Skip to main content

PNAS APC and Open Access: A Tiered Pricing System That Rewards Planning

PNAS charges $5,575 for immediate OA with site license, $6,075 without. Delayed OA costs $3,025. Pricing tiers, institutional deals, and funder compliance.

Editorial processThe Manusights editorial team researches and maintains these guides using source review, field-specific analysis, and our documented editorial process.How we work

Readiness scan

APC budgeted? See what PNAS reviewers are likely to push back on.

The fee is one decision. Getting through review is the harder one. Run the Free Readiness Scan with PNAS as your target to see desk-rejection risk, likely reviewer concerns, and journal fit.

Check my readinessPrivate API processing. Your manuscript is not used to train models.See example reports
Cost context

PNAS publishing costs and open access options

APC is one cost. Funder mandates, institutional agreements, and access route timing all shape what you actually pay.

Full journal profile

What shapes what you pay

  • Gold OA at PNAS costs $6,075. Check whether your institution has a read-and-publish agreement that waives this.
  • Funder mandates (NIH, Wellcome, UKRI) may require immediate OA, verify compliance before choosing a subscription route.
  • Check the journal's correspondence for any access-route deadline; an APC does not establish when that choice is due.

When OA is worth the cost

  • When your funder or institution requires it, non-compliance can affect future funding.
  • When your topic benefits from broad immediate access beyond institutional subscribers.
  • Open access can widen practical access, but it does not change whether the journal fits the manuscript.

Quick answer: PNAS charges per article, and the route you choose sets the price. For articles published in volume 123 and later, delayed open access is $3,025, immediate open access is $6,075 ($5,575 for corresponding authors at institutions with current-year site licenses), and Brief Reports are $2,600 with immediate open access included.

The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences operates a tiered APC system that rewards institutional affiliation, penalizes ignorance of the options, and confuses a remarkable number of first-time authors. Here's how it actually works.

The PNAS pricing tiers

PNAS is a hybrid journal published by the National Academy of Sciences. It offers multiple publication routes at different price points:

Publication Option
APC (USD)
Access
Immediate OA (corresponding author at an institution with a current-year site license)
$5,575
Free from day one (CC BY or CC BY-NC-ND)
Immediate OA (regular fee)
$6,075
Free from day one (CC BY or CC BY-NC-ND)
Delayed OA
$3,025
Free within six months (CC BY-NC-ND)
Brief Reports (immediate OA included)
$2,600
Free from day one (CC BY or CC BY-NC-ND)

These are the fees PNAS lists for articles published in volume 123 and later; articles published in volume 122 follow the 2025 APC structure.

The "site license" distinction is important. Corresponding authors from institutions with current-year site licenses pay $5,575 for immediate OA instead of the regular $6,075. That $500 difference is pure money left on the table if you don't realize your institution has a license.

Brief Reports cost $2,600 with immediate OA included. They are limited to 3 pages (approximately 1,600 words) and 15 references, but if your findings can be presented concisely, this format costs $2,975 to $3,475 less than the standard immediate OA fee.

If the cost looks workable, the harder question is whether your paper will clear desk review. A PNAS desk-rejection risk check takes about two to three minutes before you commit to these fees.

Understanding delayed vs immediate OA

The delayed OA option at $3,025 (CC BY-NC-ND) means your article is free to read within six months of publication, on the PNAS website and in PubMed Central. You still pay, but roughly half as much as for immediate OA.

For researchers whose funders allow a six-month delay, delayed OA is the cheaper research-article route. PNAS deposits the version of record in PubMed Central automatically. For NIH-funded work, PNAS says that with delayed OA authors must also deposit their Author Accepted Manuscript in the NIH Manuscript Submission system upon acceptance, so check the NIH steps before you choose.

For researchers whose funders require immediate access, delayed OA will not meet the requirement. PNAS offers immediate OA under CC BY, notes that Plan S-funded authors may not be able to use Plan S funds to pay open access fees, and will grant waivers for the CC BY fee on a case-by-case basis if they do not have funds available.

