Nutrients Formatting Requirements: Complete Author Guide
Nutrients formatting guide. Word limits, figure specs, reference format, LaTeX vs Word, and journal-specific formatting quirks you need to know.
Readiness scan
Formatting done? See what Nutrients reviewers are likely to push back on.
Formatting gets a paper past the technical check, not past the editor. Run the Free Readiness Scan with Nutrients as your target to see desk-rejection risk, likely reviewer concerns, and journal fit.
Quick answer: Nutrients (MDPI) has no maximum length for research articles, though most published papers run 4,000 to 8,000 words. Its instructions ask for a structured abstract of around 250 words, while MDPI's general style guide says up to 200 words; the publisher's documents differ, so aim for 200 words or fewer.
Nutrients accepts free-format first submissions (the MDPI Word or LaTeX template is encouraged), uses MDPI's numbered reference style with abbreviated journal names, and publishes all content open access. The journal covers human nutrition, including clinical nutrition, public health nutrition, and functional foods.
Before working through the formatting details, a Nutrients pre-submission checklist flags the structural issues that cause desk rejection before editors even reach the formatting questions.
Word and page limits by article type
Nutrients is an open-access journal published by MDPI (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute). It's one of MDPI's highest-profile journals with an impact factor above 5. Unlike traditional subscription journals with tight page budgets, Nutrients has no maximum manuscript length.
Article Type | Word Guideline | Abstract | Figures/Tables | Reference Guideline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Research Article | No maximum length (typically 4,000-8,000) | Structured, around 250 words (MDPI style guide: up to 200) | No published limit | No formal cap |
Review | No maximum length (typically 6,000-12,000) | MDPI style guide: up to 200 words, one paragraph | No published limit | No formal cap |
Systematic Review | No maximum length | Structured, around 250 words (MDPI style guide: up to 200) | No published limit | No formal cap |
Communication | No published limit | No separate limit published | No published limit | No formal cap |
Brief Report | No published limit | No separate limit published | MDPI says Brief Reports usually contain two figures and/or a table | No formal cap |
Editorial | No published limit | No separate limit published | No published limit | No formal cap |
The absence of a strict word limit doesn't mean you should write without restraint. MDPI reviewers will flag unnecessary padding. Most successful Nutrients research articles land between 4,500 and 7,000 words. If your paper runs past 10,000 words, ask yourself whether it could be split into two focused papers.
Nutrients publishes roughly 4,000 articles per year (3,940 in 2025, per MDPI's journal statistics page), making it one of the most prolific journals in the nutrition space. That page lists a 71% rejection rate for 2025 and 67% for 2026 (data as of 30 June 2026). The review process is fast: MDPI's journal page reports a median of about 15.8 days from submission to first decision (first half of 2026).
MDPI describes Communications as short articles that present preliminary results or significant findings that are part of a larger study, and Brief Reports as short observational studies that report preliminary results; Nutrients does not publish a word limit for either. Not every MDPI article type is available at every journal, so check the article types offered in the submission form.
Abstract requirements
Nutrients asks for a structured abstract for original research articles and systematic reviews.
- Word limit: around 250 words in the Nutrients instructions; up to 200 words in MDPI's general style guide (the documents differ, so aim for 200 or fewer)
- Structure: Structured, with the headings Background/Objectives, Methods, Results, and Conclusions (Nutrients instructions); MDPI's general style guide describes a single paragraph without headings
- Citations: Not allowed in the abstract
- Keywords: 3 to 10 keywords, listed after the abstract
- Abbreviations: Avoid in the abstract where possible; define at first use if necessary
The abstract should cover the research question, methodology, main results (with specific numbers), and conclusions. Nutrients covers everything from molecular nutrition to public health, so the abstract needs to clearly position the work within its specific sub-field.
MDPI journals index keywords aggressively for SEO and discovery. Choose keywords that complement the title rather than repeating it. If your title mentions "vitamin D supplementation," your keywords should include related terms like "25-hydroxyvitamin D," "bone mineral density," or "deficiency prevalence."
Figure and table specifications
Nutrients follows MDPI's standard figure guidelines, which are more relaxed than many traditional publishers.
Figure specifications:
Parameter | Requirement |
|---|---|
Resolution | Preferably no less than 600 dpi |
Accepted formats | PNG, JPEG or TIFF |
Color mode | Color figures are encouraged, in RGB at 8-bit per channel |
Table font size | Smaller fonts, no smaller than 8 pt, may be used for larger tables |
Placement | Insert figures close to their first citation, numbered in order of appearance |
Total upload size | All files together must not exceed 120 MB |
There's no cap on the number of figures or tables. This is one of the advantages of MDPI's online-only format. You can include as many figures as needed without worrying about page charges or print constraints. That said, every figure should add something. Reviewers will question figures that could be summarized in a sentence.
