PNAS Formatting Requirements: Complete Author Guide
PNAS formatting guide. Word limits, figure specs, reference format, LaTeX vs Word, and journal-specific formatting quirks you need to know.
Senior Researcher, Oncology & Cell Biology
Author context
Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for oncology and cell biology, with deep experience evaluating submissions to Nature Medicine, JCO, Cancer Cell, and Cell-family journals.
Next step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.
Quick answer: PNAS Research Articles are limited to 6 journal pages (roughly 4,000 words of body text), with a Supporting Information (SI) Appendix for extended data. A 120-word Significance Statement is required. References use numbered citations in parentheses (not superscript). Author contributions are mandatory. The page limit is enforced strictly, and exceeding it costs $375 per extra page.
Word and page limits by article type
PNAS measures manuscript length in journal pages, not word count. This is one of the most important things to understand before formatting your submission. A standard Research Article gets 6 pages, and that's a hard boundary with financial consequences for overruns.
Article Type | Page Limit | Approximate Words | Abstract | Significance Statement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Research Article | 6 pages | ~4,000 words | 250 words max | 120 words (required) |
Brief Report | 4 pages | ~2,500 words | 150 words max | 120 words (required) |
Perspective | 6 pages | ~4,000 words | None | None |
Commentary | 2 pages | ~1,000 words | None | None |
Letter | 1 page | ~500 words | None | None |
Colloquium Paper | 6 pages | ~4,000 words | 250 words max | 120 words (required) |
Review | 8 pages | ~6,000 words | 250 words max | 120 words (required) |
The 6-page limit includes the title, author list, abstract, Significance Statement, main text, references, and figure legends. It does not include the SI Appendix. This means your actual body text budget is tight. With 2-3 figures taking up page space, you might only have 3,000-3,500 words of actual prose.
Excess page charges: If your final typeset article exceeds the page limit, PNAS charges $375 per extra page. This fee applies after acceptance and is based on the production team's layout, not your manuscript page count. Authors have some ability to trim during proofs, but it's better to stay within limits from the start.
The practical implication: PNAS papers are dense. Every sentence carries weight. If you find yourself writing lengthy transitions or restating results in the discussion, you're wasting space you don't have.
Abstract requirements
PNAS uses a standard unstructured abstract, but also requires a separate Significance Statement. Both are mandatory for Research Articles.
Abstract:
- Word limit: 250 words maximum
- Structure: Single paragraph, no subheadings
- Citations: Not allowed
- Content: Should cover the motivation, approach, key results, and implications
Significance Statement:
- Word limit: 120 words maximum
- Audience: Written for a broad scientific audience, including scientists outside your field
- Jargon: Avoid field-specific terminology. If a term wouldn't be understood by a physicist reading a biology paper, rewrite it.
- Position: Appears on the first page of the published article, below the abstract
The Significance Statement is unique to PNAS and is one of the most common sources of revision requests. Editors take it seriously because it's prominent in the published layout and is used by the media when covering PNAS papers.
A good Significance Statement explains what the problem is, why it matters, and what your paper changes. It shouldn't just restate the abstract in simpler terms. Think of it as a pitch to someone at a different department's seminar.
Bad example: "We studied the role of protein X in disease Y and found it interacts with protein Z."
Better example: "Patients with disease Y have no targeted therapies. We identify a previously unknown interaction between proteins X and Z that can be blocked by existing drugs, opening a treatment path for the 200,000 patients diagnosed annually."
Figure and table specifications
PNAS doesn't enforce a strict figure cap, but figures consume page space, and the 6-page limit is rigid. In practice, most Research Articles have 4-6 figures.
Figure specifications:
Parameter | Requirement |
|---|---|
Maximum figures | No strict cap (limited by page budget) |
Resolution (photographs) | 300 dpi minimum |
Resolution (line art) | 600 dpi minimum |
File formats | TIFF, EPS, PDF, or high-resolution JPEG |
Color mode | RGB (online), CMYK (print) |
Single column width | 8.7 cm (3.42 inches) |
Double column width | 17.8 cm (7.0 inches) |
Maximum height | 23.0 cm (9.0 inches) |
Font in figures | Helvetica or Arial, 6-8 pt |
Panel labels | Uppercase italic letters (A, B, C) |
PNAS-specific figure detail: Panel labels in PNAS figures are italicized uppercase letters. This is unusual. Most journals use bold, non-italic labels. If you miss this, the production team will fix it, but it signals unfamiliarity with PNAS conventions.
