Remote Sensing APC and Open Access: MDPI Pricing, Discounts, and How It Stacks Up
Remote Sensing (MDPI) charges CHF 2,700 (~$2,900) for open access. Gold OA only, no subscription track. Full cost breakdown and comparison with top alternatives.
Senior Researcher, Oncology & Cell Biology
Author context
Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for oncology and cell biology, with deep experience evaluating submissions to Nature Medicine, JCO, Cancer Cell, and Cell-family journals.
Next step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.
Quick answer: Remote Sensing, published by MDPI, charges CHF 2,700 (approximately $2,900 USD) for open access. It's a gold OA journal, meaning there's no free subscription track. Every published article requires the APC. That said, MDPI offers several discount mechanisms, and the fee is considerably lower than hybrid journals in the same field.
What Remote Sensing charges
Component | Details |
|---|---|
APC | CHF 2,700 (~$2,900 USD) |
License | CC BY 4.0 (default) |
Submission fee | $0 |
Color figures | $0 |
Page charges | $0 |
Subscription track | Not available (gold OA only) |
Remote Sensing is one of MDPI's largest journals by article volume, publishing well over 5,000 articles annually. It covers satellite imagery, LiDAR, radar, UAV-based sensing, and all forms of Earth observation data processing. The journal's size makes it one of the most active publication venues in the geospatial sciences.
MDPI quotes APCs in Swiss francs (CHF). The USD equivalent fluctuates with exchange rates, but CHF 2,700 has hovered around $2,800-$3,000 in recent years. Your actual cost depends on the exchange rate at the time of invoicing.
No subscription track: what that means
Unlike hybrid journals from Elsevier, Springer Nature, or Wiley, Remote Sensing is purely gold open access. There's no option to publish for free behind a paywall. Every accepted paper requires the APC.
This is a fundamental difference that changes the cost calculus. At a hybrid journal like Remote Sensing of Environment (Elsevier), you can publish for $0 via the subscription track and still get the same peer review, DOI, and indexing. At Remote Sensing (MDPI), you're always paying.
For researchers with grant funding earmarked for publication costs, this isn't a problem. For those without, it's a real barrier, and it's why MDPI's discount programs matter more than Elsevier's or Springer's.
MDPI discounts and waivers
MDPI has a more varied discount system than traditional publishers:
Institutional memberships. MDPI offers institutional membership programs that provide a 10% APC discount for all corresponding authors affiliated with the member institution. Your library may have signed up. Check MDPI's institutional membership list or ask your librarian.
Editorial board discounts. Members of Remote Sensing's editorial board receive APC discounts or vouchers. This is standard across MDPI journals.
Reviewer vouchers. MDPI provides discount vouchers to peer reviewers. If you review for Remote Sensing or other MDPI journals, you accumulate credits that reduce your APC. The typical voucher is worth CHF 300-500.
Low-income country waivers. MDPI offers automatic full waivers for authors from low-income countries and partial waivers for lower-middle-income countries, following World Bank classifications.
Guest editor waivers. If you're a guest editor for a Remote Sensing special issue, MDPI typically provides fee waivers for your own submissions to that issue.
Hardship waivers. Available on request. MDPI states these are evaluated case by case and don't affect editorial decisions.
Discount type | Typical value | How to access |
|---|---|---|
Institutional membership | 10% off | Check with your library |
Review voucher | CHF 300-500 | Review for MDPI journals |
Editorial board | Varies | Board membership |
Low-income country | 100% waiver | Automatic at submission |
Guest editor | Full waiver | Special issue editorship |
Institutional agreement coverage
Here's where MDPI journals diverge sharply from Elsevier or Springer titles. MDPI is generally not included in the major national Read & Publish agreements (DEAL, Jisc, UKB, Bibsam). Those deals cover Elsevier, Springer Nature, and Wiley, not MDPI.
Some institutions have MDPI-specific agreements, but coverage is far less consistent:
Agreement type | Coverage | Notes |
|---|---|---|
Elsevier R&P deals | Not applicable | MDPI is a separate publisher |
Springer Compact | Not applicable | Different publisher |
MDPI institutional membership | 10% discount | Growing but limited network |
Individual university deals | Varies | Some institutions have direct agreements |
National consortium deals | Rare | A few Nordic consortia have MDPI arrangements |
This is the single biggest practical difference between publishing in Remote Sensing versus a hybrid Elsevier or IEEE journal. If your institution has a strong Elsevier or IEEE agreement, you can publish OA for free in Remote Sensing of Environment or IEEE TGRS. At Remote Sensing (MDPI), you're likely paying out of pocket or from your grant.
How Remote Sensing compares on cost
Journal | APC (USD) | Model | IF (2024) | Publisher | Institutional Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Remote Sensing | ~$2,900 | Gold OA | ~5 | MDPI | Limited (MDPI memberships) |
Remote Sensing of Environment | ~$4,200 | Hybrid | ~13 | Elsevier | Elsevier R&P (broad) |
IEEE Trans Geoscience & Remote Sensing | ~$2,400 OA / $0 sub | Hybrid | ~8 | IEEE | IEEE agreements |
ISPRS J Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing | ~$4,000 | Hybrid | ~12 | Elsevier | Elsevier R&P (broad) |
GIScience & Remote Sensing | ~$2,800 | Gold OA | ~6 | Taylor & Francis | Some T&F agreements |
The comparison reveals something counterintuitive: Remote Sensing isn't always the cheapest option.
