Skip to main content

MNRAS Formatting Requirements: Complete Author Guide

MNRAS has no strict word limit for main journal papers (Letters are limited to five pages). LaTeX with the mnras.cls class is encouraged, author-date Harvard references, and long tables go online as machine-readable files with a short sample table in the paper.

Editorial processThe Manusights editorial team researches and maintains these guides using source review, field-specific analysis, and our documented editorial process.How we work

Readiness scan

Formatting done? See what Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society reviewers are likely to push back on.

Formatting gets a paper past the technical check, not past the editor. Run the Free Readiness Scan with Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society as your target to see desk-rejection risk, likely reviewer concerns, and journal fit.

Check my readinessPrivate API processing. Your manuscript is not used to train models.See example reports

Quick answer: MNRAS doesn't impose a strict word or page limit on main journal papers. The rules that actually trip authors up are small and exact, per the MNRAS instructions to authors (checked October 9, 2026):

  • Keywords: between one and six, and every one must come from the official MNRAS key words list. Nothing else is permitted.
  • Abstract: normally no more than 250 words for a paper and 200 words for a Letter.
  • MNRAS Letters: no more than five pages. The title, author list, affiliations, abstract, keywords, data availability statement, acknowledgements and references don't count toward that limit; appendices do.
  • Template: MNRAS encourages LaTeX with its own class files (mnras.cls and the mnras.bst bibliography style, on CTAN), but papers prepared with other class files, or in Word, are also considered.
  • Long author lists: for articles with 50 or more authors in a collaboration group, list the corresponding author and up to 10 main authors on ScholarOne, and give the full list on the manuscript's title page with the collaboration name last.

References use the author-date (Harvard-style) system.

In our pre-submission review work on MNRAS manuscripts, the formatting slip we would fix first is the key-words line: free-text phrases lifted from an arXiv abstract instead of entries from the official list. It takes five minutes to correct and it is the one detail an editorial assistant can check at a glance.

Long tables go online as machine-readable files, with a short sample table in the paper. MNRAS is published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Before working through the formatting details, a MNRAS formatting and readiness check flags the structural issues that cause desk rejection before editors even reach the formatting questions.

Word and page limits by article type

MNRAS is one of the three leading astronomy journals globally, alongside The Astrophysical Journal and Astronomy & Astrophysics. The journal doesn't cap the length of main journal papers but does enforce strict limits on MNRAS Letters.

Article Type
Page/Word Limit
Abstract
Figures
Machine-Readable Tables
Main Journal Paper
No page limit
Normally 250 words or fewer
No published cap
Sample table in the paper, full table online
MNRAS Letters
5 pages maximum (front matter, data statement, acknowledgements and references excluded; appendices counted unless supplied as supplementary material)
Normally 200 words or fewer
Limited by page budget
If applicable
Correction
No published limit
None (Corrections have no abstract)
If needed
N/A

MNRAS asks for manuscripts in a single line-spaced, two-column format so that the length of the paper can be judged, so the page count of your compiled mnras PDF is the number to check against the Letters limit. The instructions list the elements excluded from the count, and appendices are counted unless they are submitted as supplementary material files.

Observational survey papers and large numerical simulation papers can run longer. The instructions say there are no page limits for Papers but ask for concision: referees and Editors may suggest shortening, which can delay acceptance. MNRAS does not publish review articles. The key principle is that length should match content. A 25-page paper presenting a minor refinement of an existing model will attract reviewer criticism about verbosity.

MNRAS Letters are for self-contained results of an original study whose rapid publication might be expected to have a significant and immediate impact on its subject area, and authors must state their reasons for seeking Letter publication when they submit. If your result can't be presented in 5 pages, it belongs in the main journal. Don't try to squeeze a full-length paper into the Letter format by using tiny fonts or compressing figures. The editors will notice.

Abstract requirements

MNRAS abstracts are flexible in format but carry specific conventions rooted in astronomical tradition.

  • Word limit: normally no more than 250 words for main journal papers and 200 for Letters (MNRAS instructions to authors, checked October 9, 2026)
  • Structure: Unstructured: a single paragraph that briefly summarizes the goals, methods, and new results
  • Citations: The MNRAS template says no references should appear in the abstract
  • Keywords: Required. One to six, listed after the abstract, all taken from the MNRAS key words list.

