Nano Letters Formatting Requirements: Complete Author Guide
Letters in Nano Letters have a preferred length of 1,500 to 4,000 words, a 150-word abstract, and a mandatory TOC graphic that fits within 3.25 x 1.75 inches. References must be complete, and substantial Supporting Information is expected.
Readiness scan
Formatting done? See what Nano Letters reviewers are likely to push back on.
Formatting gets a paper past the technical check, not past the editor. Run the Free Readiness Scan with Nano Letters as your target to see desk-rejection risk, likely reviewer concerns, and journal fit.
Quick answer: Letters in Nano Letters have a preferred length of 1,500 to 4,000 words (the editorial-policies section of the guidelines says less than 3,000), a 150-word abstract, and a mandatory TOC graphic that fits within 3.25 x 1.75 inches. ACS asks for complete references at submission, and substantial Supporting Information is expected. Published by ACS, the journal covers all areas of nanoscience and has an impact factor above 9.
Before working through the formatting details, a Nano Letters formatting and readiness check flags the structural issues that cause desk rejection before editors even reach the formatting questions.
Word and page limits by article type
Nano Letters is a high-impact letters journal published by the American Chemical Society (ACS). Its research article type is the short Letter (communication), focused on nanoscience and nanotechnology.
Article Type | Word Limit | Abstract Limit | Figures | TOC Graphic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Letter | Preferred 1,500 to 4,000 words (editorial policies: under 3,000) | 150 words | Preferred 3 to 6 in total, including schemes (editorial policies: no more than 5) | Required |
Perspective (invited only) | 1,500 to 2,000 words | About 120 words | Optional | Required |
Mini-Review (invited only) | Generally 3,000 to 6,000 words | No published limit | No published limit | Required |
The guidelines do not say which parts of the manuscript count toward the word total, so confirm with the journal office if you are close to the ceiling. Supporting Information is submitted as separate files. For a journal with a JIF above 9, the bar for what goes into those words is extremely high.
ACS does not publish a Nano Letters submission count or acceptance rate. The journal is competitive, and the editors are selective about both scientific quality and scope. Manuscripts that are primarily synthetic reports without mechanistic insight or broader implications are routinely desk-rejected.
The letter format means you need to be strategic. Present your strongest results in the main text. Move supporting data, controls, and detailed methods to the Supporting Information. Reviewers understand this structure and expect it.
One thing to know: Nano Letters doesn't have a distinct "communication" versus "article" format for research papers; they are all Letters. If your work needs more space than the Letter length for the main narrative, ACS Nano (same publisher, full-length articles) is the natural alternative.
Abstract requirements
Nano Letters follows ACS abstract conventions.
- Word limit: 150 words maximum for Letters; invited Perspectives carry a brief abstract of about 120 words
- Graphic: a TOC/abstract graphic is required with each manuscript (see below)
The abstract should be self-contained and describe the main finding with specific quantitative outcomes. For Nano Letters, the abstract often determines whether a reader opens the full paper. State what you made or measured, what you found, and why it matters, all within 150 words.
Write the abstract so it stands on its own: define abbreviations again in the body text, and avoid pointing to figures, tables, or equations.
Figure and table specifications
Figures are the visual backbone of Nano Letters papers. The journal is image-rich, and high-quality figures are expected.
Figure specifications:
Parameter | Requirement |
|---|---|
Minimum resolution (black and white line art) | 1200 dpi |
Minimum resolution (grayscale art) | 600 dpi |
Minimum resolution (color art) | 300 dpi |
File formats | See the ACS list of acceptable software and file designations |
Single column width | Up to 240 points (3.33 in) |
Double column width | 300 to 504 points (4.167 to 7 in) |
Maximum depth | 660 points (9.167 in), including the caption |
Font in figures | Helvetica or Arial work well; lettering no smaller than 4.5 points in the final published format |
Line weight | No thinner than 0.5 point |
The guidelines do state a figure count for Letters: 3 to 6 figures in total, including schemes, is preferred, and the editorial-policies section says no more than 5. Put additional figures in the Supporting Information. Multi-panel figures are standard. A single figure with panels (a) through (f) is typical for nanoscience papers that combine synthesis, characterization, and performance data.
