Skip to main content

Physical Review Letters APC and Open Access: APS Pricing, SCOAP3, and What Physicists Actually Pay

Physical Review Letters charges $4,140 for open access (hybrid). SCOAP3 covers HEP articles free. APS pricing, institutional deals, and cost comparisons.

Editorial processThe Manusights editorial team researches and maintains these guides using source review, field-specific analysis, and our documented editorial process.How we work

Readiness scan

APC budgeted? See what Physical Review Letters reviewers are likely to push back on.

The fee is one decision. Getting through review is the harder one. Run the Free Readiness Scan with Physical Review Letters as your target to see desk-rejection risk, likely reviewer concerns, and journal fit.

Check my readinessPrivate API processing. Your manuscript is not used to train models.See example reports

Quick answer: Physical Review Letters (PRL) charges $4,140 for gold open access on the 2026 APS price list. APS says there is no required fee to publish on the standard subscription route.

For high-energy physics articles posted to arXiv with a hep primary category, the SCOAP3 consortium covers OA costs. PRL's pricing sits alongside the physics community's long tradition of preprint-first publishing.

What PRL charges

Physical Review Letters is published by the American Physical Society (APS). The pricing structure is more nuanced than most journals:

Item
Cost (USD)
Notes
Subscription publication
$0
Default route, behind paywall
Gold open access
$4,140
2026 APS price list; CC BY license, free to all readers
Optional Page Charge (Letter)
$830
Not required under the subscription model; $310 for a Comment or Reply
Color figures in print
$1,090 first, $595 each additional
Optional; color is free online
SCOAP3-covered HEP articles
$0
APC covered by SCOAP3 consortium
Color figures (online)
$0
Free

Two things stand out here. First, APS sets the APC at the point of submission to the specific journal, including for transferred articles, and publishes it per journal each year. Second, PRL asks authors of published Letters for an Optional Page Charge that is not required under the subscription model, which can surprise authors who expect no charge at all.

If the cost looks workable, the harder question is whether your paper will clear desk review. A Physical Review Letters desk-rejection risk check takes about two to three minutes before you commit to these fees.

Page charges: the 4-page tradition

PRL was designed for short, high-impact papers. APS limits a Letter to 3,750 words for the core of the paper, which it says works out to about four journal pages, and a Letter can add up to two pages of End Matter that do not count against the limit. The limit is not enforced through page surcharges: a paper determined to be overlength at submission is sent back to be shortened.

Separately, to help defray editorial and production expenses, authors of published Letters may contribute an Optional Page Charge:

  • $830 for a Letter
  • $310 for a Comment or Reply

Authors are not required to pay this charge to publish in PRL under the traditional subscription model. Charges for color figures in print and for reprints are separate.

The practical advice is to keep your Letter within the length limit. Move non-essential derivations, supplementary figures, and extended data analysis to End Matter or Supplemental Material, although APS says Supplemental Material should not be used to avoid a length limit.

SCOAP3: free OA for high-energy physics

Here's where PRL's pricing gets genuinely interesting. The SCOAP3 consortium (Sponsoring Consortium for Open Access Publishing in Particle Physics), coordinated by CERN, covers OA publication costs for high-energy physics articles in participating journals.

PRL is a SCOAP3 participating journal. If your paper is classified as high-energy physics (HEP), the following happens:

  1. Your paper is accepted by PRL through normal peer review.
  1. APS checks the arXiv ID and primary category (hep-ex, hep-th, hep-ph or hep-lat).
  1. SCOAP3 covers the APC. You pay nothing, provided APS receives your arXiv ID and you agree to a CC BY license.
  1. The paper is published as gold OA under CC BY.
SCOAP3 Detail
Information
Covers
HEP-classified articles in participating journals
Funding
Redirected library subscription funds from 3,000+ institutions
Author cost
$0
License
CC BY
Coverage in PRL
HEP papers posted to arXiv with a primary category of hep-ex, hep-th, hep-ph or hep-lat
Other participating APS journals
Physical Review C, Physical Review D

SCOAP3 is a remarkable model. Instead of individual authors or institutions paying APCs, the consortium redirected existing library subscription budgets into a pool that covers OA for an entire subdiscipline. APS has participated since January 1, 2018, and the current arrangement extends to articles published through 2027.

