Journal Guides7 min readUpdated Mar 24, 2026

Nutrients APC and Open Access: MDPI Pricing, Reputation, and How It Compares to Top Nutrition Journals

Nutrients (MDPI) charges CHF 2,900 (~$3,150) for open access. Gold OA, IF ~5. How it compares to Journal of Nutrition, AJCN, and alternatives.

Senior Researcher, Oncology & Cell Biology

Author context

Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for oncology and cell biology, with deep experience evaluating submissions to Nature Medicine, JCO, Cancer Cell, and Cell-family journals.

Next step

Choose the next useful decision step first.

Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.

Open Journal Fit ChecklistAnthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.Run Free Readiness Scan

Quick answer: Nutrients charges CHF 2,900 (~$3,150 USD) per article. It's a fully gold open access journal published by MDPI, and it's become one of the most-published-in nutrition journals worldwide. With an impact factor around 5 and over 5,000 articles per year, Nutrients occupies a unique space: higher-impact than most MDPI journals, but more accessible than traditional society-published nutrition journals.

What Nutrients charges

Component
Details
Standard APC
CHF 2,900 (~$3,150 USD)
Model
Gold OA (all articles)
License
CC BY (default, required)
Submission fee
$0
Color figures
$0
Page charges
$0

MDPI prices all journals in Swiss Francs. The USD equivalent fluctuates with exchange rates, and the Swiss Franc has been historically strong against the dollar, which can push the effective cost above $3,150 at times.

The APC is charged at acceptance. MDPI invoices through its Author Services portal. Payment by credit card, wire transfer, or institutional purchase order is accepted. Notably, Nutrients' CHF 2,900 APC is higher than many other MDPI journals (for example, Sensors charges CHF 2,600), reflecting Nutrients' stronger impact factor.

The MDPI publishing model

If you haven't published with MDPI before, the model is different from traditional publishers. Here's what to expect:

Speed is the headline feature. MDPI journals are known for rapid turnaround. First decisions at Nutrients typically arrive within 2-4 weeks. This is dramatically faster than most society journals in nutrition, where 8-16 week review times are common.

Volume is high. Nutrients publishes over 5,000 articles per year. For context, the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition publishes around 300-400, and the Journal of Nutrition publishes around 250-350. Nutrients is operating at megajournal scale in a specialized field.

Special Issues are a major pathway. A large fraction of Nutrients publications come through Special Issues, themed collections organized by Guest Editors. MDPI actively recruits Guest Editors and promotes Special Issue participation. Some researchers view Special Issues positively (curated topic collections, community building); others are wary (potential quality variance, unsolicited invitations).

CC BY is the only license. There's no CC BY-NC-ND option. All articles are published under CC BY, meaning anyone can reuse your work, including commercially, with attribution. This satisfies all funder OA mandates.

MDPI institutional discounts

MDPI doesn't structure institutional agreements the way Elsevier or Springer Nature do. Instead, it offers its own programs:

Institutional Open Access Program (IOAP): Participating institutions receive 10% off all MDPI APCs. Over 500 institutions participate globally. The discount isn't as substantial as a full R&P agreement, but it's something.

No Read & Publish deals. Since all MDPI journals are already gold OA, there's no subscription component to bundle. MDPI's discount model is simpler: IOAP membership or individual waivers.

Library recommendation program: Endorsement from your institutional library can unlock additional discounts.

Check MDPI's institutional page to see if your institution participates.

Waivers

Automatic country-based waivers: MDPI provides full APC waivers for corresponding authors from lower-income countries, using its own classification system. Lower-middle-income countries receive partial discounts.

Hardship waivers: Available on request. MDPI states that financial limitations shouldn't prevent publication of quality research. Approval is discretionary.

Editor/reviewer discounts: Active MDPI editors and reviewers sometimes receive APC discount vouchers. If you review frequently for MDPI journals, ask about this program.

No funder-specific deals. Unlike some publishers that have direct arrangements with funding bodies, MDPI handles waivers at the individual or institutional level.

How Nutrients compares

Journal
APC (USD)
Model
IF (2024)
Annual Volume
Publisher
Nutrients (MDPI)
~$3,150
Gold OA
~5
~5,000+
MDPI
Journal of Nutrition
~$2,000-$3,000
Hybrid
~4
~300
ASN/Oxford
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
~$4,000-$5,000
Hybrid
~7
~350
ASN/Oxford
British Journal of Nutrition
~$3,200
Hybrid
~3
~500
Cambridge UP
Frontiers in Nutrition
~$2,950
Gold OA
~4
~3,000
Frontiers
$2,850
Gold OA
~3.9
~20,000
Springer Nature

This comparison reveals several things:

Nutrients vs. Journal of Nutrition: The Journal of Nutrition is published by the American Society for Nutrition (ASN) through Oxford University Press. It's a society journal with deep roots and strong name recognition in the US nutrition community. Its IF (~4) is actually slightly lower than Nutrients (~5), but it carries more prestige in certain academic circles due to its selectivity and society backing. The Journal of Nutrition is a better choice if society affiliation matters to your audience.