MNRAS keywords are drawn from a controlled vocabulary specific to astronomy. The keyword line appears immediately after the abstract. In the LaTeX class it is entered in a keywords environment, and the entries are separated by n-rules (two hyphens in LaTeX), not commas. The journal's own example layout is "Key words:" followed by entries such as galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert and radio continuum: galaxies, each separated by an n-rule.

Choose from the predefined MNRAS keyword list (linked from the journal's Instructions to Authors). Don't invent custom keywords. The MNRAS LaTeX guide describes the list as agreed between all the major astronomy journals and revised every few years.

A convention in astronomy abstracts: quantitative results are expected. "We measure the stellar mass function at z = 2-3 and find a characteristic mass of log(M*/M_sun) = 10.8 +/- 0.2" is the level of specificity MNRAS readers expect. Vague abstracts that promise "interesting results" without numbers don't meet the standard.

Figure and table specifications

MNRAS follows standard astronomical figure conventions with some specific requirements.

Figure specifications:

Parameter
Requirement
Resolution
Bitmapped elements at an effective resolution of 400 dpi or greater at final size; TIFF files at 300 ppi (grey-scale or half-tone) or 800 ppi (combined line and tone) at final size
File formats
EPS preferred; PDF and TIFF files can also be used
Colour
Make figures colour-blind friendly where possible; the journal is online only
Single column width
84 mm in one passage of the instructions, approximately 80 mm in another
Font in figures
Lettering sized for a final size of around 8 pt; line weight not less than 0.3 pt at final size
Vector formats
Authors should use vector graphics for line diagrams and plots

Colour policy: The MNRAS instructions ask authors to make figures colour-blind friendly where possible, and note that red and green in the same figure is particularly problematic for some readers. They also note that colouring or shading of table cells cannot be supported in the web version of published articles. Using different line styles (solid, dashed, dotted) alongside colour is a sensible way to keep data series distinguishable for every reader.

Astronomical plotting conventions: MNRAS reviewers expect figures to follow community norms:

  • Error bars on all data points (statistical, systematic, or both)
  • Clear axis labels with units (e.g., "Flux density (mJy)" not just "Flux")
  • Logarithmic scales where appropriate (magnitudes, luminosities, redshifts)
  • Color bars for 2D density plots or images with appropriate labels
  • Proper use of astronomical coordinate systems (RA/Dec, galactic coordinates)

Multi-panel figures: Very common in MNRAS. Label panels as (a), (b), (c) or with descriptive labels. Each panel needs explicit description in the caption.

Astronomical images: For telescope images, include orientation indicators (N/E arrows), scale bars (in arcseconds or physical units), and the instrument/filter information in the caption.

Machine-readable tables

This is one of the more distinctive parts of the MNRAS procedure. Long data tables go online as machine-readable files rather than in full in the paper.

When it applies: The instructions describe this procedure for long tables and do not set a row count. Tables of catalog data, photometric measurements, spectroscopic parameters, or any large dataset are the typical case.

Format requirements:

  • A machine-readable file, for example plain ASCII text
  • A description of the columns
  • The file is placed online in exactly the format supplied, because the publisher does not modify supplementary files

How it works in the manuscript: In the manuscript, include a sample table consisting of the first 5-10 rows of data, and have the caption state that the full table is available online.

The machine-readable table is uploaded to ScholarOne as "Supplementary material (online)" during submission. It appears on the journal's website as a downloadable file alongside the article. This allows other researchers to use your data directly without manual transcription, which is a core principle of reproducible astronomy.

VizieR integration: MNRAS encourages authors to deposit large catalogs in the VizieR database at CDS (Centre de Donnees astronomiques de Strasbourg). Once deposited, VizieR provides a permanent URL and integrates the data into the astronomical data ecosystem. Reference the VizieR catalog number in the paper.

Reference format

MNRAS uses an author-date (Harvard-style) citation system. This is a significant difference from most physics journals, which use numbered citations.

In-text citations:

  • Single author: (Smith 2024)
  • Two authors: (Smith & Jones 2024)
  • Three authors: all three names at first mention, then (Smith et al. 2024)
  • More than three: (Smith et al. 2024)
  • Multiple citations, ordered by date: (Jones et al. 2023; Smith 2024)

Reference list format (alphabetical order):

Smith A. B., Jones C. D., Williams E. F., 2024, MNRAS, 528, 1234

Key formatting details from the instructions:

  • Author names: surname first, then initials, with no commas after author surnames and no ampersand between the final two author names.
  • List all of the authors if there are eight or fewer, otherwise give just the first author followed by "et al."
  • Year after author list.
  • Journal abbreviation (MNRAS, ApJ, A&A, etc.), using the abbreviations the instructions list.
  • Volume number and first page or article number.
  • The reference list should include no bold or italic.
  • No article titles in journal references (the instructions show titles for books and conference proceedings, but a PhD thesis entry gives no title).