If your paper is posted to arXiv with a hep primary category, your PRL publication can be open access without an APC, although you do need to give APS the arXiv ID and agree to a CC BY license.

The preprint culture factor

Physics is the field that invented preprint culture. arXiv has been the primary distribution channel for physics papers since the 1990s. When a physicist finishes a paper, they post it to arXiv. Often weeks or months before journal publication.

This changes the OA calculus significantly. Most physicists already have their work freely accessible on arXiv before PRL peer review is complete. The "open access" that PRL offers is access to the formatted, peer-reviewed, version-of-record paper. But the scientific content was already public.

For this reason, many physicists don't feel the same pressure to pay for gold OA that biologists or medical researchers do. Their community reads arXiv, not journal websites. The journal version is important for the formal record, for citations, and for tenure files. But practical access to the science doesn't depend on it.

It's not that physicists don't value open access. Many already have it, through arXiv.

APS institutional agreements

APS has its own set of institutional arrangements, though they're less extensive than those of Springer Nature or Wiley:

Program
Coverage
Notes
Institutional open access agreements
Eligible authors at participating institutions, no APC
APS lists agreements in Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States
SCOAP3
HEP articles fully covered
More than 3,000 libraries and research institutions participate
UK Jisc
Institutions in the Jisc Consortium
Listed by APS as an open access agreement
Germany
Max Planck Society and the TIB Consortium
Listed by APS as open access agreements
Lower-income countries
APC waived for eligible corresponding authors
APS offers waivers for research in over 115 lower-income countries and territories

The US physics community doesn't have the same large-scale Read & Publish infrastructure that biology and chemistry enjoy through Springer Nature, Elsevier, and Wiley. APS journals are society-published and priced more modestly, so the institutional deal landscape is thinner.

For most US-based physicists, the practical approach is: publish via the subscription route (free), post to arXiv (free), and if your funder requires formal OA, pay the $4,140 APC from your grant or departmental funds.

Waivers and discounts

Automatic waivers: APS offers APC waivers to submitting corresponding authors doing research in over 115 lower-income countries and territories. APS identifies qualifying articles automatically.

Other discounts: APS says it does not currently provide other discounts or waivers for PRL. Any queries about eligibility must be sent to help@aps.org no later than the point of article submission.

Institutional agreements: Authors at institutions covered by an APS open access agreement publish open access with no individual APC payment.

SCOAP3 coverage: For HEP articles, this functions as a complete waiver funded by the consortium rather than the publisher.

The $4,140 APC is paid by the author, institution or funder, so check an institutional agreement, SCOAP3 and the lower-income-country waiver before budgeting for it.

Three facts about PRL that shape publishing decisions

1. PRL published 2,971 papers in 2025 (APS metrics page), and APS's archived July 2013 policy says fewer than 25% of submitted papers were finally accepted. This makes it competitive but not prohibitively selective. The journal covers all areas of physics, from condensed matter to astrophysics to quantum information. Getting into PRL requires a clear, significant result, but it doesn't require the kind of once-in-a-decade breakthrough that Nature Physics demands.

2. You can post your article on arXiv. For subscription articles for which APS holds copyright, APS says authors may post and update the article on free-access e-print servers such as arXiv, as long as the APS-formatted version of record is not used and the APS copyright is clear. Combined with the arXiv preprint, this means your work can be freely readable from day one via arXiv. The $4,140 APC buys you immediate formal OA under a CC BY license, with the version of record free to all readers, but the practical difference is small.

3. PRL has the highest citation count of any physics journal. Despite its modest IF (~8.1), PRL's total citation volume exceeds that of Nature Physics, Science, and every other physics venue. This is because PRL publishes far more papers and has been the standard venue for physics results for over 60 years. A PRL publication is universally recognized across all physics subdisciplines.

