Applied Sciences APC and Open Access: MDPI Pricing, Volume, and How It Stacks Up
Applied Sciences (MDPI) charges CHF 2,400 (~$2,600) for open access. Gold OA megajournal, 13,404 papers in 2025. Compared with PLOS ONE, Sensors, IEEE Access.
Readiness scan
APC budgeted? See what Applied Sciences reviewers are likely to push back on.
The fee is one decision. Getting through review is the harder one. Run the Free Readiness Scan with Applied Sciences as your target to see desk-rejection risk, likely reviewer concerns, and journal fit.
Applied Sciences publishing costs and open access options
APC is one cost. Funder mandates, institutional agreements, and access route timing all shape what you actually pay.
What shapes what you pay
- Gold OA at Applied Sciences costs CHF 2,400. Check whether your institution has a read-and-publish agreement that waives this.
- Funder mandates (NIH, Wellcome, UKRI) may require immediate OA, verify compliance before choosing a subscription route.
- Check the journal's correspondence for any access-route deadline; an APC does not establish when that choice is due.
When OA is worth the cost
- When your funder or institution requires it, non-compliance can affect future funding.
- When your topic benefits from broad immediate access beyond institutional subscribers.
- Open access can widen practical access, but it does not change whether the journal fits the manuscript.
Quick answer: Applied Sciences charges CHF 2,400 (~$2,600) per article.
It's a fully gold open access journal published by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland, and it publishes at very high volume: 13,404 papers in 2025, according to the journal's MDPI statistics page. For researchers who need indexed, fast-turnaround OA publication in applied science and engineering, it's one of the most affordable options available.
CHF 2,400 is the Applied Sciences publication fee for every article type, with no submission fee on top, and MDPI only invoices it once the paper is accepted. What you personally pay depends on where you sit.
What you will pay, by situation
Your situation | What you pay | Check first |
|---|---|---|
No institutional deal, no invitation | The full CHF 2,400 | Whether your grant budget allows open-access fees |
Your university is in MDPI's IOAP | A discount set by your institution's agreement | MDPI's IOAP participant list |
Your library has an MDPI flat fee agreement | Nothing per article within the agreement, since the institution pays an annual fee | Ask the library before the invoice arrives |
You were personally invited by the editorial office | A discount or waiver may be offered | Get the offer in writing before you submit |
ISPM or PTZE member | A society discount | Your membership status with the society |
Source: MDPI Applied Sciences APC page and IOAP page, as summarized in the sections below.
What Applied Sciences charges
Component | Details |
|---|---|
Standard APC | CHF 2,400 (~$2,600 USD) |
Model | Gold OA (all articles) |
License | CC BY (default, required) |
Submission fee | $0 |
Color figures | $0 |
Page charges | None listed on the APC page |
These figures were verified against the MDPI Applied Sciences fee page at MDPI journal page in October 2026, and the journal's indexing was cross-referenced against its DOAJ record. Applied Sciences uses a single flat APC with no article-type tier: the CHF 2,400 charge is the same for an Article, a Review, or a Communication. MDPI prices its journals in Swiss Francs.
At current exchange rates, CHF 2,400 comes out to approximately $2,600 USD, but this fluctuates. Invoices are emailed shortly after acceptance to the payment contact provided by the authors. Payment options listed by MDPI include credit card, wire transfer, and PayPal, and MDPI accepts purchase orders. For the journal's full scope and metrics, see the Applied Sciences journal hub.
At CHF 2,400, Applied Sciences sits in the upper part of MDPI's price list, which runs from free and CHF 500 titles up to CHF 2,900, but at the low end of the largest MDPI journals. For comparison, Sensors (MDPI) charges CHF 2,600, and higher-tier MDPI journals like the International Journal of Molecular Sciences charge more. Among the large MDPI journals with a Web of Science impact factor, it is one of the cheaper ones.
If the cost looks workable, the harder question is whether your paper will clear desk review. A Applied Sciences desk-rejection risk check takes about two to three minutes before you commit to these fees.
The MDPI publishing model
MDPI runs a distinctive operation. Understanding how it works helps contextualize the APC and what you're paying for.
