Advanced Functional Materials APC and Open Access: Wiley Pricing, DEAL Agreements, and Alternatives
Advanced Functional Materials charges ~$5,500-$6,000 for open access. Wiley hybrid model, DEAL agreements, and comparison with ACS Nano and Nature Materials.
Senior Researcher, Oncology & Cell Biology
Author context
Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for oncology and cell biology, with deep experience evaluating submissions to Nature Medicine, JCO, Cancer Cell, and Cell-family journals.
Next step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.
Quick answer: Advanced Functional Materials charges roughly $5,500-$6,000 for gold open access. The subscription track is free. As a Wiley-VCH journal, it's covered by Wiley's DEAL and other Read & Publish agreements. For researchers at German institutions (which have the largest Wiley DEAL agreement in the world), publishing OA in AFM costs nothing.
What Advanced Functional Materials charges
Component | Details |
|---|---|
Gold OA APC | ~$5,500-$6,000 |
CC BY license | Higher end of range |
CC BY-NC-ND license | Lower end of range |
Subscription-track | $0 |
Submission fee | $0 |
Color figure charges | $0 (online); print color fees may apply |
Advanced Functional Materials is published by Wiley-VCH as part of the Advanced Materials family. It sits alongside Advanced Materials (the flagship), Advanced Energy Materials, and Small. All four share the same APC pricing structure and institutional agreement coverage.
Wiley's institutional agreement network
Wiley has built a substantial Read & Publish network, anchored by the German DEAL agreement (one of the largest transformative deals in academic publishing):
Region / Consortium | Coverage | Notes |
|---|---|---|
Germany (DEAL) | Full APC coverage for German authors | The gold standard, covers all Wiley journals |
UK (Jisc) | Full APC coverage | Covers Wiley hybrid and OA journals |
Netherlands (UKB) | Full coverage | National agreement |
Austria | Full coverage | FWF/consortium agreement |
Sweden (Bibsam) | Full or partial | Active |
Hungary, Czech Republic, Poland | Various | Growing network |
United States | Varies by institution | No national deal, but many individual agreements |
Australia (CAUL) | Capped | Shared across institutions |
The German DEAL agreement is particularly relevant for materials science researchers. Germany produces a large share of the world's materials science research, and the DEAL agreement means German authors can publish OA in any Wiley journal, including the entire Advanced Materials family, at no cost.
For US researchers: Wiley doesn't have a national US agreement (no publisher does), but many major research universities have individual Wiley R&P deals. Check your library's Wiley agreement status.
The Advanced Materials family
AFM is one member of Wiley-VCH's materials science flagship family:
Journal | APC (USD) | IF (2024) | Focus | Annual Volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Advanced Materials | ~$5,500-$6,000 | ~27 | Broad materials (flagship) | ~3,000 |
Advanced Functional Materials | ~$5,500-$6,000 | ~15 | Functional applications | ~5,000 |
Advanced Energy Materials | ~$5,500-$6,000 | ~25 | Energy storage/conversion | ~2,000 |
Small | ~$5,000-$5,500 | ~13 | Nanoscience | ~3,000 |
Small Methods | ~$5,000-$5,500 | ~12 | Methods in nanoscience | ~1,000 |
Small Structures | ~$4,500-$5,000 | ~8 | Nanostructures | ~500 |
All are covered by the same Wiley institutional agreements. If your agreement covers one, it covers all.
AFM publishes roughly 5,000 articles per year, making it one of the higher-volume selective materials journals. It's more accessible than Advanced Materials (which is extremely selective at IF ~27) but more selective than Scientific Reports or PLOS ONE.
Waivers and discounts
Automatic waivers: Wiley offers full APC waivers for corresponding authors in Research4Life Group A countries (low-income). Group B countries (lower-middle-income) receive partial discounts.
Institutional discounts: Beyond full R&P coverage, some institutions have negotiated partial APC discounts with Wiley. These are applied automatically during the production process.
Financial hardship: Case-by-case requests are accepted. Wiley's stated policy is that inability to pay should not prevent publication of quality research.
Society memberships: AFM is not associated with a specific scientific society, so there are no society-member discounts (unlike ACS journals, which offer ACS member discounts).