The mnras.bst BibTeX style file is distributed with the MNRAS LaTeX package, and the MNRAS LaTeX guide strongly encourages BibTeX. Use it.

No article titles in journal references. This is a major MNRAS quirk that catches authors from other fields. The instructions' example journal references don't include the title of the cited paper. Books and conference proceedings show titles. If your BibTeX style is showing article titles, you may be using the wrong .bst file.

ADS BibTeX entries: The astronomy community uses NASA's Astrophysics Data System (ADS) as the primary source for BibTeX entries. ADS provides correctly formatted BibTeX entries for virtually every astronomy paper. Use ADS exports with mnras.bst for error-free references.

The instructions state no reference cap, but they ask authors to avoid long lists of citations of previous publications unless the articles are directly relevant. MNRAS does not publish review articles, and if a paper uses a long list of cited papers the author should be able to justify it to the Editor.

Supplementary material guidelines

MNRAS supports online-only supplementary material in addition to machine-readable tables.

Supported types:

  • Extended figures and tables
  • Machine-readable data files
  • Appendices too long for the main paper
  • Video and animation files
  • Code scripts

Online supplementary material is mentioned in the text or figure caption with a statement that it is available online, and it is uploaded to ScholarOne as "Supplementary material (online)". Files go online in exactly the format supplied, and appear on the journal's website as downloadable files. The combined size of everything uploaded must not exceed 350 MB.

For large datasets (survey catalogs, simulation outputs), deposit in a public astronomy repository:

  • CDS/VizieR: Standard for astronomical catalogs
  • MAST: For HST, JWST, and other space telescope data
  • IRSA: For infrared survey data
  • Zenodo: For general scientific datasets

Cite the repository accession number or DOI in the paper. Where ethically feasible, MNRAS strongly encourages authors to make all data and software code on which the conclusions rely available to readers, through the main manuscript, supporting files or a public repository.

LaTeX vs Word: MNRAS LaTeX is the standard

MNRAS recommends LaTeX because it is the method best suited to the mathematical nature of the material, and encourages authors to use the official MNRAS LaTeX class.

MNRAS LaTeX class:

latex
\documentclass[fleqn,usenatbib]{mnras}

Key options:

  • fleqn left-aligns equations (MNRAS convention)
  • usenatbib enables the natbib citation package for author-date citations
  • The class produces two-column output by default; the onecolumn option should be used only if necessary for the display of numerous very long equations
  • The letters option is used for papers in the journal's Letters section

Files at submission: ScholarOne does not compile LaTeX files, so compile a PDF or PS yourself and upload a single complete manuscript file containing all figures and tables, designated "Complete manuscript file (PDF, PS or DOC)". Do not zip or compress it. Manuscript files larger than 10 MB are not supported by the online submission system. After acceptance, at the "First Look" stage, you upload the source files (the .tex, figure files and .bib files, plus the .bbl) combined in a single .zip or .tar.gz archive with a readme file. The class guide asks authors to include only packages that are actually used, with a comment explaining each one.

BibTeX: Use mnras.bst as your bibliography style. Combined with natbib, this produces the correct author-date citation format. The invocation is:

\bibliographystyle{mnras}
\bibliography{yourbibfile}

Word submissions: MNRAS considers papers prepared in word processors such as Microsoft Word, although it encourages LaTeX (MNRAS instructions to authors, checked October 9, 2026). In astronomy, Word manuscripts are rare, and LaTeX keeps the equations and tables closest to the production format.

Practical tip: The MNRAS LaTeX class is available on CTAN, Overleaf, and from the MNRAS website. Overleaf has a ready-to-use MNRAS template that includes the class file, bibliography style, and a sample manuscript.

One common error: using \documentclass{article} instead of \documentclass{mnras}. The generic article class won't reproduce the journal's layout. MNRAS encourages its own class files, but papers prepared using other class files can also be accepted.

Journal-specific formatting quirks

These are the details that experienced MNRAS authors know:

Left-aligned equations. MNRAS uses left-aligned (fleqn) equations, not centered. This is set by the fleqn option in the document class. Don't override this in your preamble.