The math: if your funder doesn't care about timing, delayed OA ($3,025) costs $2,550 less than immediate OA at the site-license rate ($5,575) and $3,050 less than the regular rate ($6,075).

Institutional agreements and deals

PNAS lists publish-and-read agreements with several institutions and consortia:

Institution / Consortium
Author Cost
Period
Notes
University of California
$3,355 total per article
January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2026
All UC campuses and the Lawrence Berkeley and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories; CC BY by default, with an option for CC BY-NC-ND
UK Jisc consortium
No APC for the corresponding author
Articles accepted January 1, 2026 to December 31, 2027
Participating UK institutions; CC BY by default
Max Planck Society
No APC for the corresponding author
Articles accepted May 1, 2026 to April 30, 2029
Participating Max Planck Society institutes; CC BY must be selected

Under the Jisc agreement, corresponding authors at participating UK institutions may publish open access in PNAS without paying article processing charges. Authors who opt out of the CC BY license are responsible for paying the full publication charges.

The UC agreement lists a discounted total rate of $3,355 per article, with no separate article page charges. The corresponding author must be affiliated with a UC campus or the Lawrence Berkeley or Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories and must publish under that affiliation. PNAS asks authors to use their institutional email address when submitting and may ask them to validate their institution.

For authors outside these agreements, check with your grants office or library for institutional open access funds.

The contributed track

PNAS has a contributed track: NAS members may contribute up to two research manuscripts a year within their area of expertise, in which they had a direct, significant role in the design and execution of the work.

In the contributed track, the NAS member submits the manuscript with the names of at least two experts who have agreed to review it. An Editorial Board member checks the fit and the reviewers' expertise and may decline the paper or suggest alternative reviewers; the Editorial Office then manages the review, and the Board member makes the final decision.

PNAS requires at least two independent expert reviewers for contributed papers. The reviewers must be from different institutions than the authors and each other, must not have collaborated with the authors in the past 48 months, and must be free of other competing interests. Their names and affiliations are published in a footnote.

From a cost perspective, PNAS's publication charges page does not list a separate fee for the contributed track.

Page charges and proof surcharges

PNAS's publication charges page lists charges per article, not per page, for articles published in volume 123 and later, and it lists no page surcharge for articles beyond 12 pages.

PNAS does state a surcharge at the proof stage. Corresponding authors should return page proofs within 48 hours and limit corrections to errors or changes that affect scientific content. Extensive corrections, additions, deletions, and rephrasing of sentences are not allowed at that stage and may be subject to editorial review and incur a surcharge of $50 per page if submitted.

The practical point: keep the manuscript within PNAS's preferred length of 6 pages and its 12-page maximum, and finish the editing before the proofs arrive.

Waivers and financial support

PNAS grants waivers for authors who do not have funding to cover APCs, for example in mathematics and astronomy, or from lower-income countries:

Waiver requests: Submit requests for waivers of charges to PNASWaiverRequests@nas.edu.

Plan S: If Plan S-funded authors do not have funds available, PNAS will grant waivers for the CC BY fee on a case-by-case basis.

Editorial independence: PNAS says papers are accepted or rejected for publication and published solely on the basis of merit.

PNAS also says it operates on a break-even basis and relies on subscription and publication fees to cover its expenses from year to year.

Funder mandate compliance

PNAS publishes guidance for several funders, and the route depends on which option you choose:

Funder/Policy
PNAS guidance
Route
NIH Public Access Policy
PNAS offers two routes to compliance
Immediate OA (no extra action), or delayed OA plus deposit of the Author Accepted Manuscript in NIHMS upon acceptance
Gates Foundation
Include the stated acknowledgment and a data availability statement
Immediate OA with CC BY; Gates funds cannot be used to pay the APC
Wellcome Trust
Include the stated statement in the submission
Immediate OA with CC BY; Wellcome funds cannot be used to pay the APC
HHMI
From January 1, 2026, HHMI lab budgets may no longer pay APCs at hybrid journals
APCs at fully open access journals such as PNAS Nexus remain eligible
Plan S (cOAlition S)
Plan S-funded authors may not be able to use Plan S funds to pay OA fees
Immediate OA with CC BY; waivers for the CC BY fee case by case if no funds are available

PNAS's NIH guidance covers both open access routes. For Plan S-funded work, PNAS points to immediate OA under CC BY, so confirm your funder's requirements before choosing a route.