Table formatting:
- Tables count toward the page limit
- Every column must have a header
- Minimize horizontal rules (top, bottom, below headers only)
- No vertical rules
- Large tables should move to the SI Appendix
Color charges: PNAS used to charge extra for color figures in print. As of the current policy, color figures are published at no additional cost in both the online and print editions. This changed in recent years, so older advice about PNAS color charges is outdated.
Reference format
PNAS uses a numbered citation system, but with a distinctive format that differs from most biomedical journals.
In-text citations: Numbers in parentheses (not superscript). For example: "as shown previously (1, 2)." Multiple references are separated by commas within the same parentheses. Ranges use an en dash: (3-7).
This is a common mistake. Many authors use superscript numbers when formatting for PNAS because that's standard at most biomedical journals. PNAS uses parenthetical numbers. Getting this wrong won't cause rejection, but it signals to reviewers that the formatting was done hastily.
Reference list format:
1. A. B. Smith, C. D. Jones, E. F. Williams, Title of article in sentence case. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 120, 1234-1240 (2023).Key formatting details:
- Author names: Initials first, then last name (e.g., "A. B. Smith")
- List all authors up to 10. For 11+, list the first 10 followed by "et al."
- Journal names use standard NLM abbreviations
- Volume number is bolded in the typeset article
- No issue numbers
- Page range followed by year in parentheses
- No DOIs in the reference list
PNAS self-citation note: When citing PNAS itself, use "Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A." as the abbreviation. Some reference managers default to "PNAS" which isn't the standard abbreviation for the reference list.
There's no formal reference cap, but Research Articles typically have 30-50 references. The page limit naturally constrains reference list length.
Supporting Information (SI) Appendix
The SI Appendix is where PNAS authors put all the data that doesn't fit in the 6-page main article. It's peer-reviewed and published online alongside the paper.
SI Appendix structure:
- SI Methods: Extended experimental procedures
- SI Figures (Fig. S1, Fig. S2, etc.): Additional data and controls
- SI Tables (Table S1, Table S2, etc.): Extended data tables
- Datasets: Large datasets uploaded as separate files
- Movies: Video files uploaded separately
SI formatting rules:
- The SI Appendix must be compiled into a single PDF for review
- It should have its own title page with the article title and "Supporting Information Appendix"
- Figures and tables are numbered with the "S" prefix (Fig. S1, Table S1)
- The SI Appendix doesn't count toward the 6-page limit
- There's no strict page cap on the SI Appendix
Practical strategy: Given PNAS's tight page limit, the SI Appendix is essential. Most successful PNAS papers have a substantial SI that contains extended methods, additional experiments, and detailed statistical analyses. The main article tells the story. The SI proves it.
Dataset deposition: PNAS requires that all data underlying the paper be available. For large datasets (genomics, proteomics, structural biology), deposition in public repositories is mandatory. Accession numbers must be cited in the Methods or SI Appendix.
LaTeX vs Word: what PNAS actually expects
PNAS has one of the better-maintained LaTeX templates in academic publishing, and the journal handles both formats equally well.
LaTeX: PNAS provides the pnasresearcharticle.cls class file along with a comprehensive template and bibliography style file. The template is available from the PNAS author center and on Overleaf. It correctly implements the 6-page layout, making it easy to check your page count before submission.
Word: PNAS also provides a Word template with pre-set styles. The Word template is less commonly used than the LaTeX template but is fully supported.
Which is better for PNAS? LaTeX has a genuine advantage here. Because PNAS measures length in pages rather than words, being able to compile your manuscript and see the actual page layout is valuable. The LaTeX template gives you this. The Word template approximates it but isn't as precise.
Initial submission: PNAS accepts a single PDF for initial review. At revision and acceptance, source files are required (.tex or .docx plus separate figure files).
A practical tip: If you're using LaTeX, compile your paper with the PNAS template early and often. It's much easier to trim content throughout the writing process than to cut 2 pages at the end.