TOC graphic (mandatory):
Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
Size | Fits an area no larger than 3.25 in by 1.75 in (about 8.25 cm by 4.45 cm), supplied at actual size |
Resolution and format | TIF at 300 dpi for color and 1200 dpi for black and white, or EPS in RGB color mode with all fonts converted to outlines or embedded |
Type | Sans serif such as Helvetica, preferably 8 pt and no smaller than 6 pt |
Label | "For Table of Contents Only", on the last page of the submitted manuscript |
The TOC graphic should visually communicate the essence of the paper at a glance. For Nano Letters, effective TOC graphics typically show a nanostructure image alongside a key data plot or a schematic of the phenomenon. Avoid text-heavy graphics. The graphic will be displayed at small sizes in the table of contents, so clarity at reduced dimensions is essential.
Color is free at ACS. Use it. Nano Letters papers without color figures are rare. TEM/SEM micrographs, optical spectra, device curves, and schematics all benefit from color.
Reference format
At initial submission, ACS accepts references in any style, but each reference must be complete, including its title. The ACS Style Quick Guide lists the required components for each reference type, and using it from the start avoids reformatting later.
Reference list format (journal article, following the ACS Style Quick Guide examples):
Author, A. B.; Author, C. D.; Author, E. F. Title of article. Journal Name Year, Volume (Issue), Pages. DOI: 10.xxxx/xxxxxKey formatting details from those examples:
- Author names: Surname, initials (e.g., "Smith, J. K.")
- Semicolons between authors
- Article titles included, in sentence case
- Journal name, then year, volume, issue, and page range or article number
- DOI at the end: DOI: 10.xxxx/xxxxx
ACS style is well-supported by citation managers. Zotero, Mendeley, and EndNote all have ACS styles.
The guidelines publish no reference limit. The letter format naturally constrains citations, so cite the most relevant work directly and move extended literature surveys to the Supporting Information if needed.
Supplementary material guidelines
Supporting Information (SI) is functionally mandatory for Nano Letters papers, even though it's not formally required.
What goes in the SI:
- Detailed experimental procedures (synthesis, fabrication, measurement protocols)
- Full characterization data (TEM, SEM, XRD, XPS, NMR, FTIR)
- Control experiments and additional data
- Computational details (DFT methods, parameters, convergence tests)
- Additional figures and tables
- Videos (device operation, dynamic processes)
The SI is submitted as separate files through the ACS Publishing Center, at the same time as the manuscript. It is provided to the reviewers during peer review. Reviewers frequently request additional SI during revision.
ACS requires a brief, nonsentence description of the contents of each SI file, including the file type extension. Label it "Supporting Information" and place it before the Acknowledgement and Reference sections, for example: "Supporting Information: Additional experimental details, materials, and methods, including photographs of experimental setup (DOC)". Descriptions such as "Supporting Information: Figures S1-S3" are insufficient.
Data deposition: For crystallographic data, deposit CIF files with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC). Nano Letters applies ACS Research Data Policy Level 1: authors are encouraged to share the data underlying their results, preferably in an appropriate public repository, and are encouraged (not required) to provide a Data Availability Statement. SI files published with an article are assigned a DOI and hosted on Figshare.
The SI for Nano Letters papers is often substantial, running 15-30 pages for a thorough experimental study. This is normal and expected. Reviewers want to see the data even if it doesn't fit in the main text.
LaTeX vs Word: what Nano Letters actually prefers
ACS accepts both, and the nanoscience community is split.
Word: ACS Word templates are listed on the Nano Letters Information for Authors page. Templates are not required for initial submission.
LaTeX: The ACS Publishing Center supports LaTeX, and ACS provides a freely available LaTeX style package that it strongly encourages authors to use. You submit your own PDF plus a ZIP archive of your LaTeX files, bibliography and graphics.
In nanoscience, the Word/LaTeX split is roughly 50/50. Materials science and chemistry groups tend toward Word; physics-leaning nanoelectronics and nanophotonics groups tend toward LaTeX. ACS's production system handles both without preference.
Initial submission: At initial submission, figures, charts, tables, schemes, and equations should be embedded in the text at the point of relevance, and Supporting Information goes in separate files. Separate graphics can be supplied later at revision, if necessary. Keep your originals organized.
Journal-specific formatting quirks
These are Nano Letters-specific details experienced authors know:
TOC graphic is mandatory. ACS requires a graphic with each manuscript. Beyond compliance, the TOC graphic affects visibility. A well-designed graphic can increase click-through rates from the table of contents significantly.
No separate subsection titles. The guidelines say Letters should not contain separate subsection titles but should flow continuously. The recommended organization is introduction and background, integrated results and discussion, and concluding remarks. Experimental and theoretical details that matter for reproducibility but are not essential to understanding the Letter belong in the Supporting Information.
