Journal Guide
Publishing in Journal of Alloys and Compounds: Fit, Timeline & Submission Guide
Alloys and compounds engineered for performance
Should you submit here?
Submit if jAC values new materials or compositions showing superior properties. Be careful if many papers thoroughly characterize crystal structure and microstructure but show no functional advantage.
Best fit if
JAC values new materials or compositions showing superior properties
Not ideal if
Many papers thoroughly characterize crystal structure and microstructure but show no functional advantage
Also compare
6.3
Impact Factor (2024)
~40-50%
Acceptance Rate
~100-130 days median
Time to First Decision
Submission guide
Journal of Alloys and Compounds Submission Guide (2026)
A practical JAC submission guide for authors deciding whether the alloy story is complete, competitive, and applied enough for editorial screening.
Journal assessment
Is Journal of Alloys and Compounds a Good Journal? The High-Volume Metallurgy Venue
J. Alloys Compd. (IF 6.3) is Elsevier's high-volume venue for alloy and intermetallic research. Here's when your paper fits, what editors expect, and how it compares to Acta Materialia, Scripta Materialia, and J. Materials Science.
Desk rejection
How to Avoid Desk Rejection at Journal of Alloys and Compounds
Avoid desk rejection at Journal of Alloys and Compounds with stronger functional proof, complete characterization, and real application fit.
What J. Alloys Compd. Publishes
Journal of Alloys and Compounds published by Elsevier is the premier journal for research on alloys, intermetallic compounds, and composite materials. With JIF 6.3 and Q1 ranking in Materials Science & Metallurgy, JAC emphasizes synthesis, characterization, and applications of new alloys and compounds. The journal publishes original research on phase diagrams, crystal structures, physical and mechanical properties, and applications. Critically: JAC values materials with demonstrated functional properties or novel processing routes. Pure structural characterization without property demonstration or application is less competitive. The journal seeks papers showing how alloying or composition engineering creates materials with superior properties.
- Alloy systems: binary, ternary, multicomponent alloys
- Intermetallic compounds: crystal structure, phase stability, properties
- Functional materials: magnetic, thermoelectric, catalytic compounds
- Phase diagrams: experimental and computational phase equilibria
- Crystal structure: X-ray crystallography, neutron diffraction analysis
- Physical properties: electrical, thermal, magnetic, optical properties
- Mechanical properties: strength, ductility, hardness, fracture behavior
- Processing and microstructure: synthesis methods, heat treatment effects
Editor Insight
“Journal of Alloys and Compounds publishes alloys and compounds with demonstrated functional properties or novel synthesis. We seek compositions solving real materials challenges or showing exceptional properties. Pure structural characterization without property demonstration or application context has limited competitiveness.”
What J. Alloys Compd. Editors Look For
Novel alloy or compound with useful functional properties
JAC values new materials or compositions showing superior properties. What makes your alloy or compound special? Does it show enhanced strength, novel magnetic properties, improved thermal conductivity, or catalytic activity? Demonstrate functional advantage over existing materials.
Complete physical and mechanical characterization
Thoroughly characterize your material. Provide crystal structure (X-ray diffraction), microstructure (electron microscopy), phase identification, and quantitative property measurements (electrical conductivity, mechanical strength, thermal properties). Surface-level characterization without depth is weak.
Understanding composition-property relationships
Explain why your composition yields superior properties. Use phase diagram analysis or theoretical calculations to show why this alloy composition is optimal. Mechanistic understanding of how alloying additions affect properties strengthens papers significantly.
Practical application demonstration or feasibility
Show how your material solves real problems. What application benefits from these properties? Demonstrate performance in intended use (structural application, thermal conductor, magnetic device). Lab discovery needs industry relevance.
Scalable synthesis and processing methods
Describe your synthesis method in sufficient detail for potential industrial scale-up. Address reproducibility, cost, and scalability. Materials requiring exotic synthesis conditions or prohibitive costs have limited practical impact.
Why Papers Get Rejected
These patterns appear repeatedly in manuscripts that don't make it past J. Alloys Compd.'s editorial review:
Characterizing alloy structure without demonstrating superior properties
Many papers thoroughly characterize crystal structure and microstructure but show no functional advantage. JAC expects property demonstration. What property is improved? Why should this alloy be adopted?
