Applied Thermal Engineering Submission Guide
What submitting to Applied Thermal Engineering actually requires: the Elsevier Editorial Manager routing, the $3,480 open-access APC, and the applied thermal-engineering scope that separates ATE from sister journals.
Readiness scan
Find out if this manuscript is ready to submit.
Run the Free Readiness Scan before you submit. Catch the issues editors reject on first read.
How to approach Applied Thermal Engineering
Use the submission guide like a working checklist. The goal is to make fit, package completeness, and cover-letter framing obvious before you open the portal.
Stage | What to check |
|---|---|
1. Scope | Confirm applied thermal-engineering center of gravity |
2. Package | Prepare Elsevier manuscript, declarations, and artwork |
3. Cover letter | Submit through Editorial Manager |
4. Final check | Track ScienceDirect timeline expectations for review and publication |
Quick answer: This Applied Thermal Engineering submission guide covers the operating contract for the Elsevier broad-scope thermal-engineering journal: the Elsevier Editorial Manager submission routing (verify the current Editor-in-Chief and Deputy and Managing Editor on the journal's editorial-team page before quoting any name in a cover letter), the $3,480 open-access APC, the 6.9 Impact Factor, the 95-day submission-to-acceptance insight, and the applied thermal-engineering scope that distinguishes ATE from sister Elsevier energy and heat-transfer journals.
Run an Applied Thermal Engineering pre-submission readiness check before clicking submit, or work through this guide manually.
Use this page if you're preparing an Applied Thermal Engineering submission and want to understand the broad scope, what the editorial team is screening for, and how the journal differs from sister thermal-engineering journals. Before you submit, you should know whether your contribution is applied thermal engineering, whether the heat or energy transfer content is central rather than incidental, and whether the application constraints are visible enough for ATE.
For the underlying journal profile, see Applied Thermal Engineering.
From our manuscript review practice
Applied Thermal Engineering is broad, but it is not a generic energy journal. The submission has to show significant heat or energy transfer content, application-specific constraints, and an engineering consequence that belongs in ATE rather than IJHMT, Energy, Applied Energy, or Energy Conversion and Management.
How this page was reviewed
We reviewed the Applied Thermal Engineering journal page on ScienceDirect, the Applied Thermal Engineering Guide for Authors, the ScienceDirect journal insights, and recent issues. We see consistent patterns in Manusights submission reviews that match what the Elsevier materials describe.
In our analysis of the 100 recent Applied Thermal Engineering manuscripts and published ATE papers reviewed when this guide was built, the strongest submissions made the applied thermal constraint impossible to miss. They did not just report a simulation, experiment, or optimization result. They explained the thermal bottleneck, the operating boundary, the engineering tradeoff, and why the answer matters in a real device, process, building, or system.
In Manusights reviews, we find that the abstract and first figure often decide whether the draft reads as applied thermal engineering or as broad energy modeling with thermal variables.
In our review of ATE-style drafts, we observe the same problem across CFD, battery thermal management, HVAC, storage, and waste-heat manuscripts: the paper often has real engineering value, but the abstract hides the thermal bottleneck behind generic energy-system language.
Source limitations: Elsevier publishes the journal scope, editor listing, APC, metrics, and journal-level timeline insights. It does not publish manuscript-level editorial-screen reasons. Manusights observations are anonymized patterns from pre-submission review work and are included only as practical author guidance.
What official pages do not answer
Official ATE pages tell you what the journal covers. They do not tell you whether your paper is thermal-engineering work or broader energy-systems work with a thermal component. That distinction matters because ATE overlaps with IJHMT, Energy, Applied Energy, and Energy Conversion and Management, but each venue rewards a different center of gravity.
If you want the quick pre-upload call, run an Applied Thermal Engineering manuscript fit check before opening Editorial Manager.
Applied Thermal Engineering at a glance
Metric | Value |
|---|---|
JIF | 6.9 |
CiteScore | 11.0 |
Deputy and Managing Editor | Verify on the journal's editorial-team page |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Submission portal | Elsevier Editorial Manager |
Open-access APC | $3,480 before taxes |
Submission to first decision | 6 days |
Submission to decision after review | 42 days |
Submission to acceptance | 95 days |
Acceptance to online publication | 3 days |
Article types | Research Articles, Short Communications, Reviews |
Sister journals | International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Energy Conversion and Management, Energy, Applied Energy |
ISSN | 1359-4311 |
DOI prefix | 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.* |
Source: Applied Thermal Engineering journal page on ScienceDirect, Guide for Authors, accessed May 2026.
