PNAS APC and Open Access: A Tiered Pricing System That Rewards Planning
PNAS charges $4,975 for immediate OA with site license, $5,475 without. Delayed OA costs $2,575. Full pricing tiers, institutional deals, and funder compliance.
Senior Researcher, Oncology & Cell Biology
Author context
Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for oncology and cell biology, with deep experience evaluating submissions to Nature Medicine, JCO, Cancer Cell, and Cell-family journals.
Next step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.
No other major journal makes you choose between three different pricing tiers before your paper even goes to production. PNAS does. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences operates a tiered APC system that rewards institutional affiliation, penalizes ignorance of the options, and confuses a remarkable number of first-time authors. Here's how it actually works.
The PNAS pricing tiers
PNAS is a hybrid journal published by the National Academy of Sciences. It offers multiple publication routes at different price points:
Publication Option | APC (USD) | Access |
|---|---|---|
Immediate OA (with site license) | $4,975 | Free from day one |
Immediate OA (without site license) | $5,475 | Free from day one |
Delayed OA | $2,575 | Paywall for 6 months, then free |
Brief Reports (immediate OA included) | $2,275 | Free from day one |
Page surcharge (beyond 12 pages, non-OA) | $575/page | N/A |
The "site license" distinction is important. If your institution subscribes to PNAS (most research universities do), you qualify for the lower immediate OA rate. That $500 difference ($4,975 vs $5,475) is pure money left on the table if you don't realize your institution has a license.
Brief Reports are a genuinely good deal at $2,275 with immediate OA included. If your findings can be presented concisely, this format saves you $2,700 compared to the standard immediate OA fee.
Understanding delayed vs immediate OA
This is where PNAS gets interesting. The delayed OA option at $2,575 gives you something unusual: your article goes behind the paywall for 6 months, then becomes freely accessible on the PNAS website and in PubMed Central. You still pay, but nearly half as much.
For researchers whose funders allow a 6-month embargo (including NIH), delayed OA is the cheapest path. You get open access, it just takes longer. Your paper is deposited in PMC automatically. You don't need to do anything extra.
For researchers with Plan S funders or others requiring immediate access, the delayed option won't work. You'll need to pay the full immediate OA fee.
The math: if your funder doesn't care about timing and your institution has a site license, delayed OA ($2,575) saves you $2,400 compared to immediate OA ($4,975). Over a career, that adds up fast.
Institutional agreements and deals
PNAS has negotiated pricing agreements with several major institutions and consortia. These are some of the best deals in academic publishing:
Institution / Consortium | Author Cost | Period | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
UC system | $3,355 | Through 2026 | Covers all 10 campuses |
UK Jisc consortium | $0 | 2026-2027 | Free for qualifying UK authors |
Max Planck Society | Reduced rate | Ongoing | Covers MPI researchers |
Individual US universities | Varies | Varies | Through institutional OA funds |
The UK Jisc deal is remarkable. UK-based corresponding authors at Jisc member institutions can publish in PNAS with the immediate OA APC fully covered through 2027. No out-of-pocket cost. This is one of the most generous national-level agreements for any journal outside the Springer Nature portfolio.
The UC system deal at $3,355 represents a 33% discount off the standard immediate OA fee. If you're at a UC campus and publishing in PNAS, this is automatically applied.
For US researchers outside these specific agreements, most R1 universities maintain open access funds that can cover PNAS APCs. The fee falls well within typical fund limits. Check with your grants office or library.
The contributed track
PNAS has a unique feature not found at any other major journal: the contributed track. Members of the National Academy of Sciences can contribute up to 2 papers per year through a special editorial pathway.
In the contributed track, the NAS member (who must be a coauthor) selects reviewers and manages the review process, then submits the paper with the reviews to the PNAS editorial board. The board can accept, reject, or send for additional review.
This track has been controversial. Critics argue it allows NAS members to select friendly reviewers. PNAS has responded by requiring that contributed papers go through the same quality checks as regular submissions, including statistical review and plagiarism screening.
From a cost perspective, contributed papers follow the same APC structure as regular submissions. The track doesn't save you money, but it can speed up the review process significantly.
Page charges beyond 12 pages
Here's a cost that catches people off guard: for non-OA articles, PNAS charges $575 for each page beyond 12. This applies to the formatted, published version, not your submitted manuscript.
A 16-page published article, for example, would incur $2,300 in page surcharges on top of any OA fee. For lengthy papers with extensive methods sections and supplementary figures that end up in the main text, this can be a real budget item.
The workaround: move detailed methods and supplementary figures to the supporting information section, which doesn't count toward the page limit. Most PNAS authors do this routinely.
Note that Brief Reports and articles with immediate OA don't incur page surcharges. The charge only applies to non-OA standard articles that exceed 12 published pages.
Waivers and financial support
PNAS offers waiver support, though it's less formalized than what larger commercial publishers provide:
Automatic waivers: Corresponding authors from low-income countries (as defined by the World Bank) receive full APC waivers.
Partial waivers: Authors from lower-middle-income countries receive reduced rates.
