Journal Guides7 min readUpdated Mar 24, 2026

Frontiers in Plant Science APC and Open Access: What CHF 2,950 Buys in Plant Biology Publishing

Frontiers in Plant Science charges CHF 2,950 (~$3,200) for open access. Gold OA model, waivers, institutional discounts, and how it compares to Plant Cell.

Senior Researcher, Oncology & Cell Biology

Author context

Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for oncology and cell biology, with deep experience evaluating submissions to Nature Medicine, JCO, Cancer Cell, and Cell-family journals.

Next step

Choose the next useful decision step first.

Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.

Open Journal Fit ChecklistAnthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.Run Free Readiness Scan

Quick answer: Frontiers in Plant Science charges CHF 2,950 (roughly $3,200 USD) for a standard research article. It's fully gold open access, meaning every published paper requires the APC and every paper is immediately free to read. Shorter article types cost less. The journal publishes over 5,000 articles annually, making it one of the largest plant biology journals by volume.

What Frontiers in Plant Science charges

Frontiers prices APCs in Swiss Francs because the publisher is headquartered in Lausanne:

Article Type
APC (CHF)
Approx. USD
Original Research Article
CHF 2,950
~$3,200
Review
CHF 2,950
~$3,200
Mini Review
CHF 2,150
~$2,300
Brief Research Report
CHF 1,150
~$1,250
Opinion
CHF 1,150
~$1,250
Perspective
CHF 1,750
~$1,900
Methods
CHF 2,150
~$2,300

The tiered pricing is one of Frontiers' genuine strengths. A focused opinion piece or brief report costs CHF 1,150 (~$1,250), which is less than half the standard APC. For plant scientists publishing shorter, methodological, or commentary-style work, this makes Frontiers significantly cheaper per article than most alternatives.

The APC is invoiced after acceptance. There is no submission fee.

Gold OA only: no subscription option

Like all Frontiers journals, Frontiers in Plant Science is entirely gold open access. There is no subscription track. Every accepted article is published under a CC BY license and is immediately free to read.

This means you can't avoid the APC by publishing behind a paywall. If your paper is accepted, the fee is required. For researchers at well-funded institutions with grant money earmarked for OA, this isn't an issue. For early-career researchers without dedicated OA budgets, it's a real consideration.

About the journal

Frontiers in Plant Science has an impact factor of approximately 4.1 (2024 JCR), placing it in Q1 for plant science. The journal covers all areas of plant biology, from molecular genetics and genomics to ecology, crop science, and plant-microbe interactions.

Three things set it apart:

  1. Volume. With 5,000+ articles per year, it's one of the highest-volume journals in the plant sciences. This reflects a broad scope and relatively high acceptance rate (estimated 40-50%).
  2. Speed. Frontiers journals tend to have faster turnaround than traditional society journals. The interactive review model, where authors and reviewers communicate directly, can accelerate the revision process.
  3. Open review. Reviewer names are published alongside accepted articles. Review is not blind. Some researchers prefer this transparency. Others find it uncomfortable, particularly junior reviewers evaluating senior authors' work.

The journal is organized into specialty sections (Plant Abiotic Stress, Plant Biotechnology, Plant Breeding, Functional Plant Ecology, and many others). Your submission is handled by section editors with relevant expertise, which generally ensures well-matched reviewers.

Institutional agreements and discounts

Frontiers operates an institutional membership program that differs from the Read & Publish models used by Springer Nature or Elsevier:

Frontiers Institutional Memberships:

  • Participating institutions receive 5-15% discounts on APCs
  • The discount applies automatically based on the corresponding author's institutional email
  • Over 100 institutions globally participate
  • The institution pays an annual membership fee in exchange for discounted APCs

Consortium-level agreements:

  • UK institutions via Jisc have negotiated Frontiers discounts
  • Scandinavian and Dutch consortia have similar arrangements
  • Some US consortia offer partial discounts

The key difference from Read & Publish: Frontiers memberships provide discounts, not full APC coverage. Your institution reduces the cost by 5-15%, but you or your grant still cover the rest. This is less generous than Springer Nature's transformative agreements, where the institution pays the full APC on your behalf.

Waivers and financial support

Automatic country-based waivers: Frontiers provides fee support for corresponding authors in low-income countries, following World Bank classifications. The waiver is applied during submission.

Lower-middle-income discounts: Partial fee reductions for authors from lower-middle-income countries. The exact percentage isn't publicly standardized.

Hardship waivers: Available on request, but Frontiers is widely reported to be less generous with discretionary waivers than publishers like Springer Nature or AAAS. A well-funded institution in a wealthy country won't qualify.

Funder arrangements: Some research funders have direct relationships with Frontiers. It's worth checking with your grants office, particularly for EU-funded projects.