Supporting Information description and data statement. Describe the SI files in a brief label headed "Supporting Information" before the Acknowledgement and Reference sections. If you include a Data Availability Statement, ACS asks for it in the manuscript under the Associated Content heading with the Supporting Information. The Corresponding Author provides the conflict-of-interest statement on behalf of all authors during submission.
ORCID iDs. Authors submitting manuscript revisions are required to provide their own validated ORCID iD before completing the submission, if one is not already linked to their ACS Publishing Center profile. All authors are strongly encouraged to register. Do not type ORCID iDs into the manuscript; ACS displays only iDs that were linked to the ACS account before acceptance.
Safety information. Authors must emphasize any unexpected, new, or significant hazards or risks associated with the reported work. For a communication or letter, this information goes in the main text.
Cover art suggestions. Authors are encouraged to submit images for the journal's front cover or Supplementary Covers when they submit the revised manuscript. Images chosen for the front cover are published at no cost to the author.
Preprint policy. Nano Letters authors may deposit an initial draft of their manuscript in a preprint service. State the preprint's link and date in the cover letter. All other prior or redundant publication is forbidden.
Frequently missed formatting requirements
These get flagged in Nano Letters submissions:
- TOC graphic wrong dimensions. ACS asks for a graphic that fits an area no larger than 3.25 x 1.75 inches, supplied at actual size. Check the size before upload.
- SI not cited in text. Reference every SI figure and table in the main text so reviewers can find the supporting data.
- Missing characterization data. For papers reporting new nanomaterials, reviewers expect full characterization covering size distribution, crystal structure, composition analysis, and stability data. Missing any of these is a common revision trigger.
- Safety information absent. ACS asks authors to emphasize any unexpected, new, or significant hazards or risks in the main text. If your synthesis uses HF, cadmium compounds, lead compounds, or other notably hazardous chemicals, describe the hazards clearly.
- Abstract exceeding 150 words. The author guidelines limit the abstract to 150 words. Edit before submission.
Submission checklist
Before submitting to Nano Letters, verify:
- Manuscript length follows the Letter guidance (preferred 1,500 to 4,000 words and 3 to 6 figures; the editorial-policies section says under 3,000 words and no more than 5 figures)
- Abstract is 150 words or fewer
- TOC graphic fits within 3.25 x 1.75 inches (TIF at 300 dpi color or 1200 dpi black and white, or EPS)
- Figures meet the minimum resolutions (1200 dpi line art, 600 dpi grayscale, 300 dpi color) with clear labels and scale bars where applicable
- References are complete, including titles
- Supporting Information covers experimental details and full characterization
- A brief description of the SI files, labeled "Supporting Information", appears before the Acknowledgement and Reference sections
- Funding sources and conflict-of-interest statement are entered in the submission system; ORCID iDs are linked to ACS accounts, not typed into the manuscript
- Any unexpected, new, or significant hazards are described in the main text
Nano Letters' high JIF means competition is intense. Getting the format right eliminates one variable. If you want to check your manuscript's readiness before submitting, Nano Letters pre-submission checklist to catch the issues that lead to desk rejection at top-tier nanoscience journals.
For the latest guidelines, visit the ACS Nano Letters author guidelines.
If you're comparing nanoscience journals, our guides on understanding impact factors and choosing the right journal can help you decide where your work fits best.
Submit If / Think Twice If
Submit if:
- Your work reports a fundamental advance in nanoscience with a clear mechanistic insight connecting structure, size, or composition to an unexpected property
- The manuscript fits the Letter length guidance (preferred 1,500 to 4,000 words and 3 to 6 figures), with a TOC graphic sized to fit within 3.25 x 1.75 inches prepared
- Supporting Information contains complete independent characterization data (not duplicates of main figures)
- See the Nano Letters journal profile for full scope and acceptance criteria
Think twice if:
- The primary contribution is synthesis of a new nanoparticle variant without demonstrating an advance in understanding; incremental synthesis without mechanistic insight is a weak fit for Nano Letters
- The manuscript is well over the Letter length guidance; cutting it down often requires cutting content the authors consider essential, and this mismatch signals scope problems early
- The TOC graphic is not prepared; ACS requires one with each manuscript
- Supporting Information contains only repeated main text figures; reviewers will request additional characterization data, extending the revision cycle
Readiness check
Run the scan while the topic is in front of you.
See score, top issues, and journal-fit signals before you submit.
What Pre-Submission Reviews Reveal About Nano Letters Submissions
For manuscripts targeting Nano Letters, four patterns generate the most consistent desk-rejection outcomes.