Hardship waivers: Case-by-case waivers are available on request. Contact the PNAS business office after acceptance. As with most journals, waiver requests are handled separately from editorial decisions.
NAS member benefits: While contributed papers don't have waived APCs, some NAS members have institutional arrangements that cover publication costs.
In practice, PNAS is a society journal operated by the National Academy of Sciences for the benefit of science. The editorial team is generally responsive to genuine hardship cases.
Funder mandate compliance
PNAS offers enough flexibility to satisfy most major funder mandates, but the route depends on which option you choose:
Funder/Policy | Compliant? | Route |
|---|---|---|
Plan S (cOAlition S) | Yes | Immediate OA with CC BY license |
NIH Public Access Policy | Yes | Immediate OA, delayed OA, or green OA (PMC deposit) |
UKRI | Yes | Immediate OA with CC BY |
ERC (European Research Council) | Yes | Immediate OA with CC BY |
Wellcome Trust | Yes | Immediate OA with CC BY |
NSF Public Access (2026) | Yes | Immediate OA or delayed OA |
The delayed OA option satisfies NIH and NSF requirements but fails Plan S. If you have a Plan S funder, you must choose immediate OA ($4,975-$5,475) and select CC BY licensing.
PNAS supports CC BY, CC BY-NC, and CC BY-ND licenses for immediate OA articles. Plan S funders require CC BY specifically. Don't select the wrong license during production.
How PNAS compares to peer journals
Journal | APC (USD) | Model | IF (2024) | Best Feature |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PNAS | $2,575-$5,475 | Hybrid | 9.1 | Tiered pricing, delayed OA option |
Nature Communications | $7,350 | Gold OA | 15.7 | High IF, broad reach |
Science Advances | $5,450 | Gold OA | 12.5 | AAAS brand, multidisciplinary |
eLife | $0 | Gold OA | 6.4 | Free, reviewed preprint model |
PLOS ONE | $1,695 | Gold OA | 2.9 | Cheapest major indexed journal |
PNAS occupies a unique position. Its tiered system means it can be among the cheapest options ($2,275 for Brief Reports, $2,575 for delayed OA) or competitive with premium journals ($5,475 without site license). No other journal in this tier offers that range.
Compared to Nature Communications at $7,350, PNAS saves $1,875 to $4,775 depending on which tier you use. The impact factor gap is real (9.1 vs 15.7), but PNAS carries enormous prestige in the US academic system, particularly for tenure and grant applications.
Science Advances at $5,450 is the closest competitor for multidisciplinary research. PNAS has a lower IF but higher volume, faster publication times for Brief Reports, and the delayed OA option that Science Advances can't match.
Hidden costs and fees to watch
PNAS has more potential fees than most journals. Here's what to track:
- Page surcharges: $575/page beyond 12 pages for non-OA articles. This is the biggest hidden cost. Push supplementary content to supporting information to stay under the limit.
- Color figures: No extra charge. Color is free in both print and online.
- Submission fee: None.
- License confusion: PNAS offers three Creative Commons license options. Picking the wrong one for your funder is a common and costly mistake.
- Site license verification: If your institution has a PNAS site license, make sure the system recognizes your affiliation. The $500 difference between licensed and unlicensed rates is worth verifying.
- Supporting information: Free to include, but large datasets must be deposited in external repositories (Dryad, Figshare, etc.), which may have their own costs for very large files.
The practical decision
PNAS rewards authors who understand its pricing system and plan accordingly. Here's how to make the best choice:
- Budget-conscious, NIH-funded? Delayed OA at $2,575. Your paper hits PMC in 6 months. NIH is satisfied. You save $2,400+.
- Short, focused findings? Brief Reports at $2,275 with immediate OA included. Best value in the PNAS system.
- Plan S funder? Immediate OA ($4,975 with site license). Check if Jisc or your institution covers it.
- UC system author? $3,355 for immediate OA. The institutional deal saves you $1,620.
The editorial bar at PNAS is high but accessible. The journal publishes across all scientific disciplines and values broad significance. If your work connects to policy, public health, or cross-disciplinary themes, PNAS is receptive.
Before submitting, make sure your manuscript demonstrates that breadth. A paper that's excellent but narrowly technical may be better suited to a specialty journal. If you want an honest assessment of whether your paper fits the PNAS bar, run a free readiness scan to identify issues that lead to desk rejection.
For a comparison of how other multidisciplinary journals handle APCs, see our Science (AAAS) cost breakdown or the Nature APC guide.
Reference library
Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide
This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.
Dataset / reference guide
Peer Review Timelines by Journal
Reference-grade journal timeline data that authors, labs, and writing centers can cite when discussing realistic review timing.
Dataset / benchmark
Biomedical Journal Acceptance Rates
A field-organized acceptance-rate guide that works as a neutral benchmark when authors are deciding how selective to target.
Reference table
Journal Submission Specs
A high-utility submission table covering word limits, figure caps, reference limits, and formatting expectations.
Before you upload
Want the full journal picture?
Scope, selectivity, what editors want, common rejection reasons, and submission context, all in one place.
These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.
Where to go next
Supporting reads
Conversion step
Want the full journal picture?
These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.