PNAS offers two Creative Commons licenses: CC BY-NC-ND and CC BY. Delayed OA is available only under CC BY-NC-ND, and the Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, Jisc, and Max Planck routes call for CC BY. Don't select the wrong license.

Readiness check

Run the scan while the topic is in front of you.

See score, top issues, and journal-fit signals before you submit.

Get free manuscript previewPrivate API processing. Your manuscript is not used to train models.See example reports

How PNAS compares to peer journals

Journal
APC (USD)
Model
IF (2025)
Best Feature
PNAS
$3,025-$6,075
Hybrid
9.5
Tiered pricing, delayed OA option
Nature Communications
$7,350
Gold OA
18.1
High IF, broad reach
Science Advances
$5,450
Gold OA
13.9
AAAS brand, multidisciplinary
eLife
$3,750
Gold OA
6.4
Free, reviewed preprint model
PLOS ONE
$2,477
Gold OA
2.8
Cheapest major indexed journal

PNAS offers a range of prices: $2,600 for Brief Reports, $3,025 for delayed OA, and up to $6,075 for immediate OA without a site license.

Compared to Nature Communications at $7,350, PNAS charges $1,275 to $4,750 less depending on which route you use. The impact factor gap is real (9.5 vs 15.7), but PNAS carries enormous prestige in the US academic system, particularly for tenure and grant applications.

Science Advances at $5,450 is the closest competitor for multidisciplinary research. PNAS has a lower IF but higher volume and a delayed OA route that costs less.

Hidden costs and fees to watch

Here's what to track:

  • Proof-stage surcharge: Extensive corrections at the proof stage may incur a surcharge of $50 per page. Limit proof corrections to errors that affect scientific content and return proofs within 48 hours.
  • Color figures: PNAS's publication charges page lists no separate color-figure charge.
  • Submission fee: PNAS's publication charges page lists none.
  • License confusion: PNAS offers two Creative Commons license options, CC BY-NC-ND and CC BY. Picking the wrong one for your funder is a common and costly mistake.
  • Site license verification: If your institution has a PNAS site license, make sure the system recognizes your affiliation. The $500 difference between licensed and unlicensed rates is worth verifying.
  • Supporting information: PNAS's publication charges page lists no separate SI fee, but datasets must be deposited in an approved external repository (for example Dryad or Figshare), which may have its own costs for very large files.

The practical decision

PNAS rewards authors who understand its pricing system and plan accordingly. Here's how to make the best choice:

  1. Budget-conscious, NIH-funded? Delayed OA at $3,025. The published version reaches PubMed Central within six months, and you also deposit the Author Accepted Manuscript in NIHMS upon acceptance. You save $2,550 or more compared with immediate OA.
  1. Short, focused findings? Brief Reports at $2,600 with immediate OA included, the lowest fee PNAS lists.
  1. Plan S funder? Immediate OA ($5,575 with a site license, $6,075 without). Check whether the Jisc agreement or your institution covers it, and ask about the CC BY fee waiver.
  1. UC system author? $3,355 total under the publish-and-read agreement, which runs through December 31, 2026. That is below the $5,575 and $6,075 immediate OA fees.

The editorial bar at PNAS is high but accessible. The journal publishes across all scientific disciplines and values broad significance. If your work connects to policy, public health, or cross-disciplinary themes, PNAS is receptive.

Before submitting, make sure your manuscript demonstrates that breadth. A paper that's excellent but narrowly technical may be better suited to a specialty journal. If you want an honest assessment of whether your paper fits the PNAS bar, PNAS submission readiness check to identify issues that lead to desk rejection.