Author contributions and classification
PNAS has specific requirements that many other journals don't:
Author contributions statement: Mandatory. Must specify what each author did. PNAS uses its own format: "Author contributions: A.B.S. designed research; C.D.J. performed research; E.F.W. analyzed data; and A.B.S. wrote the paper." Use author initials, not full names.
Article classification: At submission, you must select a PNAS classification for your article:
- Physical Sciences (with subcategories like Applied Mathematics, Chemistry, Physics)
- Biological Sciences (with subcategories like Biochemistry, Cell Biology, Neuroscience)
- Social Sciences (with subcategories like Economics, Psychology, Political Sciences)
This classification determines which editor and reviewers handle your paper. Choose carefully. A paper classified as "Immunology" will reach different reviewers than one classified as "Cell Biology," even if the content overlaps.
Article type designation: Research Articles can be designated as either "Direct Submission" or "Contributed." Contributed articles are submitted by NAS members and follow a different review process. Most authors submit through the Direct Submission track.
Journal-specific formatting quirks
ORCID is mandatory for the corresponding author. Won't be processed without it.
Title length. PNAS prefers short, specific titles. There's no strict character limit, but the editorial style favors brevity. Avoid subtitles with colons when possible.
No separate Introduction heading. Like Nature and Science, PNAS papers don't use a formal "Introduction" heading. The opening section is untitled. The first heading in the body is typically "Results" or a Results subheading.
Results before Discussion. PNAS uses the order: untitled introduction, Results, Discussion, Methods. Methods come last in the main text, before references. Some authors place Materials and Methods before Results, and PNAS doesn't reject this, but the Results-first convention is standard.
Footnotes for affiliations. PNAS uses footnotes (not endnotes) for author affiliations, designated with superscript lowercase letters. This is handled by the template but worth knowing.
Abbreviations. Define at first use in the abstract and again in the body text. Standard abbreviations (DNA, RNA, ATP) don't need definition.
Classification codes. PNAS assigns subject classification codes to every article. Authors suggest codes at submission, but editors make the final assignment.
Competing interest statement. Mandatory. Use the exact phrasing "The authors declare no competing interest" if none exist.
Frequently missed formatting details
- Significance Statement is separate from the abstract. Don't combine them. They serve different purposes and appear in different locations on the published page.
- Page count includes everything. Title, author list, abstract, Significance Statement, body text, references, and figure legends all count toward the 6 pages. Only the SI Appendix is excluded.
- Line numbers. Required on all pages of the manuscript for review.
- Double spacing. Required for the submission manuscript.
- Footnotes vs endnotes. PNAS uses footnotes, not endnotes. This affects how you set up your Word or LaTeX document.
- Figure legends go at the end of the manuscript. After the reference list, not under the figures.
- Ethics statements. IRB and IACUC approvals must be stated in the Methods section with protocol numbers.
Submission checklist
Before submitting to PNAS:
- Manuscript fits within 6 pages using the PNAS template
- Abstract is 250 words or fewer, unstructured
- Significance Statement is 120 words or fewer, written for a broad audience
- References use numbered parenthetical format (not superscript)
- Author contributions statement uses author initials
- SI Appendix is compiled as a single PDF
- ORCID iD provided for corresponding author
- Article classification selected
- Competing interest statement included
- Line numbers and double spacing throughout
- Data deposition accession numbers included where needed
PNAS formatting is demanding because of the page limit. Every element of your manuscript competes for space. If you want to catch formatting issues and structural problems before submission, run a free manuscript scan to identify the issues that lead to administrative returns at top-tier journals.
For the latest guidelines, visit the PNAS Information for Authors page. Templates for both LaTeX and Word are available there.
If you're comparing PNAS with similar multidisciplinary journals, our guides on PNAS impact factor and Science Advances formatting requirements cover related options.
Reference library
Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide
This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.
Dataset / reference guide
Peer Review Timelines by Journal
Reference-grade journal timeline data that authors, labs, and writing centers can cite when discussing realistic review timing.
Dataset / benchmark
Biomedical Journal Acceptance Rates
A field-organized acceptance-rate guide that works as a neutral benchmark when authors are deciding how selective to target.
Reference table
Journal Submission Specs
A high-utility submission table covering word limits, figure caps, reference limits, and formatting expectations.
Before you upload
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Move from this article into the next decision-support step. The scan works best once the journal and submission plan are clearer.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.
Where to go next
Conversion step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.