MDPI-specific figure requirements:
- Figures must be cited in the text in sequential order
- Multi-panel figures use lowercase letters: (a), (b), (c)
- Figure captions go below the figure (handled by the template)
Tables in Nutrients follow a specific MDPI format. They must have a caption above the table, and a table footnote can be added below it. The MDPI template handles this layout. MDPI advises against vertical lines, blank rows and blank columns, and tables must be editable, not supplied as images.
Color is free because Nutrients is online-only. There's no concept of print color charges. Use color whenever it improves comprehension.
Reference format
Nutrients uses the MDPI house reference style, a numbered style in which journal names are abbreviated according to ISO 4 rules.
In-text citations: Bracketed numbers [1], [2], [1,2], [1-3]. Sequential order based on first appearance.
Reference list format:
1. Author, A.B.; Author, C.D. Title of Article. Abbreviated Journal Name Year, Volume, Article Number or Pages.Key formatting specifics:
- Author names: Surname, initials with periods (e.g., "Smith, J.K.")
- Use semicolons between authors
- Abbreviated journal names (ISO 4 rules), as in MDPI's own example "Am. J. Clin. Nutr." If you are not sure how to abbreviate a title, MDPI says to leave the full title and the Editorial Office will abbreviate it.
- Article titles in sentence case
- Year follows journal name, preceded by a space
- Volume follows the year, followed by article number or page range
- DOIs are not mandatory but are highly encouraged
If you're using a citation manager, you'll need to change the output style to MDPI format. The Nutrients instructions say style files for EndNote and Zotero are available, but double-check that journal names come out abbreviated as in MDPI's example.
There's no formal cap on references. Research articles typically cite 30 to 60 sources. Reviews can go much higher. MDPI doesn't penalize long reference lists.
Supplementary material guidelines
MDPI journals handle supplementary material through their own hosting system.
Common supplementary content for Nutrients:
- Extended data tables (dietary intake data, nutrient databases)
- Additional statistical analyses
- Survey instruments and questionnaires
- Detailed participant flow diagrams
- Raw or processed datasets
Supplementary material is submitted through the MDPI submission system as separate files. Each file must be cited in the main text with the S prefix, as "Figure S1" or "Table S1." MDPI uses a specific format: "Figure S1" (not "Supplementary Figure 1" or "SF1").
Supplementary files are available to the referees during peer review and are published alongside the article. They are hosted on the MDPI website and freely accessible.
For large datasets, MDPI encourages deposition in public repositories (Figshare, Zenodo, institutional repositories). The DOI should be cited in the data availability statement.
MDPI's data availability statement: Required for all articles. This appears as a dedicated section at the end of the paper (handled by the template). You must specify where data is available, whether on request, in supplementary material, or in a public repository.
LaTeX vs Word: what Nutrients actually prefers
Nutrients accepts both and encourages authors to use the MDPI templates.
Word (most common): The Nutrients instructions encourage authors to use the Microsoft Word template and say that using it will substantially shorten the time to copy-edit and publish accepted manuscripts. Download it from the MDPI author instructions page. Manuscripts prepared in Word must be converted into a single file before submission, with graphics inserted in the main text after the paragraph of their first citation.
LaTeX: MDPI provides Nutrients LaTeX template files. Manuscripts prepared in LaTeX must be collated into one ZIP folder, including all source files and images so that the Editorial Office can recompile the submitted PDF. You can also submit directly from the writeLaTeX template gallery by selecting the MDPI LaTeX template.
In the nutrition and food science community, Word is dominant. Probably 90%+ of Nutrients submissions arrive in Word format. LaTeX is uncommon in this field unless the paper involves substantial statistical modeling or mathematical nutrition models.
One important Nutrients-specific point: the journal now accepts free-format submissions. There are no strict formatting requirements at first submission, but every manuscript must contain the required sections: Author Information, Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Materials & Methods, Results, Conclusions, Figures and Tables with Captions, Funding Information, Author Contributions, Conflict of Interest and other Ethics Statements. References may be in any style as long as the formatting is consistent, and when the manuscript reaches the revision stage you will be asked to format it according to the journal guidelines.