Volume and speed: Applied Sciences published 13,404 papers in 2025, according to its MDPI statistics page. MDPI reports a first decision about 15 days after submission and acceptance to publication in 2.9 days (medians for papers published in the first half of 2026). This speed is a genuine differentiator for researchers who can't afford to wait 6-12 months at traditional journals.
Special Issues: A significant portion of Applied Sciences content appears in Special Issues, which are themed collections organized by Guest Editors. MDPI actively recruits Guest Editors and invites submissions. Some researchers find Special Issues useful for targeted peer review within their niche. Others see them as a potential quality concern. Either way, the APC page lists a single APC for Applied Sciences and no separate Special Issue charge.
Scope: Applied Sciences covers essentially everything in applied natural sciences and engineering, from materials science to computer science to civil engineering to food technology. The scope is deliberately broad, similar to Scientific Reports but skewed toward engineering and applied fields.
Peer review: Standard single-blind peer review with at least two reviewers. MDPI also offers an optional open review feature where reviewer reports are published alongside the paper.
MDPI institutional discounts
MDPI runs its own institutional program rather than the Read & Publish agreements used by Elsevier, Springer Nature, or Wiley.
Institutional Open Access Program (IOAP): MDPI says it has over 1000 participating institutions. Researchers affiliated with participating universities receive a discount on APCs across all MDPI journals, including Applied Sciences, and the discount level is set by the agreement between MDPI and the institution.
Flat fee agreements exist. MDPI's IOAP page describes a flat fee agreement for institutions with substantial ongoing publication: the institution pays an annual fee so its corresponding authors can publish a fixed or unlimited number of articles in MDPI journals. Ask your library whether your institution has one.
Recommending the program: If your institution is not on the IOAP participants list, MDPI invites you to recommend the program to your library.
Check whether your institution participates in IOAP on MDPI's institutional partnerships page.
Waiver and Discount Paths
Invited submissions: MDPI says its Editorial Offices may issue personal invitations to submit to a journal or Special Issue and offer discounts and waivers for those invited submissions.
Institutional path: The Institutional Open Access Program (IOAP) gives affiliated authors a discount whose level is set by the agreement between MDPI and the institution, and some institutions have flat fee agreements.
Waiver requests: MDPI states that it is "committed to making open access publishing accessible to all authors" and that waiver requests are handled separately from peer review. Its APC page does not list a hardship or country-based waiver, so ask the editorial office before assuming one.
Reviewer vouchers and editorial board waivers: MDPI provides reviewer vouchers to selected reviewers, and Editorial Board Members may receive up to one full APC waiver per year.
Affiliated societies: The International Society for Plasma Medicine (ISPM) and the Polish Society of Applied Electromagnetics (PTZE) are affiliated with Applied Sciences, and their members receive a discount on the article processing charges.
Funder mandate compliance
Funder/Policy | Compliant? |
|---|---|
Plan S (cOAlition S) | Yes (CC BY, gold OA) |
NIH Public Access | Yes (immediate OA) |
UKRI | Yes |
ERC / Horizon Europe | Yes |
NSF | Yes |
DFG | Yes |
Applied Sciences is fully Plan S compliant. All articles are published gold OA with CC BY, so there's no embargo period and no need for green OA workarounds.
How Applied Sciences compares
Journal | APC (USD) | Model | IF (2025) | Annual Volume | Publisher |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Applied Sciences (MDPI) | ~$2,600 | Gold OA | ~2.5 | ~13,400 | MDPI |
Scientific Reports | $2,850 | Gold OA | ~4.9 | ~20,000 | Springer Nature |
PLOS ONE | $2,477 | Gold OA | ~2.8 | ~15,000 | PLOS |
~$2,800 | Gold OA | ~4 | ~10,000 | MDPI | |
IEEE Access | $2,160 | Gold OA | ~4.2 | ~20,000 | IEEE |
The megajournal landscape comes down to a few trade-offs:
Applied Sciences vs Scientific Reports: Scientific Reports has a higher IF (~3.9 vs ~2.5) and stronger brand recognition, especially in the life sciences. Applied Sciences is cheaper, faster, and more engineering-focused. If your work is applied engineering, Applied Sciences is a natural fit. If it's interdisciplinary or biomedical, Scientific Reports may carry more weight with your reviewers and committee.