Section numbering. MNRAS uses Arabic numerals for sections (1, 1.1, 1.1.1). The Introduction is Section 1. Conclusions typically come last, followed by Acknowledgements (British spelling) and References.

Acknowledgements spelling. MNRAS uses British English spelling: "Acknowledgements" (with the "e"). The LaTeX class defines a dedicated \section*{Acknowledgements} command. Don't use the American spelling "Acknowledgments."

Standard acknowledgement text. Some facilities and funders expect particular acknowledgements, and MNRAS accepts what is required of authors. For example, papers using SDSS data should include the SDSS acknowledgement boilerplate. Papers using ESO data should acknowledge ESO. The relevant boilerplate text is available from each facility's website. Facility acknowledgements go in the Acknowledgements section, not in footnotes.

Data availability statement. Required for articles published in MNRAS. It goes in the end matter, after the Acknowledgements, under the heading "Data availability", and should describe the data and software behind the results and provide means of access where possible, for example by linking to the data or giving a unique identifier.

Author affiliation format. MNRAS uses numbered superscript affiliations linked to an affiliation list below the author names. The MNRAS LaTeX class handles this through the \author command, with the institution list started by \\.

Running header. The MNRAS class automatically generates a running header from the short title and author list. Provide these using \title[Short Title]{Full Title} and the appropriate author commands.

No "e.g.," or "i.e.," in italics. MNRAS house style sets "e.g." and "i.e." in roman (upright) type, not italics. The copy editors will change this if you italicize them.

Redshift notation. In astronomy, redshift is typically denoted as "z" (italicized). Keep the notation consistent throughout, for example "at $z = 2.5$" rather than switching between "z=2.5" and "redshift 2.5."

Frequently missed formatting requirements

  1. Machine-readable tables. A long table needs a sample table in the paper and a machine-readable file uploaded as online supplementary material. Authors regularly forget to prepare and upload these.
  1. No article titles in journal references. The mnras.bst style omits titles from journal citations, matching the instructions' examples. A different BibTeX style that includes titles produces a reference list that departs from journal style.
  1. British English spelling. MNRAS uses British conventions: "colour," "behaviour," "modelling," "analyse." The instructions ask for British spellings and say the publisher ensures full compliance with house style.
  1. Colour-blind friendly figures. The instructions ask for figures that are colour-blind friendly where possible, and flag red and green in the same figure as particularly problematic.
  1. Data availability statement. This became mandatory in recent years, and older authors sometimes forget to include it.

Submission checklist

Before you submit to MNRAS, verify:

  • Manuscript uses the official mnras.cls LaTeX class (encouraged, not mandatory)
  • BibTeX uses mnras.bst for author-date references
  • Keywords follow the MNRAS controlled vocabulary
  • Abstract includes quantitative results
  • Sample table in the paper and a machine-readable file prepared for each long table
  • Figures are colour-blind friendly where possible
  • All microscopy/telescope images have orientation and scale indicators
  • Acknowledgements section uses British spelling and includes any facility acknowledgement text your facilities require
  • Data availability statement is included
  • References are alphabetical with no article titles for journal papers

MNRAS formatting is straightforward once you're working within the LaTeX class, but the astronomy-specific conventions (machine-readable tables, author-date references, British spelling) trip up authors coming from other fields. If you want to verify your manuscript's readiness, MNRAS pre-submission checklist to catch presentation issues before they reach the reviewers.

For the latest instructions, visit the MNRAS Instructions to Authors at Oxford University Press. The LaTeX class and sample files are available from the same page.

If you're deciding between astronomy journals, our guides on journal impact factors and how to choose the right journal can help you compare MNRAS with ApJ, A&A, and other venues.

Submit If / Think Twice If

Submit if:

  • Your work is in observational or theoretical astronomy, astrophysics, or cosmology and is prepared in LaTeX using the mnras class files
  • References use Harvard author-date style and are formatted with the mnras.bst BibTeX style file
  • Long tables are prepared as a short sample table in the paper plus a machine-readable file uploaded as online supplementary material

Think twice if:

  • The manuscript is prepared in Word; MNRAS considers Word papers but encourages LaTeX, and Word papers should follow the same style and layout, with extra care over references and figure numbers
  • Your citation style is numbered throughout the text; MNRAS requires Harvard author-date and full reformatting to numbered style is a significant revision
  • Color figures use red and green together or color as the only differentiator between data series; the instructions ask for colour-blind friendly figures where possible
  • The paper is primarily instrumentation or laboratory astrophysics without an observational or theoretical astronomy application; scope alignment with MNRAS content is evaluated at desk

Readiness check

Run the scan while the topic is in front of you.

