Journal Guides9 min readUpdated Mar 24, 2026

Physical Review D Formatting Requirements: Complete Author Guide

Physical Review D formatting guide. Word limits, figure specs, reference format, REVTeX/LaTeX, SCOAP3 compliance, and journal-specific quirks you need to know.

Senior Researcher, Oncology & Cell Biology

Author context

Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for oncology and cell biology, with deep experience evaluating submissions to Nature Medicine, JCO, Cancer Cell, and Cell-family journals.

Next step

Choose the next useful decision step first.

Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.

Open Journal Fit ChecklistAnthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.Run Free Readiness Scan

Quick answer: Physical Review D (PRD) doesn't enforce a strict word or page limit. The journal requires REVTeX 4.2 (LaTeX) as the submission format and uses the APS numbered reference style with square-bracket citations. SCOAP3 covers open access fees for eligible high-energy physics articles. Word submissions are technically possible but not recommended. PRD is published by the American Physical Society and is the primary journal for particle physics, field theory, gravitation, and cosmology.

Word and page limits by article type

PRD is one of the few major physics journals that doesn't impose a hard word or page limit. The journal trusts authors to keep papers proportional to their scientific content. That said, practical constraints exist in the form of page charges.

Article Type
Page/Word Limit
Abstract
Figures
SCOAP3 Coverage
Regular Article
No strict limit
~600 words recommended
No cap
Depends on subfield
Rapid Communication
~4 published pages
~150 words
Limited
Depends on subfield
Letter
~4 published pages
Brief
Limited
Depends on subfield
Review
No strict limit
~600 words
No cap
Case-by-case
Comment
~1 published page
Brief
1-2
Usually covered
Erratum
Brief
N/A
If needed
Usually covered

Most published PRD articles fall between 8 and 20 published pages (two-column format). Experimental collaboration papers can be much longer, sometimes exceeding 40 pages, due to the detailed systematic uncertainty analyses that high-energy physics demands.

Page charges are a factor. For articles not covered by SCOAP3, APS charges page fees beyond a free page allowance. For SCOAP3-covered subfields (high-energy physics, nuclear physics), the page charge issue largely disappears because SCOAP3 covers the publication costs. Check whether your subfield qualifies before worrying about page fees.

A practical note: PRD reviewers don't penalize long papers if the length is justified. A thorough treatment of a new theoretical framework or a complete experimental analysis can legitimately run 25+ pages. But padding an incremental result to 20 pages will draw criticism.

Abstract requirements

PRD abstracts are relatively flexible compared to biomedical journals, but there are specific expectations.

  • Word limit: No strict cap, but 200-600 words is typical. Keep it proportional to the paper.
  • Structure: Unstructured (single paragraph or a few short paragraphs)
  • Citations: Allowed but discouraged. Use only when referencing a specific prior result that's essential context.
  • Keywords: Not required by the journal. APS assigns PACS and PhySH (Physics Subject Headings) classifications.
  • LaTeX in abstract: Allowed. Equations, symbols, and inline math render correctly in the abstract on the APS website.

The abstract should state the problem, the approach (theoretical or experimental), and the main result with quantitative precision. In high-energy physics, this means confidence levels, cross-section measurements, or mass limits. In theory, this means the key prediction or derivation result.

A PRD-specific convention: for experimental papers, the abstract often opens with a one-sentence description of the dataset ("Using 139 fb^{-1} of proton-proton collision data at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV collected by the ATLAS detector at the LHC..."). This establishes the experimental context immediately.

Figure and table specifications

PRD imposes minimal restrictions on figures. The emphasis is on clarity and scientific accuracy rather than rigid format rules.

Figure specifications:

Parameter
Requirement
Resolution
600 dpi minimum for all figures
File formats
EPS (preferred), PDF, PNG, or JPEG
Color
Free (no extra charge online or in print)
Single column width
8.6 cm (~3.4 inches)
Double column width
17.8 cm (~7 inches)
Font in figures
Consistent with body text size when printed
Vector formats
Strongly preferred for plots and diagrams

Color figures: APS provides color figures at no extra charge in both the online and print editions of PRD. This has been APS policy for years and removes a barrier that exists at some other physics publishers.

Plot conventions in high-energy physics: PRD papers frequently contain complex data plots with error bars, fit curves, and systematic uncertainty bands. There are community conventions (not journal requirements) that reviewers expect:

  • Data points with statistical error bars in black
  • Systematic uncertainty as shaded bands
  • Theoretical predictions as colored lines with appropriate labels
  • Legends that are readable at the published column width
  • Axis labels that include units

Feynman diagrams: PRD papers regularly include Feynman diagrams. These can be generated with packages like TikZ-Feynman, FeynMF, or JaxoDraw. Vector formats (EPS, PDF) are preferred. Don't submit Feynman diagrams as rasterized images if possible.

