Advanced Science Impact Factor
Advanced Science has a 2025 Journal Impact Factor of 14.1. Verify Wiley's current metrics, ISSN, open-access model, and source boundary.
Journal evaluation
Want the full journal picture?
See scope, selectivity, submission context, and what editors actually want before you decide whether the journal is realistic.
Quick answer: Advanced Science has a 2025 Journal Impact Factor (JIF) of 14.1. Wiley's current journal profile also lists a CiteScore of 18.2, 20% acceptance rate, median nine days from submission to first decision, fully open-access publishing, and ISSN 2198-3844. Cite 14.1 as the 2025 JIF released in 2026, and do not use a journal metric as evidence that an individual materials, chemistry, physics, or life-sciences manuscript fits the journal.
Last reviewed: July 14, 2026. Evidence basis: the current Wiley Advanced Science profile and Wiley's journal overview.
What is the Advanced Science impact factor at a glance?
Metric or identifier | Current value | Source boundary |
|---|---|---|
Journal Impact Factor | 14.1 (2025 JIF) | Official Wiley profile |
CiteScore | 18.2 | Official Wiley profile |
Acceptance rate | 20% | Official Wiley profile; journal aggregate, not an individual forecast |
Submission to first decision | Median 9 days | Official Wiley profile; not a peer-review or acceptance promise |
Publishing model | Fully open access | Official Wiley profile |
Online and print ISSN | 2198-3844 | Official Wiley profile |
Publisher | Wiley-VCH GmbH | Official Wiley profile |
The 14.1 JIF is a journal-level, two-year citation-window measure. The
18.2 CiteScore, acceptance rate, and decision median use different
underlying measures. They should not be combined into a single quality score
or used to rank individual authors, papers, laboratories, or proposals.
Is this the exact Wiley journal record?
Advanced Science is Wiley's fully open-access interdisciplinary journal.
Its published scope spans fundamental and applied work in materials science,
chemistry, physics, engineering, medical and life sciences, earth and
environmental sciences, and social sciences and humanities. The exact journal
identifier is ISSN 2198-3844.
This query can collide with the Wiley Advanced portfolio. A value for
Advanced Materials, Advanced Functional Materials, **Advanced Energy
Materials, Advanced Healthcare Materials, or Small Science** is not an
Advanced Science value. The title, ISSN, metric year, and source should agree.
Verify before citing | Match | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
Exact title | Advanced Science | The Wiley portfolio contains similarly named journals |
Standard abbreviation | Adv. Sci. | Helps distinguish the title in records and references |
Identifier | ISSN 2198-3844 | Resolves portfolio and directory collisions |
Metric year | 2025 | Identifies the citation period for the JIF |
Source | Current Wiley journal profile | Anchors the lookup to the publisher display |
Advanced Science impact factor trend: source boundary
The current Wiley profile supports the 2025 JIF of 14.1, but the primary
record checked for this page does not publish a complete, year-by-year JIF
table. We therefore do not present a multi-year chart, a change from a prior
year, or a forecast. A historical value copied from an unsourced directory can
look plausible while using a different title, data year, or metric method.
Metric data year | JIF supported by the current primary record | What can be claimed |
|---|---|---|
2025 | 14.1 | Current Wiley-displayed JIF only |
The absence of a verified series matters more than a decorative chart. A
reader who needs an audited historical comparison should use a source that
identifies each JIF data year and its provenance, then label each point by
year. The current exact-record lookup remains useful, but it does not prove
that the metric went up, down, or stayed constant relative to an earlier year.
How should the Wiley metrics be read?
The 14.1 JIF answers a narrow citation-metric question. The 18.2 CiteScore is
an Elsevier Scopus-derived metric displayed by Wiley, while the 20% acceptance
rate and nine-day initial-decision median describe journal-level editorial
outcomes. Each can provide context, but none establishes whether a particular
paper has the evidence, reach, or framing that Advanced Science requires.
Decision | Better evidence than a metric alone | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
Is this the intended journal? | Exact title, abbreviation, and ISSN | Stops Wiley-portfolio substitution |
Is the metric current? | Current Wiley profile and stated metric year | Keeps data and release period aligned |
Does the paper fit? | Scope, contribution, evidence, and intended readers | Citation averages cannot decide editorial fit |
Is a deadline feasible? | Current workflow plus the actual deadline | A median first decision is not publication time |
Is the work ready? | Claims, controls, characterization, data, and limitations | Journal metrics cannot validate a manuscript |
What the 14.1 JIF does not establish
The JIF does not establish an acceptance rate for one author, a required
citation count, a guaranteed editorial outcome, an article processing charge,
or a recommendation to submit. Wiley's displayed 20% rate and nine-day median
are aggregates. A desk decision can be faster or slower, and a manuscript sent
for review can require revision, additional evidence, or a different route.
For institutional reporting, follow the metric source and year required by the
institution. This page records the current publisher display and exact journal
identity; it is not a licensed Journal Citation Reports export or a substitute
for a local evaluation policy.