Funder mandate compliance
Funder/Policy | Compliant? | Route |
|---|---|---|
Plan S (cOAlition S) | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY |
NIH Public Access | Yes | PMC deposit after 12-month embargo or gold OA |
UKRI | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY or rights retention |
ERC | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY |
DFG (Germany) | Yes | Gold OA, covered by DEAL |
NSF | Yes | Embargo deposit or gold OA |
DOE | Yes | Embargo deposit in OSTI or gold OA |
For German DFG-funded researchers, the DEAL agreement makes compliance seamless and free. For European Plan S funders, the OA option with CC BY satisfies mandates. For US funders (NSF, DOE), the free subscription track with embargo deposit works.
How AFM compares to competitors
Journal | APC (USD) | Model | IF (2024) | Publisher | R&P Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adv Funct Mater | ~$5,500-$6,000 | Hybrid | ~15 | Wiley | Strong (DEAL, Jisc) |
ACS Nano | ~$4,500-$5,500 | Hybrid | ~15 | ACS | Strong (ACS deals) |
Nature Materials | $12,850 | Hybrid | ~38 | Springer Nature | Strong (SN deals) |
~$4,500-$5,500 | Hybrid | ~9 | ACS | Strong (ACS deals) | |
Nano Letters | ~$4,500-$5,500 | Hybrid | ~10 | ACS | Strong (ACS deals) |
Chemistry of Materials | ~$4,500-$5,500 | Hybrid | ~7 | ACS | Strong (ACS deals) |
The practical cost comparison between AFM and ACS Nano (both IF ~15) often comes down to which publisher your institution has a better deal with. If you have Wiley DEAL coverage, AFM is free. If you have ACS coverage, ACS Nano is free. The science should drive the journal choice, but institutional agreements can tip the balance.
AFM vs Advanced Materials: which to target
This is the most common question in the materials science community. Both are Wiley, same APC, same institutional coverage. The difference:
Advanced Materials (IF ~27): The flagship. More selective. Publishes papers that advance the entire materials field. Desk-rejects ~75% of submissions. If your work is genuinely groundbreaking with broad implications, target this first.
Advanced Functional Materials (IF ~15): The workhorse. Still selective, but more accessible. Publishes strong work in functional applications. Better for papers that advance a subfield rather than the entire field. Desk rejection rate is lower (~50-60%).
Many labs submit to Advanced Materials first and, if rejected, transfer to AFM. The transfer is frictionless within the Wiley system, and editor recommendations sometimes explicitly suggest it.
Hidden costs
- No page charges beyond the APC
- Online color is free. Print color charges may apply for print issues, but the journal is primarily online.
- Graphical abstract recommended but not required. No charge for including one.
- Supporting Information is free to host.
- Transfer doesn't reset the APC clock. If you transfer from Advanced Materials to AFM after rejection, the APC at AFM is the same price as it would have been for a direct submission.
The practical decision
For materials scientists targeting AFM:
- Check your Wiley agreement. If your institution has DEAL or another Wiley R&P deal, publish OA at no cost.
- No Wiley deal but have ACS deal? Consider ACS Nano (IF ~15, similar APC but covered by ACS agreements).
- No agreements at all? Publish via subscription for free. AFM has universal library access in materials science departments.
- Rejected from Advanced Materials? Transfer to AFM within the Wiley system. Same APC terms, lower selectivity bar.
Before submitting to any of the Advanced Materials family journals, make sure your materials characterization is thorough and your functional demonstration is convincing. Run a free readiness scan to catch issues before they become reviewer objections.
Reference library
Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide
This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.
Dataset / reference guide
Peer Review Timelines by Journal
Reference-grade journal timeline data that authors, labs, and writing centers can cite when discussing realistic review timing.
Dataset / benchmark
Biomedical Journal Acceptance Rates
A field-organized acceptance-rate guide that works as a neutral benchmark when authors are deciding how selective to target.
Reference table
Journal Submission Specs
A high-utility submission table covering word limits, figure caps, reference limits, and formatting expectations.
Before you upload
Want the full journal picture?
Scope, selectivity, what editors want, common rejection reasons, and submission context, all in one place.
These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.
Where to go next
Supporting reads
Conversion step
Want the full journal picture?
These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.