Chemical Communications APC and Open Access: Short Papers, Modest Fees, and How RSC Stacks Up
Chemical Communications (ChemComm) charges ~$2,000-$2,500 for open access. Hybrid model, RSC Gold for Gold deals, and comparison to Angewandte and JACS.
Senior Researcher, Oncology & Cell Biology
Author context
Specializes in manuscript preparation and peer review strategy for oncology and cell biology, with deep experience evaluating submissions to Nature Medicine, JCO, Cancer Cell, and Cell-family journals.
Next step
Choose the next useful decision step first.
Use the guide or checklist that matches this page's intent before you ask for a manuscript-level diagnostic.
Quick answer: Chemical Communications (ChemComm) charges approximately $2,000-$2,500 for gold open access. It's a hybrid journal published by the Royal Society of Chemistry, so the default subscription route costs nothing. ChemComm specializes in short communications across all chemistry disciplines, with a current impact factor around 5.
What Chemical Communications charges
ChemComm is published by the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC). Here's the fee structure:
Publication Route | Cost (USD) | Access |
|---|---|---|
Subscription (default) | $0 | Behind paywall, institutional access |
Open access (CC BY) | ~$2,500 | Free to all, allows commercial reuse |
Open access (CC BY-NC) | ~$2,000 | Free to all, non-commercial use only |
These APCs are notably lower than what ACS or Wiley charge for their chemistry journals. A CC BY article in JACS costs $6,000, while ChemComm's CC BY option is less than half that. The RSC has historically positioned itself as a more affordable alternative to ACS and Wiley, and the pricing reflects that.
The APC is charged after acceptance. There's no submission fee. No page charges. No color figure surcharges for online publication.
Hybrid model: subscription is still the norm
Like most RSC journals, ChemComm is hybrid. The majority of published papers go through the subscription track at no cost to the author. Institutional subscribers (which include most research universities) have full access.
This means the real-world cost for many ChemComm authors is zero. You submit, your paper gets reviewed and accepted, and it's published behind the paywall. Your colleagues at research institutions can read it through their library subscriptions.
The practical question is whether your funder requires open access. If you're funded by UKRI, an ERC grant, or a Plan S funder, you'll need the gold OA option. If you're on NSF, DOE, or industry funding without an OA mandate, the subscription track works fine and costs nothing.
RSC Gold for Gold and Read & Publish agreements
The Royal Society of Chemistry has been building transformative agreements under its Gold for Gold program:
Region / Institution | Coverage | Notes |
|---|---|---|
UK (Jisc) | UK universities | Full APC coverage for RSC journals |
Germany | German institutions | Through Projekt DEAL-style agreements |
Sweden | Swedish universities | Bibsam consortium |
Netherlands | Dutch universities | UKB consortium |
United States | Select institutions | Growing but less comprehensive than UK |
Canada | Select institutions | Through CRKN |
UK authors benefit the most. The RSC is a UK-based learned society, and its Jisc agreement is one of the most generous in chemistry publishing. If you're at a UK university, your ChemComm OA APC is almost certainly covered. You don't need to do anything special. The system recognizes your institutional affiliation and applies the coverage during production.
For US-based researchers, RSC agreements are institution-specific and less universal than ACS deals. Check your library's open access page for RSC coverage before assuming you'll need to pay out of pocket.
Three facts about ChemComm
1. Short communications only. ChemComm publishes communications of about 3-4 printed pages. These aren't full-length research articles. They're concise reports of new findings that are significant enough to merit rapid publication. The journal also publishes Feature Articles (invited reviews) and Highlights (short commentaries), but the core content is communications. If your work requires 8-10 pages to explain properly, ChemComm isn't the right venue. Look at RSC's other journals like Chemical Science or Dalton Transactions.
2. Impact factor around 5. ChemComm's IF has settled around 4.5-5.5 in recent years. This places it below the elite chemistry journals (JACS at ~15, Angewandte Chemie at ~13.4, Nature Chemistry at ~22) but solidly above most specialist chemistry journals. For a rapid communication reporting an interesting finding, an IF around 5 is respectable. It signals that the work was novel enough to catch an editor's attention but doesn't carry the prestige weight of JACS or Angewandte.
3. Broad chemistry scope with strong organic and inorganic coverage. ChemComm covers all chemistry subdisciplines, but it has traditionally been strongest in organic chemistry, organometallic chemistry, and inorganic/coordination chemistry. Materials chemistry, chemical biology, and catalysis are also well represented. If your communication fits any of these areas, ChemComm is a natural venue.
Waivers and discounts
The RSC offers several pathways to reduce or eliminate the APC:
Research4Life waivers: Authors from Research4Life-eligible countries receive automatic APC waivers or deep discounts. Group A countries get full waivers.
RSC member discounts: RSC members receive discounts on APCs, typically 15-25%. If you're already an RSC fellow or member, this applies automatically.
Hardship waivers: Available on request for authors who genuinely can't access funding. The RSC states that editorial decisions are never influenced by ability to pay.
Chemical Science alternative: If cost is your primary concern, the RSC publishes Chemical Science as a fully gold OA journal with zero APC. The RSC funds it entirely. Chemical Science has a higher IF (~8.4) than ChemComm and publishes full-length articles. The tradeoff is higher selectivity, but if your work is competitive, it's the best deal in chemistry.