Journal-specific formatting quirks
These are Nutrients and MDPI-specific details that catch authors off guard:
Template is encouraged, not mandatory, at first submission. Nutrients accepts free-format submissions and asks for formatting to the journal guidelines at the revision stage. Using the template substantially shortens copy-editing time after acceptance, so download the current version if you plan to use it.
Author information is detailed. MDPI requires full first and last names (the initials of any middle names can be added) and strongly recommends that authors have an ORCID iD. Authors are also encouraged to add an optional biography of 300 to 1,500 characters and post it to SciProfiles.
Section numbering is automatic. The MDPI template numbers sections automatically (1. Introduction, 2. Materials and Methods, etc.). Don't add your own section numbers. The template handles it.
Research article structure. The Nutrients instructions list the sections of a research article as Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusions (optional). The Discussion may be combined with the Results.
Ethics statements are prominently placed. For human studies, the ethics statement (IRB approval number, informed consent) appears in its own section at the end of the paper, not buried in the Methods. The MDPI template includes dedicated sections for this.
Funding statement format. MDPI requires a specific format: "This research was funded by [Funder Name], grant number [Number]." Use the exact template wording.
Author contributions section. Required. Each author's role described using CRediT-like categories. The template provides a dedicated section for this.
Frequently missed formatting requirements
These get flagged in MDPI technical review:
- Journal names in references. MDPI's reference guide asks for abbreviated journal names (ISO 4 rules). Citation managers can output full names, so switch to MDPI style and verify every reference manually.
- Required sections missing. Nutrients accepts free-format submissions, but the manuscript must still contain the required sections. The MDPI Word or LaTeX template makes that easier.
- ORCID iDs missing. MDPI strongly recommends that authors have an ORCID account. The iD can be added in the submission system and is included in the published paper with an icon linking to the ORCID profile.
- Data availability statement missing. MDPI requires this for all articles. It's a template section, so fill it in rather than deleting it.
- Ethics statement for human studies. Any research involving human participants must include IRB approval details and informed consent statements. This is checked by the editorial office before review.
Submit If / Think Twice If
Submit if:
- Your nutrition, food science, or dietary intervention study has sufficient sample size, appropriate controls, and a clear mechanistic or clinical contribution
- The manuscript contains all required sections (the current MDPI template makes this easier) and the abstract follows the Nutrients structure with no citations
- The corresponding author's ORCID iD is registered and ready to link during submission
- References use MDPI format with abbreviated journal names
- See the Nutrients journal profile for full scope and acceptance criteria
Think twice if:
- The manuscript is not yet in MDPI template format; Nutrients accepts free-format first submissions, but you will be asked to format it to the journal guidelines at the revision stage, so using the template early saves time
- The abstract cites literature or uses abbreviations not defined within the abstract text; this is a common MDPI-specific requirement that authors from other publisher backgrounds frequently overlook
- The study lacks a control group or has a sample size too small for the dietary intervention being evaluated; Nutrients reviewers assess study design rigor, not just statistical significance
- The corresponding author does not have an ORCID iD; MDPI strongly recommends one, and registration is free
Readiness check
Run the scan while the topic is in front of you.
See score, top issues, and journal-fit signals before you submit.
What Pre-Submission Reviews Reveal About Nutrients Submissions
For manuscripts targeting Nutrients, four patterns generate the most consistent desk-rejection outcomes.
Required sections missing from a free-format manuscript. Nutrients accepts free-format submissions with no strict formatting requirements, but every manuscript must contain the required sections: Author Information, Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Materials & Methods, Results, Conclusions, Figures and Tables with Captions, Funding Information, Author Contributions, Conflict of Interest and other Ethics Statements. The Editorial Office's technical pre-check verifies adherence to the Instructions for Authors, and a submission that fails it to the extent that further review is prevented does not proceed. The current MDPI Word or LaTeX template, available from the MDPI instructions page, is encouraged because it substantially shortens copy-editing.
Abstract does not follow the Nutrients structure or contains citations, undefined abbreviations, or equations. Nutrients asks for a structured abstract of around 250 words with the headings Background/Objectives, Methods, Results, and Conclusions, while MDPI's general style guide gives a 200-word maximum; the two documents differ. The style guide also says the abstract must be self-contained, with abbreviations defined in the abstract and no reference to the bibliography or figures, and that it must not contain equations. The abstract must stand alone as a complete summary of the objective, methods, key results, and conclusions of the study.
ORCID iDs not added in the submission system. MDPI strongly recommends that authors have an ORCID account. The iD can be added in the submission system (SuSy) and is included in the published paper with an icon linking to the ORCID profile. Registration is free, so add the iDs for the corresponding author and co-authors before you submit.