Funder mandate compliance

Funder/Policy
Compliant?
Route
Plan S (cOAlition S)
Yes
Gold OA with CC BY ($4,140) or SCOAP3
NIH Public Access Policy
Yes
Gold OA or green OA (arXiv posting)
UKRI
Yes
Gold OA with CC BY
ERC (European Research Council)
Yes
Gold OA with CC BY
NSF Public Access (2026)
Yes
Gold OA or accepted manuscript deposit
DOE
Yes
Green OA through OSTI, or gold OA

APS says posting the article on e-print servers such as arXiv is compliant with many funder policies around the world, including in the USA, without any APC. Plan S is the exception: it requires immediate OA with CC BY, which means either paying the $4,140 APC or having SCOAP3 cover it (for HEP papers).

DOE-funded researchers can comply through DOE's OSTI repository, where the accepted manuscript is deposited. No APC needed.

Readiness check

Run the scan while the topic is in front of you.

See score, top issues, and journal-fit signals before you submit.

Get free manuscript previewPrivate API processing. Your manuscript is not used to train models.See example reports

How PRL compares to peer journals on cost

Journal
APC (USD)
Model
IF (2024)
OA Notes
Physical Review Letters
$4,140
Hybrid
~8.1
SCOAP3 covers HEP; subscription route has no required fee
Nature Physics
$12,500+
Hybrid
~18.0
Springer Nature Read & Publish deals
Science
$0 (subscription only)
Subscription
~47.3
No OA option for flagship
PNAS
$2,575-$5,475
Hybrid
~9.5
Tiered pricing, delayed OA option
Journal of High Energy Physics
$0
Gold OA
~4.9
Fully SCOAP3-funded, always free

At $4,140 for OA (or $0 for subscription + arXiv), PRL is much cheaper than Nature Physics ($12,500+) while offering broader scope and higher total citation volume.

The Journal of High Energy Physics (JHEP), published by Springer Nature and fully funded by SCOAP3, is completely free for all HEP authors. If your work is specifically HEP, JHEP is the zero-cost alternative, though PRL carries broader prestige across physics subdisciplines.

PNAS is an interesting cross-disciplinary comparison. Its delayed OA option at $2,575 is cheaper than PRL's $4,140, but PNAS is a multidisciplinary journal. For physics-specific results, PRL's audience is more targeted.

Hidden costs and considerations

  • The Optional Page Charge is optional. APS invites authors of published Letters to contribute $830, but authors are not required to pay it under the traditional subscription model.
  • Supplemental Material is free. Move non-essential derivations and extended data there, although APS says it should not be used to avoid a length limit.
  • arXiv posting is expected. While not technically required, virtually all PRL authors post to arXiv. If you don't, your paper may get less early attention from the physics community.
  • Color is free online. Print color costs $1,090 for a single figure and $595 for each additional color figure.
  • Length review: PRL editors may ask you to shorten your paper during review, not just for scientific reasons but to fit the format. This is a feature of the journal's editorial philosophy, not a bug.
  • Your institution matters for pricing. If your institution is covered by an APS open access agreement, the APC is covered centrally. Confirm your institution's status before submission.

The practical decision

For most physicists, publishing in PRL costs nothing or close to it. APS says there is no required fee on the subscription route. arXiv provides immediate public access to the science.

If you need formal gold OA (for Plan S compliance or institutional mandates), the 2026 APS price is $4,140. And if you're in HEP, SCOAP3 covers even that.

The main cost to check is whether an institutional agreement, SCOAP3 or a waiver already covers the APC. Keep your Letter within the length limit and confirm your institution's open access agreement status.

For more about APS publishing options, visit the APS Publications page. For a comparison with a multidisciplinary alternative, see our PNAS APC guide.

Before submitting to PRL, make sure your paper communicates a clear, significant result within the journal's tight format constraints. PRL values conciseness and impact. Physical Review Letters submission readiness check to check whether your manuscript is structured for the kind of efficient, high-signal presentation that PRL editors expect.

