Journal Guide
Publishing in Advanced Materials: Fit, Timeline & Submission Guide
Interdisciplinary materials research where the result has to matter across chemistry, physics, engineering, and beyond.
Should you submit here?
Submit if the manuscript should feel important beyond one narrow subfield and should clearly change how researchers think about a class of materials, a device direction, or a design strategy. Be careful if the real bar is cross-field importance, not just good materials work with a strong property table.
Best fit if
The manuscript should feel important beyond one narrow subfield and should clearly change how researchers think about a class of materials, a device direction, or a design strategy
Not ideal if
The real bar is cross-field importance, not just good materials work with a strong property table
Also compare
29.1
Impact Factor
15%
Acceptance Rate
14 days median submission to first decision
Time to First Decision
Readiness Scan
See whether your manuscript clears Advanced Materials’s editorial screen.
Free 1 to 2 minute scan. Get a fit score, top issues, and the specific Advanced Materials desk-reject patterns flagged before you submit.
Private API processing. Your manuscript is not used to train models.
What Advanced Materials Publishes
Advanced Materials says it publishes important discoveries on any and all materials and highlights two defining traits: cutting-edge work on functional materials and pronounced interdisciplinarity. That is the fit test. The journal is not simply for strong materials papers or record-property tables. It is for materials work that changes what researchers across multiple adjacent communities think is possible.
- Functional materials with electronic, optical, magnetic, mechanical, catalytic, or bioactive properties
- Materials chemistry and materials physics discoveries that connect synthesis, structure, and function
- Interdisciplinary materials systems spanning chemistry, physics, engineering, and life or health sciences
- Energy, electronic, and photonic materials where the material advance is genuinely consequential
- Biomaterials and health-related materials when the materials insight remains central and field-shaping
- Materials demonstrating transferability beyond one curated device stack, synthesis route, or benchmark
Editor Insight
“Advanced Materials is not just for strong materials papers. It is for discoveries that reshape the conversation across the field. If the paper is only excellent inside one niche, it may still be a very good paper, but it is probably the wrong journal.”
Advanced Materials fit decision
Use this profile as the canonical Advanced Materials fit owner. Submission mechanics belong on the Advanced Materials submission process, package requirements belong on the Advanced Materials submission guide, live status anxiety belongs on Advanced Materials under review, and metric-only questions belong on Advanced Materials impact factor.
The fit decision is narrower than the journal name suggests. Advanced Materials is broad, but it is not a catch-all for every strong materials manuscript. The manuscript needs a result that changes how multiple materials communities think about a material class, device strategy, mechanism, or design rule.
- Strong fit: one material principle or design rule changes a broader conversation.
- Reroute risk: the paper mainly reports a better number under narrow conditions.
- Strong fit: chemists, physicists, engineers, and application researchers can all see the implication.
- Reroute risk: only one specialist group can evaluate why it matters.
- Strong fit: structure, processing, and function explain each other.
- Reroute risk: performance is disconnected from materials logic.
What changed in this review
Last reviewed: 2026-09-01. Wiley's current Advanced Materials profile reports a 29.1 Journal Impact Factor, 15% acceptance rate, and 14-day median submission-to-first-decision signal. Those metrics confirm the journal is highly selective and fast at first screening, but they do not answer whether one manuscript belongs there. Manusights therefore treats the metrics as context, not the decision.
For authors, the practical mistake is target inflation. A paper can be technically excellent, well controlled, and highly publishable while still being a better fit for Advanced Functional Materials, Advanced Energy Materials, Small, ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, Matter, or Nature Materials.
Submission-readiness route
Before submitting, pressure-test three dependencies in order:
- Contribution breadth: can someone outside the immediate materials subfield state what changed?
- Mechanistic durability: does the paper explain why the result happens, not only that it happened?
- Application consequence: does the material insight change a device, diagnostic, catalyst, interface, biomaterial, energy system, or design strategy in a way readers can reuse?
If all three are strong, the next step is a manuscript-level check. A materials-journal fit review can test whether the title, abstract, first figure, and contribution statement read like Advanced Materials rather than a narrower Wiley portfolio target.
If the paper is close but not clearly broad enough, compare it against Advanced Materials vs Advanced Functional Materials and Advanced Energy Materials vs Advanced Materials.
Source boundary
Official Wiley pages define the journal identity, current metrics, publication frequency, and author-facing route. Manusights adds the fit interpretation: whether a manuscript has enough cross-field consequence, mechanism, and transferability for Advanced Materials. This profile does not predict acceptance, reviewer selection, or one manuscript's decision timeline. Recheck Wiley before relying on metrics in formal correspondence.