References use full journal names rather than MDPI's abbreviated form. Nutrients follows the MDPI reference style, in which journal names are abbreviated according to ISO 4 rules (MDPI's own example is Am. J. Clin. Nutr.). Reference managers set to full journal names should be switched to the MDPI style and the list checked. If you are unsure how to abbreviate a title, MDPI says to leave the full title and the Editorial Office will abbreviate it.
A Nutrients formatting and readiness check evaluates manuscript structure, MDPI template compliance, abstract length, and reference format against these desk-rejection patterns before you submit.
For a manuscript-specific signal before you submit, run a Nutrients submission readiness check.
Or see example reports before you finalize.
Submission checklist
Before submitting to Nutrients, verify:
- Manuscript contains all required sections (the current MDPI Word or LaTeX template is encouraged)
- Abstract follows the Nutrients structure (Background/Objectives, Methods, Results, Conclusions), stays near 200 words, and has no citations
- 3-10 keywords listed after the abstract
- Figures are preferably 600 dpi or higher, cited in sequential order
- References use MDPI style with abbreviated journal names
- Authors have ORCID iDs (strongly recommended by MDPI)
- Author contributions section is complete
- Data availability statement is included
- Ethics and informed consent statements are present for human studies
- Funding information uses MDPI's standard format
Getting MDPI formatting right on the first attempt avoids the back-and-forth that delays processing. If you want to check your manuscript's readiness before submitting, Nutrients submission readiness check to catch formatting and structural issues upfront.
For the latest Nutrients author guidelines, visit the MDPI instructions for authors.
If you're deciding where to publish your nutrition research, check our guides on understanding impact factors and choosing the right journal for help comparing your options.
Frequently asked questions
Nutrients has no maximum manuscript length, provided that the text is concise and comprehensive. Practically, most published research articles fall between 4,000 and 8,000 words. For the abstract, the Nutrients instructions ask for a structured abstract of around 250 words, while MDPI's general style guide says up to 200 words; the two documents differ, so aim for 200 words or fewer.
Yes, for original research articles and systematic reviews. The Nutrients instructions ask for a structured abstract of around 250 words with the headings Background/Objectives, Methods, Results, and Conclusions. MDPI's general style guide describes a single paragraph of up to 200 words without headings; the two documents differ, so follow the Nutrients headings and keep the abstract near 200 words.
Nutrients uses the MDPI house reference style with numbered citations in brackets [1], [2]. References are listed at the end in numerical order. The format includes full article titles, abbreviated journal names, year, volume, and page range or article number.
Yes. Nutrients is a fully open access journal published by MDPI. All articles are published under a Creative Commons license (typically CC BY 4.0). Authors pay an article processing charge (APC) upon acceptance. The APC for Nutrients is approximately CHF 2,900 as of 2026.
Not for the first submission. Nutrients accepts free-format submissions with no strict formatting requirements, but every manuscript must contain the required sections (author information, abstract, keywords, introduction, materials and methods, results, conclusions, figures and tables with captions, funding information, author contributions, conflict of interest and other ethics statements). Authors are encouraged to use the MDPI Word or LaTeX template, which the instructions say substantially shortens copy-editing, and are asked to format the manuscript to the journal guidelines at the revision stage.
Sources
- Nutrients - Author Guidelines
- Nutrients - Journal Homepage
- Clarivate Journal Citation Reports (2026 release for the 2025 Journal Impact Factor)
- Nutrients on SciRev
Free guide
Formatting is the cheapest reason to get desk rejected.
An editor can reject your paper before a reviewer ever opens it, and the reasons are almost always fixable in an afternoon. This is the checklist of what gets checked first, and what to do about each one.
Before you upload
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Move from this article into the next decision-support step. The scan works best once the journal and submission plan are clearer.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.
Private API processing. Your manuscript is not used to train models.
Put the guidance to work
Choose the practical next step for your research.
Start with the question in front of you, or use the guided learning path when you want a clearer view of the full publishing process.
Where to go next
Start here
Same journal, next question
- Nutrients Submission Guide: What Editors Screen Before Review
- How to Avoid Desk Rejection at Nutrients
- Nutrients Impact Factor 2026: 5.8, Q1, Rank 19/114
- Nutrients Review Time: What Authors Can Actually Expect
- Is Your Paper Ready for Nutrients? What MDPI's Volume Machine Actually Rewards
- Nutrients Acceptance Rate: What Authors Can Use