Applied Sciences vs PLOS ONE: PLOS ONE is cheaper ($2,477) and has been around longer. It has stronger recognition in the biomedical sciences but has seen declining output over the past decade. Applied Sciences publishes at high volume in the engineering and applied science space (13,404 papers in 2025).
Applied Sciences vs IEEE Access: IEEE Access is the cheapest option at $2,160 and carries the IEEE brand, which matters in electrical engineering and computer science. If your work falls within IEEE's scope, IEEE Access is often the better value play.
Applied Sciences vs Sensors (MDPI): Both are MDPI journals with similar processes. Sensors is more specialized (sensor technology, IoT, measurement) and slightly more expensive. If your work is specifically about sensors, Sensors is the better fit. If it's broader applied engineering, Applied Sciences works.
Hidden costs and considerations
- Currency risk and VAT: CHF pricing means USD costs shift with exchange rates. The Swiss Franc has historically appreciated against the dollar, which gradually pushes costs up for US-based authors. Depending on your country, MDPI's invoice may also add local VAT on top of the CHF 2,400 headline, so the all-in cost can exceed the quoted APC.
- Institutional coverage depends on your institution. The IOAP discount level is set by each agreement, and some institutions have flat fee agreements that cover APCs. If yours does not, you will likely pay out of pocket or from grant funds.
- Special Issue quality variance. While there's no extra charge for Special Issues, the quality of peer review can vary depending on the Guest Editor. Stick to Special Issues organized by researchers you know or whose work you respect.
- Reputation considerations. MDPI's high-volume model attracts criticism in some academic circles. In certain fields (particularly in Europe), MDPI journals are viewed with skepticism. In others (particularly in Asia and engineering), they're mainstream. Know your community's norms.
When Applied Sciences makes sense
Applied Sciences is a good fit when:
- You need fast, indexed, OA publication in applied engineering or natural sciences
- Your work is technically sound but not high enough impact for field-specific selective journals
- Speed matters (first decisions in about 15 days, the MDPI median)
- Your budget is limited and you can't afford $4,000+ Elsevier or Wiley APCs
- Your funder mandates immediate gold OA
Think carefully if:
- Your community looks down on MDPI (ask your advisor or senior colleagues)
- IEEE Access could work and is cheaper ($2,160)
- The specific subfield journal (Sensors, Materials, Energies) is a better scope fit
- You're applying for jobs or grants where journal prestige matters more than output speed
Readiness check
Run the scan while the topic is in front of you.
See score, top issues, and journal-fit signals before you submit.
APC comparison across MDPI's biggest journals
If you're considering Applied Sciences, you're probably also looking at other MDPI titles. Here's how the APCs, metrics, and volumes stack up across the publisher's most popular journals.
Journal | APC (CHF) | APC (~USD) | IF (2024 JCR) | JCI | Quartile | Articles/Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Applied Sciences | 2,400 | ~$2,600 | 2.5 | 0.52 | Q2 | ~13,400 |
Sensors | 2,600 | ~$2,800 | 4 | 0.77 | Q2 | ~10,000 |
Materials | 2,600 | ~$2,800 | 3.1 | 0.65 | Q2 | ~9,500 |
Energies | 2,600 | ~$2,800 | 3.2 | 0.66 | Q2 | ~8,000 |
Int. J. Mol. Sci. | 2,900 | ~$3,150 | 5.6 | 1.03 | Q1 | ~12,000 |
Sustainability | 2,400 | ~$2,600 | 4.1 | 0.66 | Q2 | ~11,000 |
Mathematics | 2,600 | ~$2,800 | 2.3 | 0.55 | Q2 | ~6,000 |
The pattern is clear: MDPI prices its lower-IF titles at CHF 2,400 and its stronger-IF titles at CHF 2,600-2,900. Applied Sciences sits at the bottom of the APC range in this table, tied with Sustainability, which matches its position in the metrics hierarchy. If your work fits Sensors or Materials by scope, you'll pay CHF 200 more but get a meaningfully higher IF and JCI. If it doesn't fit those narrower scopes, Applied Sciences is the default broad-scope option, and tied with Sustainability for the lowest APC in this table.
