Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews APC and Open Access: Elsevier Pricing, R&P Deals, and Cheaper Alternatives
Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews charges ~$4,500-$5,000 for open access. Elsevier hybrid model, Read & Publish deals, and how it compares to Applied Energy.
Senior Researcher, Oncology & Cell Biology
Author context
Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for oncology and cell biology, with deep experience evaluating submissions to Nature Medicine, JCO, Cancer Cell, and Cell-family journals.
Next step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.
Quick answer: Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews (RSER) charges approximately $4,500-$5,000 for gold open access. It's a hybrid Elsevier journal, so subscription-track publication is free. With an impact factor around 15, RSER is one of the most cited journals in energy research, though its review-heavy format inflates that number compared to journals that publish mostly original studies.
What RSER charges
Component | Details |
|---|---|
Gold OA APC | ~$4,500-$5,000 |
CC BY license | Higher end of range |
CC BY-NC-ND license | Lower end of range |
Subscription-track | $0 |
Submission fee | $0 |
Page/color charges | $0 |
Elsevier sets its APCs based on the journal's "impact category." RSER falls into Elsevier's premium pricing tier because of its high citation metrics. The APC is charged at acceptance, and Elsevier's Author Services team handles invoicing. You'll receive payment instructions after your paper clears peer review and editorial approval.
There's no submission fee, which means you don't pay anything until the paper is accepted. This is standard across Elsevier journals. Color figures, supplementary data, and extended page counts don't incur extra charges.
Why RSER is expensive (and why it might still be worth it)
RSER's APC sits at the top of Elsevier's energy journal range. The pricing reflects three things:
- High impact factor (~15). Elsevier's APC tiers correlate directly with journal IF. Higher IF means higher APC. RSER's IF is among the highest in the energy category.
- Review article focus. RSER publishes primarily review and survey articles. These tend to be long (often 30-60 pages), heavily referenced, and widely cited. A single RSER review can accumulate hundreds of citations.
- Elsevier's margin model. Elsevier operates at roughly 35-37% profit margins. APCs for premium journals reflect both costs and profit targets.
The practical question is whether the visibility justifies the price. For review articles that synthesize an entire subfield, RSER's readership and citation velocity are hard to match. A well-written RSER review can define a research area for years.
Elsevier Read & Publish agreements
Elsevier has built a global network of transformative agreements. If your institution participates, the RSER APC may be partially or fully covered.
Region / Consortium | Coverage | Notes |
|---|---|---|
Netherlands (VSNU) | Full APC coverage | Elsevier's home country, strong deal |
Germany (DEAL) | Full coverage | One of the largest OA deals globally |
UK (Jisc) | Full or partial | Tiered by institution |
Sweden | Full coverage | National agreement |
Norway | Full coverage | Unit consortium |
Hungary | Full coverage | EISZ consortium |
Australia | Select institutions | CAUL negotiations |
United States | Limited | Some individual university agreements |
One thing to watch: Elsevier's agreements sometimes exclude certain premium journals or cap the number of OA articles per institution per year. RSER is usually included in the core agreement, but confirm with your library before assuming coverage.
US-based researchers are less likely to have full Elsevier R&P coverage than European colleagues. If you're at a US university, check your library's Elsevier agreement status directly.
Waivers and discounts
Developing country waivers: Elsevier offers reduced or waived APCs for authors in countries classified under Research4Life's HINARI program. Group A countries receive full waivers. Group B countries get 50% reductions.
Financial hardship: Elsevier considers case-by-case waiver requests, though approval rates aren't publicly disclosed. If your institution lacks an R&P deal and your grant doesn't cover APCs, it's worth submitting a waiver request at the point of acceptance.
No membership discounts: Unlike ACS or RSC, Elsevier doesn't offer society membership-based APC discounts for RSER. The journal isn't affiliated with a learned society.
Funder mandate compliance
Funder/Policy | Compliant? | Route |
|---|---|---|
Plan S (cOAlition S) | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY |
NIH Public Access | Yes | Gold OA or green OA after 12-month embargo |
UKRI | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY, or rights retention |
ERC | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY |
NSF | Yes | Gold OA or embargo deposit |
Horizon Europe | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY |
DOE | Yes | Green OA via OSTI after embargo |
For Plan S compliance, you'll need the CC BY license option, which is the higher end of RSER's APC range. Most European funders now require this. US funders (NIH, NSF, DOE) still allow the green OA route with an embargo period, meaning you can publish via subscription track and self-archive the accepted manuscript after 12-24 months.