See score, top issues, and journal-fit signals before you submit.

Get free manuscript previewPrivate API processing. Your manuscript is not used to train models.See example reports

What Pre-Submission Reviews Reveal About Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Submissions

For manuscripts targeting Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, four patterns generate the most consistent desk-rejection outcomes.

Key words chosen outside the official list. MNRAS allows one to six key words and every one has to come from its published key words list. Manuscripts that carry free-text keywords copied from a preprint, or seven or more entries, get sent back for correction before review. Pick the narrowest matching entries from the list rather than broad ones that describe half the journal.

Harvard author-date citation style not applied. MNRAS uses an author-date (Harvard) citation system, which differs from the numbered reference systems used in most physics journals. In-text citations appear as (Surname et al. Year) and the reference list is sorted alphabetically by first author surname. Using the MNRAS BibTeX style file (mnras.bst) handles this automatically. Manuscripts that use numbered citations throughout the text are not compatible with MNRAS style and require complete reference reformatting.

Long data tables not handled through the online-material procedure. For long tables the instructions ask for a sample table of the first 5 to 10 rows in the paper, a caption stating that the full table is available online, and a machine-readable file (for example ASCII text) with a description of the columns uploaded as online supplementary material. The file goes online in exactly the format supplied. A long table presented in full in the body, with no machine-readable file, is a mismatch with that procedure.

Color figures that are not colour-blind friendly. The MNRAS instructions ask authors to make figures colour-blind friendly where possible, and flag red and green in the same figure as particularly problematic for some readers. The journal is online only, so the concern is accessibility for readers rather than a black-and-white print edition. Data series distinguished by color alone, without accompanying line styles, symbols, or patterns, are the case to fix before submission.

A MNRAS submission readiness check evaluates manuscript structure, LaTeX compliance, citation style, and data table requirements against these desk-rejection patterns before you submit.

For a manuscript-specific signal before you submit, run a Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society submission readiness check.

Or see example reports before you finalize.

Frequently asked questions

No. MNRAS does not impose a strict word or page limit on main journal papers. The instructions ask Papers to be concise, and referees and Editors may suggest shortening. MNRAS Letters, however, are limited to five pages, not counting front matter, acknowledgements and references.

No. MNRAS encourages LaTeX and supplies its own class files (mnras.cls with the mnras.bst bibliography style), but it also considers papers prepared with other class files or in word processors such as Microsoft Word. Most astronomers still submit in LaTeX.

MNRAS uses an author-date (Harvard-style) citation system. In-text citations appear as (Author et al. Year) and the reference list is sorted alphabetically. The MNRAS BibTeX style (mnras.bst) handles formatting automatically. This is different from most physics journals, which use numbered citations.

For a long table, the MNRAS instructions ask the paper to include a sample table of the first 5 to 10 rows, with a caption stating that the full table is available online. The full table is provided as a machine-readable file (for example ASCII text) with a description of the columns, uploaded as online supplementary material and placed online in exactly the format supplied. MNRAS also encourages authors to upload machine-readable tables to the VizieR database at CDS.

Yes. The MNRAS instructions do not list a separate colour charge, and the journal is now online only. They do ask authors to make figures colour-blind friendly where possible, noting that red and green in the same figure is particularly problematic for some readers.

References

Sources

  1. MNRAS instructions to authors, Oxford University Press.
  2. Clarivate Journal Citation Reports.
  3. Royal Astronomical Society journals, RAS.
  4. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society on SciRev

Free guide

Formatting is the cheapest reason to get desk rejected.

An editor can reject your paper before a reviewer ever opens it, and the reasons are almost always fixable in an afternoon. This is the checklist of what gets checked first, and what to do about each one.

The guide, plus the weekly brief on getting published. One email on Mondays and a product note at most once a month, unsubscribe in one click.

Before you upload

Choose the next useful decision step first.

Move from this article into the next decision-support step. The scan works best once the journal and submission plan are clearer.

Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.

Private API processing. Your manuscript is not used to train models.

Put the guidance to work

Choose the practical next step for your research.

Start with the question in front of you, or use the guided learning path when you want a clearer view of the full publishing process.

Internal navigation

Where to go next