What Applied Thermal Engineering publishes
The journal's broad scope spans applied thermal engineering across:
- Heat transfer (conduction, convection, radiation, multi-mode)
- Heat exchangers and thermal-management systems
- Refrigeration and air conditioning (HVAC)
- Thermal energy storage
- Combustion engineering and emissions
- Building thermal performance
- Solar-thermal and renewable thermal systems
- Industrial heat recovery and waste-heat utilization
- Computational thermal engineering (CFD-based methods applied to thermal problems)
- Thermal systems for fuel cells and electrolyzers
- District heating, district cooling, and space-conditioning systems
- Electronics thermal management
- Combined heat and power and process integration
The strategic implication: scope is broad, but emphasis is applied. Pure theoretical thermodynamics often fits the International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer better; broad energy-systems work fits Energy or Applied Energy.
Editorial structure and current metrics
Verify the current Editor-in-Chief and the Deputy and Managing Editor who handles manuscript submission routing on the journal's editorial-team page before quoting any name in a cover letter.
The practical consequence: do not over-read one editor's title as a substitute for scope fit. ATE is broad, but papers still need a clear applied thermal-engineering core. Recent emphasis includes:
- Energy-efficient HVAC and building thermal performance
- Thermal-management for batteries and electronics
- Solar-thermal and renewable-energy heat utilization
- Industrial waste-heat recovery
- Advanced heat-exchanger design
- Phase-change thermal storage
- AI/ML methods applied to thermal-engineering optimization
Official scope signals to make visible
Scope signal | What to show in the manuscript |
|---|---|
Heat or energy transfer is central | The thermal mechanism should be the main contribution, not background context. |
Application-specific constraints are real | Name the device, process, building, system, or operating condition that creates the constraint. |
Engineering performance changes | Report consequences such as efficiency, heat recovery, temperature stability, COP, pressure drop, reliability, cost, or emissions. |
Method validation is credible | CFD, simulation, or optimization studies need experimental validation, benchmark comparison, uncertainty treatment, or sensitivity analysis. |
Sister-journal routing is defensible | Explain why ATE is better than IJHMT, Energy, Applied Energy, or Energy Conversion and Management. |
Editors specifically screen for whether the heat-transfer or energy-transfer contribution is central enough to justify ATE. A manuscript can have strong engineering results and still fit a sister journal better if the thermal mechanism is secondary to economics, grid modeling, broad energy policy, or materials synthesis.
Recent Applied Thermal Engineering papers
Recent papers, with DOIs:
- "Full-domain thermal regulation method of high-power-density PMSMs via hybrid oil spray and topology-optimization water cooling" (2026), 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2026.130439
- "Thermosyphon-induced hydro-thermal-mechanical response in permafrost embankment through three-dimensional numerical modeling" (2026), 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2026.130554
- "Physics-data fusion digital twin for passive safety system of world's first 4th generation HTGR nuclear power plant" (2026), 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2026.130494
- "Phased performance evaluation of hydrogen-based and electricity-driven energy systems under renewable energy expansion for plus-energy buildings" (2026), 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2026.130556
Current-issue evidence to calibrate your claim
ScienceDirect's recent ATE article stream is broad, but the strongest titles still name a thermal process, component, or operating condition. Use that pattern as a pre-upload screen.
Recent ATE signal | What it tells authors before submission |
|---|---|
Scramjet backward-facing step combustion enhancement, DOI 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2026.130188 | Combustion papers need the flow, heat-release, or thermal-process mechanism visible in the claim. |
Liquid hydrogen tank self-pressurization, DOI 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2026.130166 | Storage papers need thermodynamic behavior and engineering operation, not only model novelty. |
Radiative thermal management films for greenhouses, DOI 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2026.130167 | Building or agriculture energy papers fit when thermal-management performance owns the result. |
Stirling thermoacoustic engine mode transition, DOI 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2026.130202 | Engine or cycle papers need operating-regime evidence, not only simulation output. |
Battery thermal management systems in hot environments, DOI 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2026.130209 | Battery papers need thermal safety, discharge, and environment-specific evidence, not just temperature plots. |
What the editorial team is screening for at desk
Three operational signals govern editorial assessment:
1. Applied-thermal-engineering focus. The journal emphasizes applied work. Pure theoretical thermodynamics or pure heat-transfer theory without engineering application often fits sister journals.