Funder mandate compliance

Funder/Policy
Compliant?
Route
Plan S (cOAlition S)
Yes
Gold OA with CC BY
NIH Public Access
Yes
Immediate OA, automatic PMC deposit
UKRI
Yes
CC BY
ERC
Yes
CC BY
Wellcome Trust
Yes
CC BY
USDA/NIFA
Yes
Immediate OA
BBSRC
Yes
CC BY

Frontiers in Plant Science is fully compliant with every major OA mandate. The CC BY license is the only option, which is exactly what Plan S requires. Articles are automatically deposited in PubMed Central, satisfying NIH requirements without any action from the author.

For plant scientists funded by USDA, BBSRC, or agricultural research councils, gold OA journals like Frontiers eliminate the need to track embargo periods or self-archiving.

How Frontiers in Plant Science compares

Journal
APC (USD)
Model
IF (2024)
Annual Volume
Selectivity
Frontiers in Plant Science
~$3,200
Gold OA
~4.1
~5,000+
Moderate
Plant Cell
~$4,000+
Hybrid
~11.6
~350
High
New Phytologist
~$3,500-$4,500
Hybrid
~8.3
~600
Selective
Plant Journal
~$3,500-$4,000
Hybrid
~6.2
~500
Selective
Plant Physiology
~$4,000+
Hybrid
~6.5
~500
Selective
PLOS ONE
$1,695
Gold OA
~2.9
~60,000+
Technical soundness

The Plant Cell is the top of the pyramid in plant biology. With an IF of ~11.6 and only ~350 articles per year, it's extremely selective. If your work is at that level, it's worth the higher APC and tougher review process. But most solid plant science papers aren't Plant Cell material, and that's completely fine.

New Phytologist (IF ~8.3) and Plant Journal (IF ~6.2) sit in between. Both are highly respected society journals with hybrid models, meaning you can publish for free via subscription. Their APCs for OA are in the $3,500-$4,500 range. If your institution has Wiley agreements (both journals are published by Wiley), OA may be covered.

Plant Physiology (IF ~6.5, published by Oxford University Press for ASPB) is another strong mid-tier option with a hybrid model and institutional agreements.

PLOS ONE ($1,695) is the budget option. It doesn't carry the same weight as a dedicated plant science journal, but for technically sound work where the venue matters less than the accessibility, it's hard to beat on price.

When Frontiers in Plant Science makes sense

The journal fits best when:

  1. Your plant science work is solid but not top-tier selective. IF ~4.1 and Q1 ranking provide a respectable venue for good science that doesn't need to appear in Plant Cell or New Phytologist.
  2. You want guaranteed OA. No decisions about license types or subscription tracks. Everything is CC BY and immediately accessible.
  3. Budget is moderate. At ~$3,200, it's cheaper than most society journals' OA options, though more expensive than PLOS ONE.
  4. Speed matters. Frontiers' interactive review model and editorial workflow tend to produce faster decisions than traditional journals.
  5. You have a short contribution. Mini Reviews, Opinions, and Brief Research Reports at CHF 1,150-2,150 are genuinely affordable.

Think twice if:

  1. Your budget is very tight. PLOS ONE at $1,695 or subscription-track publishing at New Phytologist ($0) may be better options.
  2. You need prestige for a career milestone. For tenure cases or major grant applications, a publication in Plant Cell or New Phytologist carries more weight.
  3. You're uncomfortable with open review. Reviewer identities are published with accepted articles.
  4. Volume concerns bother you or your committee. Some hiring and tenure committees view high-volume journals with skepticism, fairly or not.

Hidden costs

  • No page charges beyond the APC
  • No color figure fees
  • Currency risk is real. The APC is priced in CHF. If the Swiss Franc strengthens against your currency between submission and acceptance (which can take 2-6 months), the effective cost increases. A 5% currency swing on CHF 2,950 adds ~$160.
  • VAT applies for some European authors, potentially adding 5-8% to the invoice
  • Formatting strictness. Frontiers requires specific templates (Word and LaTeX). Non-conforming manuscripts get returned before review, which costs time, not money.

The practical decision

For most plant biology researchers, the choice between Frontiers in Plant Science and its competitors comes down to three factors: budget, prestige needs, and speed.

If your institution covers the APC through a Frontiers membership or grant funds, and you want fast, open, Q1 publication, Frontiers in Plant Science is a solid choice. If cost is the primary concern, look at subscription-track options at New Phytologist or Plant Journal, where you can publish for free.

Whatever journal you choose, a polished manuscript makes a difference at every tier. Reviewers everywhere check statistical methods, figure quality, and logical structure. Run a free readiness scan to identify problems before they become revision requests.

Reference library

Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide

This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.

Open the reference library

Before you upload

Want the full journal picture?

Scope, selectivity, what editors want, common rejection reasons, and submission context, all in one place.

These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.

Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.

Internal navigation

Where to go next

Open Journal Guide