What Advanced Materials Editors Look For
A materials discovery with broad consequence
The manuscript should feel important beyond one narrow subfield and should clearly change how researchers think about a class of materials, a device direction, or a design strategy.
Interdisciplinary relevance
Wiley explicitly emphasizes the journal's interdisciplinarity. The best papers speak naturally to chemists, physicists, engineers, and adjacent application researchers rather than only to one specialist audience.
A functional advance, not just a better number
The result should show why the material matters, not merely that it slightly outperforms a benchmark under curated conditions.
A story that stays important after the headline figure
Strong papers usually combine novelty, mechanism, and a compelling reason the material changes design or application logic.
Mechanistic durability
Editors and reviewers need to see why the result happens, not only that it happened. Structure, processing, and function should explain each other.
Transferable validation
Benchmarking, stability, controls, and failure modes should show that the insight survives beyond one favorable test condition.
Why Papers Get Rejected
These patterns appear repeatedly in manuscripts that don't make it past Advanced Materials's editorial review:
Treating the journal like a high-metric general materials venue
The real bar is cross-field importance, not just good materials work with a strong property table.
Submitting a narrow optimization paper
An incremental gain in one device metric or one synthetic tweak usually lacks the breadth and consequence the journal is built around.
Forgetting the interdisciplinary audience
The journal itself points to interdisciplinarity as a key to its success, so papers written only for one niche leave a lot of fit on the table.
Claiming transformative value without explaining the underlying materials logic
Reviewers at this level expect more than performance bragging. They want to know why the advance matters and how it changes the design space.
Overpacking the manuscript with secondary experiments instead of one strong central argument
Broad importance usually comes from a clear idea executed convincingly, not from an overloaded paper trying to prove everything at once.
Letting the contribution disappear when the exact device architecture is removed
If the result only matters inside one curated stack, the paper may be publishable but not broad enough for this journal.
Does your manuscript avoid these patterns?
The Free Readiness Scan reads your full manuscript against Advanced Materials's criteria and flags the specific issues most likely to cause rejection.
Insider Tips from Advanced Materials Authors
Start with the consequence, not the synthesis details
Editors need to see quickly why the materials result belongs in a top interdisciplinary venue before they get into the technical execution.
Make the interdisciplinarity real
A paper reads stronger here when it genuinely bridges communities instead of merely borrowing vocabulary from another field.
Use the figures to teach the field
The best Advanced Materials papers often become reference points because the schematics and summary figures make a new materials idea easy to adopt.
Device or systems relevance helps when it proves consequence
Practical demonstration matters when it sharpens the importance of the materials advance rather than distracting from it.
Treat metrics as context, not the submission argument
The 29.1 Journal Impact Factor, 15% acceptance-rate signal, and 14-day median first-decision display confirm selectivity, but the manuscript still has to prove why it belongs.
Compare against the right sibling journal
Advanced Functional Materials, Advanced Energy Materials, Matter, ACS Nano, Small, or a specialist venue may be more honest when the paper is excellent but narrower.
Show why the lesson transfers
A reviewer should be able to say what future authors can reuse from the paper even if they work on a different material system.
Keep the central claim narrow enough to verify
Field-shaping does not mean overclaiming. It means the paper makes one durable, well-supported materials argument that other communities can use.
The Advanced Materials Submission Process
Build a flagship-level materials story
PrepPrepare a manuscript where the advance is important enough to matter across multiple parts of the materials community, not just within one specialist lane.
Submit through Wiley
Day 0Frame the paper around the central materials consequence, the breadth of interest, and the interdisciplinary reason it belongs in Advanced Materials.
Editorial screening
Before peer reviewEditors are looking first for importance, breadth, and whether the paper feels like one of the most important materials discoveries the journal could publish.
Peer review
Reviewer-dependentReview typically probes whether the result is truly broad and durable enough for a flagship materials journal rather than simply impressive inside one niche.
Revision and publication
Reviewer-dependent after first decisionThe strongest revisions usually sharpen the central claim, broaden the significance framing, and clarify mechanism or design logic.
Advanced Materials by the Numbers
| Journal Impact Factor(Wiley journal metrics, checked 2026-09-01) | 29.1 |
| CiteScore(Wiley journal metrics, checked 2026-09-01) | 42 |
| Acceptance rate(Wiley journal metrics, checked 2026-09-01) | 15% |
| Submission to first decision(Wiley journal metrics, checked 2026-09-01) | 14 days median |
| Publisher | Wiley-VCH |
| Publication frequency | Weekly |
| Founded | 1989 |
| Primary positioning | Interdisciplinary flagship materials journal |
Before you submit
Advanced Materials accepts a small fraction of submissions. Make your attempt count.