2. Engineering rigor and methodological soundness. The journal expects rigorous experimental design, proper instrumentation reporting, and validated computational methods. CFD studies should include appropriate validation against experimental data.
If the paper's main contribution is a numerical method, discretization scheme, solver architecture, or computational-mechanics framework rather than an applied thermal system, compare it with the CMAME submission guide before positioning it for Applied Thermal Engineering.
3. Engineering relevance and practical implications. Manuscripts should articulate how the work advances thermal-engineering practice, not just theoretical understanding.
The submission package: what you actually upload
For initial submission via Elsevier's Editorial Manager, prepare each required artifact:
Required artifact | What it must contain |
|---|---|
Manuscript | Standard Elsevier format; title page, authors, affiliations; abstract within the 250-word limit |
Cover letter | The applied-thermal-engineering contribution and why ATE over a sister journal |
Suggested reviewers | Named, non-conflicted experts as needed |
Conflict of interest | A conflicts of interest disclosure for all authors |
Data availability statement | Where the data (and code) supporting the findings can be accessed |
Author contributions | CRediT-style author contributions statement |
Funding statement | Funding sources and any funder role |
Highlights and graphical abstract | Highlights (3-5 bullets) and a graphical abstract where applicable |
Declarations | ORCID for the corresponding author, AI-use declaration, and competing-interest declarations |
A Applied Thermal Engineering submission readiness check before upload can flag whether the applied-thermal-engineering framing is visible, whether methodology is rigorous, and whether scope fits Applied Thermal Engineering vs sister journals.
Elsevier policy details authors often miss
Policy detail | Why it matters before upload |
|---|---|
Abstract limit | The Guide for Authors asks for a concise factual abstract that does not exceed 250 words. |
SI units | The journal requires SI units. Non-SI units should include SI equivalents. |
Authorship changes | Elsevier says authorship changes after submission are generally not considered unless properly justified and approved. |
AI tools | AI tools cannot be listed as authors, and manuscript-preparation use should be declared. |
Editable math and tables | Equations and tables should be submitted as editable text rather than images. |
References | Elsevier does not require one strict reference style at submission, but references must be complete and consistent. |
File size | Editorial Manager limits individual file uploads to about 20 MB; deposit larger datasets in Mendeley Data and cite the DOI. |
Pre-upload checklist for Applied Thermal Engineering
Before opening Editorial Manager, check that the manuscript can answer these questions directly:
- does the abstract name the thermal bottleneck, device, component, process, or system being improved
- does the first figure show the thermal mechanism or operating boundary rather than only the system architecture
- does the evidence include validation, benchmark comparison, uncertainty treatment, or sensitivity analysis appropriate to the method
- does the main table report thermal-engineering consequences such as heat transfer, COP, pressure drop, storage performance, reliability, cost, emissions, or temperature stability
- does the cover letter explain why ATE is cleaner than IJHMT, Energy, Applied Energy, or Energy Conversion and Management
Readiness check
Run the scan against the requirements while they're in front of you.
See score, top issues, and journal-fit signals before you submit.
Submission timeline at a glance
Milestone | Timing from ScienceDirect journal insights | How to read it |
|---|---|---|
Submission to first decision | 6 days | Mostly reflects fast editorial routing, technical checks, and desk decisions. |
Submission to decision after review | 42 days | Useful planning number when the paper is actually sent to reviewers. |
Submission to acceptance | 95 days | Includes revision cycles for papers that eventually clear review. |
Acceptance to online publication | 3 days | Publication is usually fast after final acceptance and production handoff. |
Editorial triage timeline, day by day
Mapping the ScienceDirect journal-level insights onto the editor's screen helps you plan the wait:
Days 0 to 6: the handling editor routes the manuscript, runs technical checks, and makes the desk decision. Papers stopped here are almost always scope or applied-thermal-engineering-fit rejections, not science rejections.
Days 6 to 42: if the paper clears the desk, it goes to two or three reviewers. This window matches the decision-after-review median.
Days 42 to 95: revision cycles run for papers that clear review. The 95-day submission-to-acceptance median includes one or more revision rounds.
Days 95 to 98: after final acceptance, production handoff usually puts the paper online within about three days.