For a comparison of how other multidisciplinary journals handle APCs, see our Science (AAAS) cost breakdown or the Nature APC guide.

Should you submit if the APC is covered?

Submit if PNAS is already a strong journal-fit choice and the APC route solves a real access, funder, or institutional requirement. APC coverage should make a good submission easier to publish, not make a weak-fit submission look better.

Think twice if the only reason to choose PNAS is that the fee is covered. The common mistake is treating APC coverage as a proxy for editorial fit. Editors still screen the manuscript for scope, evidence strength, and audience value before the payment question matters.

Is open access at PNAS worth the APC?

Worth paying if:

  • Your funder mandates open access (check Plan S / cOAlition S requirements)
  • An institutional Read & Publish agreement covers the fee
  • Open access visibility meaningfully benefits your research area
  • The APC fits within your grant budget

Consider alternatives if:

  • The APC is a personal out-of-pocket expense
  • A subscription option or green OA (preprint + embargo) satisfies your funder
  • Another OA journal with a lower APC would provide similar visibility

For a manuscript-specific signal before you submit, run a PNAS submission readiness check.

Or see example reports before you finalize.

Frequently asked questions

For articles published in volume 123 and later, PNAS lists delayed open access at $3,025 and immediate open access at $6,075, or $5,575 for corresponding authors at institutions with current-year site licenses. Brief Reports cost $2,600 and are always immediate open access. PNAS grants waivers for authors who do not have funding to cover the charges.

Immediate open access makes your article free to read from publication day, under CC BY or CC BY-NC-ND. Delayed open access (CC BY-NC-ND) makes it free within six months of publication, and PNAS says all articles, regardless of license, are free within six months. PNAS deposits the version of record in PubMed Central either way. For NIH-funded work, PNAS describes both routes as compliance paths, but with delayed open access authors must also deposit the Author Accepted Manuscript in the NIH Manuscript Submission system upon acceptance.

Yes, through its publish-and-read agreements. The University of California agreement lists a discounted total of $3,355 per article (January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2026). The Jisc agreement lets corresponding authors at participating UK institutions publish open access without paying APCs (articles accepted January 1, 2026 to December 31, 2027), and the Max Planck Society agreement does the same for participating institutes (articles accepted May 1, 2026 to April 30, 2029). Institutions with current-year site licenses also get the lower immediate open access fee of $5,575. Check your library for current agreements.

NAS members may contribute up to two research manuscripts a year within their area of expertise, in which they had a direct, significant role in the design and execution of the work. Contributed manuscripts are peer-reviewed by at least two independent experts, and the reviewers' names are published. PNAS's publication charges page does not list a separate fee for the contributed track.

PNAS offers immediate open access under a CC BY license. Its publication charges page notes that Plan S-funded authors may not be able to use Plan S funds to pay open access fees, and that PNAS will grant waivers for the CC BY fee on a case-by-case basis if they do not have funds available. PNAS does not state that the delayed option complies with Plan S, so confirm your funder's requirements before choosing a route.

References

Sources

  1. Pnas - Author Guidelines
  2. PNAS publication charges
  3. Pnas - Journal Homepage
  4. Clarivate Journal Citation Reports (2026 release, 2025 JIF data)

Free guide

The list price is rarely the price you pay.

Waivers, funder agreements and institutional deals move it, and the deadline for most of them is submission, after which there is no appeal. Every figure in the guide was read off the publisher or funder page that sets it, on the date shown, and each one is linked at the end.

The guide, plus the weekly brief on getting published. One email on Mondays and a product note at most once a month, unsubscribe in one click.

Before you upload

Want the full picture on PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)?

Scope, selectivity, what editors want, common rejection reasons, and submission context, all in one place.

These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.

Private API processing. Your manuscript is not used to train models.

Put the guidance to work

Build a journal decision from more than one signal.

Use comparison data as a starting point, then confirm the live source that governs the actual submission decision.

Internal navigation

Where to go next