Funder mandate compliance
Funder/Policy | Compliant? | Route |
|---|---|---|
Plan S (cOAlition S) | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY (~$2,500) |
NIH Public Access | Yes | Gold OA or green OA (12-month embargo via accepted manuscript) |
UKRI | Yes | Gold OA with CC BY, often covered by Jisc deal |
ERC | Yes | CC BY |
NSF Public Access (2026) | Yes | Gold OA or accepted manuscript deposit |
Wellcome Trust | Yes | CC BY |
For UK researchers on UKRI grants, the combination of ChemComm and the Jisc agreement is seamless. The OA APC is covered, the CC BY license satisfies the mandate, and you don't need to think about repository deposits.
For US researchers, the green OA route (depositing your accepted manuscript after a 12-month embargo) satisfies NIH and NSF mandates without paying the APC. Given that ChemComm's APC is relatively modest, though, the OA option is affordable enough that many groups simply pay it.
How ChemComm compares to peer journals
Journal | APC (USD) | Model | IF (2024) | Format | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chemical Communications | ~$2,000-$2,500 | Hybrid | ~5 | Short comms | Quick reports, all chemistry |
Angewandte Chemie | $5,500-$6,000 | Hybrid | ~13.4 | Comms + articles | High-impact comms, strong in Europe |
JACS | $5,000-$6,000 | Hybrid | ~15.0 | Comms + articles | Top-tier chemistry, US prestige |
Organic Letters | ~$4,500-$5,500 | Hybrid | ~5.0 | Short comms | Organic chemistry specifically |
Chemistry - A European Journal | ~$4,000-$5,000 | Hybrid | ~3.9 | Full articles + comms | European chemistry community |
ChemComm vs. Angewandte Chemie: This is the comparison most chemists make. Both publish communications. Angewandte is more prestigious (IF 13.4 vs ~5), more selective, and more than twice as expensive for OA. If your communication is strong enough for Angewandte, submit there. The prestige gap is significant. If it's not quite at that level, ChemComm at half the cost is a sensible alternative.
ChemComm vs. JACS: JACS Communications are the gold standard in chemistry. With an IF of 15 and a reputation that opens doors, JACS is the aspirational target. But JACS desk-rejects roughly half of submissions, and its APC is 2-3x higher. ChemComm occupies the next tier down, which is perfectly fine for solid results that are interesting but not field-changing.
ChemComm vs. Organic Letters: If your work is specifically organic chemistry, Organic Letters (ACS) is a direct competitor. The IFs are similar (~5), but Organic Letters' APC is roughly double ChemComm's. Organic Letters has strong name recognition in the organic community, particularly in the US. ChemComm has broader scope and is cheaper. The choice often comes down to audience and geography.
ChemComm vs. Chemistry - A European Journal: Chem Eur J has a lower IF (~3.9) and publishes full articles as well as communications. It's more expensive for OA than ChemComm. Unless you specifically need the European Journal format for a longer paper, ChemComm offers better value for short communications.
Hidden costs and practical considerations
- No page charges beyond the APC (if OA is selected)
- No color figure fees for online publication
- Short format means lower writing investment. A ChemComm paper is 3-4 pages. The preparation time is much less than a full article, which makes the overall cost-per-effort favorable even if you pay the APC.
- Supporting Information (SI): You can include extensive SI at no extra cost. Most ChemComm papers rely heavily on SI for experimental details, spectra, and additional data.
- RSC formatting: RSC templates are straightforward and less fussy than ACS Paragon Plus. Most authors find the submission process smooth.
- Review speed: ChemComm typically provides initial decisions within 4-6 weeks. Rejected communications are returned quickly, which means you don't lose months if the paper isn't a fit.
When ChemComm is the right choice
ChemComm works well when:
- You have a concise, self-contained finding that fits in 3-4 pages
- You want an affordable OA option (or free subscription publication)
- Your work is strong but not quite at the Angewandte/JACS level
- You want faster turnaround than more selective journals
- You're a UK researcher with automatic RSC/Jisc APC coverage
Consider other options if:
- Your results need a full-length article to explain properly
- You need the prestige signal of JACS or Angewandte for career advancement
- You want zero APC and your work could fit Chemical Science (IF ~8.4, free)
- Your communication is purely organic chemistry and the Organic Letters audience matters more
For more on RSC publishing costs and how they compare across chemistry, see our JACS APC guide. Before submitting to ChemComm, make sure your communication is tightly written and your key finding is front and center. Editors make fast decisions on short papers, and first impressions matter. Run a free readiness scan to catch structural issues, missing data, and presentation gaps before submission.
Reference library
Use the core publishing datasets alongside this guide
This article answers one part of the publishing decision. The reference library covers the recurring questions that usually come next: how selective journals are, how long review takes, and what the submission requirements look like across journals.
Dataset / reference guide
Peer Review Timelines by Journal
Reference-grade journal timeline data that authors, labs, and writing centers can cite when discussing realistic review timing.
Dataset / benchmark
Biomedical Journal Acceptance Rates
A field-organized acceptance-rate guide that works as a neutral benchmark when authors are deciding how selective to target.
Reference table
Journal Submission Specs
A high-utility submission table covering word limits, figure caps, reference limits, and formatting expectations.
Before you upload
Want the full journal picture?
Scope, selectivity, what editors want, common rejection reasons, and submission context, all in one place.
These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.
Anthropic Privacy Partner. Zero-retention manuscript processing.
Where to go next
Supporting reads
Conversion step
Want the full journal picture?
These pages attract evaluation intent more than upload-ready intent.