Table formatting: Tables in PRD follow the standard REVTeX format. Use \begin{table} with \begin{ruledtabular} for the ruled lines. Table captions go above the table. For long tables that span multiple pages, use the longtable package.

Reference format

PRD uses the APS reference style, which is shared across all APS journals (Physical Review Letters, Physical Review A-E, Reviews of Modern Physics, etc.).

In-text citations: Numbers in square brackets, assigned in order of first appearance: [1], [2,3], [4-7].

Reference list format:

[1] A. B. Author, C. D. Author, and E. F. Author, Title of article, Phys. Rev. D 100, 012345 (2019).

Key formatting details:

  • Author names: First initial(s) and last name (e.g., "A. B. Smith").
  • Use "and" before the last author.
  • Journal names are abbreviated (Phys. Rev. D, Phys. Rev. Lett., J. High Energy Phys., etc.).
  • Volume numbers are in bold.
  • Article numbers are used instead of page numbers for journals that use them (e.g., Phys. Rev. D uses six-digit article numbers).
  • Year is in parentheses at the end.
  • DOIs are not typically included in the printed reference list but are linked in the online version.
  • For arXiv preprints: include the arXiv identifier (e.g., arXiv:2301.12345 [hep-ph]).

ArXiv citations: In high-energy physics, citing arXiv preprints is common and accepted. The format is: Author(s), arXiv:YYMM.NNNNN [subject-class]. If the preprint has been published, cite the published version with the arXiv number as supplementary information.

Collaboration papers: Large experimental collaborations (ATLAS, CMS, LHCb, etc.) are cited as "Collaboration Name (Author list), ..." with the collaboration name appearing first. The BibTeX entries for collaboration papers follow a specific format handled by INSPIRE-HEP.

PRD doesn't cap the number of references. Theory papers typically cite 30 to 60 sources. Experimental papers can cite 80+ due to the need to reference detector descriptions, previous measurements, and theoretical predictions.

Supplementary material guidelines

PRD's approach to supplementary material differs from many other fields.

Supplemental material: PRD supports supplemental material that is published alongside the article. This can include additional plots, extended data tables, derivation details, and code.

HEPData: For experimental results, the high-energy physics community has a strong convention of depositing numerical results in HEPData. This repository stores the data underlying published figures and tables in machine-readable formats. Depositing in HEPData isn't a PRD requirement, but it's expected by the community and increasingly by reviewers.

Code and analysis preservation: The physics community uses platforms like GitHub, Zenodo, and CERN's analysis preservation tools. PRD encourages authors to provide links to public code repositories when the analysis involves custom software.

Ancillary files: PRD allows authors to attach ancillary files to the arXiv submission. Since virtually all PRD papers appear on arXiv, ancillary files (supplementary plots, data files, Mathematica notebooks) are often hosted there rather than through the journal's own supplementary system.

For very large datasets (collision data, simulation samples), authors should reference the data's location in CERN's open data portal or equivalent repositories rather than trying to attach them to the paper.

LaTeX vs Word: REVTeX is the standard

PRD is a LaTeX journal. Period. While APS technically accepts other formats, PRD submissions are overwhelmingly in LaTeX, and the journal's production pipeline is built around it.

REVTeX 4.2: The required document class is REVTeX 4.2, maintained by APS. The basic invocation:

\documentclass[prd,preprint]{revtex4-2}

Key options:

  • prd selects Physical Review D formatting.
  • preprint produces a single-column, double-spaced layout for review.
  • reprint produces the two-column published layout (useful for checking page count).
  • twocolumn can also produce two-column output.
  • showpacs shows PACS numbers (if used).
  • amsmath,amssymb for mathematical typesetting (load as package options or separate packages).

BibTeX: Use apsrev4-2.bst as your bibliography style file. This handles all APS reference formatting automatically. Don't use generic styles like unsrt.bst or plain.bst.

Word submissions: APS doesn't provide a Word template for PRD. If you must submit in Word, contact the editorial office first. You'll likely face delays during production because the conversion to APS's typesetting system is non-trivial for complex physics manuscripts with many equations.

Practical tip: Use Overleaf with the REVTeX 4.2 template. It handles all package dependencies and compilation issues. If you're working locally, make sure you have a current TeX distribution (TeX Live 2024 or later) to avoid compatibility issues with REVTeX.

One common pitfall: using the \documentclass[prd]{revtex4-1} (version 4.1 instead of 4.2). Version 4.1 is outdated and may cause formatting inconsistencies. Always use revtex4-2.

