: Strongly preferred. NEJM provides a Word template available from the NEJM author center.
- LaTeX: Accepted but uncommon. Use Elsevier's or a generic article class. NEJM doesn't provide a journal-specific LaTeX template.
The practical reality: NEJM publishes almost entirely clinical and translational research. Papers rarely contain complex mathematical notation that would benefit from LaTeX. Over 95% of NEJM submissions come in Word format, and the production pipeline is optimized for it.
If you do use LaTeX, ensure your BibTeX database outputs Vancouver-style references. The vancouver.bst style file works for NEJM's format with minor adjustments.
Cover page requirements
NEJM requires a detailed title page.
Title page elements:
- Title: Concise, descriptive, no abbreviations. For clinical trials, include the study design: "Drug X versus Placebo for Condition Y: A Randomized Controlled Trial."
- Author names and degrees: Full names with highest academic degrees (MD, PhD, etc.). NEJM is one of the few journals that requires degrees to be listed.
- Institutional affiliations: Department, institution, city, state/country.
- Corresponding author: Full postal address, email, phone, fax.
- Word count: Listed explicitly (body text and abstract separately).
- Number of display items: Listed explicitly.
- Support/funding: Listed on the title page in addition to the "Funded by" abstract line.
- Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier for all clinical trials.
ICMJE Forms: All authors must complete the ICMJE Uniform Disclosure Form for Potential Conflicts of Interest. This is non-negotiable. Forms must be completed within the previous 12 months. NEJM helped create the ICMJE disclosure framework, and compliance is verified before any manuscript proceeds to review. You can download the form from the ICMJE website.
Author contributions: NEJM requires a statement describing each author's contribution. The journal follows ICMJE authorship criteria strictly: (1) substantial contributions to conception/design or data acquisition/analysis, (2) drafting or critical revision, (3) final approval, and (4) accountability for the work.
Statistical requirements
NEJM has stricter statistical reporting requirements than most journals, and this is an area where many manuscripts fail.
Statistical analysis plan (SAP): Required for all clinical trials. Must be finalized before database lock. Published as part of the Supplementary Appendix.
Independent statistical review: NEJM frequently requests that the statistical analysis be independently verified. For industry-sponsored trials, NEJM may require that an independent academic statistician (not employed by the sponsor) verify the primary analysis. This requirement has caught many industry submissions off guard.
Specific reporting requirements:
- All p values must be two-sided
- Confidence intervals (95%) are preferred over p values for treatment effects
- Exact p values should be reported (e.g., p=0.03), not inequality thresholds (p<0.05)
- Bonferroni or other multiple-comparison corrections must be applied and explained when applicable
- Intention-to-treat analysis is the primary analysis for randomized trials
- Sensitivity analyses should test whether findings hold under alternative assumptions
Trial reporting: CONSORT compliance is mandatory for all randomized trials. The CONSORT flow diagram is required and counts as one of your 4 display items. For non-randomized studies, STROBE compliance is expected. For systematic reviews, PRISMA is required.
Journal-specific formatting quirks
These are the details that experienced NEJM authors know:
Author degrees on the byline. NEJM lists author degrees (MD, PhD, MPH, etc.) next to names in the published article. This is unusual among top journals. Submit the correct degrees for all authors at the initial submission to avoid production delays.
NEJM redraws all figures. Unlike most journals that use author-submitted figures as-is (with minor adjustments), NEJM's art department redraws every figure from scratch to match the journal's visual style. Submit clean, well-labeled source figures with all data clearly indicated. The published version will look different but contain the same information.
The "Funded by" line is structural. This line appears between the abstract and the main text and is visible in every format (print, HTML, PDF). It's not a footnote or acknowledgment. It's a fixed structural element of every NEJM Original Article. Don't bury funding information only in the Acknowledgments.
Editorials accompany major articles. If your Original Article is accepted, NEJM will typically commission an independent editorial that publishes alongside it. You don't write this editorial, but knowing it exists helps you understand the publication timeline. The editorial author receives your manuscript in advance and may contact you with questions.
Proof review is author-responsible. NEJM provides page proofs and expects careful author review. The journal makes this clear: factual errors that survive to publication because authors didn't catch them during proofing are the authors' responsibility. Check every number, every CI, every p value in proofs.
Conventional units first. NEJM uses conventional units for laboratory values (mg/dL, cells/mm^3), with SI units in parentheses. This is the opposite of The Lancet, which prefers SI units first. Getting this wrong won't trigger rejection, but it marks you as unfamiliar with the journal.
No graphical abstract. Unlike Cell (where it's mandatory), NEJM does not use graphical abstracts. Don't submit one.
Video abstracts. NEJM increasingly features video summaries of major articles, produced by the NEJM media team. Authors may be invited to participate in a video interview for their paper. This is arranged post-acceptance and is optional.
Frequently missed formatting requirements
- ICMJE forms for every author. Not just the corresponding author. Every person listed as an author must submit a completed ICMJE disclosure form. Missing forms will delay processing.
- Degrees on the title page. Include the highest academic degree for each author (MD, PhD, ScD, etc.). NEJM requires this and will request it if omitted.
- CONSORT flow diagram counts as a display item. Plan your 4-item budget knowing that clinical trials almost always need a flow diagram.
- ClinicalTrials.gov number in the abstract. For trials, the registration number must appear at the end of the abstract, not just on the title page.
- Statistical analysis plan finalized before unblinding. For randomized trials, NEJM requires documentation that the SAP was locked before the database was unblinded. Submitting without this documentation will trigger editorial queries.
- Double-spacing and line numbers. Required for the review manuscript. Submissions without line numbers make it harder for reviewers and will be returned.
Submission checklist
Before submitting to NEJM, verify:
- Body text is within 2,700 words (Original Article)
- Structured abstract (Background, Methods, Results, Conclusions) is within 250 words
- "Funded by" line appears after the abstract
- Display items total 4 or fewer (figures + tables)
- References are Vancouver style, numbered, 40 or fewer with up to 20 authors listed
- ICMJE disclosure forms completed for all authors
- CONSORT checklist and flow diagram included (for trials)
- Trial registration number in the abstract and on the title page
- Statistical analysis plan in the Supplementary Appendix
- Author degrees listed on the title page
- Data sharing statement included
- Double-spacing and line numbers throughout
- Conventional units used (not SI first)
NEJM publishes roughly 5% of submitted Original Articles. The formatting has to be perfect just to get past the initial screen. If you want to check whether your manuscript meets the structural and formatting standards of top medical journals before submitting, run a free readiness scan to identify gaps that lead to desk rejection.
For the full and most current author guidelines, see NEJM's instructions for authors. The ICMJE disclosure form is available from the ICMJE website.
If you're deciding between NEJM and The Lancet, our Lancet formatting requirements guide compares word limits, abstract structure, and reporting standards side by side.
Reference library
Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide
This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.
Dataset / reference guide
Peer Review Timelines by Journal
Reference-grade journal timeline data that authors, labs, and writing centers can cite when discussing realistic review timing.
Dataset / benchmark
Biomedical Journal Acceptance Rates
A field-organized acceptance-rate guide that works as a neutral benchmark when authors are deciding how selective to target.
Reference table
Journal Submission Specs
A high-utility submission table covering word limits, figure caps, reference limits, and formatting expectations.
Before you upload
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Move from this article into the next decision-support step. The scan works best once the journal and submission plan are clearer.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.
Where to go next
Conversion step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.