Nutrients vs. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (AJCN): AJCN is the premium nutrition journal, with an IF around 7. It's far more selective and publishes mostly clinical nutrition studies with large sample sizes or RCTs. Its APC is higher (~$4,000-$5,000), and it's a hybrid journal with institutional agreements through Oxford UP. If your study is strong enough for AJCN, it's the higher-prestige choice. But most nutrition research won't meet AJCN's selectivity threshold.

Nutrients vs. British Journal of Nutrition: BJN (Cambridge University Press) has a lower IF (~3) and a more traditional publication model. It's well-regarded in Europe and publishes a mix of clinical and basic nutrition research. The APC is similar to Nutrients, but BJN is a hybrid journal with subscription-track available.

Nutrients vs. Frontiers in Nutrition: Both are gold OA journals at similar price points. Frontiers in Nutrition has a lower IF (~4) and a similar MDPI-like model (fast review, high volume, Special Issues called "Research Topics"). The choice between them often comes down to which has published more in your specific subfield.

Funder mandate compliance

Funder/Policy
Compliant?
Plan S (cOAlition S)
Yes (CC BY, gold OA)
NIH
Yes (immediate OA, PubMed Central deposit)
UKRI
Yes
ERC/Horizon Europe
Yes
NSF
Yes
Wellcome Trust
Yes

Fully compliant across all mandates. CC BY is the default and only license option. All Nutrients articles are deposited in PubMed Central, satisfying NIH requirements automatically.

What Nutrients publishes

Nutrients covers the full range of nutrition science:

  1. Clinical nutrition. Dietary interventions, supplementation trials, malnutrition management, and nutritional assessment in clinical populations. This is the journal's strongest area by volume.
  1. Nutritional epidemiology. Cohort studies, dietary pattern analysis, nutrient intake associations with disease outcomes. The journal publishes many observational studies that might not meet the novelty threshold at AJCN.
  1. Micronutrient research. Vitamin D, iron, zinc, folate, and other micronutrient studies. The journal has become a major venue for vitamin D research in particular.
  1. Gut health and microbiome. Probiotics, prebiotics, dietary fiber, and gut microbiota composition studies. This is a growing area within the journal.
  1. Sports nutrition. Supplement efficacy, dietary strategies for athletes, and exercise-nutrition interactions.

Three Nutrients-specific facts:

  1. The journal has published more vitamin D research papers than any other single journal in the past five years.
  2. Nutrients was launched in 2009 and crossed the 5,000 articles/year mark by 2022, one of the fastest-growing journals in the nutrition category.
  3. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses make up a substantial fraction of Nutrients' most-cited papers. If you have a well-conducted meta-analysis, this is a receptive venue.

Hidden costs

  • Currency risk. CHF pricing means the USD cost shifts with exchange rates. The Swiss Franc tends to strengthen over time, which can make the effective APC rise.
  • Special Issue fees: No additional charges for publishing in Special Issues. But be selective about which invitations you accept. Legitimate Special Issues are organized by recognized researchers in the field.
  • No page limits, but very long manuscripts may face editorial requests to trim.
  • Rapid review comes with expectations. MDPI's speed means reviewers have shorter turnaround windows. This can occasionally result in less thorough reviews, though Nutrients generally maintains decent review quality.

The practical decision

Nutrients makes sense when:

  1. You need fast, indexed, gold OA publication in nutrition science
  2. Your work is methodologically sound but doesn't meet the selectivity of AJCN or Journal of Nutrition
  3. Plan S compliance requires immediate CC BY publication
  4. You have a systematic review or meta-analysis that fits the journal's scope
  5. Speed matters for your career timeline or funding reporting

Think carefully if:

  1. Your audience primarily reads AJCN or Journal of Nutrition and might view MDPI skeptically
  2. You're in a field where MDPI's reputation is controversial (this varies by institution and country)
  3. Budget is very tight and Frontiers in Nutrition (~$2,950) or a society journal with subscription-track ($0) could work

Before submitting, make sure your methodology section is rigorous, your statistical analysis is appropriate, and your claims match your data. Nutrients reviewers are generally constructive, but sloppy statistics or overclaimed results will still get caught. Run a free readiness scan to check your manuscript before submission.

Reference library

Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide

This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.

Open the reference library

Before you upload

Want the full journal picture?

Scope, selectivity, what editors want, common rejection reasons, and submission context, all in one place.

These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.

Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.

Internal navigation

Where to go next

Open Journal Guide