Marginal property improvement without clear application significance
Showing 5-10% improvement in a property is insufficient without explaining why this matters. Exceptional properties or solution to known material limitation is required for competitive papers.
Ignoring competing compositions and cost considerations
Proposing alloy with 25% rare earth addition has limited impact if cost is prohibitive. Address cost, material availability, and compare with existing alloys showing clear advantage.
Limited analysis of phase stability and composition-property relationship
Papers lacking phase diagram information or understanding of why this composition yields properties are less competitive. Show composition-property connections mechanistically.
Poor data quality or inconsistent characterization
Incomplete X-ray diffraction patterns, unclear microstructure images, or property data lacking error bars reduce credibility. High standards for data quality are expected.
Does your manuscript avoid these patterns?
The Free Readiness Scan reads your full manuscript against J. Alloys Compd.'s criteria and flags the specific issues most likely to cause rejection.
Insider Tips from J. Alloys Compd. Authors
High-entropy alloys and new compositional spaces are hot topics
Multi-component alloys with multiple principal elements attract submission. Novel compositional approaches showing unexpected properties often receive strong reception.
Magnetic and thermoelectric materials have strong application drivers
Alloys for permanent magnets, magnetocaloric effects, thermoelectric power generation, or soft magnetic applications receive strong interest. Clear application context increases impact.
Computational phase prediction combined with experimental validation is valued
Using CALPHAD databases or machine learning to predict promising compositions, then experimentally validating predictions, demonstrates modern materials research approach.
Rare earth reduction or substitution is increasingly important
Papers showing how to reduce or eliminate rare earth elements while maintaining properties are becoming competitive as supply concerns grow.
Microstructure control through processing is highly valued
Demonstrating how processing conditions (cooling rates, annealing, pressure) control microstructure and resulting properties shows materials engineering sophistication.
The J. Alloys Compd. Submission Process
Manuscript preparation
Prep6,000-9,000 words with 6-8 figures. Include composition details, crystal structure analysis (XRD patterns), microstructure images (SEM/TEM), quantitative property measurements with error bars, and application discussion. Supporting info: additional crystallography data, property curves.
Submission via Elsevier system
Day 0Submit at https://www.editorialmanager.com/JALCOM/. Required: manuscript, figures emphasizing novel properties and application potential, cover letter highlighting composition novelty and property advantage.
Editorial assessment
1-2 weeksEditor assesses novelty, property significance, and characterization completeness. Papers without demonstrated property advantage or functional interest face lower priority. Moderate desk rejection ~25-35%.
Peer review
100-130 days2-3 materials experts assess composition novelty, characterization rigor, and property significance. Reviewers check XRD indexing and phase identification carefully. First decision 100-130 days.
Revision and publication
Revision: 4-8 weeksRevisions often request additional property measurements, comparison with known alloys, or application demonstration. Publication 2-4 weeks after acceptance.
J. Alloys Compd. by the Numbers
| 2024 Impact Factor | 6.2 |
| 5-Year Impact Factor | 6.7 |
| Acceptance rate | ~40-50% |
| Desk rejection rate | ~25-35% |
| Median first decision | ~115 days |
| Open access option | $2,900 USD |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Founded | 1992 |
Before you submit
J. Alloys Compd. accepts a small fraction of submissions. Make your attempt count.
Start with the Free Readiness Scan. Unlock the Full AI Diagnostic for $29. If you need deeper scientific feedback, choose Expert Review. The full report is calibrated to J. Alloys Compd..
Article Types
Research Article
6,000-9,000 wordsComplete alloy/compound characterization with property analysis
Short Communication
3,000-4,500 wordsFocused alloy discovery with rapid publication
Review
9,000-12,000 wordsComprehensive alloy/compound technology review
Landmark J. Alloys Compd. Papers
Papers that defined fields and changed science:
- High-entropy alloys (Cantor et al., 2004) - discovered multicomponent alloy field
- Permanent magnets based on rare earths (1970s-1980s) - revolutionized magnetic materials
- Shape-memory alloys (NiTi discovery, 1960s) - enabled functional alloy applications
- Thermoelectric intermetallics (2000s) - developed efficient energy conversion materials
- Magnetocaloric materials for refrigeration (2010s) - showed alternative cooling approaches
Preparing a J. Alloys Compd. Submission?
