Journal Guides8 min readUpdated Mar 24, 2026

Journal of Materials Chemistry A Formatting Requirements: Complete Author Guide

Journal of Materials Chemistry A formatting guide. Word limits, figure specs, reference format, LaTeX vs Word, and journal-specific formatting quirks you need to know.

Senior Researcher, Oncology & Cell Biology

Author context

Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for oncology and cell biology, with deep experience evaluating submissions to Nature Medicine, JCO, Cancer Cell, and Cell-family journals.

Next step

Choose the next useful decision step first.

Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.

Open Journal Fit ChecklistAnthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.Run Free Readiness Scan

Quick answer: Journal of Materials Chemistry A (JMCA) doesn't enforce a strict word limit, but Papers typically run 5,000 to 8,000 words and Communications 3,000 to 4,000. You must submit a table of contents (TOC) graphic with every manuscript. References follow RSC style with superscript numbers. JMCA is published by the Royal Society of Chemistry and carries an impact factor above 10, making it one of the most competitive materials science journals for energy and sustainability research.

Word and page limits by article type

JMCA publishes several article types. None have hard word limits, but there are strong editorial expectations about length.

Article Type
Typical Length
TOC Graphic
Abstract
Invitation Required
Paper
5,000-8,000 words
Required
Unstructured, ~200 words
No
Communication
3,000-4,000 words
Required
Unstructured, ~150 words
No
Review
8,000-15,000 words
Required
Unstructured, ~250 words
Yes
Perspective
5,000-8,000 words
Required
Unstructured, ~200 words
Yes
Highlight
2,000-4,000 words
Required
Unstructured, ~150 words
Yes

The lack of a hard word limit gives you flexibility, but JMCA editors are active about manuscript length. If a referee suggests your paper is too long, the editor will almost always ask you to cut. The culture at RSC journals favors focused papers that make one or two clear points rather than exhaustive studies.

Communications at JMCA are meant for urgent, high-impact results that benefit from rapid publication. They go through the same peer review process but are expected to be self-contained in a shorter format. Don't submit a Communication and then include 30 pages of supplementary material to compensate for the short main text. Reviewers see through this.

Reviews and Perspectives require an invitation from the editorial board. If you're interested in writing a review for JMCA, contact the editorial office with a brief proposal and outline before writing.

Abstract requirements

JMCA uses a simple, unstructured abstract.

  • Word limit: No strict limit, but 150 to 250 words is the norm
  • Structure: Single unstructured paragraph
  • Citations: Not permitted
  • Abbreviations: Define at first use
  • Keywords: Not required (RSC journals don't use author-submitted keywords)

The abstract for a JMCA paper should state what you made or studied, what you measured, and what the main performance metric was. For energy materials papers, reviewers expect specific numbers: don't say "high efficiency" when you can say "18.7% power conversion efficiency."

RSC journals don't use author-submitted keywords. Instead, the RSC editorial system categorizes papers using its own taxonomy. This means your title and abstract are the primary text used for editor and reviewer matching. Write them to be findable by the right specialists.

Figure and table specifications

JMCA follows RSC's figure guidelines.

Figure specifications:

Parameter
Requirement
Preferred formats
TIFF, EPS, PDF
Minimum resolution (photographs)
300 dpi
Minimum resolution (line art)
600 dpi
Single-column width
8.5 cm
Double-column width
17.1 cm
Font in figures
Helvetica or Arial, 7-9 pt
Color charges
None
Maximum file size
10 MB per file

Table formatting:

  • Tables should be editable, not images
  • Number sequentially (Table 1, Table 2)
  • Title above, footnotes below
  • Use superscript lowercase letters for footnotes (a, b, c)
  • Minimal lines: horizontal rules only

For materials science figures, JMCA has specific expectations. Crystal structure illustrations should include unit cell parameters. Electron microscopy images need scale bars and measurement conditions in the caption. Electrochemical data should use consistent axis formatting across all panels.

Color is free at JMCA for both online and print, which is a meaningful advantage over some ACS journals that still charge for print color. Use this to make clear, information-rich figures.

Table of contents (TOC) graphic

The TOC graphic is mandatory for all JMCA submissions and is one of the most distinctive RSC formatting requirements.

Specifications:

  • Size: approximately 8 cm wide by 4 cm tall
  • Resolution: 300 dpi minimum
  • Format: TIFF, EPS, or PDF
  • Content: Single image summarizing the key finding
  • Text: A one- or two-sentence description accompanies the graphic (entered in the submission system, not part of the image)

The TOC graphic appears in the journal's online table of contents, in email alerts to subscribers, and in RSC search results. It's the visual that determines whether a browsing reader clicks on your paper or scrolls past it.

Effective TOC graphics for JMCA typically show the material structure or architecture on one side and the performance metric on the other, connected by an arrow. Keep it simple. A TOC graphic crammed with text and data points defeats its purpose.

Don't reuse your graphical abstract from another publisher's format as the TOC graphic. The dimensions are different (RSC uses a wider, shorter format than Elsevier), and resizing distorts the image.

Reference format

JMCA uses the RSC reference style, which is a numbered system.

In-text citations: Superscript numbers (e.g., "as reported previously^1,2"). Numbers assigned in order of first appearance.

Reference list format:

1. A. B. Author, C. D. Author and E. F. Author, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2024, 12, 1234-1240.

Key formatting details:

  • Author names: Initials first, then surname
  • Use "and" before the last author
  • Journal names abbreviated and italicized
  • Year, volume, and pages separated by commas
  • Volume in bold
  • No article titles in journal references (this is an RSC-specific quirk)
  • Book references include titles; journal references don't

The most distinctive feature of RSC reference style is that article titles are omitted from journal references. This differs from ACS, Elsevier, and most other publishers. Only the author names, journal, year, volume, and pages appear. This saves space but makes the reference list less informative for readers.