Should you submit if the APC is covered?

Submit if Physical Review Letters is already a strong journal-fit choice and the APC route solves a real access, funder, or institutional requirement. APC coverage should make a good submission easier to publish, not make a weak-fit submission look better.

Think twice if the only reason to choose Physical Review Letters is that the fee is covered. The common mistake is treating APC coverage as a proxy for editorial fit. Editors still screen the manuscript for scope, evidence strength, and audience value before the payment question matters.

Is open access at Physical Review Letters worth the APC?

Worth paying if:

  • Your funder mandates open access (check Plan S / cOAlition S requirements)
  • An institutional Read & Publish agreement covers the fee
  • Open access visibility meaningfully benefits your research area
  • The APC fits within your grant budget

Consider alternatives if:

  • The APC is a personal out-of-pocket expense
  • A subscription option or green OA (preprint + embargo) satisfies your funder
  • Another OA journal with a lower APC would provide similar visibility

For a manuscript-specific signal before you submit, run a Physical Review Letters submission readiness check.

Or see example reports before you finalize.

From the publisher

Physical Review Letters at a glance

The figures Physical Review Letters publishes about speed, selectivity and cost, each linked to the page we read it on. They describe the journal, not your manuscript's chances.

Check your manuscript before you submit
Submission to first decision7 daysmedian. journals.aps.org, checked October 2026
Decision after peer review54 daysmedian, 2025 (previous calendar year). journals.aps.org, checked October 2026
Optional open access fee$4,1402026. journals.aps.org, checked October 2026

Frequently asked questions

Physical Review Letters charges $4,140 for gold open access publication on the 2026 APS price list. APS says there is no required fee to publish in its hybrid journals on the standard subscription route. PRL is a hybrid journal. For high-energy physics articles posted to arXiv with a hep primary category, the SCOAP3 consortium covers the OA fee, making open access publication free to the author.

SCOAP3 (Sponsoring Consortium for Open Access Publishing in Particle Physics) is a CERN-led initiative that covers OA costs for high-energy physics articles in participating journals. PRL is a SCOAP3 participating journal. If your paper is posted to arXiv with a primary category of hep-ex, hep-th, hep-ph or hep-lat, you give APS the arXiv ID, and you agree to a CC BY license, the APC is covered by SCOAP3 at no cost to you.

Not as a requirement. APS limits a Letter to 3,750 words, about four journal pages for the core of the paper, and asks authors of published Letters to contribute an Optional Page Charge of $830 ($310 for a Comment or Reply). Authors are not required to pay it under the traditional subscription model. Charges for print color figures and reprints are separate.

Yes, in most cases. APS says there is no required fee on the standard subscription route, and the Optional Page Charge is not required. For HEP papers, SCOAP3 covers OA costs, and authors at institutions with an APS open access agreement can publish open access without an APC.

PRL charges $4,140 for OA versus Nature Physics at $12,500+. PRL has a lower IF (~8.1 vs ~18) but publishes far more papers and is considered the standard venue for significant physics results. PRL is dramatically cheaper and more accessible for most physicists.

References

Sources

  1. Physical Review Letters - Author Guidelines
  2. Physical Review Letters - Journal Homepage
  3. Clarivate Journal Citation Reports (2026 release for the 2025 Journal Impact Factor)

Free guide

The list price is rarely the price you pay.

Waivers, funder agreements and institutional deals move it, and the deadline for most of them is submission, after which there is no appeal. Every figure in the guide was read off the publisher or funder page that sets it, on the date shown, and each one is linked at the end.

The guide, plus the weekly brief on getting published. One email on Mondays and a product note at most once a month, unsubscribe in one click.

Before you upload

Want the full picture on Physical Review Letters?

Scope, selectivity, what editors want, common rejection reasons, and submission context, all in one place.

These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.

Private API processing. Your manuscript is not used to train models.

Put the guidance to work

Build a journal decision from more than one signal.

Use comparison data as a starting point, then confirm the live source that governs the actual submission decision.

Internal navigation

Where to go next