How RSER compares to competing energy journals
Journal | APC (USD) | Model | IF (2024) | Publisher | Primary Content |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews | ~$4,500-$5,000 | Hybrid | ~15 | Elsevier | Reviews |
Applied Energy | ~$4,500-$5,000 | Hybrid | ~11 | Elsevier | Original research |
Energy Policy | ~$3,500-$4,000 | Hybrid | ~9 | Elsevier | Policy research |
Renewable Energy | ~$3,500-$4,000 | Hybrid | ~8 | Elsevier | Original research |
Joule | ~$9,500 (Cell Press) | Hybrid | ~39 | Cell Press/Elsevier | High-impact original |
Energy & Environmental Science | ~$3,000-$3,500 | Hybrid | ~32 | RSC | Original research |
Several things stand out in this comparison:
RSER vs. Applied Energy: Both are Elsevier, both charge similar APCs. Applied Energy publishes original research while RSER focuses on reviews. If you have a review article, RSER is the better fit. For original research, Applied Energy is the default.
RSER vs. Joule: Joule (Cell Press) charges nearly double RSER's APC and has a much higher IF (~39). But Joule is a selective, high-profile journal that publishes far fewer papers. It's not a direct competitor for most energy researchers.
RSER vs. Renewable Energy: Renewable Energy is cheaper (~$3,500-$4,000) and publishes original research. It's the more cost-effective option for papers that don't need RSER's review-journal prestige.
RSER vs. Energy Policy: If your work has a policy angle, Energy Policy is cheaper and better targeted. RSER reviews sometimes cross into policy territory, but the journal's core audience is technical.
Hidden costs and considerations
- Review articles take months to write. A typical RSER review involves reading 200-400 papers and synthesizing them into a coherent narrative. The APC is a small fraction of the total time investment.
- Length isn't penalized. RSER doesn't charge per page. A 60-page review costs the same as a 20-page review.
- Supplementary materials are free. You can include extensive supporting data, tables, and figures as supplements without extra cost.
- No fast-track or expedited review fees. RSER doesn't offer paid priority review.
- Self-archiving is allowed after an embargo period (typically 24 months for Elsevier). You can post the accepted manuscript on your institutional repository or personal website.
Tips for managing RSER publication costs
- Check your R&P agreement first. If you're at a European institution, there's a good chance Elsevier's agreement covers RSER. Ask your library before assuming you'll pay out of pocket.
- Budget the APC into your grant application. Most energy research funders (DOE, EPSRC, DFG, NWO) allow publication costs as a line item. Include APCs in your next grant budget.
- Consider the subscription track. If your funder doesn't require immediate OA, publishing for free on the subscription track is a legitimate choice. Most energy researchers have institutional access to RSER anyway.
- Look at Renewable Energy or Energy Policy if cost is the deciding factor and your paper could fit either journal.
The practical decision
For energy researchers writing review articles:
- Your institution has an Elsevier R&P deal? Choose gold OA at no cost. Check your library page.
- No R&P deal but funder requires OA? Pay the APC (~$4,500-$5,000) and use CC BY.
- No OA requirement? Publish via subscription track for free. Self-archive after the embargo.
- Cost is the priority? Submit to Renewable Energy or Energy Policy, both of which charge less.
- High-impact original research? RSER publishes reviews, not original studies. Look at Applied Energy or Joule for original research.
RSER is the dominant review journal in sustainable energy, and a well-placed review there can define your subfield for years. But even review articles need tight structure and clear argumentation to get past editors. Run a free readiness scan to check your manuscript's organization and clarity before submitting.
Reference library
Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide
This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.
Dataset / reference guide
Peer Review Timelines by Journal
Reference-grade journal timeline data that authors, labs, and writing centers can cite when discussing realistic review timing.
Dataset / benchmark
Biomedical Journal Acceptance Rates
A field-organized acceptance-rate guide that works as a neutral benchmark when authors are deciding how selective to target.
Reference table
Journal Submission Specs
A high-utility submission table covering word limits, figure caps, reference limits, and formatting expectations.
Before you upload
Want the full journal picture?
Scope, selectivity, what editors want, common rejection reasons, and submission context, all in one place.
These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.
Where to go next
Supporting reads
Conversion step
Want the full journal picture?
These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.