Start with the Free Readiness Scan. Unlock the Full Review from $39, with local pricing shown before checkout. If you need deeper submission planning, choose the Submission-Ready Dossier. The full report is calibrated to Advanced Materials.
Article Types
Research Article
Follow current Wiley guidanceCarefully selected top-quality materials paper.
Review
Follow current Wiley guidanceReview-format contribution under current Wiley article types.
Perspective
Follow current Wiley guidancePerspective-format contribution under current Wiley article types.
Landmark Advanced Materials Papers
Papers that defined fields and changed science:
- Perovskite solar cells achieving record efficiencies - transforming photovoltaic technology
- Graphene and 2D materials with exceptional properties - enabling novel device applications
- Shape-memory polymers with programmable properties - new class of functional materials
- Superhydrophobic surfaces inspired by lotus leaves - biomimetic materials with practical applications
- MOF-based materials for gas storage and separation - porous materials with transformative potential
Preparing a Advanced Materials Submission?
Get pre-submission feedback from reviewers who've published in Advanced Materials and know exactly what editors look for.
Run Free Readiness ScanNeed expert depth? See Expert Review Options
Primary Fields
Related Journal Guides
- Publishing in Nature
- Publishing in Advanced Functional Materials
- Publishing in ACS Nano
- Publishing in Materials
Latest Journal-Specific Guides
- Submission guideAdvanced Materials Interfaces Submission Guide: Fit and FilesA current Wiley source-checked guide to Advanced Materials Interfaces, centered on interface ownership, evidence, free-format submission, and data reporting.
- Journal assessmentIs Advanced Materials a Good Journal? Impact, Scope, and FitAdvanced Materials (JIF 29.1, Wiley, Q1) is the top interdisciplinary materials journal. Here is who should submit, what the editors want, and how it stacks up against Nature Materials and ACS Nano.
- Desk rejectionHow to Avoid Desk Rejection at Advanced Materials in 2026At Advanced Materials, good data isn't the standard. That's the entry fee. The real question is whether the paper feels field-shifting enough to deserve reviewer time.
- Review timelineAdvanced Materials Review Time 2026: Time to First Decision and PublicationAdvanced Materials takes 6-12 weeks to a first decision for papers that pass desk review. Desk rejection decisions arrive in 2-4 weeks. Here's a realistic timeline breakdown for one of materials science's top journals.
More Guides for This Journal
- Acceptance rateAdvanced Materials Acceptance Rate: How Hard Is It to Get Published?Advanced Materials is one of the most selective materials science journals, with a 2025 JIF of 29.1 (2026 JCR release) and aggressive desk rejection for work that doesn't reach its impact standard. Here's what actually gets in.
- Impact factorAdvanced Materials Interfaces Impact Factor 2026: 4.5 (2025 JIF)Advanced Materials Interfaces has a 2025 Journal Impact Factor of 4.5. Verify Wiley's current metrics, exact title, ISSN, and source boundary.
- Publishing costsAdvanced Materials APC and Open Access: What Wiley Charges for One of Materials Science's Top JournalsAdvanced Materials charges ~$5,500-$6,000 for open access. Hybrid Wiley journal, DEAL agreements, IF ~27. Full cost breakdown and how it compares to ACS Nano.
- Submission processAdvanced Materials Submission Process: Portal, Review, and What to ExpectA practical Advanced Materials submission process guide covering the Wiley submission portal, editorial screening, review stages, and what to expect at each step.
- Manuscript prepAdvanced Materials Cover Letter: What Editors Actually Need to SeeAdvanced Materials editors are screening for broad materials consequence fast. A strong cover letter makes that flagship case without hype.
- Publishing guideAdvanced Materials Formatting Requirements ChecklistPrepare an Advanced Materials submission with a source-backed checklist for files, figures, supporting information, and disclosures.
中文版本
阅读中文投稿指南 →Ready to submit to Advanced Materials?
A desk rejection costs months. Get expert feedback before you submit, from scientists who know exactly what Advanced Materials editors look for.
Avoid Desk Rejection
Get expert pre-submission review before you submit to Advanced Materials. 3-7 day turnaround.
Manuscript Rejected?
Expert revision help to strengthen your manuscript and resubmit with confidence.
Reviewer Response Help
Get expert guidance crafting your response to Advanced Materials reviewers.
Need field-expert depth? See Expert Review Options