Remote Sensing of Environment is Elsevier's flagship in the field. Its IF (~13) is more than double Remote Sensing's (~5), and while its listed APC (~$4,200) is higher, it's free through the subscription track. If you don't need OA, RSE costs $0. If your institution has an Elsevier R&P deal, RSE's OA is also free. Remote Sensing (MDPI) costs ~$2,900 no matter what.
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing is another strong competitor. As a hybrid IEEE journal, it offers a free subscription track. Its OA fee (~$2,400 for IEEE members) is actually lower than Remote Sensing's APC, and its IF (~8) is higher. IEEE also has institutional agreements, though they're less extensive than Elsevier's.
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing charges a similar APC to RSE but with IF ~12. Again, the subscription track is free.
So why do researchers choose Remote Sensing (MDPI)? Three reasons: speed, acceptance rate, and volume.
What makes Remote Sensing distinctive
Fast review cycles. MDPI journals are known for rapid turnaround. Remote Sensing typically delivers a first decision in 15-25 days. Total time from submission to publication often runs 6-10 weeks. Compare that to 3-6 months at Remote Sensing of Environment or IEEE TGRS.
Higher acceptance rate. Remote Sensing accepts roughly 40-50% of submissions. That's substantially higher than RSE (~15-20%) or IEEE TGRS (~25-30%). For researchers who need a publication quickly, whether for graduation requirements, grant reporting, or career milestones, this matters.
Massive output. With 5,000+ articles per year, Remote Sensing is one of the largest journals in Earth observation. This volume means there's space for solid, well-executed work that might not meet the novelty bar at more selective journals.
Special issues dominate. A large fraction of Remote Sensing's content comes through special issues. Guest editors organize themed collections, and invited papers go through the same peer review as regular submissions. Special issues can provide a more targeted audience for your work.
Funder mandate compliance
Funder/Policy | Compliant? | Route |
|---|---|---|
Plan S (cOAlition S) | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY (default) |
NIH Public Access | Yes | Gold OA (immediate access) |
UKRI | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY |
ERC | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY |
Horizon Europe | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY |
NSF | Yes | Gold OA (immediate access) |
Because Remote Sensing is fully gold OA with CC BY licensing, it automatically satisfies virtually every funder mandate. There's no embargo, no license complications, no green OA workarounds. Every article is immediately and permanently free.
This is one genuine advantage of gold OA journals. You don't have to think about compliance. The default publication mode satisfies Plan S, NIH, UKRI, and every other major funder policy.
Hidden costs and practical details
- Swiss franc billing. MDPI invoices in CHF. If your institution processes payments in USD or EUR, the bank's exchange rate determines your final cost. Some institutions add foreign transaction fees.
- No page limits per se, but MDPI's formatting is space-efficient. Long supplementary files are fine.
- MDPI templates are required. The LaTeX and Word templates are free but specific to MDPI formatting.
- VAT considerations. European institutions may face VAT on the APC, adding 7.7% (Swiss VAT rate) or potentially your local rate depending on your institution's tax status.
- English editing. MDPI offers an optional paid English editing service. It's not required, but the journal may suggest it during review. This is a separate cost from the APC.
The reputation question
It's worth addressing directly: MDPI journals, including Remote Sensing, carry reputational baggage in some academic circles. Some researchers view MDPI as a borderline predatory publisher. Others consider it a legitimate, if aggressive, open access operation.
The reality is somewhere in the middle. Remote Sensing is indexed in Web of Science, has a real IF (~5), conducts peer review, and publishes genuine research. But the high volume, fast turnaround, and extensive special issue program raise questions about consistency. The quality of individual papers varies more than at selective journals like RSE or IEEE TGRS.
For hiring and promotion decisions, Remote Sensing papers generally count, but they may carry less weight than publications in RSE or IEEE TGRS at institutions that evaluate journal prestige closely. Know your evaluation context.
The practical decision
- Need speed and have grant funds? Remote Sensing's fast turnaround and high acceptance rate make it a practical choice. Budget CHF 2,700 from your grant.
- Institution has Elsevier or IEEE agreements? Consider Remote Sensing of Environment (Elsevier) or IEEE TGRS instead. OA may be free through institutional deals, and both carry higher prestige.
- No OA mandate, tight budget? A hybrid journal's subscription track costs $0. IEEE TGRS or ISPRS JPRS let you publish for free.
- Funder compliance is the priority? Remote Sensing's gold OA model satisfies every major funder mandate automatically. No embargo hassles.
Before submitting to any remote sensing journal, make sure your methodology, validation data, and accuracy assessments are clearly documented. Reviewers at Remote Sensing still expect solid experimental design. Run a free readiness scan to check your manuscript against common rejection triggers.
For a broader look at journal impact factors and what they mean for your submission choices, see our guide.
Reference library
Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide
This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.
Dataset / reference guide
Peer Review Timelines by Journal
Reference-grade journal timeline data that authors, labs, and writing centers can cite when discussing realistic review timing.
Dataset / benchmark
Biomedical Journal Acceptance Rates
A field-organized acceptance-rate guide that works as a neutral benchmark when authors are deciding how selective to target.
Reference table
Journal Submission Specs
A high-utility submission table covering word limits, figure caps, reference limits, and formatting expectations.
Before you upload
Want the full journal picture?
Scope, selectivity, what editors want, common rejection reasons, and submission context, all in one place.
These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.
Where to go next
Supporting reads
Conversion step
Want the full journal picture?
These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.