SCOAP3 compliance formatting

SCOAP3 (Sponsoring Consortium for Open Access Publishing in Particle Physics) is a funding model that covers open access publication costs for eligible articles. This affects PRD submissions in several ways:

Eligibility: Articles in high-energy physics (particle physics, nuclear theory, lattice gauge theory, and related subfields) are typically covered by SCOAP3. Articles in gravitational physics, astrophysics, or condensed matter topics within PRD may not be covered.

License: SCOAP3-funded articles are published under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Non-SCOAP3 articles may be published under APS's standard copyright transfer.

Page charges: SCOAP3 coverage eliminates page charges for the author. Without SCOAP3 coverage, APS charges for pages beyond a free allowance (the specific threshold and rate change periodically).

Formatting impact: SCOAP3 compliance doesn't change the formatting requirements. Your manuscript follows the same REVTeX template and style guidelines regardless of SCOAP3 status. The SCOAP3 designation is handled administratively during submission and production.

Authors should select the appropriate funding option during submission in APS's PROLA submission system. If you're unsure whether your article qualifies for SCOAP3, the editorial office can advise based on the paper's subject classification.

Journal-specific formatting quirks

These are the details that experienced PRD authors know:

No "Introduction" section label is optional. Unlike some journals, PRD papers typically do label their Introduction section. The standard structure is: I. Introduction, II-IV. Main sections, V. Conclusions/Summary, followed by Acknowledgments, Appendices, and References.

Roman numeral section numbering. PRD uses Roman numerals for sections (I, II, III) and uppercase letters for subsections (A, B, C). This is standard APS formatting handled automatically by REVTeX.

Acknowledgments placement. The Acknowledgments section appears after the last main-text section but before any appendices and the references. In REVTeX, use \begin{acknowledgments}...\end{acknowledgments} (note: American spelling with no "e").

Appendices. Appendices appear after Acknowledgments and before References. In REVTeX, use \appendix followed by \section{...} for each appendix. Appendices are labeled A, B, C, etc. Equations in appendices are numbered as (A1), (A2), etc.

Author affiliations. REVTeX handles author-affiliation linking through superscript numbers. For large collaboration papers, the author list follows specific conventions (collaboration name first, author list in a footnote or appendix). Use \collaboration{ATLAS} or equivalent REVTeX commands.

ORCID iDs. APS encourages but doesn't strictly require ORCID iDs. The corresponding author is expected to provide one. The REVTeX template supports ORCID through the \orcid{} command.

eprint numbers. APS journals display the arXiv eprint number on the published article page. When submitting, you can provide the arXiv identifier, and it will be linked in the published version.

Length estimates. To estimate your published page count, compile with the reprint option in REVTeX. A single-column preprint page corresponds to roughly half a two-column published page. This helps you gauge potential page charges.

Frequently missed formatting requirements

  1. REVTeX version. Use revtex4-2, not revtex4-1 or revtex4. Outdated versions cause compilation warnings and formatting mismatches.
  1. BibTeX style. Use apsrev4-2.bst for the APS reference format. Generic BibTeX styles will not produce correct APS formatting.
  1. Acknowledgments spelling. The REVTeX environment uses acknowledgments (American English, no "e"). Using acknowledgements will either cause an error or produce incorrect formatting.
  1. Figure format. Use vector formats (EPS, PDF) for all plots and diagrams. Rasterized plots at low resolution are a common reviewer complaint.
  1. ArXiv preprint format. When citing arXiv preprints, include the subject classification in square brackets: arXiv:2301.12345 [hep-ph].

Submission checklist

Before you submit to Physical Review D, verify:

  • Manuscript uses REVTeX 4.2 with the prd option
  • BibTeX uses apsrev4-2.bst
  • Abstract summarizes the result with quantitative precision
  • References use APS style with abbreviated journal names
  • Figures are high-resolution (600 dpi minimum), preferably vector format
  • Section numbering uses Roman numerals
  • Acknowledgments section is correctly placed and spelled
  • SCOAP3 eligibility is determined before submission
  • ArXiv submission is prepared (virtually all PRD papers go to arXiv)
  • All equations are numbered sequentially

Formatting for PRD is straightforward if you use REVTeX correctly. The real challenge is the physics. If you want to check your manuscript's structural quality before submitting, run a free readiness scan to catch presentation issues that can slow down the review process even at physics journals.

For the most current REVTeX templates and author guidelines, visit the APS Author Information page. The REVTeX 4.2 template is also available directly through CTAN and on Overleaf.

If you're choosing between APS journals for your work, our guides on journal impact factors and how to choose the right journal can help you decide between PRD, PRL, and other venues.

Reference library

Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide

This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.

Open the reference library

Before you upload

Choose the next useful decision step first.

Move from this article into the next decision-support step. The scan works best once the journal and submission plan are clearer.

Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.

Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.

Internal navigation

Where to go next

Open Journal Fit Checklist