If you use a reference manager, select the "RSC" or "Royal Society of Chemistry" output style. Zotero, Mendeley, and EndNote all have RSC styles available.

There's no formal reference cap, but Papers typically cite 40 to 60 references. Communications tend to have 20 to 30.

Supplementary material guidelines

RSC calls supplementary content "Electronic Supplementary Information" (ESI).

What goes in ESI:

  • Detailed experimental procedures
  • Additional characterization data
  • Supporting calculations
  • NMR spectra, mass spectra, XRD patterns
  • Video content
  • Computational details

Formatting:

  • Submit as a single PDF file
  • Use the RSC ESI template (available on the RSC website)
  • Number items as Fig. S1, Table S1, etc.
  • Include a table of contents at the beginning of the ESI file
  • Each item must be cited in the main text with "ESI" designation (e.g., "see Fig. S1, ESI")
  • Maximum file size: 20 MB

A distinctive RSC convention: in-text references to supplementary material use the "ESI" tag. You write "see Fig. S1, ESI†" with a dagger symbol. The dagger links to the electronic supplementary information. This is handled automatically in the RSC LaTeX template but needs to be added manually in Word.

The ESI should have its own brief introduction explaining what it contains. Don't just dump figures and tables without context. Start with a paragraph listing what's included and why.

LaTeX vs Word submission

JMCA accepts both formats. RSC provides templates for each.

Word submissions:

  • Use the RSC Word template (available from the JMCA author guidelines)
  • Double-spaced, 12-point font
  • Figures embedded in text for review, separate files for production

LaTeX submissions:

  • Use the RSC LaTeX template (rsc article class)
  • Available on the RSC website and Overleaf
  • The template handles ESI cross-references, TOC graphic placement, and RSC reference formatting
  • Use the rsc.bst bibliography style

Both formats are handled equally well in the RSC production pipeline. There's no editorial preference. For materials science papers, Word is slightly more common, but LaTeX is well-represented, particularly among authors from physics-adjacent subfields like perovskite solar cells and thermoelectrics.

The RSC LaTeX template includes a dedicated environment for the TOC graphic (\begin{tocentry}...\end{tocentry}). This ensures the graphic is formatted correctly for production. Using this environment rather than a manual figure placement is important.

Journal-specific formatting quirks

Details specific to JMCA:

No article titles in references. This is the RSC house style and it trips up nearly every first-time RSC author. Journal references include only authors, journal, year, volume, and pages. No title. It feels wrong, but it's correct.

ESI dagger notation. The dagger symbol (†) is used to mark the first reference to electronic supplementary information. This is an RSC convention that doesn't exist at other publishers. The LaTeX template handles it; in Word, insert it manually.

The TOC graphic text is entered separately. The one- to two-sentence description that accompanies the TOC graphic is typed into a field in the submission system, not included in the image file or the manuscript. Authors sometimes miss this and leave the field blank, which means their TOC entry appears without explanatory text.

Author affiliations use superscript letters. RSC journals use lowercase superscript letters (a, b, c) to link authors to affiliations, not numbers. This is the opposite of most Elsevier and ACS journals.

JMCA has a "significance" criterion. Beyond technical quality, JMCA evaluates whether a paper advances the field meaningfully. The formatting implication: your Introduction needs to clearly establish what's new and why it matters. A results-first structure that buries the significance in the Conclusions section doesn't work at JMCA.

Color figures reproduce well in RSC journals. RSC's online-first publication model means most readers see your paper in color on screen. But the journal still produces print issues, and color reproduction in print is free. This means you don't need to worry about grayscale readability.

Frequently missed formatting requirements

Common issues at JMCA:

  1. Including article titles in references. RSC style omits titles from journal references. This is the most common formatting error for first-time RSC authors.
  1. Missing TOC graphic. The submission system requires it, but authors sometimes upload a placeholder or forget the accompanying text description.
  1. Wrong ESI cross-reference format. RSC uses "Fig. S1, ESI†" format. Other formats (like "Figure S1" or "Supplementary Fig. 1") will be corrected by the production team, adding time.
  1. Affiliations using numbers instead of letters. RSC uses superscript letters, not numbers, for author-affiliation links.
  1. Submitting an uninvited Review. Reviews require editorial invitation. Uninvited submissions are returned without review.

Submission checklist

Before you submit to JMCA:

  • Paper is appropriately concise (typically 5,000-8,000 words)
  • Abstract is ~200 words, unstructured, no citations
  • TOC graphic uploaded (8 cm x 4 cm, 300 dpi)
  • TOC text entered in the submission system
  • References in RSC style (no article titles, superscript numbers)
  • ESI formatted as single PDF with table of contents
  • ESI references use dagger notation
  • Author affiliations use superscript letters
  • All figures at minimum resolution (300 dpi photos, 600 dpi line art)

JMCA's competitive review process means that presentation quality influences outcomes. A clean, well-formatted manuscript with clear figures and the correct RSC conventions signals familiarity with the journal and attention to detail. Run a free formatting check before you submit to catch RSC-specific style issues.

For the most current guidelines, visit the RSC author guidelines on the RSC website.

If you're considering where to submit, our guides on JMCA impact factor and RSC Advances formatting requirements can help you compare RSC journals.

Reference library

Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide

This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.

Open the reference library

Before you upload

Want the full journal picture?

Scope, selectivity, what editors want, common rejection reasons, and submission context, all in one place.

These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.

Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.

Internal navigation

Where to go next

Open Journal Guide