Journal Guides8 min readUpdated Mar 25, 2026

Journal of Alloys and Compounds Acceptance Rate

Journal of Alloys and Compounds does not disclose an official acceptance rate. The editorial filter that matters is whether your materials paper demonstrates functional properties, not just structural characterization.

By Senior Researcher, Chemistry

Senior Researcher, Chemistry

Author context

Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for chemistry journals, with deep experience evaluating submissions to JACS, Angewandte Chemie, Chemical Reviews, and ACS-family journals.

Journal evaluation

Want the full journal picture?

See scope, selectivity, submission context, and what editors actually want before you decide whether the journal is realistic.

Open Journal GuideAnthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.Run Free Readiness Scan

Quick answer: Elsevier does not publish an official acceptance rate for Journal of Alloys and Compounds. The journal carries an IF of 6.2 (2024 JCR) and is one of the highest-volume journals in materials science. What matters more than a guessed percentage is whether your paper demonstrates functional properties, not just structural characterization.

What you can say honestly about the acceptance rate

Elsevier does not disclose acceptance rates for individual journals. Community aggregators report estimates, but these are not publisher-verified.

What is stable about the editorial model:

  • The journal has published since 1992 through Elsevier with single-blind peer review
  • It is ranked Q1 in multiple materials science categories
  • The scope covers metallic alloys, intermetallics, ceramics, glasses, semiconductors, and composites
  • The editorial emphasis explicitly requires demonstrated functional properties or novel synthesis approaches

That functional-property requirement is the planning surface authors should use.

What the journal is really screening for

The handling editor at Journal of Alloys and Compounds is asking:

  • Does the paper show what the material does? XRD peaks, SEM images, and lattice parameters of a new ternary alloy are not enough. The editor wants magnetic, electrical, thermal, optical, or mechanical property data that someone actually cares about.
  • Is there a property-structure relationship? The paper must connect structural data to functional behavior and explain the mechanism. Showing XRD and then showing properties separately is not sufficient.
  • Is the novelty beyond incremental composition tweaks? Substituting one element for another in a well-studied system and reporting slightly different lattice parameters does not clear the bar unless the property change is meaningful and explained.
  • Is the benchmarking adequate? Claims of improved performance must be compared against the best published values for similar systems under equivalent conditions.

The better decision question

Does your paper demonstrate functional properties of the material and connect them to the structure through a clear mechanism?

If yes, the journal is a realistic target. If your manuscript is primarily "we synthesized X and characterized it" with XRD, SEM, and TEM but no functional testing, the acceptance-rate discussion is irrelevant. The missing property data is the issue.

Where authors usually get this wrong

  • Submitting characterization-only papers where the primary contribution is synthesis confirmation via XRD and microstructural imaging, with no functional property measurements
  • Disguising organic chemistry or polymer science papers as materials papers by adding a metallic component
  • Reporting incremental composition variations in well-studied systems without meaningful property changes or mechanistic explanation
  • Missing error bars, multiple-sample testing, or batch-to-batch reproducibility data
  • Front-loading abstracts with structural data instead of stating what the material does, which signals a characterization paper to the editor

What to use instead of a guessed percentage

If you are deciding whether to submit, these pages give you more useful signal than an unofficial rate:

Together, they help you judge whether the paper is property-ready for this journal.

Practical verdict

The honest answer to "what is the Journal of Alloys and Compounds acceptance rate?" is that there is no strong official number. Elsevier does not publish one.

The useful answer is: Journal of Alloys and Compounds is a high-volume Q1 materials journal (IF 6.2), the editorial filter has shifted away from pure structural reports toward functional property demonstrations, and the question that predicts desk outcomes is whether your paper shows what the material does and why. A guessed percentage does not help you decide. The functional-property question does.

If you want to check whether your manuscript communicates its functional contribution clearly, a free Manusights scan is the best next step.

References

Sources

  1. 1. Elsevier, Journal of Alloys and Compounds journal page
  2. 2. Elsevier, Journal of Alloys and Compounds author guidelines and scope statement
  3. 3. Clarivate Analytics, Journal Citation Reports 2024 (JIF 6.2, Q1 Materials Science)
  4. 4. SCImago Journal & Country Rank, Journal of Alloys and Compounds

Reference library

Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide

This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.

Open the reference library

Before you upload

Want the full journal picture?

Scope, selectivity, what editors want, common rejection reasons, and submission context, all in one place.

These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.

Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.

Internal navigation

Where to go next

Open Journal Guide