One thing worth noting: Applied Sciences' JCI of 0.52 is below the global median (1.0), meaning papers in this journal get cited less than average for their category. That's not a dealbreaker, but it's context you should have when comparing options.
How the Applied Sciences APC has changed
MDPI sets APCs journal by journal and shows only the current amount on each journal's APC page, which carries no effective date and no fee history. On 9 October 2026 that page lists CHF 2,400 for Applied Sciences. Because the page does not publish past or future amounts, treat the fee as something that can change: the CHF pricing adds currency risk, and if you are budgeting a multi-year grant, check the MDPI APC page again before you submit rather than assuming CHF 2,400 will hold.
When MDPI open access is and isn't worth the APC
Let's be direct. MDPI journals aren't for everyone, and Applied Sciences' CHF 2,400 isn't always money well spent. Here's an honest breakdown.
Scenario | Worth it? | Why |
|---|---|---|
Funder mandates immediate gold OA | Yes | Fully compliant with Plan S, NIH, UKRI, Horizon Europe, no embargo workarounds needed |
You need publication speed (weeks, not months) | Yes | A first decision in about 15 days (MDPI median) is genuinely fast; few journals match this |
Applied engineering work that's solid but not field-defining | Yes | Soundness review means good work gets published without the novelty lottery |
Your field views MDPI negatively | No | In parts of European academia and some life science communities, MDPI publications carry reputational risk |
IEEE Access covers your scope | No | IEEE Access costs $1,850 with a higher IF (3.6) and stronger brand in EE/CS |
You're building a tenure or grant portfolio | Depends | Some committees count MDPI publications at face value; others discount them. Ask your department before spending the money |
The paper could realistically land in a field journal | No | A Q1 field journal with no APC beats paying $2,600 for a Q2 megajournal every time |
Your institution has Elsevier/Wiley Read & Publish deals | No | If your library covers APCs at Elsevier or Wiley OA titles, you'd get higher-prestige OA for $0 out of pocket |
The honest take: Applied Sciences is a rational choice when you need fast, indexed, compliant OA publication and your work is solid applied research without a better-fit specialist home. It's not a rational choice when you're paying out of pocket and a cheaper or more prestigious alternative exists. Don't let MDPI's efficient submission workflow substitute for asking whether this is actually the best venue for your career.
In Our Pre-Submission Review Work
Across Manusights submission reviews for authors weighing the Applied Sciences APC, the CHF 2,400 fee is rarely the real decision. The real decision is whether the manuscript is ready and whether Applied Sciences is the right venue for it. Three patterns recur, and each one shows where the money is at risk of being spent before the question is answered.
Paying the APC to skip a fit decision: Authors reach for Applied Sciences because the workflow is fast and the fee is moderate, but the abstract and scope have not been tested against whether a no-APC field journal would take the same paper. We flag this before the invoice, because a Q1 field journal with no APC usually beats a CHF 2,400 Q2 megajournal for most career goals; the fee should follow a deliberate venue choice, not a default.
Soundness gaps that the fee does not fix: Applied Sciences reviews for technical soundness, so a paper with thin methods, missing controls, or a vague data-availability statement still gets sent back, and the fast turnaround does not help. The money buys open-access visibility, not a pass on rigor, so the methods and the data package have to be ready before the APC is a sensible spend.
Special-issue momentum overriding venue fit: A guest-editor invitation creates urgency that pushes authors to pay before they have asked whether Applied Sciences is the right home rather than a narrower specialist journal. We separate the invitation from the fit question so the APC is spent on a considered choice.
The common thread is that the APC is a downstream decision. When the abstract names the contribution, the methods and figures are reproducible, the data is deposited, and the venue is a deliberate fit rather than the fastest option, CHF 2,400 for fast, indexed, compliant open access is a rational spend. When any of those are still open, the cheaper move is to fix the manuscript or change the target before paying, not after.
Should you submit if the APC is covered?
Submit if Applied Sciences is already a strong journal-fit choice and the APC route solves a real access, funder, or institutional requirement. APC coverage should make a good submission easier to publish, not make a weak-fit submission look better.