Get pre-submission feedback from reviewers who've published in J. Alloys Compd. and know exactly what editors look for.
Run Free Readiness ScanNeed expert depth? See Expert Review Options
Primary Fields
Related Journal Guides
All journal guidesLatest Journal-Specific Guides
- Submission guideJournal of Alloys and Compounds Submission Guide (2026)A practical JAC submission guide for authors deciding whether the alloy story is complete, competitive, and applied enough for editorial screening.
- Journal assessmentIs Journal of Alloys and Compounds a Good Journal? The High-Volume Metallurgy VenueJ. Alloys Compd. (IF 6.3) is Elsevier's high-volume venue for alloy and intermetallic research. Here's when your paper fits, what editors expect, and how it compares to Acta Materialia, Scripta Materialia, and J. Materials Science.
- Desk rejectionHow to Avoid Desk Rejection at Journal of Alloys and CompoundsAvoid desk rejection at Journal of Alloys and Compounds with stronger functional proof, complete characterization, and real application fit.
- Review timelineJournal of Alloys and Compounds Review Time: What Authors Can Actually ExpectJournal of Alloys and Compounds is usually steady rather than fast. The useful submission question is whether the paper teaches something real.
More Guides for This Journal
- Acceptance rateJournal of Alloys and Compounds Acceptance Rate: What Authors Can UseJournal of Alloys and Compounds does not disclose an official acceptance rate. The editorial filter that matters is whether your materials paper demonstrates functional properties, not just structural characterization.
- Impact factorJournal of Alloys and Compounds Impact Factor 2026: 6.3, Q1, Rank 11/96Journal of Alloys and Compounds impact factor is 6.3 with a 5-year JIF of 5.9. See rank, quartile, and what it means.
- Publishing costsJournal of Alloys and Compounds APC and Open Access: Elsevier Pricing, R&P Deals, and Cost ComparisonsJournal of Alloys and Compounds charges ~$3,800-$4,200 for gold open access. Elsevier hybrid model, R&P deals, waivers. Compared to Materials Letters and more.
- Submission processJournal of Alloys and Compounds Submission Process: What Happens and What Editors Judge FirstA practical guide to the Journal of Alloys and Compounds submission process, covering what editors screen for first and what to fix before upload.
- Manuscript prepJournal of Alloys and Compounds Cover Letter: What Editors Actually Need to SeeJALCOM editors screen for alloy-system identification, novelty over the journal's massive archive, and characterization depth.
Ready to submit to J. Alloys Compd.?
A desk rejection costs months. Get expert feedback before you submit, from scientists who know exactly what J. Alloys Compd. editors look for.
Avoid Desk Rejection
Get expert pre-submission review before you submit to J. Alloys Compd.. 3-7 day turnaround.
Manuscript Rejected?
Expert revision help to strengthen your manuscript and resubmit with confidence.
Reviewer Response Help
Get expert guidance crafting your response to J. Alloys Compd. reviewers.
Reference library
Compare J. Alloys Compd. with the broader publishing context
This journal guide is the best starting point for J. Alloys Compd.. The reference library covers the surrounding questions authors usually ask next: whether the package is ready, what drives desk rejection, how neighboring journals compare, and what the submission constraints look like across the field.
Checklist system / operational asset
Elite Submission Checklist
A flagship pre-submission checklist that turns journal-fit, desk-reject, and package-quality lessons into one operational final-pass audit.
Flagship report / decision support
Desk Rejection Report
A canonical desk-rejection report that organizes the most common editorial failure modes, what they look like, and how to prevent them.
Dataset / reference hub
Journal Intelligence Dataset
A canonical journal dataset that combines selectivity posture, review timing, submission requirements, and Manusights fit signals in one citeable reference asset.
Dataset / reference guide
Peer Review Timelines by Journal
Reference-grade journal timeline data that authors, labs, and writing centers can cite when discussing realistic review timing.
Need field-expert depth? See Expert Review Options