Letter format requirements not met: manuscript exceeds the Letter length guidance or misses the TOC graphic. ACS Nano Letters is a Letter-format journal. The author guidelines give a preferred Letter length of 1,500 to 4,000 words with 3 to 6 figures, and their editorial-policies section says less than 3,000 words and no more than 5 figures. Additionally, ACS requires a Table of Contents (TOC) graphic with each manuscript, sized to fit an area no larger than 3.25 inches wide by 1.75 inches tall.
Novelty insufficient for the letter format: incremental nanoparticle synthesis without property-mechanism coupling. ACS Nano Letters editors evaluate whether each submission advances the fundamental understanding of nanoscale phenomena, not merely reports a new nanoparticle variant. Submissions where synthesis of a new material variant is the primary contribution, without demonstrating an unexpected property or mechanistic advance relative to existing systems, are declined at desk. The journal's author guidelines describe it as a forum for original results on fundamental, applied, and emerging nanoscience research that require rapid dissemination.
Incomplete references: titles and other required components missing. ACS accepts references in any style at initial submission, but they must be complete, including titles. Incomplete references are the formatting error to avoid; the ACS Style Quick Guide lists the required components for each reference type.
Supporting Information that repeats main text figures rather than providing independent characterization data. Nano Letters reviewers expect the Supporting Information to contain the full characterization data that supports but does not duplicate the main text: NMR spectra, XRD patterns, TEM images with statistical analysis, and control experiments. Submissions where the SI reproduces main text figures with minor modification, or where critical characterization supporting the main claim is absent from both the main text and SI, are flagged for data insufficiency.
A Nano Letters submission readiness check evaluates manuscript structure, letter-format compliance, and characterization completeness against these desk-rejection patterns before you submit.
For a manuscript-specific signal before you submit, run a Nano Letters submission readiness check.
Or see example reports before you finalize.
Frequently asked questions
Nano Letters' author guidelines give a preferred Letter length of 1,500 to 4,000 words with 3 to 6 figures in total (including schemes) and an abstract limited to 150 words. Their editorial-policies section states the manuscript guidelines as less than 3,000 words, no more than 5 figures, and an abstract of no more than 150 words, so the publisher's own text differs; plan to the stricter figures. The guidelines do not say which parts of the manuscript count toward the word total. Nano Letters does not publish full-length research articles; if your manuscript is much longer than a Letter, consider ACS Nano instead.
Yes. ACS requires a Table of Contents (TOC) graphic with each manuscript, for display in the table of contents and the abstract. Supply it at actual size so that it fits in an area no larger than 3.25 x 1.75 inches (about 8.25 x 4.45 cm). It should give a quick visual impression of the essence of the manuscript without giving specific results.
At initial submission, ACS accepts references in any style as long as they are complete, including titles. ACS style lists author names, article title, journal name, year, volume, and pages, followed by the DOI; the ACS Style Quick Guide gives the required components for each reference type.
Supporting Information is not technically mandatory but is expected for virtually all Nano Letters papers. The letter format is so compact that experimental details, additional characterization, and control experiments almost always require SI. Reviewers will question the absence of SI.
Nano Letters covers nanoscience and nanotechnology broadly, including nanomaterials synthesis, nanodevices, nanophotonics, nanobiotechnology, nanoelectronics, and the physical and chemical properties of nanoscale systems. The journal emphasizes fundamental insights with broad impact.
Sources
- Nano Letters, author guidelines, American Chemical Society.
- Clarivate Journal Citation Reports.
- Nano Letters on SciRev
Free guide
Formatting is the cheapest reason to get desk rejected.
An editor can reject your paper before a reviewer ever opens it, and the reasons are almost always fixable in an afternoon. This is the checklist of what gets checked first, and what to do about each one.
Before you upload
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Move from this article into the next decision-support step. The scan works best once the journal and submission plan are clearer.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.
Private API processing. Your manuscript is not used to train models.
Put the guidance to work
Choose the practical next step for your research.
Start with the question in front of you, or use the guided learning path when you want a clearer view of the full publishing process.
Where to go next
Start here
Same journal, next question
- Nano Letters Submission Guide
- How to Avoid Desk Rejection at Nano Letters
- Is Nano Letters a Good Journal? JIF, Scope & Fit Guide
- Nano Letters Review Time: What Authors Can Actually Expect
- Nano Letters Impact Factor 2026: 9.1, Q1, Rank 10/79
- Nano Letters 'Under Review': What Each Status Means and When to Expect a Decision