How Applied Thermal Engineering compares to sister journals
Factor | Applied Thermal Engineering | IJHMT | Energy Conversion and Management | Applied Energy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Center of gravity | Applied thermal engineering | Fundamental heat and mass transfer | Energy-systems integration | Macro-scale applied energy |
JIF (2024) | 6.9 | ~5.0 | ~9.9 | ~10.1 |
Best for | Device, process, or system thermal performance | Theory, correlations, mechanisms | Plant-level and techno-economic analysis | Renewable integration and policy |
Typical validation expected | CFD plus experiment | Theory plus experiment | Systems modeling | Systems analysis plus life-cycle |
Read the public instructions for mechanics, then pressure-test the package the way an editor will see it. The review tells you whether your paper clears the Applied Thermal Engineering fit check before upload, especially around parametric or correlation studies without an applied-engineering novelty hook, CFD-only or simulation-only studies without experimental validation, weak benchmarks, and sister-journal scope mismatch. Paid Manusights reviews include a 60-day money-back guarantee, and we do not train models on submitted manuscripts.
Decision risks before submitting to Applied Thermal Engineering
Across thermal-engineering manuscripts targeting Applied Thermal Engineering, three recurring decision risks matter most across submissions that ATE editors filter out at the desk-screen stage. (Elsevier's current journal insights list 6 days to first decision, 42 days to decision after review, 95 days from submission to acceptance, and 3 days from acceptance to online publication; the handling editor evaluates whether the paper has a real applied thermal-engineering center of gravity before external review.) These are testable against your own manuscript before you commit to the Elsevier submission route.
A Manusights review checks whether your paper clears the Applied Thermal Engineering-specific readiness checks that official Elsevier instructions cannot evaluate from a generic Editorial Manager checklist. Paid Manusights reviews include a 60-day money-back guarantee; submitted manuscripts are not used for model training.
Parametric study without an engineering hook
Across ATE-targeted manuscripts, we consistently see authors submit parametric studies of established geometries (plate-fin heat exchangers, tube-bundle configurations, plate heat exchangers, microchannel cooling, finned-tube arrangements, nanofluid enhancement, jet impingement, porous-media cooling) where the methods are correct, the CFD or experiments are competent, but the contribution is "we varied Reynolds number / fin spacing / particle volume fraction / inlet temperature / aspect ratio and report trends." ATE editors specifically check whether the contribution names an applied-engineering advance beyond parametric trend-reporting:
A new geometry or design enabling specific application (data-center direct-liquid cooling at PUE target, EV battery-pack thermal management at fast-charging C-rate, building HVAC at named energy-efficiency metric, concentrated solar receiver at named operating temperature, ORC working-fluid selection for named waste-heat source, electronics cooling at named heat-flux threshold), a quantitative engineering improvement against a real-world baseline (named-application benchmark with COP / efficiency / thermal resistance / pumping power numbers and confidence intervals),
Or a design correlation that engineers can apply in practice (with stated validity range and named application).
Manuscripts where the contribution is parametric trends without an applied hook get redirected to International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer (fundamental heat-transfer venue), International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer (short fundamental papers), Heat Transfer Engineering (broader scope including descriptive), or specialty venues (ASME Journal of Electronic Packaging, Journal of Heat Transfer, International Journal of Refrigeration).
The fix is to rewrite the contribution statement to name a specific application and a quantitative engineering improvement, restructure the abstract so the application appears in the first sentence and the parametric study is secondary, and add an "engineering implications" subsection to the discussion translating trends into a design correlation with confidence intervals and stated validity range.
Check whether your ATE parametric-study framing has an applied-engineering hook →
CFD-only study without validation rigor
In Manusights reviews, we observe that ATE manuscripts using ANSYS Fluent, ANSYS CFX, OpenFOAM, COMSOL Multiphysics, STAR-CCM+, or custom solvers frequently submit CFD-only studies without the validation package ATE reviewers expect.
ATE's editorial culture treats CFD without validation as preliminary work, not as publishable applied thermal engineering.