Think twice if the only reason to choose Applied Sciences is that the fee is covered. The common mistake is treating APC coverage as a proxy for editorial fit. Editors still screen the manuscript for scope, evidence strength, and audience value before the payment question matters.
Is open access at Applied Sciences worth the APC?
Worth paying if:
- Your funder mandates open access (check Plan S / cOAlition S requirements)
- An institutional Read & Publish agreement covers the fee
- Open access visibility meaningfully benefits your research area
- The APC fits within your grant budget
Consider alternatives if:
- The APC is a personal out-of-pocket expense
- A subscription option or green OA (preprint + embargo) satisfies your funder
- Another OA journal with a lower APC would provide similar visibility
Last verified: April 2026 against Clarivate 2026 JCR release.
For a manuscript-specific signal before you submit, run an Applied Sciences Basel submission readiness check.
Or see example reports before you finalize.
The practical decision
Applied Sciences fills a specific niche: affordable, fast, broad-scope OA publication for applied research. It won't win prestige contests with Nature or Science, and it doesn't need to. For researchers who need to get solid work published and accessible quickly, it's a reliable, indexed venue with predictable costs.
The biggest risk isn't the money (it's one of the cheaper options). It's the reputational question. Before submitting, ask whether your department and field view MDPI favorably. If the answer is yes, or if it doesn't matter for your career stage, Applied Sciences is a strong practical choice.
Before you submit, make sure your manuscript meets the journal's standards for technical soundness and reproducibility. Applied Sciences submission readiness check to catch issues before they reach reviewers.
Frequently asked questions
Applied Sciences charges CHF 2,400 (approximately $2,600 USD) per article. All articles are gold open access under a CC BY license. There is no fee at submission: MDPI invoices the APC only after a paper is accepted, and the instructions say there is no additional cost for publishing full-color graphics.
Yes. Applied Sciences is indexed in Web of Science (IF ~2.5), Scopus, and several other databases. It has been publishing since 2011 and is one of the largest journals in the world by annual output. MDPI has faced scrutiny for its volume-driven model, but Applied Sciences is an established, indexed venue.
Applied Sciences (MDPI, CHF 2,400, IF ~2.5, gold OA) and Scientific Reports (Springer Nature, $2,850, IF ~3.9, gold OA) are both megajournals. Scientific Reports has a higher IF and stronger brand recognition. Applied Sciences is cheaper and faster.
Sometimes. MDPI's APC page says discounts and waivers may be available through institutional agreements (the Institutional Open Access Program, where the discount level is set by each institution's agreement), reviewer vouchers, and selected invitations issued to individual authors. It does not list a country-based or hardship waiver, so check the MDPI APC page before assuming one applies.
MDPI does not publish an acceptance rate, but the journal's statistics page reports a rejection rate of 58% for 2025 and 56% for 2026 (data as of 30 June 2026). The journal evaluates manuscripts primarily on technical soundness and reproducibility rather than perceived novelty or impact. This makes it accessible for solid applied research across engineering and natural sciences.
Sources
- Applied Sciences Basel - Author Guidelines
- Applied Sciences Basel - Journal Homepage
- Clarivate Journal Citation Reports (2026 release for the 2025 Journal Impact Factor)
Free guide
The list price is rarely the price you pay.
Waivers, funder agreements and institutional deals move it, and the deadline for most of them is submission, after which there is no appeal. Every figure in the guide was read off the publisher or funder page that sets it, on the date shown, and each one is linked at the end.
Before you upload
Want the full picture on Applied Sciences?
Scope, selectivity, what editors want, common rejection reasons, and submission context, all in one place.
These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.
Private API processing. Your manuscript is not used to train models.
Put the guidance to work
Build a journal decision from more than one signal.
Use comparison data as a starting point, then confirm the live source that governs the actual submission decision.
Where to go next
Start here
Same journal, next question
- Applied Sciences Basel submission guide
- Applied Sciences Impact Factor 2026: 2.9, Q2
- Applied Sciences Acceptance Rate: What Authors Can Use
- Applied Sciences Basel Review Time: What Authors Can Actually Expect
- Applied Sciences Response to Reviewers: How to Write a Rebuttal That Wins
- Rejected from Applied Sciences (MDPI)? The 7 Best Journals to Submit Next