Named failure patterns: portfolio substitution and metric relabeling
Portfolio substitution occurs when a reader finds a high citation number
for an Advanced-family title and assigns it to Advanced Science. The practical
check is brief: match the full title, the Adv. Sci. abbreviation, ISSN
2198-3844, metric year, and Wiley source before citing the number.
Metric relabeling occurs when CiteScore is called an impact factor, or when
an acceptance rate is presented as a quality score. Wiley displays several
metrics together because they answer different questions. State the requested
metric by name and retain its data year.
Metric-to-manuscript inference occurs when a journal average becomes a
claim about a specific article. A materials platform with limited validation,
a narrow chemistry result, or a life-sciences paper without a credible
cross-field contribution can be a poor fit despite the journal's metric.
What does open access change, and what does it not change?
Advanced Science is fully open access, which means published work is available
to readers without a subscription. It does not erase editorial selectivity,
remove the need for a funding plan, or make every interdisciplinary label
credible. The manuscript still has to make a substantive contribution for the
readers the journal serves.
The useful submission question is therefore not whether 14.1 is high enough.
It is whether the work makes a clear, evidence-backed advance that travels
across its relevant communities. A single-subfield materials result may be
clearer in a specialist journal; a contribution joining materials, chemistry,
physics, engineering, or life sciences may have a more natural Advanced Science
reader case. That is a scope judgment, not a JIF consequence.
How did we verify this record?
We matched the current Wiley journal profile, official overview, exact title,
ISSN, and publisher-displayed metric table on July 14, 2026. The source method
is deliberately narrow: current values come from Wiley, and the page names
the distinct methods behind JIF and CiteScore rather than treating all visible
numbers as interchangeable. It does not construct a historic JIF series
because the current primary record checked here does not publish a complete
year-by-year table.
Why this exact-record page exists
Searchers often reach a metric result when they need a narrow factual answer,
then encounter several numbers and similarly named Wiley journals. This page
helps make that lookup auditable: it identifies the target journal, retains
the metric year, names the publisher record, separates companion metrics, and
states the facts the record cannot establish. The cited Wiley sources are the
authority for current journal data; Manusights supplies the record-matching and
decision boundary so a metric lookup is not silently converted into submission
advice or a claim about one paper.
The page owns only advanced science impact factor. It deliberately routes
submission preparation to the existing guide and adjacent-journal selection to
the comparison page below. That separation keeps a metric lookup concise while
letting each related page answer one reader job rather than competing for the
same query.
The specific named failure pattern documented here is portfolio
substitution: an otherwise credible value is copied from another Wiley Advanced
title. In practice, this page helps before a metric is cited by asking the
reader to compare each of the title, abbreviation, ISSN, metric year, and
source. That short audit is more useful than a longer list of unsourced
historic values because it can be repeated against the publisher record.
For a formal citation, retain the journal title, metric name, metric year, and
source together: "Advanced Science's 2025 Journal Impact Factor is 14.1,
according to Wiley." That avoids turning a 2025 citation metric into a 2026
impact factor or an unsupported judgment of a paper's quality.
What should authors verify before citing the metric?
- Match Advanced Science, Adv. Sci., and ISSN 2198-3844.
- Describe 14.1 as a 2025 JIF, not a 2026 citation-year value.
- Do not substitute CiteScore, acceptance rate, or first-decision median for the JIF.
- Keep journal-level median timing separate from a submission or publication promise.
- Use the current Wiley scope and author guidance for a submission decision.
For the manuscript-level question, use the Advanced Science submission guide and an interdisciplinary manuscript readiness check. For adjacent venue decisions, see Advanced Materials versus Advanced Functional Materials.
Submit If
- You need a current, exact-title Wiley metric lookup with a primary-source boundary.
- You need to distinguish the 2025 JIF from Wiley's CiteScore, acceptance, and timing displays.
- You have already assessed the work against the journal's current scope and reader community.
Think Twice If
- The target is another Wiley Advanced-family journal.
- A journal-level metric is being used to forecast acceptance, citations, or timeline for one paper.
- A complete historical JIF series, current fee, or category ranking is needed but is not established by the source used here.
Frequently asked questions
Advanced Science has a current 2025 Journal Impact Factor of 14.1 on its official Wiley journal profile. Cite it as a 2025 JIF released in 2026, not as a 2026 citation-year value.
Yes. Wiley describes Advanced Science as a fully open-access interdisciplinary journal.
The current Wiley profile lists a CiteScore of 18.2, a 20% acceptance rate, and a median of nine days from submission to first decision. These metrics are not substitutes for the JIF.
Advanced Science uses online and print ISSN 2198-3844. Check the exact title and ISSN before applying a metric from the Wiley Advanced portfolio.
No. The JIF is a journal-level citation metric. Manuscript fit depends on the interdisciplinary contribution, evidence, audience, and current editorial criteria.
Sources
Before you upload
Want the full journal picture?
Scope, selectivity, what editors want, common rejection reasons, and submission context, all in one place.
These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.