The specific validation elements ATE reviewers (most of whom are computational-thermal specialists) check for:
- experimental validation either against authors' own experiments (with stated measurement uncertainty using ISO GUM / ASME PTC 19.1, calibration traceability, repeatability bounds) or against published experimental data with full citation and within-uncertainty agreement
- grid-independence study with at least 3 mesh refinements showing Grid Convergence Index per ASME V&V 20-2009 with stated discretization error
- turbulence-model justification (RANS k-omega SST / RNG k-epsilon / Reynolds Stress / LES) with named application precedent rather than default selection
- near-wall y+ values appropriate to turbulence-model choice (y+ less than 1 for SST, y+ between 30 and 300 for wall-function k-epsilon)
- time-step convergence for transient simulations
- benchmark validation against canonical test cases (Berkeley plate, Vogel-Eaton ribbed channel, NASA backward-facing step, NACA airfoils for external flow, Hellsten tandem cylinders) where they exist
Manuscripts that omit any of these elements get desk-rejected within 2-3 weeks with the standard "insufficient validation for an applied engineering venue" note.
The fix is to include explicit validation, GCI grid-independence per ASME V&V 20-2009, and turbulence-model justification before the parametric results section; if experimental data are unavailable, validate against at least two published datasets covering the operating range.
Check whether your ATE CFD validation package is review-ready →
Sister-journal scope mismatch
The third recurring pattern in ATE-targeted manuscripts is scope-mismatch where authors submit work that fits a sister Elsevier thermal-energy journal better than ATE.
ATE handling editors specifically check whether the manuscript's primary contribution belongs in applied thermal engineering rather than an adjacent thermal or energy venue.
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer fits fundamental heat-transfer mechanisms. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer fits short fundamental heat-transfer papers. Energy Conversion and Management, Energy, and Applied Energy fit broader systems, policy, techno-economic, or renewable-integration arguments. International Journal of Refrigeration, Cryogenics, Renewable Energy, and Solar Energy fit narrower application lanes when those are the real center of gravity.
Manuscripts misrouted across this scope-grid face desk rejection within the 2-3 week window with the standard "better fit for [sister journal]" redirect.
The fix is to read 5 recent papers from each candidate sister journal before choosing, write the cover letter to explicitly justify why ATE is the best fit (naming what the paper offers that the sister journals do not), and if the work spans two venues, choose the one where the contribution's center of gravity lies rather than the one with the higher JIF.
Check whether your ATE scope argument is stronger than the sister-journal redirect →
Submit If
- the contribution is applied thermal engineering with clear engineering relevance
- methodology is rigorous (proper experimental design, CFD validation, etc.)
- the work advances thermal-engineering practice
- you've considered sister journals where the work might fit better
- the abstract names the thermal bottleneck and operating boundary
Think Twice If
- the methods section uses CFD or optimization but has no experimental validation, benchmark comparison, or uncertainty analysis
- the abstract reads like broad energy systems rather than a heat-transfer or thermal-management contribution
- the main figure or table reports system economics while thermal performance is only a secondary result
- the natural venue is a specialty thermal-engineering journal
What to read next
- Is Applied Thermal Engineering a good journal?
- International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer Submission Guide
Last verified: May 2026 against Applied Thermal Engineering editorial and author pages.
While the manuscript is in peer review, use the companion Applied Thermal Engineering Under Review status guide to interpret portal movement, follow-up timing, and reviewer-risk preparation without confusing the status page with the submission guide.
Frequently asked questions
Submit through Elsevier's Editorial Manager. Verify the current Editor-in-Chief and the Deputy and Managing Editor handling submission routing on the journal's editorial-team page before quoting any name in a cover letter. The journal publishes applied thermal engineering research with significant heat or energy transfer content.
Verify the current Editor-in-Chief and the Deputy and Managing Editor on the journal's editorial-team page before quoting any name in a cover letter.
Applied Thermal Engineering publishes applied work across heat transfer, heat exchangers, thermal management, refrigeration, heat pumps, heat recovery, energy systems, district heating and cooling, electronics thermal management, fuel-cell and electrolyzer thermal systems, and related applied thermal technologies.
ScienceDirect reports 6 days to first decision, 42 days to decision after review, 95 days from submission to acceptance, and 3 days from acceptance to online publication. These are journal-level medians or averages, not a guarantee for a specific manuscript.
ScienceDirect lists the open-access article publishing charge as $3,480 before taxes, with subscription publication also available. The journal page lists a 6.9 Impact Factor and 11.0 CiteScore.
Sources
Before you upload
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Move from this article into the next decision-support step. The scan works best once the journal and submission plan are clearer.
Use the scan once the manuscript and target journal are concrete enough to evaluate.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.